-
Case DISMISSED in 34 SECONDS!
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8CgVu25gujqkgXzoC7ueKA/join
NEED TO BEAT A DUI? I CAN BE YOUR LAWYER, TOO.
Call 502-931-6788 OR
Schedule an appointment with me: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforman
Let's work to get your DUI case resolved!
Connect With the DUI Guy:
Website: https://www.FormanAndAssociatesLaw.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheDUIGuyPlus
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDUIGuyPlus
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/FormanLarry
#criminaldefenseattorney #duidefenselawyer #duiattorney Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8CgVu25gujqkgXzoC7ueKA/join
NEED TO BEAT A DUI? I CAN BE YOUR LAWYER, TOO.
Call 502-931-6788 OR
Schedule an appointment with me: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforma...
published: 28 Mar 2023
-
Early Termination of Probation in PA or NJ - Is the Shutdown, the right time, to argue for it?
Criminal Defense lawyer Alfonso Gambone explains early termination of probation in Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Read my article on Early Termination of Probation - http://gambonelaw.com/the-factors-that-determine-early-termination-of-probation/
Learn More About Me - http://gambonelaw.com/alfonso-gambone/
Download My Free Books - http://gambonelaw.com/reports/
Read My Blog - http://gambonelaw.com/blog/
Listen to Previous Podcasts http://gambonelaw.com/podcasts/
New Jersey and Pennsylvania have procedures for an individual to petition the court for early termination of their probation. This can be a huge benefit to a client as probation often hinders a person’s ability to obtain jobs, qualify for loans, or start businesses. In New Jersey, NJSA 2C: 45-2 permits an individual, his or her...
published: 01 Jul 2020
-
How to ruin summer and the difference between warrantless searches - Pennsylvania vs. New Jersey
Criminal defense lawyer Alfonso Gambone provides his insight on warrantless searches in Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Warrantless search is a major issue in all criminal defense cases but especially those involving illegal guns, drugs, narcotics, controlled substance, Drunk Driving and DWI. This is reason why our criminal defense law firm focuses so much time researching it and discussing the issue with clients and their families in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
What happened in Commonwealth v. Alexander? The Pennsylvania Constitution once again offers greater protections against warrantless searches than the United States Constitution.
In a huge opinion (Commonwealth v. Alexander) that will send shockwaves throughout criminal courts in Pennsylvania, on Tuesday, December 22, 2020...
published: 17 Jun 2021
-
Losing Your Job in NJ Traffic Court Through Forfeiture
http://bit.ly/1qcuGHK You can lose your job as a result of conviction of charges in municipal court. If you hold public employment or a public office and are convicted of a disorderly (or petty disorderly) persons offense (what other states call "misdemeanors"), you stand to lose your job. Find out why!
published: 14 Sep 2014
-
Delaware Court of Common Pleas Top # 7 Facts
Delaware Court of Common Pleas Top # 7 Facts
published: 02 Nov 2015
-
Growing up Pentecostal... #short
published: 28 May 2021
-
Want Your Case Dismissed? Don't Accept a Plea.
If you're being charged with a crime, there are three ways your case can end: dismissal, trial, or a plea. If you accept a plea, your case will not be dismissed. This sounds simple, but it's something most people don't think of when they're deciding whether or not to accept a plea. Most cases that get dismissed are dismissed later in the case. Once the state is preparing for trial on a case, there are certain problems that may come up that were not clear just from reading the police report. Obviously, not every case is going to get dismissed. If you want your case dismissed (everyone does) to think about the reason you want your case dismissed and how badly you want it dismissed. Are you willing to take your case to trial if the state doesn't dismiss your case?
If you have any questions a...
published: 27 Sep 2022
-
LANDLORD TENANT COURT IN NEW JERSEY - HACKENSACK 07601 | 201-646-3333 | (2021)
Hi, I'm Vanessa. I recommend Rafael Gomez as a lawyer to everyone if you need help with anything, for simple cases, actually for anything you need.
------------------------------------------------------------------
CHARLES W. STRUNCK, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CARMEN M. FIGUEROA, Defendant-Respondent.
No. A-1224-14T4.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted October 20, 2015.
Decided May 3, 2016.
Begelman, Orlow & Melletz, attorneys for appellant (Marc M. Orlow and Daniel S. Orlow, on the briefs).
The Micklin Law Group, attorneys for respondent (Brad M. Micklin and Richard M. Muglia, on the brief).
