IDEAL

There is an IDEAL stake pool out there. It is me! :D

I am not sure what the question asked is about. If it is about saturation just make sure it is below ~95%. If it is about pool margin (e.g. ~0% or ~1%) it is what the stake pool operator gets out of the staking rewards. Does that help?

Was filling the Paldea Evolved map and this Fuecoco #035's back seems to have some kind of ink and alignment error. Fun find!

edit: the bottom card is a normal one for reference.

Hi Evergreen, I am afraid adapools has changed their website. That feature no longer seems to exist (neither does it on Cexplorer).

If we look at the columns that are now on the Adapools website, I would recommend the following:

- APY: between 3 and 4.5 percent. This sounds like a big difference between stake pools but the APY will more or less become equal for all of them;

- Stake/ Size: a saturation of no more than 50%. This is to avoid joining a pool that soon becomes too saturated. Oversaturated pools will have to reduce the capped amount of rewards to an increased number of stake. In simple terms, reduced rewards for all;

- Blocks: the main point is if the stake pool has made blocks before. That would be the amount within the brackets. Smaller pools tend to have the same rewards as bigger pools but less consistent block production. This is why the first number (e.g. 4 or 0) doesn't tell us that much.

- Fees: the lower the better! For example, the pool I run has a 0% margin (so no fees) and 340 ada base cost (all pools have this fee - which is deduced from the rewards a pool makes before rewards are sent out to delegators).

- Pledge: the higher the pledge the better. That being said, some stake pool operators, like me, don't have unlimited funds to work with. So, I would say that everything above 100k ADA pledge is more than sufficient.

Please let me know if that helps :)

Nope. That being said, the printer has become a donor. I split up the parts for other printers.

Yes, the Sprite Pro Kit does come with a mount for the CL touch. I adjusted the Z, X and Y offsets via the Eeprom editor in Octoprint. Are these different than the nozzle offsets?

If so, could I change these with commands rather than a new firmware?

Sure thing. I downloaded the configurations from this BTT's Github page and this configuration from Marlin's Github page. Please, let me know if that helps.

Yes, it does. When I home the probe is on the center of the bed.

Thanks for the suggestion. Both switches are being hit and have not been altered.

When I bought the Sprite Pro Kit I was under the impression that it would be a simple change. However, I soon noticed that the Sprite Pro Kit's mount would not hit the X-axis switch of the Neo. So, I replaced the one I had with a stock Ender 3 V2's one. It now hits the switch like it is supposed to.

The strange thing is that I did not alter the Y-axis at all. However, this is the axis where things seem to go wrong. Weird since the Sprite Pro and firmware should all be designed for the same size bed.

It has been a while but I recall downloading configurations for Ender 3 V2's with Touch from BTT's and Marlin's Github pages. Some of the ones listed on BTT's page had some kind of bug with the Z-axis.

Apologies for not being able to offer a more clear answer.

Same here!

I also upgraded a Ender 3 V2 Neo with the Sprite Pro kit - and replaced the X limit switch and housing. Would love the .bin file as I never compiled firmware before.

Tried this with 2 Creality 4.2.2 boards (original and replacement). No luck. I think their new GD boards just ain't that good...

Went for the SKR mini e3 v3 but it has its own problems. Can't use the screen without rewiring :(

I made the same mistake. Was having loads of fun with the printer and thought this would be a nice and simple upgrade. Was I ever wrong...

Did you manage to design a solution for this u/YourMomsAVaper? If so, would you be willing to share it?

Shame to turn it to ewaste... If I would toss it what would be an alternative?

I imagine we are just talking about just a different kind of board here, right? The rest of the printer should still work just fine.

Thanks! I will attempt to install this and make it work.

"To load content into the platform, a user must be a verified individual."

Note that Elon Musk said authenticated and not verified. I would recommend contacting the Atala PRISM team, proposing the idea for feedback and submitting requests for their courses. Their experts and knowledge of SSI (self-sovereign identities) and DID (decentralized identifiers) could be of a lot of value for the development of this proposal.

Some questions:

- Does it need to be a platform or could JulianX also be a browser plugin that checks content?

- What impact would it have if JulianX signed and tracked both authors and messages? (think of sharing messages and adoption in other platforms)

- Are authors required to be verified or would authentication suffice? (think of DID pairs)

- How will communities know whether something is real or fake news?

- What could happen if news is "real" but not liked a lot?

- Could the trust-based reputation be abused? (think of review bombing on YouTube and Steam)

I hope these questions help improve the proposal. Good luck!