U.S. Supreme Court rulings

The 9A protects any right not enumerated in the Constitution, but there’s debate as to exactly what rights are implied by the Constitution.

One way to derive rights is to see whether a right is implied by another amendment. If there is a right of the people to keep and bear arms, this may imply a right to defend oneself and one’s country.

The 13A prohibits any sort of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime.

A law prohibiting workers from striking, (unless it’s a prison strike), could easily be interpreted as involuntary servitude, since the state is forcing people to engage in labour. Such a law would be unconstitutional under the 13A.

Is the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act unconstitutional?

What do you think?