spacelazarwolf Answer:
this may actually be the funniest anon i’ve ever gotten. “violent body parts” u mean me violently getting my guts rearranged by a hot guy on a thursday afternoon??
here’s a fun challenge: cis women stop projecting your trauma onto queer people. if “p*nises” are truly such a massive trigger to you that you shriek and faint and seize at the mere mention of one, then filter the word and don’t interact with people who have, want, or enjoy getting railed by penises.
and stop fucking painting gay men as predatory or violent for simply being into dick. it’s an age-old homophobic argument that y’all are falling hook line and sinker for. no amount of trauma — which many people who aren’t cis women also have, by the way, including myself — will excuse this type of homophobic behavior. grow up.
spacelazarwolf:
also this is part of a bigger conversation about the line between acknowledging that triggers are valid and acknowledging that people’s bodies and existence should not be censored simply because they have a dick, are disabled, have a facial or body difference, are fat, are thin, etc.
your triggers aren’t your fault, but they are your responsibility. this kind of behavior people exhibit online, of demanding that anyone they feel uncomfortable with must be censored, is why fat people get asked to leave eating disorder recovery spaces, and why people with facial scarring or differences are terrified of leaving their house, or why disabled people get constantly harassed in public. if you truly are so upset by someone’s body that you can’t stand to look at them……..then don’t. don’t look at them. walk away. remove yourself from that situation. but people with bodies that are demonized by society do not have an obligation to censor our existences for your comfort or even for your triggers.
also people need to understand the difference between “this upsets me” and “this triggers me” bc some of y’all are using trigger when you mean “i don’t like it >:(“