House Republicans Activate Super-Racist Powers, Kill Own Bill Honoring Black Florida Judge
Guess that'll teach KBJ a lesson.
In yet another reminder that the Republican Party is now being run by complete assholes — as if we needed such reminders after January 6, when two-thirds of House Republicans voted to overturn the 2020 election — the New York Times reports (Paywall-free linky!) that House Republicans sabotaged a bill to honor a history-making Black judge last month. The bill would have renamed the federal courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida, after Justice Joseph W. Hatchett, Florida's first Black Supreme Court Justice, and the first Black judge appointed to the federal bench in the South. Hatchett died last year at the age of 88.
Back in December, the measure had passed in the Senate easily, where it was sponsored by both of Florida's Republican senators. Like many such bills, it was so uncontroversial that it passed on a voice vote, without debate. It was set to sail through the House as well, with the unanimous support of Florida's 27 House members. It's the sort of routine nice thing for local heroes Congress regularly handles without a hitch.
But at the last minute before the March 30 House vote, Republicans suddenly decided they couldn't possibly support renaming the federal building for Justice Hatchett, and the bill died, because under the fast-track rules used for the measure, it needed a two-thirds majority to pass. Some Republicans found themselves very challenged when asked to explain their sudden opposition to the bill that they'd sponsored just hours before:
Asked what made him vote against a measure that he had co-sponsored, Representative Vern Buchanan, Republican of Florida, was brief and blunt: “I don’t know,” he said.
As it turned out, there was a perfectly shitty reason for the GOP reversal: Ostensibly, it was because aides for Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Georgia), had dug up a 1999 AP article about an appeals court ruling in which Hatchett had overturned a Florida law allowing students to lead prayers at graduation ceremonies — a ruling that was completely in line with previous Supreme Court rulings on prayer in schools.
The Times doesn't mention this, but we certainly will: the House vote also came the week after virtually the entire right wing had conniptions during the Senate confirmation hearings for Ketanji Brown Jackson, slurring her as soft on child porn offenders and a supposed friend of "Critical Race Theory." But golly, none of the House Republicans mentioned that spectacle, so it couldn't possibly have been a factor in rejecting recognition of another historic Black judge, could it?
Rep. Clyde, the first-term rightwing freak who went from barricading the doors to the House on January 6 to insisting the insurrectionists looked like a “normal tourist visit,” insists that the 1999 ruling was absolutely for certain his sole reason for leading the GOP rejection of honoring Justice Hatchett.
“He voted against student-led school prayer in Duval County in 1999,” Mr. Clyde, a deacon at his Baptist church in Bogart, Ga., said in an interview. “I don’t agree with that. That’s it. I just let the Republicans know that information on the House floor. I have no idea if they knew that or not.”
The Times notes that, in addition to his change of heart on the January 6 attack, including a vote against honoring Capitol Police officers, Rep. Clyde has a remarkably consistent voting record when it comes to a particular topic. See if you can guess what topic it is!
He also opposed the Emmett Till Anti-Lynching Act, which made lynching a federal hate crime and explicitly outlawed an act that was symbolic of the country’s history of racial violence. Mr. Clyde also voted against recognizing Juneteenth as a federal holiday. [...]
Mr. Clyde insisted that race had nothing to do with his opposition to the measure. “We’re one race — the human race,” he said. “It has everything to do with the decision he made.”
The day after the vote on renaming the federal courthouse, Clyde also gave a House floor speech condemning Jackson, repeating the same distortions of her judicial record that had dominated the Senate hearings and accusing her of advancing horrific "wokeness." But he didn't mention her race, so everything's cool and we're probably just being mean to the poor fellow, who went beyond the usual complaints that Brown was soft on child porn offenders (her sentences were consistent with other federal judges) and suggested she's a fan of "child sex torture." Perfectly normal discourse from a perfectly normal Republican.
As the Times points out, Hatchett was truly a historic figure in the Florida judiciary, the sort of person for whom buildings get named all the time.
Justice Hatchett could not stay in the hotel where the Florida bar exam was being administered when he took it in 1959 because of Jim Crow laws segregating the South. When he was nominated by President Jimmy Carter to the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Judge Hatchett was the first Black man to serve on a circuit that covered the Deep South.
Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida and one of the bill’s sponsors, said the judge, an Army veteran who died last year at 88, had “lived an inspiring life of service.”
Senator Rick Scott of Florida, a Republican who co-sponsored the measure, said in a statement after the Senate passed the bill in December that Judge Hatchett “broke barriers that have inspired countless others in the legal profession.”
