In 1992 Carl Pickens won the Offensive Rookie of the Year with a mere 326 yards. While it's not uncommon for award winners to have relatively average seasons, Pickens' win raises the question: has there ever been a less impressive award-winning performance?

Typically, even the winners who don't have outstanding years still manage to achieve something notable or overcome significant challenges, like the comeback player of the year. However, Pickens' win with such minimal production appears unprecedented, at least to the best of my knowledge. Can you think of any worse award-winning seasons?

In fairness, he was probably a deserving winner. That's how bad the rookie class was. Look at the voting results. In second place was Vaughn Dunbar with 565 yard rushing on 3.7 ypc. Jason Hanson, a kicker who doesn't even play offense, finished third in the voting. David Klingler, who only started four games, managed to secure the fifth spot. This begs the question: was the offensive rookie class of '92 one of the least impressive on one side of the ball?