Press J to jump to the feed. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts
Log In
Found the internet!

Dogecoin Development

r/dogecoindev

78
pinned by moderators
Posted by
dogecoin core developer
1 year ago
78
39 comments
10
Posted by3 days ago
10
6 comments
3
Posted by5 days ago
3
0 comments
16
Posted by6 days ago
Gold
https://www.reddit.com/link/11nqa34/video/89vl265a6xma1/player

The first Braille $Doge Wallet generator in the world released

https://dogebraille.com

I will also publish all code opensource to all community in a few days. Also I will improve it to adapt to a paper wallet to be more friendly. It uses LibDogecoin to generate

https://twitter.com/inevitable360/status/1634194227826491404

Hope u like it and improve it :)

16
2 comments
10
Posted by7 days ago

So we gotta be transparent about this.

Dogecoin has ordinals now. I'm not going to advertise the project but it's there if you want to find it. Tens of thousands of them have been minted on dogecoin's blockchain in the past weeks.

It looks like an inscription is limited to 1.5kb which, obviously, is much smaller than bitcoins which the size limit is a mere 4mb. So we are doing better by a longshot.

Now to get it out of the way, If dogecoin adopted segwit or taproot the ordinals would get way bigger on dogecoin. As we have discussed in previous posts, there may be a way to implement a reworked or especially hardfork version of segwit that is modified to be safe from extended amounts of non-transaction data and to also not bifurcate the signature data from the blockchain.

Using patricks tool we can see our block usage has doubled. It was 2% full on average, now pushing over 4%.

So my thought is get the communities perspective on this. Should we do an investigation and find the BIP's (bitcoin improvement proposal) we adopted that allowed ordinals on dogecoin at all to begin with and consider whether or not to reverse that BIP adoption?

Or should we accept the way things are right now - non transaction data of 1.5kb (OP return which is allowed non transaction data section, is 0.08kb [80 bytes]). So ya a standard transaction was around 200 bytes before, but some were around 1 kb if there were many inputs and outputs to the transaction. Personally I think we are ok, we just need to make sure not to adopt things that might put us at risk of bigger inscriptions in the future. I personally also think an investigation into how ordinals were able to be done (we supposedly limit non-transaction data to 0.08kb currently) on dogecoin in the first place would be great.

Or do you love what is happening with bitcoin and think dogecoin should adopt standard segwit and taproot and get like 4mb jpeg blocks clogging up the works and putting us at risk of illegal content on the blockchain? Maybe you want us to immediately raise blocksize and speed up the blocks to accommodate more?

Let me know what you think!

10
22 comments
4
6

About Community

A subreddit for dogecoin related development.
Created Dec 20, 2013

24.9k

Members

11

Online

Top 5%

Ranked by Size

r/dogecoindev Rules

1.
Follow the Reddit Content Policy
2.
Content Policy
3.
Be excellent to each other!

Moderators

Moderator list hidden. Learn More