Ah, but that one time in 1999 Hatchett threw out a school prayer law that the Supreme Court at the time would absolutely have thrown out had the case gone that far, so no way should any good Republican honor the dirty Jesus-hater.
GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz, a moral paragon in his own right, explained he'd seen the light, and had little choice but to reverse course, explaining in a statement that "a colleague shared some of the judge’s rulings with me I had not previously read,” and that “This caused me to withdraw my support for the measure."
Even House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-California) voted against the bill, although he didn't offer a reason why.
Not surprisingly, Democrats were plenty pissed off by the sudden Republican reversal on the bill.
“I was appalled,” said Representative Kathy Castor, Democrat of Florida, who grew up hearing about Judge Hatchett from her father, a former county court judge. “I was looking around, saying, ‘What is happening?’” [...]
Livid as she watched the red lights signifying “no” fill the vote board on the wall of the House chamber, Ms. Castor said she approached one of her Republican colleagues on the floor, searching for answers.
“They didn’t articulate a reason for voting ‘no,’” she said. “It was knee-jerk, herd mentality.”
Florida Democrat Debbie Wasserman-Schultz put it even more bluntly, noting that
"If the standard that we use is one ruling out of thousands, then what else could we conclude but that they are not willing to name a courthouse after a Black person?" [...] "It seems pretty suspect."
Gosh, Democrats are so obsessed with race. It's getting to where Republicans can't arbitrarily kill a bill to honor a respected Black jurist, at the same time they're slagging another respected Black jurist, without Democrats just dragging race into everything. Why can't they simply accept that the real problem was that Hatchett obviously hated Jesus?
[NYT (free linky) / Photo: Florida Archives]
Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations. If you can, please help us keep this mommyblog going with a monthly $5 or $10 donation!
Marjorie Taylor Greene Knows What's A Waste Of Time, It Is Military Service
Today's Republicans are strange, aren't they?
You know, we often say people like Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene and that whole crew are some of the most severely anti-American trash we've ever laid eyes on, and we say it because that's what we think of them. But usually, at least lately, it's because they're giving aid and comfort to America's enemies and siding with Vladimir Putin against the innocent Ukrainians Putin is genociding.
This time Marjorie Taylor Greene just decided to go for it and directly took a squatting shit all over American troops, personally. Newsweek reports that the other day Greene went on Lou Dobbs's podcast, whereupon she explained that if you join the military right now, you're "throwing your life away."
ICYMI: Joining the military \u201cis like throwing your life away\u201d according to Marjorie Taylor Greenepic.twitter.com/KLcf2FkrJ9— PatriotTakes \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@PatriotTakes \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1649805706
Lou Dobbs went on a tirade about how bad the military is these days, and asked who would want to have anything to do with that. And Greene responded:
"Not my son, and I know a lot of young people don't want to have anything to do with that, it's like throwing your life away."
Sorry, we need to spend one sentence here imagining how horribly embarrassing it would be if Greene was your mom. OK, anyway!
Dobbs gave his wingnut analysis of people joining the military after Joe Biden ended the Afghanistan war, saying potential recruits would be just left to get murdered like the 13 servicemembers who were tragically killed at the Kabul airport during the withdrawal. But then Greene made it so much fuckin' weirder, like she does. Newsweek with the transcript:
"Not to mention how they've been forced to take the vaccine and the ones that didn't want to take it have been discharged. Who wants to be treated that way?"
Nobody tell her they take a shitload of other vaccines too. Just shuffle 'em through at boot camp and throw needles in all their arms, whichever vaccines they currently need. And nobody gets to hee haw and grunt at their drill sergeant and say their religion doesn't allow them to take vaccines on account of how they are morons who believe every vaccine is made of a fully formed partial birth-aborted fetus.
Greene also suggested that rules of engagement mean that people are "shot at, killed and maimed" before they're allowed to fire back and defend themselves.
"It's a disaster from the top down and the bottom up."
Yeah we bet Marjorie Crossfit Greene knows a whole lot about rules of engagement. Maybe she learned about it when she was doing her own research on Jewish Space Lasers.
"We can add in the training, the woke training, where they have to undergo this ridiculous ideology of the sick and satanic Left."
Yep, that's how basic training is. "Drop and give me 50 ridiculous ideologies of the sick and satanic Left!"
