Steve Scalise Still Can't Bring Himself To Say One Mean Word About A Gun
Yes, that Steve Scalise. It's your Sunday Show rundown!
Consider us surprised that we are still talking about guns in the wake of the Uvalde tragedy. Not because we shouldn't be, but because we usually move on due to a combination of lack of media attention span and governmental inaction.
But that doesn't mean some aren't trying to make that happen. This week we focus on GOP congressman and House Minority Whip, Steve Scalise, who even after being a victim of a politically motivated shooting has always dutifully read his NRA/GOP script.
On Fox News Sunday, host John Roberts played a clip of President Joe Biden urging a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, or at least universal background checks, to help prevent tragedies like Uvalde, Buffalo and others.
But Steve Scalise would not blame the guns.
SCALISE: When we have a shooting instead of sitting down and going "what is really causing this? Why do we see these happening more and more in the last few years?", it immediately becomes a debate about taking away guns. [...] It immediately pushes everyone to their corners instead of sitting down and saying, "why don't we look and see if we can find some tell-tale signs so that there could be intervention." We need to focused more on stopping things before they happen [...] It immediately becomes about Democrats wanting to take away guns. [...] Why don't we talk about the root causes of these problems?
As if it's some big mystery why these things happen. For instance, the easily availability of guns. Also for instance things like the dangerous "great replacement" conspiracy theory, which we know has inspired mass shootings.
Before the Uvalde mass shooting, Texas GOP Gov. Greg Abbott was urging Texans to buy more guns and making it easier to get them.
\u201cHere is Greg Abbott encouraging Texans to buy more guns, & a shout out to the NRA to make sure he gets brownie points.\u201d— Yombe (@Yombe) 1654268326
Roberts noted that President Biden's proposals include "red flag" laws and raising the minimum age for gun purchases to 21. What did Scalise have to say to these moderate proposals?
SCALISE: In a lot of these school shootings, there was somebody in the school who knew they were gonna take action before the shooting. [...] We have to get kids more engaged in alerting authorities if they see something that they are concerned about and let the authorities take action, if necessary. And try to intervene and stop something before it happens...
Well, so far this seems reasonable, other than the light victim-blaming of people not being "more alert." Seems we can find common ground, as Scalise basically describes the type of things that would help if "red flag" laws were in effect. Good for him.
SCALISE: ...instead of immediately after going after the rights of gun owners away.
Just kidding.
Scalise continued talking about "hardening schools" and "provid[ing] more resources for students to let authorities know," because again, it's up to the victims to be more alert.
Roberts showed how the United States far and away leads all other developed countries in gun violence:
Roberts asked what seems to be causing that, and Scalise gave a reasonable response:
SCALISE: In America, you've seen in the last couple of years this crazy 'Defund The Police' movement. But you've also seen a movement that's been going on for a few years in big cities where DAs aren't even prosecuting criminals until there is a shooting.
Just kidding.
Instead, Scalise offered bullshit about police that were never actually "defunded," and right-wing myths about cities being some post-apocalyptic hellscape. Roberts again tried to show how the majority of Americans support sensible policies like "red flag" laws, but to no avail:
SCALISE: Under the guise of 'red flag,' they take away due process [...]
ROBERTS: [...] But if that had happened in case of Buffalo shooter, 10 people would be alive today.
SCALISE: Well again, due process is a constitutional right.
So is "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," which are kinda hard if all these innocents are getting murdered with guns.
We wish Democratic Senator Chris Murphy all the luck negotiating bipartisan gun reform, but GOP leadership shows it's basically futile. He's a victim of gun violence who was saved by a member of the LGBTQ community, but that can't stop him from being a gun-defending anti-LGBTQ asshole.
That NRA money and bigotry is too strong, apparently.
Have a week.
Wonkette is fully funded by readers! If you love Wonkette, fund us!
Can Tim Ryan Write JD Vance’s Hillbilly Eulogy In Ohio Senate Race?
Looks promising.
The US Senate seat in Ohio that Republican Rob Portman’s vacating is generally considered a big reach for Democrats. Donald Trump easily won the state in 2016 and 2020. It seems like a slam dunk hold for Republicans, but a new poll shows a closer race than you’d expect.
A USA Today Network Ohio/Suffolk University survey released today has Hillbilly Zelig candidate JD Vance leading Democratic Rep. Tim Ryan by just two percentage points among likely Ohio voters. That’s well within the margin of error.
PREVIOUSLY: JD Vance Pretty Sure America Needs To Laugh More At People’s Tragic Deaths
Vance received the support of 41.6 percent of voters questioned compared to Ryan’s 39.4 percent. Almost 17 percent of respondents percent remain undecided in the closely watched race to replace retiring Sen. Rob Portman (R).
Additionally, 39.8 percent of respondents said they find Ryan more favorable, compared to the 34.6 who say the same about Vance.
