Posts about Stablecoins
A year ago today Terra USD began it's final depeg from $1 with the price sitting at $.9999 after two days of fighting to hold the peg, the price plunged down to $.80 and then $.16 by the end of the week. A year later the price of the unbacked stablecoin sits at $.018.
https://i.redd.it/5czta9om28ya1.pngLuna was sitting at $77.47 a year ago today a week later the circulating supply increased from 342M to 6.5T in one week with the price dropping to $.0001. The current price today is $.00009
Terra Luna - 1 year chartThis post shows the one year increase in the circulating supply. Notice the huge spike at the beginning coincided with the last days of the depeg. 342M to 6.5T
https://messari.io/asset/terra-luna-classic/chart/sply-circThis post detailed what was happening when Terra USD depegged and was a warning for people not to buy.
UST and Luna price are directly related - You can burn Luna and mint UST, or you can burn UST and mint Luna. On May 8th (not including any fees you could burn about 60 UST ($60) to get 1 Luna ($60) - when UST started depegging people became financially incentivized to burn UST and convert it to Luna - increasing the supply of Luna. Since demand isn't keeping up with the increased supply - the price of Luna is continuing to crash. Currently with 1 UST worth $.55 and 1 Luna worth $.0058 (not including fees you can mint 330.57 Luna for $1 (true dollar) of UST.
No post on the failure of Luna would be complete without the "FUD post" that aged like fine wine. On March 10th 2022, two months before the final depeg a Reddit User by the name of /u/cwm9 wrote a post challenging the CryptoCurrency Reddit community to explain why Terra Luna wasn't a scam. In that post he created a hypothetical of what would happen to Terra in the event of a depeg which was contrary to the narrative being spread about a depeg event, and to his credit it happened exactly as they suggested.
But go the other way: when people start selling their UST because they want to go back to bitcoin, they mint Luna and sell it. Now the price of Luna goes down. The fact that the price is going down and total coins minted is rising encourages the selling of Luna making the price drop farther. If the price drops too far, it can no longer support the burning of UST to get a dollar by selling Luna.
This Wednesday afternoon (3) an unknown address on the Tron Network burned 405 million TUSD after transactions originated from two known addresses: “Binance Hot Wallet” and “Black Hole Address”.
https://i.redd.it/ol17arq6vnxa1.pngThe amount burned is equivalent to 16.2% of the total reserve of $2.51 billion of TrueUSD, informed by Chainlink. Due to the dimensions involved, this Wednesday’s burn is a relevant event for the stablecoin.
The second origin address is the same “burning address” to which the $405 million was sent and was triggered by a Smart Contract linked to a “Ratify Mint” transaction type.
https://i.redd.it/0opjh7k8vnxa1.pngIt all started at 14:40h this afternoon, with four identical transactions of just under $50 million TUSD and one receipt of $30 million TUSD, originating from the “Binance Hot Wallet” within a 20-minute gap between the first and last transactions. Totalling $230 million TUSD received from the exchange.
https://i.redd.it/vezvqj5avnxa1.png20 minutes later, the “unknown address” received eight more identical transactions for $20 million TUSD and a receipt of $15.5 million TUSD. For a total of US$ 175.5 million which, added to previous receipts, totals US$ 405 million burned.
https://i.redd.it/h8eo9nnbvnxa1.pngHowever, this second batch of transactions originated from the “Black Hole Address” which, just a few minutes later, received the total for the “burn”, identified by the Whale Alert Twitter account.
The burning of tokens on the blockchain usually occurs by sending assets to an address that supposedly cannot make transactions, as it is an “invalid” address — which does not have a private key capable of signing transactions protected by cryptography.
Before its final destination, supposedly erasing the stablecoin tokens from existence, the amount passed through an “intermediate address” that has performed several similar transactions in the past. Receiving amounts and immediately transferring the exact amount to another destination.
What happened here is that around $175.5M TUSD were minted, just to be burnt a few minutes later.
The event took place a few hours after the launch of the new blockchain project for Web3 created by former Meta (Facebook) developers: Sui Network.
The Sui mainnet went live this morning and Binance has listed the token on several pairs, including the pair with the stablecoin TUSD. Prior to this, it was possible to stake TUSD or BNB on Changpeng Zhao's exchange to participate in SUI’s the initial distribution.
The Blockworks website reported on Tuesday (2) the liquidity injection of around US$ 200 million in TUSD in the USDT pair. Making this the exchange’s most liquid pair. The liquidity injection took place at the same time as the TUSD “depeg”, trading $0.20 above the stable value of $1.00.
On the project's official website and Twitter page, the team describes TrueUSD as “the most transparent stablecoin on the market”, but so far there has been no official statement about the unusual movement reported in this article.
I tried to download the most recent “real-time audit report” table, issued at 17:00h today (Wednesday, 3) on the official website. But the result is the following error message:
{"error":true,"message":"The endpoint has encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later."}
The latest activity on TrueUSD's Twitter is a response in denial to analyst Adam Cochram's accusation about an alleged acquisition of the project by Justin Sun, creator of Tron. The response also states that they will take legal action against the alleged defamation.
https://i.redd.it/ibf1cjfevnxa1.pngA few days ago, we learned that the French bank Société Générale (SG) was working on a Euro-pegged Stablecoin project.
This project is developed on the Ethereum blockchain in the form of a smart contract.
The interesting thing about such a smart contract is that everyone can check the source code of the project by themselves.
A good way to see how a bank sees things for digital currencies.
So I invite you to have a look at this smart contract here: https://etherscan.io/address/0xf7790914dc335b20aa19d7c9c9171e14e278a134#code
Then, you might be surprised like me to see that in this Euro-pegged Stablecoin, SG has implemented a function called recall allowing SG to get your money back without your consent:
SG can recall your moneyAnother function called burn should interest you since it allows SG to burn your money:
SG can burn your moneyThis is not even a CBDC, the source code of which will obviously be closed to prevent people from seeing what is in store for them.
It is simply a Euro-pegged Stablecoin project.
This makes you fear the worst when CBDCs are imposed on you!
Bitcoin is your way out. You can go audit the Bitcoin source code. You won't find a recall or burn function.
In the Bitcoin system, your Bitcoin is yours once you've taken possession of your private keys.
Don't Trust, Verify.