Opens profile photo
Follow
Daniel Baryon
@AnarkYouTube
Anarchist. Building the new in the shell of the old. (He/Him). I run the YT channel Anark: youtube.com/c/anark/
Oklahomapatreon.com/anarkBorn March 9, 1986Joined September 2009

Daniel Baryon’s Tweets

Pinned Tweet
My newest video is out, part 1 of A Modern Anarchism: Anarchist Analysis. This has been in production for months and I am so happy to finally release! I combine a variety of theoretical frameworks in order to synthesize a modern anarchism. Share it around!
15
134
407
All of this.
Quote Tweet
If anarchism is to be revolutionary, it must be more than a radical aesthetic, more than an individual philosophy, more than edgy nihilism or machismo militancy or youth subculture. It must constitute itself as a restorative force, predicated around love of human potential.
2
11
Anyone trying to reduce anarchism to merely a political stance in opposition to states rather than a deep ethical opposition to *all domination* is inevitably, invariably trying to provide space for something fucked up and will get caught collaborating with fash.
9
114
506

Topics to follow

Sign up to get Tweets about the Topics you follow in your Home timeline.

Carousel

"One who is constantly striving to force everything into a mechanical order at last becomes a machine himself and loses all human feeling." Rudolf Rocker
3
11
63
Rocker had one of the most profound influences on me of any single thinker. Nationalism and Culture solidified the foundations of my anarchism and set me on my current path. I am eternally grateful to him for the beautiful, moving, insightful work that he produced.
Quote Tweet
Happy Birthday to Rudolf Rocker.
3
25
Abuse is a social contagion which spreads through repetition. Hurt, we hurt others, hoping to experience resolution, but more often perpetuating harm. The many hierarchical structures in society then exploit this destructive cycle, solidifying themselves in our actions.
2
27
109
「もしアナキズムが革命的であろうとするならば、それはラディカルな美学以上、個人の哲学以上、とげとげしいニヒリズムや闘争的な男性や若者のサブカルチャー以上でなければならない。それは、人間の可能性を愛することを前提とした、復元の力として自らを形作らなければならないのである」
Quote Tweet
If anarchism is to be revolutionary, it must be more than a radical aesthetic, more than an individual philosophy, more than edgy nihilism or machismo militancy or youth subculture. It must constitute itself as a restorative force, predicated around love of human potential.
2
8
A movement based in love is the only movement that will win. 👌❤️
Quote Tweet
I won't pretend to have the answers. I only know that the first step is in asking the questions. Because we will not build a liberatory movement by disposing of human beings or in essentializing them as their mistakes. A movement based in love is the only movement that will win.
Show this thread
2
9
I won't pretend to have the answers. I only know that the first step is in asking the questions. Because we will not build a liberatory movement by disposing of human beings or in essentializing them as their mistakes. A movement based in love is the only movement that will win.
3
7
60
Show this thread
What does it look like to practice patience and kindness with those who make mistakes? Where do people who are in the process of unlearning hierarchical mentalities go to ask questions? What is the role of radicals in undermining a culture of disposability?
3
4
61
Show this thread
So do not take this as a plea to soften our approach to bigotry or reactionary viewpoints or harm in organizational spaces, as there is very serious work to be done which cannot afford to be derailed by these attitudes. It is instead a question to the movement:
1
2
53
Show this thread
And there is good reason why our spaces end up this way. At root, it comes from a desire to protect the vulnerable. We know we have to take a hard line on certain behaviors or viewpoints, because otherwise our spaces will be dangerous to those who are marginalized.
1
1
60
Show this thread
The ensuing environment also makes it hard for people to grow. People become terrified to ask questions or breech difficult topics, because they think they risk being disposed of. Those who are brave/foolish enough to do so often end up in horrible arguments that split coalitions
1
4
65
Show this thread