×

Here are NROL-22 (USA 184) flight data from March 8th 2014 by _ManWithNoMemories_ in UFOs

[–]kenriko -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Downvoting should be reserved for low effort or low quality posts.

Don’t upvote or downvote if it’s just not your cup of tea because doing so can prevent others from seeing it and having a useful conversation on the topic.

Here are NROL-22 (USA 184) flight data from March 8th 2014 by _ManWithNoMemories_ in UFOs

[–]kenriko 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Dude I pulled the same strings as you right down to that blogger. Great job. If I were not busy with back to school for my kids yesterday I might have beat you to the punch.

One note about the orbit of USA 184. It hangs out at a very high polar most of the day. While we are not aware of exactly what the sensors are able to resolve but they are tuned for distance given the useful orbit is designed for the widest view possible to detect ICBM launched and tracking (resolving a plane sized object should be easily within capabilities)

Blogger is: @Marco_Langbroek on x.com

Why Does My M3 Suck by [deleted] in TeslaModel3

[–]kenriko -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Looks like a chart of ICE manufacturers stock over the next 10 years

Airliner video might be fake but it does line up with a 777-200 by kenriko in UFOs

[–]kenriko[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There was another thread that went into this. They do have a thermal targeting pod on the wing in some load outs that does false color thermal.

Reminder, THIS video is NOT CGI by BEERD0UGH in UFOs

[–]kenriko 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You’re trying to mince words if you go re-read what I wrote:

“The US government has worked for 80 years to make sure nothing has provenance”

Perhaps “nothing” Is an overstatement, but tell me you disagree that they have been actively working to undermine the sources.

Reminder, THIS video is NOT CGI by BEERD0UGH in UFOs

[–]kenriko 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I didn’t say they were successful. You’re being pedantic.

Reminder, THIS video is NOT CGI by BEERD0UGH in UFOs

[–]kenriko 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I know what the word means.

This is a UFO sub and the US government has worked for 80 years to make sure nothing has provenance.

Reminder, THIS video is NOT CGI by BEERD0UGH in UFOs

[–]kenriko 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Oh god is provenance the new consensus from NDT.

Objective and Thorough Analysis of the Airliner Data by rollingalpine in UFOs

[–]kenriko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re missing my point.

If this is the real video they were worried would get leaked (minus the UFOs and blinking out of existence) and instead it blew up…

You release the crazy UFO version and later if the real one leaks with an explosion people would just say it’s a remix of the UFO video and also fake.

In that case you would need to keep the satellite info etc.. consistent.

Objective and Thorough Analysis of the Airliner Data by rollingalpine in UFOs

[–]kenriko 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m getting downvoted because it’s an inconvenient possibility and also plausible.

FLIR is NOT a MQ-1L, it is instead a MQ-1C with 2 additional camera sensors under the wings as shown here. by CMDANDCTRL in UFOs

[–]kenriko 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Drone was likely already airborne they have a long loiter time. Just re-tasked for intercept.

Objective and Thorough Analysis of the Airliner Data by rollingalpine in UFOs

[–]kenriko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes I was an art director from 2006 - 2011 I could have pulled it off with a mixture of Cinema4D, After Effects and perhaps some practical.

But it would have taken a very long time to make. I wonder why someone would invest that time for basically a prank video unless it was for a demo reel and in that case you would be public about it.

Airliner video might be fake but it does line up with a 777-200 by kenriko in UFOs

[–]kenriko[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Same and I was firmly in the “this is B.S” camp. I actually did this overlay to try and disprove the original as not being a 777.

Lots of new accounts being hostile. Lots of vote swings either way.

Weird behavior I usually only see when there’s a disinfo campaign on a subject online.

Objective and Thorough Analysis of the Airliner Data by rollingalpine in UFOs

[–]kenriko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I’ll say i’m a pilot and have done VFX so possess all of what you just said was required. I didn’t make it but certainly there are people out there with all of the same skill overlap.

Objective and Thorough Analysis of the Airliner Data by rollingalpine in UFOs

[–]kenriko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could see this being the case but the UFOs being added to discredit a leak of the real video as also a fake.