This all looks good. Despite Trump’s endorsement, Vance is not yet matching Trump’s 53 percent of the vote. Ryan is not yet at Biden’s 45 percent, but he has more room to grow, especially with the sizable percentage of undecided voters. It’s also revealing that more Ohio voters find Ryan more favorable than Vance, who's a soulless fraud. Sure, a voter can support a candidate they don’t personally like but who will advance their favored positions — that’s a big lesson from 2016. But the GOP has spent the past year smearing Democrats as pedophile groomers. If Ryan is withstanding this barrage, there’s reason to hope.
Or not. Washington Post congressional reporter Paul Kane quickly doused the USA Today/Suffolk poll with a bucket of rhetorical ice water.
\u201cThis poll will send liberal hearts racing, but as @GaryPeters told me last summer, he's no interest in chasing "reach" states. DSCC won't admit it, but they won't chase Ohio as their predecessors chased Alaska, Indiana, SC, etc. There's a core focus of about 6-7 races. No more.\u201d— Paul Kane (@Paul Kane) 1654051799
He tweeted: "This poll will send liberal hearts racing, but as [Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chair Gary Peters] told me last summer, he's no interest in chasing ‘reach' states. DSCC won't admit it, but they won't chase Ohio as their predecessors chased Alaska, Indiana, SC, etc. There's a core focus of about 6-7 races. No more.”
Alaska, Indiana, and South Carolina are solid red states. Democrats have won statewide in Ohio fairly recently. Kenyan-born socialist Barack Obama carried the state twice, and Sen. Sherrod Brown held his seat in 2018 with 53 percent of the vote. Yes, he enjoyed the advantage of incumbency, but that wasn’t enough to save former Democratic Senators Joe Donnelly from Indiana and Bill Nelson from Florida.
Ryan has arguably modeled Brown’s down-to-earth, relatable appeal. He’s also zeroed in on Vance’s many flaws, picking at them like a scab with every ad and tweet.
\u201cFRAUD\n/fr\u00f4d/\n\n1 a : An act of deceiving or misrepresenting\n\nb : A person who is not what he or she pretends to be\n\nc : JD Vance\u201d— Tim Ryan (@Tim Ryan) 1654031253
Ryan isn’t claiming he’s more bipartisan or loves the cops more than Vance. He’s making clear to voters that Vance isn’t someone they should trust. Obama did the same to Romney in Ohio.
Kane added in another tweet: “What Peters said last summer: 'My goal is just to win. And 52 or 53 is OK with me ... [In 2020 Peters] clamored for more resources to shore up his must-win race [in Michigan] ... 'Oh, Michigan, you’re fine. We’re going to put our money in X.' Another state that wasn’t going to happen.”
Peters narrowly held his Senate seat by less than two points, slightly underperforming Biden. This might make him salty about Ryan’s chances. However, even if his goal is “just to win,” it doesn’t make sense to abandon Ohio. Democrats would need to hold Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and New Hampshire, which are all currently rated tossups. That only maintains our current Manchin/Sinema-stymied majority. If we want to reach 52 or 53 seats, Democrats would need additional victories in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Florida. I like Rep. Val Demings, but I consider her bid to unseat Sen. Marco Rubio more of a “reach" than Ryan’s campaign. A February poll had her down seven points.
Donating to Amy McGrath and, yes, Jaime Harrison was setting your money on fire. However, Tim Ryan is worth the reach.
[The Hill]
Follow Stephen Robinson on Twitter.
Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.
Yr Wonkette is 100 percent ad-free! Please subscribe, donate, and otherwise help keep us alive and kicking!
Voters REALLY Want Samuel Alito To Get The F*ck Off Their Personal Bodily Autonomy
Huh!
Ever since somebody leaked Samuel Alito's deep dark twisted late night forced pregnancy fantasies to Politico, every polling outfit and its mother has been asking and re-asking the American public if it's sure it wants to see Roe v. Wade upheld as the law of the land. You know, like America's suddenly going to be fine with women becoming chattel to fulfill white conservative Christians' requests for a domestic supply of infants to brainwash.
Politico Playbook reports that since Alito's draft opinion was leaked, support for keeping Roe is only intensifying, and people are paying more and more attention. The newest poll, from Politico and Morning Consult, says 66 percent of Americans are at least basically aware of Alito's gross disgusting confessions, and they are not into it.
Some bullet points we're copy/pasting from Playbook:
- On overturning Roe: Fifty-three percent of voters say Roe should not be overturned, up three percentage points since last week. Twenty-eight percent say Roe should be overturned.
- Among Republican voters, just 48% support overturning Roe. That’s down three points from last week.
- On the midterms: Fifty-eight percent of voters said it is important for them to vote for a candidate in the midterms who supports abortion access. That includes 82% of Democratic voters, 57% of independents and more than 1 in 3 Republicans (35%).
Wow. Republicans really might have overestimated how OK their own voters would be with this, and we know we are going out on a limb here, but it's possible this one particular issue might cause certain Republican women to vote for a Democrat just this once and lie to their husbands afterward. Yes, we know we've held out hope for that before and lost all hope for humanity afterward, but we've never been in this specific situation before. It's always been theoretical. People have never believed Republicans or their bought-and-paid-for partisan hack garbage justices would actually do it. Now America is reading drafts of them doing it.
