![](http://web.archive.org./web/20230626091236im_/https://styles.redditmedia.com/t5_2t160/styles/communityIcon_6ydt05bqi5q51.png?width=256&v=enabled&s=2c7185d84f54bea9a0a5575096a6c17e2a2c0836)
AskPolitics: Questions for professionals
r/Ask_Politics
When I first read about what quorum meant, it seemed relatively straightforward. But the more I learned, the less I understood.
For the sake of argument, let's say you have a city council with 5 members. We'll name them A, B, C, D and E.
If A, B and C meet at a bridge to discuss possible repair work (with no public hearing posted), that's an obvious quorum (against the rules).
What if A and B meet at the bridge on Friday to discuss the bridge. Then B and C meet there on Saturday to discuss it. Even though the same information was passed between all 3, is that not a quorum?
Since the concept of a quorum predates digital communication, does that create some gray areas? For example, if 3 redditors are discussing a local event on a post in r/Akron and unknowingly all 3 are part of the same board, would that be a violation?