archive.today webpage capture | Saved from | ||
All snapshots | from host www.stormfront.org | ||
WebpageScreenshot | |||
![]() |
![]() |
|
Newslinks & Articles All news of interest to White Nationalists. Do not post the full text of copyrighted articles without permission of the owner. Limit "fair use" excerpts to 65 words. |
Community Links |
Social Groups |
Contacts |
Members |
Search Forums |
Advanced Search |
Search Blogs |
Tag Search |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools
|
Search this Thread
|
Display Modes
|
|
#11 | |
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 453
|
Quote:
Ron Paul's platform: Physically secure our borders and coastlines. No amnesty. End birthright citizenship. This is a sensible policy and the best among the candidates as far as our cause is concerned. Immigration is by far the number one issue we are facing (both as White Nationalists and as a nation). Immigration is the reason I will not vote for McCain. Make no mistake, McCain despite his subservience to Jewish Supremacists and the Amnesty crowd will still be a more reliable president than either of the Democrats whether the issue is immigration or just about anything else. Democrats would love to enact a Libertarian border policy as every new mud, mestizo and yellow is a new voter. Kennedy opened the flood gates of Third World immigration in 1965. If it were up to the Democrats, including Obama and Hillary, the flood gates would be open still further. |
|
|
![]() |
WakeUpWhitePeople |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by WakeUpWhitePeople |
|
#12 | |
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: High up in the Wolf's Lair
Posts: 2,548
|
Quote:
Taken selectively, those issues will attract a number of SF members; but don't expect any swarm of new members for the LP. All one has to do is to attend one of their national conventions, and have a look at the circus freaks who comprise the party. What a collection of race mixers, muds, pimps, whores, and wife swappers. I've been to one of their "conventions." If it were up to me, most of them would be locked up in a concentration camp out in the desert. Arkan_USA |
|
|
![]() |
|
#13 |
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 533
|
I'm not at home with the Libertarian ideas. Apparently, the forefathers weren't either. Otherwise they wouln't have made the state and federal borders.
|
|
![]() |
electronic |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by electronic |
|
#14 |
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 496
|
Again, Libertarianism is not the same thing as the Libertarian Party.
Libertarianism is merely a political philosophy and has more to do with abstract concepts than concrete ideas. The Libertarian Party takes the Libertarian Philosophy and wraps it around anarchist and multiculturalist ideals which I do not support. They also have a tendency to twist the words of the founding fathers. On their immigration page, they quoted Thomas Jefferson as saying (paraphrased) that it's the natural right of a man to seek happiness whereever they are able to. I'm pretty sure that when Thomas Jefferson refers to the natural rights of men that he is talking about other whites and not the mud races yet they quote him as if he would support the invasion of illegal aliens from down south. I also agree that the majority of Stormfronters have libertarian views even if they don't want to admit it. I consider myself to have libertarian political views for among other things, the following reasons : 1.I believe that business owners should have the right to choose who they hire. If I am a business owner, it's my business and my money and if I don't want to hire blacks or other minorities, I feel the government has no right to interfere. 2.I believe in absolute freedom of speech with no exceptions, especially when it comes to so-called "hate speech". 3.I believe in following the second amendment to the letter. Any restrictions on gun ownership is unconstitutional. The second amendment is pretty clear cut and dry on the issue and does not allow for "exceptions" such as banning assault weapons or handguns. 4.I believe that people should be allowed to create segregated neighborhoods. If I buy out a large plot of land and want to divide it up and build houses to create a neighborhood, I should have the right to control who comes in and who doesn't. It's my land, not the government's and I should be able to decide who I sell it to. And if I don't want any minorities, well it's my land. |
|
![]() |
|
#15 |
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 453
|
damicatz,
I agree the LP has many good ideals. However, I worked with many Libertarians during the Ron Paul campaign and along with the anti War 9/11 liberals, socialists, communists and anarchists who were working on the campaign, they all had problems with Ron Paul's tough immigration stance. Immigration and pro life were the two things they stomached because they believed in the rest. I also agree the LP would be preferable to most Dems and Repubs because we would be left alone to associate with who we want to, we could have racial property covenants in real estate contracts and we would have many other benefits under a LP regime. However, the policy of allowing 95% of all Africans, Mestizos and Asians into our country would be a disaster. I think the Constitution Party is the better choice among major Third Parties. My main point is immigration is THE top priority, more than Zionist Wars or the economy or any other issue. Immigration is why I cannot vote McCain. I cannot vote for anyone who supported Amnesty and McCain led the way. McCAin's Leave No Illegal Alien Behind Act caused me to do something political for the first time beyond voting. I contacted all 100 senators. I volunteered for Ron Paul's campaign this year. Once we lose our majority status here, we will become like South Africa and Zimbabwe circa 2008. |
|
![]() |
WakeUpWhitePeople |
View Public Profile |
Find More Posts by WakeUpWhitePeople |
|
#16 |
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kosher America
Posts: 10,322
|
It should be the other way around. The Libertarian Party, which is a kiss of death, should stop wasting its time, fold its tent, and get on with a new movement. And they should try, although I know it is difficult, to get their heads out of the sand and look clearly at the world around them.