Before Judges Fisher and Espinosa.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff Charles W. Strunck, III, appeals from an ord...
published: 23 Aug 2021
-
SHOCKING: Woman Calls 911 To Ambush Police Officers
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgISFlWDATayhFZb6-k-3eA/join
Last November, 21-year old Daziana "Dazi" Natasha Lewis called 911 in the early morning asking for police to respond to her location at a closed K-Mart. When the Greenville County Sheriff's Office arrived, a stand-off occurred. Officers tried to talk her down, but she met them with silence. See the twist ending and how it relates to two other cases we've already covered.
The Comm Center offers expert insights into true crime and emergency response from seasoned professionals. Drew, a retired law enforcement officer with 29 years of experience as a detective, police supervisor, and 911 center administrator, joins Jon, an active 911 dispatcher with over 10 years in dispatch, plus expe...
published: 17 Jan 2025
-
Salavantis to Seek Common Pleas Judge
Salavantis to Seek Common Pleas Judge
published: 10 Feb 2021
0:34
Case DISMISSED in 34 SECONDS!
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8CgVu25gujqkgXzoC7ueKA/join
NEED TO BEAT A DUI? I CAN BE YOUR LAWYER, TOO.
Call 5...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8CgVu25gujqkgXzoC7ueKA/join
NEED TO BEAT A DUI? I CAN BE YOUR LAWYER, TOO.
Call 502-931-6788 OR
Schedule an appointment with me: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforman
Let's work to get your DUI case resolved!
Connect With the DUI Guy:
Website: https://www.FormanAndAssociatesLaw.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheDUIGuyPlus
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDUIGuyPlus
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/FormanLarry
#criminaldefenseattorney #duidefenselawyer #duiattorney Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8CgVu25gujqkgXzoC7ueKA/join
NEED TO BEAT A DUI? I CAN BE YOUR LAWYER, TOO.
Call 502-931-6788 OR
Schedule an appointment with me: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforman
Let's work to get your DUI case resolved!
Connect With the DUI Guy:
Website: https://www.FormanAndAssociatesLaw.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheDUIGuyPlus
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDUIGuyPlus
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/FormanLarry
#criminaldefenseattorney #duidefenselawyer #duiattorney
https://wn.com/Case_Dismissed_In_34_Seconds
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8CgVu25gujqkgXzoC7ueKA/join
NEED TO BEAT A DUI? I CAN BE YOUR LAWYER, TOO.
Call 502-931-6788 OR
Schedule an appointment with me: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforman
Let's work to get your DUI case resolved!
Connect With the DUI Guy:
Website: https://www.FormanAndAssociatesLaw.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheDUIGuyPlus
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDUIGuyPlus
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/FormanLarry
#criminaldefenseattorney #duidefenselawyer #duiattorney Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8CgVu25gujqkgXzoC7ueKA/join
NEED TO BEAT A DUI? I CAN BE YOUR LAWYER, TOO.
Call 502-931-6788 OR
Schedule an appointment with me: http:/www.meetme.so/larryforman
Let's work to get your DUI case resolved!
Connect With the DUI Guy:
Website: https://www.FormanAndAssociatesLaw.com/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheDUIGuyPlus
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDUIGuyPlus
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/FormanLarry
#criminaldefenseattorney #duidefenselawyer #duiattorney
- published: 28 Mar 2023
- views: 5940851
3:14
Early Termination of Probation in PA or NJ - Is the Shutdown, the right time, to argue for it?
Criminal Defense lawyer Alfonso Gambone explains early termination of probation in Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Read my article on Early Termination of Probati...
Criminal Defense lawyer Alfonso Gambone explains early termination of probation in Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Read my article on Early Termination of Probation - http://gambonelaw.com/the-factors-that-determine-early-termination-of-probation/
Learn More About Me - http://gambonelaw.com/alfonso-gambone/
Download My Free Books - http://gambonelaw.com/reports/
Read My Blog - http://gambonelaw.com/blog/
Listen to Previous Podcasts http://gambonelaw.com/podcasts/
New Jersey and Pennsylvania have procedures for an individual to petition the court for early termination of their probation. This can be a huge benefit to a client as probation often hinders a person’s ability to obtain jobs, qualify for loans, or start businesses. In New Jersey, NJSA 2C: 45-2 permits an individual, his or her probation officer, or the court itself, to terminate probation. A New Jersey court will evaluate the petition based on the individual’s criminal history, nature of the offense, and whether or not the person has complied with all conditions of the probations. The court will also consider the person’s reasoning for requesting early termination and any other factors the court determines to be relevant. A New Jersey petition has a much higher probability of success if the probation officer recommends or is not opposed to the termination. The procedure in Pennsylvania is very similar and a judge in the Commonwealth will evaluate similar factors.