Newsweek suggests Greene might have been talking about a letter fellow moron and retiring Oklahoma GOP Sen. Jim Inhofe sent to General Mark Milley suggesting that the military under Biden has spent six million hours teaching the military about "woke" and "critical race theory." It was signed by all the stupids. Tom Cotton, Marsha Blackburn, Tommy Tuberville, bunch of others ... basically, hell's dumbest trivia team. They're allllllll snorting this particular coke out of each other's cracks right now.
So that's cool.
Of course, Greene isn't unique in smearing her hateful brain thoughts all over the troops lately.
Tucker's been whining about vaccine mandates and the military rooting out white supremacists, accusing Biden of trying to remove "sincere Christians" and "men with high testosterone levels" from the military. You know, the things Tucker is worried about the most. And he's been having a masculinity crisis all over all the women who serve, particularly pregnant women. He's really been leading this charge lately.
And then, in a precursor to Greene's comments about troops "throwing their lives away," it's hard to forget just before the 2020 election when Jeffrey Goldberg reported in The Atlantic on what Donald Trump really thinks about people who fight and die in America's military. "Why should I go to that cemetery? It's filled with losers," he said, about a planned visit to the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery in Paris in 2018. It was raining, and he was reportedly scared of getting his hair wet.
Trump thought John McCain was a "fucking loser," because he got captured. He thought George H. W. Bush was a "loser" because his plane got shot down in World War II.
"I don't get it. What was in it for them?" Trump said to John Kelly, as they stood at Kelly's son's grave at Arlington in 2017.
"Nobody wants to see that," Trump said, asking people planning a military parade in 2018 to please not include any amputees or other war wounded.
"It's like throwing your life away," said Marjorie Taylor Greene, about joining the military. "We can add in the training, the woke training, where they have to undergo this ridiculous ideology of the sick and satanic Left," she added, because she's not just anti-American, she's fucking stupid.
Play us out, Adam Kinzinger.
Just an absolute idiot. Yet still will be praised by people like \u2066@GOPLeader\u2069 because, well, money and speakership\n\nMarjorie Taylor Greene Says Joining Military Is 'Throwing Your Life Away'https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-military-throwing-life-lou-dobbs-interview-1697176\u00a0\u2026— Adam Kinzinger (@Adam Kinzinger) 1649821714
Hello MTG. I\u2019m still in the military and it certainly is not a life thrown away. \n\nYou are an absolute, utter, Faux patriot. Some might say fraud. \n\nAll my veterans out there need to RT this far and wide. #mtg #disgracehttps://twitter.com/wendyforus/status/1514026456619405318\u00a0\u2026— Adam Kinzinger (@Adam Kinzinger) 1649812193
[Newsweek / h/t Joe.My.God]
Follow Evan Hurst on Twitter right here!
Wonkette is funded ENTIRELY by a few thousand people like you. If you're not already, would you pls consider being the few thousandth and one?
MAGA Q Loon Called For Martial Law, Exhorted Militants To 'Make Those People Feel It Inside' Congress
And they did.
“If we make the people inside that building sweat and they understand that they may not be able to walk in the streets any longer if they do the wrong thing, then maybe they’ll do the right thing,” former Roger Stone ratfucking aide Jason Sullivan told a group of Trump supporters on December 30, 2020. “We have to put that pressure there.”
“There has to be a multiple-front strategy, and that multiple-front strategy, I do think, is descend on the Capitol, without question,” he said. “Make those people feel it inside.”
Which does sound a wee smidge incite-y, although don't get too excited since calling for protestors to "descend on Congress" seven days hence clearly fails the "imminence" test from Brandenberg v. Ohio, which refers to "imminent lawless action."
The New York Times put out one of the weirder riot origin stories yesterday with a recording of Sullivan, who exhorted Trump supporters on a conference call to intimidate members of Congress and let them “understand that people are breathing down their necks.” He also vowed that Trump would impose “a limited form of martial law” to maintain his hold on power.
“I don’t see any other way around it, because he’s not going to allow an election fraud to take place,” Sullivan continued.
“Biden will never be in that White House,” Sullivan went on. “That’s my promise to each and every one of you.”
On a bizarre website fusing "The Wizard of Oz" imagery and QAnon tropes, the self-described "Wizard of Twitter" claims to have "developed and deployed a proprietary social media listening and execution software technology during the Trump 2016 Presidential Campaign. This game-changing software helped drive the narrative by design in a meaningful, significant way that helped tip the scales in candidate Trump’s favor… at the last moment." And that's no mean feat when your account has been suspended for violating Twitter's terms of service.