See my signature for an experienced assessment of the Libertarian Ideology. |
|
![]() |
|
#17 | |
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: High up in the Wolf's Lair
Posts: 2,548
|
Quote:
Arkan_USA |
|
|
![]() |
|
#18 |
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Jews=Muslims
Posts: 4,715
|
|
|
![]() |
|
#19 |
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: At the Ministry of Pompous White Deviltry, Heathen Headquarters.
Posts: 6,280
Blog Entries: 32
|
1) I'm not voting for a Communist [ryhmes with witch].
2) It'll be a cold day in hell before I vote for some Zionist-owned Half-breed [ryhmes with chigger]. 3) Voting for White-Goy McCain would be like voting for all the above, along with a healthy dollop of Dr. Strangelove thrown-in for good measure. As such, I'll either write-in Ron Paul, or seriously consider any third-party candidate EXCEPT Bloomberg for obvious reasons. Hell, I'm going to vote, just so I can one day say I finally didn't vote for a member of the Jew-slate of approved candidates, for a change! |
|
![]() |
|
#20 | |
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In transit
Posts: 4,947
|
Quote:
Earth. You clearly don't understand the immigration platform of the LP, despite the fact that several people have attempted to explain it to you. Furthermore, it doesn't seem to have occurred to you that not every supporter of the LP agrees with every aspect of the official platform. Immigration is a very contentious issue in Libertarian circles and a lot of people dislike the official platform for one reason or another. Keep in mind, also, that the LP platform supports our right to post on this website without fear of repercussion, our right to arm and defend ourselves, and the right to segregate ourselves from non-whites. They also oppose government invasion of our privacy, thought (hate) crime laws, and affirmative action. So while the Republicans and Democrats are in a competition to see who can destroy us the fastest, the Libertarians are working to protect the freedoms that allow us to have a WN movement in the first place. Fascism comes in many varieties and is not always going to be pro-white- it would be silly to even hope for that. Just look at our current government. |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Display Modes |
|
|
|
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The question is, why do we have Muslims in the country? asks Paul Nehlen (Paul Ryan's opponent) | NationalCrusader14 | Newslinks & Articles | 32 | 08-09-2016 01:34 AM |
An open letter from Libertarian Party Chair Nicholas Sarwark to Sen. Rand Paul | Gladiatrix | Politics & Continuing Crises | 3 | 11-28-2014 05:26 PM |
Rand Paul says he is no Libertarian | NationalAnarchist | Politics & Continuing Crises | 13 | 05-14-2013 05:12 PM |
Constitution party vs Libertarian Party | causalset | Politics & Continuing Crises | 1 | 10-01-2012 07:54 AM |
Rand Paul's Tea Party supporters claim Kentucky result heralds beginning of dismantling of federal government | Pictish | Newslinks & Articles | 52 | 11-04-2010 01:13 PM |