kimbureh:
listen, if you believe Glass Onion’s message of bashing super rich people is a form of “self”-critique, then you clearly don’t understand who the 1% are.
When Rian Johnson calls out fake Elon Musk in his fun detective movie, this is not an attempt at “self-deprecating humor”. Rian Johnson is “I own nice houses”-rich, he is not “I control nations, wars, economies, and the livelihoods of millions”-rich like Elon Musk is.
Rian Johnson is closer in his wealth to you than he is to Elon Musk, by far.
I am all for holding rich people accountable, I support calling out the Hollywood industry. But we *need* to learn to tell billionaires and millionaires apart, or our criticism of the political system will be fraught.
people in the notes who disagree with this take claim that I must be a Rian Johnson “stan”, because they cannot come up with a single reason why else somebody would point to the disproportionate difference in power between billionaires and millionaires.
To everyone who is willing to listen: nowhere in this post did I absolve millionaires. Nowhere in this post did I say that wealth inequality is a good thing. What I did say was, essentially: It’s billionaires who make the world run like it does, and they will gladly sacrifice millionaires in order to distract us.
We can abolish billionaires AND tax multi-millionaires out of their millions, those two things can and should co-exist.
What I believe is: If all millionaires disappeared tomorrow, nothing would change. The billionaires would simply create new millionaires if it served their agenda.
If all billionaires disappeared tomorrow, it would change the trajectory of the world. Imagine Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos all disappearing without anybody being able to step into their place. Space X? Cancelled. Facebook/Meta and all the connected surveillance tech? Gone. Amazon workers no longer in the chokehold of a monopolist? Unions arise.
If Rian Johnson disappeared tomorrow? It’s a couple obituaries and that’s it. That’s the difference.