Meek Mill's alleged probation violation issue has attracted national attention. While Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered his release yesterday, his case isn't over, This case demonstrates a great example of how even an arrest without a conviction while on probation can result in a jail sentence or a longer period of probation. In the case of Mr. Robert Williams (aka Meek Mill) his violation resulted in a 2-4 state prison sentence and an appeal that is now pending.
Our law firm represents individuals in Pennsylvania and New Jersey who are charged with a variety of crimes and offenses that include illegal drugs, narcotics, guns, firearms, and driving while intoxicated (DWI) or under the influence of drugs or alcohol (DUI). While our firm strives to provide clients and their families with the highest level of criminal defense representation, sometimes the evidence is simply overwhelming and the person is convicted or must enter into a negotiated or non-negotiated guilty plea.
New Jersey & Pennsylvania Sentencing
Following a conviction or a plea, the trial court in Pennsylvania (Court of Common Pleas) or in New Jersey (Superior Court) must determine the appropriate sentence based on the individual’s criminal history (prior record score), and the seriousness of the offense (offense gravity score).
In New Jersey and Pennsylvania, felony offenses usually carry with them a presumption of state prison or county jail incarceration, while misdemeanors do not usually carry that same presumption. Pennsylvania classifies crimes into 3 categories: felony, misdemeanor, and summary offenses; New Jersey classifies “crimes” as those indictable offenses within the state. The seriousness of these offenses range from crimes of the 1st degree to crimes of the 4th degree an include crimes of violence such as murder and manslaughter as well as possessory crimes such as possession with the intent to deliver or distribute narcotics along with firearms crimes under New Jersey’s Graves Act.
The Presumption of Incarceration & Probation In New Jersey & Pennsylvania
Our law firm has had a great history of obtaining probation for clients whose criminal convictions carried with them presumptions of incarceration. When a person is sentenced to a period of probation in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, it is typically at least 1 year and it is not unusual for probation to last 4 or 5 years. The standard period of probation for most pre-trial diversion programs like Pre-Trial Intervention (PTI) (New Jersey), Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD), and conditional dismissals/discharges (Jersey) is 1 year. This means that a person will be subject to supervision during this time, which could include random drug or alcohol tests, and other conditions like anger management classes or drug rehab.
https://wn.com/Early_Termination_Of_Probation_In_Pa_Or_Nj_Is_The_Shutdown,_The_Right_Time,_To_Argue_For_It
Criminal Defense lawyer Alfonso Gambone explains early termination of probation in Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Read my article on Early Termination of Probation - http://gambonelaw.com/the-factors-that-determine-early-termination-of-probation/
Learn More About Me - http://gambonelaw.com/alfonso-gambone/
Download My Free Books - http://gambonelaw.com/reports/
Read My Blog - http://gambonelaw.com/blog/
Listen to Previous Podcasts http://gambonelaw.com/podcasts/
New Jersey and Pennsylvania have procedures for an individual to petition the court for early termination of their probation. This can be a huge benefit to a client as probation often hinders a person’s ability to obtain jobs, qualify for loans, or start businesses. In New Jersey, NJSA 2C: 45-2 permits an individual, his or her probation officer, or the court itself, to terminate probation. A New Jersey court will evaluate the petition based on the individual’s criminal history, nature of the offense, and whether or not the person has complied with all conditions of the probations. The court will also consider the person’s reasoning for requesting early termination and any other factors the court determines to be relevant. A New Jersey petition has a much higher probability of success if the probation officer recommends or is not opposed to the termination. The procedure in Pennsylvania is very similar and a judge in the Commonwealth will evaluate similar factors.
Meek Mill's alleged probation violation issue has attracted national attention. While Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered his release yesterday, his case isn't over, This case demonstrates a great example of how even an arrest without a conviction while on probation can result in a jail sentence or a longer period of probation. In the case of Mr. Robert Williams (aka Meek Mill) his violation resulted in a 2-4 state prison sentence and an appeal that is now pending.
