I have just finished watching this movie and I am honestly confused. I haven't read much about it beforehand. I've heard about it being "over the top" but I haven't expected this. Maybe I'm too sensitive, although I don't think so.

I find it outrageous that people are defending the movie, calling it "misunderstood" and portraying a "deeper meaning", moreover, a "SOCIOPOLITIC" meaning.

Was it really necessary to make it so graphic? Was the "message" necessary? What message is it even really trying to portray?

Abuse of all kinds are subjects that are often being shoved unter the rug or not make public. But is this movie really trying to approach this and "do" something?

By the amount of imagery and the kind of, it just felt like material for people who enjoy this kind of content to me. The "message" that it's supposed to send just feels like a cover up, like a way to publish this type of content without raising eyebrows.

You're free to try to "open my eyes", but as for now I just find it disturbing comparing the imageries vs. meaning content ratio.

Update: Thank you for your comments. I must say I was taken away by the shock of the moment, to say so. After reading what you had to say, I did look more into the story of the movie itself and was able to formulate my thoughts better. I elaborated this a bit more in one of my comments.