Household Finance
I’ve got a trip coming up. Do I need travel insurance?
Peace of mind is a good thing, but consider the cost.
Recently Posted
Certificate of deposit (CD) vs. savings account: How to choose
One or the other, or both, or neither?
Dots and dollars: The Fed dot plot, explained
For interest rate projections, read between the dots.
What the SECURE 2.0 Act means for you and your retirement
Some positive tweaks to retirement rules.
Household Finance
What is buy now, pay later and should you take advantage of it?
There’s always a catch.
What is due diligence? A professional and personal standard
Be sure to do your homework.
How to use Federal Work-Study as part of your financial aid
Get guaranteed student income.
Bull and bear markets: What to know about each
… and how savvy investors respond.
What is dollar cost averaging?
Getting more for your money?
Selling call and put options: A guide to the risks and rewards
Your rights vs. your obligations.
Retirement
What the SECURE 2.0 Act means for you and your retirement
Some positive tweaks to retirement rules.
End of life planning: Cremation vs. burial, choosing a nursing home, and more
Is there any topic that’s less fun to discuss?
Filling the Original Medicare gap: What is Medicare Supplement Insurance?
Bumping up the basics.
The Social Security decision: Drawing early, delaying, or taking at full retirement age
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer.
Featured Term
See AllGlossary
ejectment
ejectment, in Anglo-American property law, legal action for recovery of land from one wrongfully in possession and monetary compensation for his unlawful detention of the land. The action, traceable to the Roman law, had its early development in feudal England. By the second half of the 16th century, ejectment was in common use to adjudicate title to any real property. In its technical operation it was highly fictitious, primarily because it was a personal action and not a real action and could be maintained only to right a wrong done to the person. The action of ejectment was preferred against the various forms of real action because of legal complexities that left many landowners either without a remedy or at the mercy of hairline technical procedures in pleading and proof. Thus landowners who wanted to establish their rightful titles would often use fictitious tenants to maintain the ejectment action; because a determination of the legal validity of the landlord’s title was necessary to establish a tenant’s right to possession, the important outcome of the action, in many cases, was the court’s recognition of the landlord’s lawful title. As a form of action, ejectment fell into disuse in England as a result of the Common Law Procedure Act of 1852. In the United States, ejectment had become part of the law of the colonies but was early reformed to abolish the technical fictions attending the law, thereby making it a title action that could be used directly by any landowner. Today there are ejectment statutes in most U.S. states.