Our law firm represents individuals in Pennsylvania and New Jersey who are charged with a variety of crimes and offenses that include illegal drugs, narcotics, guns, firearms, and driving while intoxicated (DWI) or under the influence of drugs or alcohol (DUI). While our firm strives to provide clients and their families with the highest level of criminal defense representation, sometimes the evidence is simply overwhelming and the person is convicted or must enter into a negotiated or non-negotiated guilty plea.
New Jersey & Pennsylvania Sentencing
Following a conviction or a plea, the trial court in Pennsylvania (Court of Common Pleas) or in New Jersey (Superior Court) must determine the appropriate sentence based on the individual’s criminal history (prior record score), and the seriousness of the offense (offense gravity score).
In New Jersey and Pennsylvania, felony offenses usually carry with them a presumption of state prison or county jail incarceration, while misdemeanors do not usually carry that same presumption. Pennsylvania classifies crimes into 3 categories: felony, misdemeanor, and summary offenses; New Jersey classifies “crimes” as those indictable offenses within the state. The seriousness of these offenses range from crimes of the 1st degree to crimes of the 4th degree an include crimes of violence such as murder and manslaughter as well as possessory crimes such as possession with the intent to deliver or distribute narcotics along with firearms crimes under New Jersey’s Graves Act.
The Presumption of Incarceration & Probation In New Jersey & Pennsylvania
Our law firm has had a great history of obtaining probation for clients whose criminal convictions carried with them presumptions of incarceration. When a person is sentenced to a period of probation in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, it is typically at least 1 year and it is not unusual for probation to last 4 or 5 years. The standard period of probation for most pre-trial diversion programs like Pre-Trial Intervention (PTI) (New Jersey), Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (ARD), and conditional dismissals/discharges (Jersey) is 1 year. This means that a person will be subject to supervision during this time, which could include random drug or alcohol tests, and other conditions like anger management classes or drug rehab.
- published: 01 Jul 2020
- views: 463
4:10
How to ruin summer and the difference between warrantless searches - Pennsylvania vs. New Jersey
Criminal defense lawyer Alfonso Gambone provides his insight on warrantless searches in Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Warrantless search is a major issue in all...
Criminal defense lawyer Alfonso Gambone provides his insight on warrantless searches in Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Warrantless search is a major issue in all criminal defense cases but especially those involving illegal guns, drugs, narcotics, controlled substance, Drunk Driving and DWI. This is reason why our criminal defense law firm focuses so much time researching it and discussing the issue with clients and their families in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
What happened in Commonwealth v. Alexander? The Pennsylvania Constitution once again offers greater protections against warrantless searches than the United States Constitution.
In a huge opinion (Commonwealth v. Alexander) that will send shockwaves throughout criminal courts in Pennsylvania, on Tuesday, December 22, 2020, the PA Supreme Court ruled that police can no longer search cars without a warrant unless there is both probable cause and emergency circumstances that require immediate action. This decision overrules and reverses the previous 2014 opinion in the case Commonwealth v. Gary
Prior to Gary and now once again with the Alexander decision the search and seizure provision of our Commonwealth’s Constitution provides a person with greater protection against illegal searches and seizures than the U.S. Constitution. Pennsylvania through Article 1, Section 8, specifically prohibited a warrantless search of a motor vehicle unless police or law enforcement could provide evidence of exigent circumstances beyond the mere mobility of the vehicle. Criminal defense lawyers can now make that argument again during a motion to Suppress evidence.
Pennsylvania vs. New Jersey – Warrantless Searches
Pennsylvania, with respect to these warrantless searches of vehicles didn’t follow the federal standard or the U.S. Constitution under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This was a very important distinction between Pennsylvania and federal law, which remained in place until April, 2014, when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided the case of Commonwealth v. Gary. New Jersey follows the federal standard and this hasn’t changed. Unlike, Pennsylvania, warrantless searches are permissible in New Jersey provided that police or law enforcement have probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime.
What happened in Commonwealth v. Gary?
There the court held specifically held that the Pennsylvania Constitution does not provide any greater protection than the U.S. Constitution. In that case, the defendant, Gary, was stopped in Philadelphia for a window tint violation. During the police investigation, the officers smelled marijuana and asked Gary “if there was anything in the vehicle that they needed to know about”. When Gary admitted that there was “weed” in the car, the officers removed and placed him in a police vehicle while calling for a canine unit.