As for other results, the poll finds that voters really really REALLY hate the idea of punishing women for having abortions, to the tune of 73 percent, and that includes 60 percent of Republicans. Giving doctors a fine is the only thing that gets to 50 percent support among Republicans.
There's another interesting section, about the credibility of this Supreme Court, which was already lacking in credibility because it's full of stolen justices installed by presidents who didn't win the popular vote, plus a hundred other reasons mostly revolving around barely investigated sexual assault allegations against Brett Kavanaugh, plus the amazing apparent ethical lapses of Clarence Thomas and Clarence Thomas's wife Ginni Thomas. It talks about reforms the Court might need. On the idea of expanding the size of the Court, we're only at 41 percent support so far. But 65 percent like the idea of term limits for justices. Seventy-two percent like a code of ethics. Sixty-one percent think there should be an age limit on how old balls the justices can be. And more!
And then right below that, 56 percent of voters say abortion should be legal in all or most cases. It also seems like people now understand, to the tune of 61 percent, that the Court is probably going to overturn Roe.
Golly, Republicans. People know what's happening and they're mad about it.
But tell us more about how colorful chalk on Susan Collins's sidewalk is the real insurrection.
Now if you'd like to watch senators vote to try to codify Roe into law and fail, here's your livestream:
Follow Evan Hurst on Twitter right here!
Wonkette is funded ENTIRELY by a few thousand people like you. If you're not already, would you pls consider being the few thousandth and one?
Loser Ex-Senator David Perdue Set To Lose Another Rigged Election In Georgia
Couldn’t happen to a worse guy.
It looks as if Donald Trump’s deranged vendetta against Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp will only result in former Sen. David Perdue’s complete humiliation. According to a new poll from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Kemp leads Perdue among voters in the GOP governor’s primary 53 percent to 27 percent.
If his lead holds, Kemp would cross the majority threshold necessary to avoid a runoff. Although, runoffs haven’t worked out well for Perdue, either. The poll, conducted by the University of Georgia’s School of Public and International Affairs, has a margin of error of 3.3 percent, so it’s always possible that Perdue is only losing by 20 points.
PREVIOUSLY: David Perdue, Kelly Loeffler Don’t Have To Go Home, But They Can’t Stay In The Senate
Kemp spanks Perdue in almost every category of primary voter polled. Perdue only leads Kemp among voters who said Trump’s endorsement made them more likely to support a candidate. Otherwise, it’s a rout. Worse, Perdue’s relentlessly negative campaign against Kemp has backfired. Kemp enjoys 71 percent approval among Republican primary voters with just 21 percent holding an unfavorable view of the governor. However, Perdue, a former Republican senator, has just 57 percent approval with just 30 percent disapproval.
“Election security” is the most important issue for primary voters polled, but they appear satisfied with the voter suppression laws Kemp has signed. Perdue’s “stabbed-in-the-back” platform isn’t resonating.
PREVIOUSLY: David Perdue Would Also Too Like Some Election Cops For Georgia
The AJC poll is from April 10 to 22, so just a few days before the governor’s debate where Perdue made an ass of himself on Trump’s behalf. He delivered a more admirable performance at the 2020 Senate debate he refused to attend.
I admit I’d hoped that Kemp and Perdue would beat each other senseless, and Stacey Abrams could mop up whoever was left with one of my wife's homemade buttermilk biscuits. However, if Trump could successfully unseat a governor for the offense of simply following the law, that would serve as another knife in the back of democracy. Greg Sargent at the Washington Post describes how big the stakes are in this primary:
A decisive Kemp win would show that Republican officials can abide by the integrity of election losses and live to tell the tale — that is, without immediately seeing their careers implode in the next GOP primary.
Sargent notes there’s something "uniquely repulsive and corrupt” about Perdue’s embrace of the Big Lie. He’s not content to wallow in resentment over a past election loss. He’s more proactively evil: He declared he wouldn’t have certified President Joe Biden’s win in Georgia, as if the governor gets a veto over free and fair elections. He accused Kemp at the debate of caving and letting “radical Democrats ... steal our election.” Note the emphasis on “our.” The actual results are immaterial to Perdue. The election “belongs” to Republicans and it’s somehow a “radical” subversion of the natural order if Democrats win.
Senator Jon Ossoff defeated Perdue while carrying just 29 percent of the white vote. His victory is directly related to the 92 percent of Black Georgians who voted for him. Kemp is no saint — the voter suppression laws are clearly intended to reduce the share of the Black electorate in future elections — but Perdue’s diatribe about “stolen” elections is straight-up Jim Crow rhetoric. As Sargent says, “this reprobate can’t lose by enough,” but I’ll still toast to his likely double digit loss.
[AJC / Washington Post]
Follow Stephen Robinson on Twitter.
Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.
Yr Wonkette is 100 percent ad-free and entirely supported by reader donations. That's you! Please click the clickie, if you are able.