Which is weird enough, but not as weird as how the call itself came to be recorded. According to the Times, law student Staci Burk, a Republican activist from Arizona, "became convinced that phony ballots had been flown in bulk into Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport."
We have questions.
She then swore out an anonymous affidavit for use in Sidney Powell's Arizona Kraken lawsuit.
More questions.
After which her house was occupied by members of the 1st Amendment Praetorian, a rightwing militia group made up mostly of Special Forces veterans and former intelligence officers which supported Michael Flynn's plan to impose martial law and seize the voting machines after the election.
Wait, what?
After becoming involved with Ms. Powell, Ms. Burk said she had been approached by several members of a right-wing paramilitary group, the 1st Amendment Praetorian, which was associated with a former legal client of Ms. Powell’s, Michael T. Flynn, Mr. Trump’s first national security adviser.
Ms. Burk said that members of the group then placed her under unwanted surveillance, insisting on moving into her home in what they described as an effort to protect her from people who might want to retaliate against her for coming forward about voter fraud.
It was a member of the 1st Amendment Praetorian, Ms. Burk said, who had joined the conference call that featured Mr. Sullivan. Ms. Burk said she recorded the call, much like she recorded other activities by the 1st Amendment Praetorian, because she felt threatened and unsafe by the group’s presence in her home.
Seems like Staci's "My house is being occupied by militants" shirt has people asking questions that were already answered by her anonymous affidavit shirt.
Anyway! Sullivan claims he was asked to participate in the call by a group of “health freedom advocate moms” — that's anti-vaxx loons to you and me — and that he simply "shared some encouragement” with his coup-curious fellow travelers.
“I only promoted peaceful solutions where Americans could raise their voices and be heard as expressed in our First Amendment,” he told the Times. “I in no way condone the violence of any protesters.”
Which may or may not be true, but his statement certainly raises quite a few questions which ought to be of interest to the Justice Department.
[NYT]
Follow Liz Dye on Twitter RIGHT HERE!
Please click here to support your Wonkette. And if you're ordering your quarantine goods on Amazon, this is the link to do it.
Yale Kid Asks Ted Cruz The Wrong Question About Blowing Guys To End World Hunger
LEARN ABOUT POLITICS, YALE KID.
A lot of folks are making something out of a question an oh-so-clever kid at Yale asked Ted Cruz this week. Cruz was there to do a live recording of his podcast, which he hosts with some idiot named Michael Knowles. And some whippersnapper named "Evan" got up to ask a question:
“Assuming it would end global hunger, would you fellate another man?” a student named Evan asked Cruz.
Evan. Can we call you "Evan," since it's our personal name, which means there's more than a 20 percent chance we won't forget your name by the end of this post?
Evan. Dear, sweet Evan. This is an inappropriate and incorrect question. Not for whatever reasons Ted Cruz didn't like the question, or that Michael Knowles didn't like the question. Knowles responded, "Like a typical leftwing undergraduate, you are engaging in consequentialist ethics." LOL, shut up you fuckin' dildo made out of human hair.
There were many laughs in the live studio audience, as Knowles said just a few too many words about how blowing guys is "flagrantly immoral." That was weird.
But it was still the wrong question.
Yale student: "Assuming it would end global hunger, would you fellate another man?"\n\nConservative commentator Michael Knowles says "absolutely not." Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) declines to answer.pic.twitter.com/Qeg7XJLfHF— The Recount (@The Recount) 1649788138
This question is inappropriate because of the suppositions it makes, namely that Ted Cruz cares if global hunger ends. A lawyer for opposing counsel would object and say "assumes facts not in evidence." To construct a question like this, you've got to make the carrot at the end of the tunnel something a reasonable observer would at least think Ted Cruz might really want, for the price of blowing some guys.
Therefore a better construction would be:
"Assuming Donald Trump would punch you in the face and spend the night with your wife afterward, would you blow a bunch of guys?"
We don't care why "Evan" constructed his question the way he did. We don't care if, as Knowles suggested, it was some reference to American Psycho. Our way is better.
And as if to prove that our way is better, Ted Cruz thought he was saying a gotcha afterward when he asked Evan, "If it would solve world hunger, would you vote for Donald Trump?"
So fuckin' sad, dude. And he doesn't even realize why it's sad, which is even sadder.
Another good construction for the question would be "assuming you got to vote for Donald Trump afterward, would you blow a bunch of guys?"
The end.
[Mediaite]
Follow Evan Hurst on Twitter right here!
Wonkette is funded ENTIRELY by a few thousand people like you. If you're not already, would you pls consider being the few thousandth and one?