When the dog arrived, Gary attempted to flee and police apprehended him. The police then searched the car without a warrant and found two pounds of marijuana underneath the front hood in a bag lodged near the air filter. Gary’s trial attorney filed a motion to suppress the illegal search under the Pennsylvania Constitution, which the Philadelphia Municipal Court and the Court of Common Pleas denied. The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the decision and an appeal was made to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
In Gary, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court noted that the Pennsylvania Constitution can provide greater protections, it found that those protections only apply when there is independent state constitutional analysis that would indicate that a standard should be applied. The Court in Gary specifically found that the mobility of the car alone didn’t necessarily invalidate a warrantless search of a vehicle and the expectation of privacy with respect to one’s automobile is significantly less than one’s home or office.
Read my blog article
What you need to know this summer and beyond about warrantless vehicle searches in Pennsylvania and New Jersey
https://gambonelaw.com/what-you-need-to-know-this-summer-and-beyond-about-warrantless-vehicle-searches-in-pennsylvania-and-new-jersey/
https://wn.com/How_To_Ruin_Summer_And_The_Difference_Between_Warrantless_Searches_Pennsylvania_Vs._New_Jersey
Criminal defense lawyer Alfonso Gambone provides his insight on warrantless searches in Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Warrantless search is a major issue in all criminal defense cases but especially those involving illegal guns, drugs, narcotics, controlled substance, Drunk Driving and DWI. This is reason why our criminal defense law firm focuses so much time researching it and discussing the issue with clients and their families in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
What happened in Commonwealth v. Alexander? The Pennsylvania Constitution once again offers greater protections against warrantless searches than the United States Constitution.
In a huge opinion (Commonwealth v. Alexander) that will send shockwaves throughout criminal courts in Pennsylvania, on Tuesday, December 22, 2020, the PA Supreme Court ruled that police can no longer search cars without a warrant unless there is both probable cause and emergency circumstances that require immediate action. This decision overrules and reverses the previous 2014 opinion in the case Commonwealth v. Gary
Prior to Gary and now once again with the Alexander decision the search and seizure provision of our Commonwealth’s Constitution provides a person with greater protection against illegal searches and seizures than the U.S. Constitution. Pennsylvania through Article 1, Section 8, specifically prohibited a warrantless search of a motor vehicle unless police or law enforcement could provide evidence of exigent circumstances beyond the mere mobility of the vehicle. Criminal defense lawyers can now make that argument again during a motion to Suppress evidence.
Pennsylvania vs. New Jersey – Warrantless Searches
Pennsylvania, with respect to these warrantless searches of vehicles didn’t follow the federal standard or the U.S. Constitution under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This was a very important distinction between Pennsylvania and federal law, which remained in place until April, 2014, when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided the case of Commonwealth v. Gary. New Jersey follows the federal standard and this hasn’t changed. Unlike, Pennsylvania, warrantless searches are permissible in New Jersey provided that police or law enforcement have probable cause to believe that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime.
What happened in Commonwealth v. Gary?
There the court held specifically held that the Pennsylvania Constitution does not provide any greater protection than the U.S. Constitution. In that case, the defendant, Gary, was stopped in Philadelphia for a window tint violation. During the police investigation, the officers smelled marijuana and asked Gary “if there was anything in the vehicle that they needed to know about”. When Gary admitted that there was “weed” in the car, the officers removed and placed him in a police vehicle while calling for a canine unit.
When the dog arrived, Gary attempted to flee and police apprehended him. The police then searched the car without a warrant and found two pounds of marijuana underneath the front hood in a bag lodged near the air filter. Gary’s trial attorney filed a motion to suppress the illegal search under the Pennsylvania Constitution, which the Philadelphia Municipal Court and the Court of Common Pleas denied. The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the decision and an appeal was made to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
In Gary, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court noted that the Pennsylvania Constitution can provide greater protections, it found that those protections only apply when there is independent state constitutional analysis that would indicate that a standard should be applied. The Court in Gary specifically found that the mobility of the car alone didn’t necessarily invalidate a warrantless search of a vehicle and the expectation of privacy with respect to one’s automobile is significantly less than one’s home or office.
