Press J to jump to the feed. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts
Log In
Found the internet!
Gaius_Octavius_ commented on
Posted by
1 point · 3 minutes ago

I remember that one because it was one of the last ones without a drive thru. I would ride my bike to it in the early 90s.

Can't really help with many specifics though. Good luck.

2 points · 1 hour ago

I mean at some point you'd want to watch the games, and sweeps are very different beasts from, well, non-sweeps. But yeah I'd say they all were closer than the Lakers and more hard fought, as they managed to win at all, instead of not.

see more
1 point · 55 minutes ago

Not all sweeps are the same. If Jokic doesn't hit two off balance three pointers with a person in his face, the Lakers probably win two games.

2 points · 34 minutes ago

Can’t play that hypothetical. Denver played with a lead in those situations. When they were behind they were aggressively efficient

see more
Score hidden · 17 minutes ago

I still want to see that series where Ham gives up on D-Lo much sooner. He was by far the biggest advantage the Nugs had but Ham just kept playing him even though he was -20 every game.

Load more comments

3
Subreddit Icon
Crossposted by6 hours ago
Posted by14 hours ago
1.5k points
3
6 comments
3 points · 2 hours ago

Maybe I'm not understanding the rules, but are there any financial consequences to offering a RFA a contract? Who tf cares if the Lakers match? Can't they just move on with the season? Like Bill said, it doesn't matter if their "just being nice in case...." cuz nobody pays back the favor.

see more
Op2 points · 36 minutes ago

It ties up your cap and you can't offer other contracts.

Gaius_Octavius_ commented on
Posted by
Score hidden · 45 minutes ago

Caesars does have that but FanDuel does not. Caesars has much more wagers for F1 and motorsports in general.

see more
Score hidden · 40 minutes ago

FanDuel tends to add F1 bets as the week goes on so they might add it closer to Sunday as well.

1 point · 1 day ago

This means that if Max wins, if your driver comes in 2nd you win. Or if your driver comes in 1st you win. Every other result is a loss. Is that correct?

I would still like a wager for Max vs. The Field, that may be -200 : +400. Just guessing, what odds would you lay?

see more
2 points · 1 day ago

Correct. Betting for 2nd place to Max or 1st place. 2nd to someone else is a loser.

They have Max vs the field bets on Caesars. Max -333; Field +250 (that is the same Max odds to win the race alone)

114
Subreddit Icon
Posted by2 days ago
114
280 comments
13 points · 1 day ago

Do you think Sean and CR had an aside afterwards to vent about how negative Amanda was about the movie?

see more
Op1 point · 3 hours ago · edited 2 hours ago

CR was much less effusive than Sean was really. He backed up a lot of the points Amanda was bringing up. He just wasn't as sarcastic and snarky about it.

2 points · 1 day ago · edited 1 day ago

So if I understand Amanda correctly, her friends don't watch movies unless they are about women? That seems pretty shallow.

see more
Op1 point · 3 hours ago

You didn't understand correctly

Load more comments

Gaius_Octavius_ commented on
Posted by
8 points · 4 hours ago

It would require such a complete and utter turn for CJ though. The CJ we’ve seen throughout the series would simply not let him take the fall for her.

see more
1 point · 4 hours ago

The choice is either CJ acting completely out of character or Toby acting completely out of character.

But they had already completely reinvented CJ when they promoted her to CoS. She suddenly became very hawkish in a way she never was before.

I took it as them both understanding that an investigation of the Cos during a Presidential election would kill any chance a Democrat had.

3 points · 3 hours ago

But the choices are “Toby does something out of character off-screen” or “CJ has three on-screen conversations that make absolutely no sense if she was the source”. If she was the source, that conversation with Toby where he confesses doesn’t happen that way, nor does the one in his apartment when they discuss the pardon - not once in either conversation do they imply or mention that he was covering for her. The third conversation was with Brock when she wouldn’t have said “tell them your source” - she would have said “tell them it was me”. Toby either was the leak or was covering for someone other than CJ.

see more
1 point · 3 hours ago

If CJ isn't the leak, I actually think much worse of her. She abandoned basically all of her principles.

Load more comments

Gaius_Octavius_ commented on
Posted by
3 points · 5 hours ago

She has a wonderful relationship with all her other children. She gets along with Sheldon. She gets along with Penny.

Leonard has a dysfunctional relationship with everyone in his life.

But we are all 100% certain she is to blame. Very interesting.

2 points · 3 hours ago

She admitted to raising him as an experiment and wrote books about it. Penny even read one of them as part of a class. She was 100 percent the problem.

see more
1 point · 3 hours ago

She admitted to raising him as an experiment and wrote books about it.

No she didn't. She treated all of her children the same. His siblings had to do the same experiments.

Load more comments

Gaius_Octavius_ commented on
Posted by
-4 points · 5 hours ago

NTA. She asked you a question and you gave her your honest answer. What do people in this comment section want? For you to have lied? It’s not even like you made the comment unprompted, because again SHE ASKED YOU!

see more
4 points · 3 hours ago

It is a little funny that the overwhelming consensus is “Start your marriage by lying to your bride”

User Avatar

Gaius_Octavius_

u/Gaius_Octavius_ · 9y
Karma
281,924
Cake day
December 23, 2014
Gives 100 Reddit Coins and a week of r/lounge access and ad-free browsing.
Received the Gold Award in the past 30 days

Moderator of these communities

r/billsimmons

45,992 members

Trophy Case (2)

Eight-Year Club

Verified Email