Read my blog article
What you need to know this summer and beyond about warrantless vehicle searches in Pennsylvania and New Jersey
https://gambonelaw.com/what-you-need-to-know-this-summer-and-beyond-about-warrantless-vehicle-searches-in-pennsylvania-and-new-jersey/
- published: 17 Jun 2021
- views: 39
3:02
Losing Your Job in NJ Traffic Court Through Forfeiture
http://bit.ly/1qcuGHK You can lose your job as a result of conviction of charges in municipal court. If you hold public employment or a public office and are co...
http://bit.ly/1qcuGHK You can lose your job as a result of conviction of charges in municipal court. If you hold public employment or a public office and are convicted of a disorderly (or petty disorderly) persons offense (what other states call "misdemeanors"), you stand to lose your job. Find out why!
https://wn.com/Losing_Your_Job_In_Nj_Traffic_Court_Through_Forfeiture
http://bit.ly/1qcuGHK You can lose your job as a result of conviction of charges in municipal court. If you hold public employment or a public office and are convicted of a disorderly (or petty disorderly) persons offense (what other states call "misdemeanors"), you stand to lose your job. Find out why!
- published: 14 Sep 2014
- views: 37
4:06
Want Your Case Dismissed? Don't Accept a Plea.
If you're being charged with a crime, there are three ways your case can end: dismissal, trial, or a plea. If you accept a plea, your case will not be dismissed...
If you're being charged with a crime, there are three ways your case can end: dismissal, trial, or a plea. If you accept a plea, your case will not be dismissed. This sounds simple, but it's something most people don't think of when they're deciding whether or not to accept a plea. Most cases that get dismissed are dismissed later in the case. Once the state is preparing for trial on a case, there are certain problems that may come up that were not clear just from reading the police report. Obviously, not every case is going to get dismissed. If you want your case dismissed (everyone does) to think about the reason you want your case dismissed and how badly you want it dismissed. Are you willing to take your case to trial if the state doesn't dismiss your case?
If you have any questions about this video, or if you're being charged with a crime in San Antonio, feel free to call me at 210-942-4997 or click the link below to schedule a free consultation:
https://seanhenricksen.com/schedule-consultation/
We also have a free download for you: 4 Things You Should Do Right Now If You've Been Arrested:
https://bit.ly/2Xjj9Eh
Also, check out our new podcast below to find out what to do when you're arrested.
https://whattoexpect.buzzsprout.com/
.
.
.
#SanAntonioLawyer
#TXLawyer
#familyviolence
#Assault
#possession
#BexarCountyLawyer
#CriminalDefenseLawyerSanAntonio
#CriminalDefenseLawyerTX
#CriminalDefenseLawyerBexar
#SeanHenricksenLawFirm
#SanAntonioLawyerFreeConsultation
#Lawyer
#CriminalDefenseLegalAdvice
#criminaldefenseattorney
#marijuana
ADVERTISEMENT
Sean Henricksen Law Firm
3011 Nacogdoches, Bldg 1
San Antonio, Texas 78217
https://wn.com/Want_Your_Case_Dismissed_Don't_Accept_A_Plea.
If you're being charged with a crime, there are three ways your case can end: dismissal, trial, or a plea. If you accept a plea, your case will not be dismissed. This sounds simple, but it's something most people don't think of when they're deciding whether or not to accept a plea. Most cases that get dismissed are dismissed later in the case. Once the state is preparing for trial on a case, there are certain problems that may come up that were not clear just from reading the police report. Obviously, not every case is going to get dismissed. If you want your case dismissed (everyone does) to think about the reason you want your case dismissed and how badly you want it dismissed. Are you willing to take your case to trial if the state doesn't dismiss your case?
If you have any questions about this video, or if you're being charged with a crime in San Antonio, feel free to call me at 210-942-4997 or click the link below to schedule a free consultation:
https://seanhenricksen.com/schedule-consultation/
We also have a free download for you: 4 Things You Should Do Right Now If You've Been Arrested:
https://bit.ly/2Xjj9Eh
Also, check out our new podcast below to find out what to do when you're arrested.
https://whattoexpect.buzzsprout.com/
.
.
.
#SanAntonioLawyer
#TXLawyer
#familyviolence
#Assault
#possession
#BexarCountyLawyer
#CriminalDefenseLawyerSanAntonio
#CriminalDefenseLawyerTX
#CriminalDefenseLawyerBexar
#SeanHenricksenLawFirm
#SanAntonioLawyerFreeConsultation
#Lawyer
#CriminalDefenseLegalAdvice
#criminaldefenseattorney
#marijuana
ADVERTISEMENT
Sean Henricksen Law Firm
3011 Nacogdoches, Bldg 1
San Antonio, Texas 78217
- published: 27 Sep 2022
- views: 91323
0:13
LANDLORD TENANT COURT IN NEW JERSEY - HACKENSACK 07601 | 201-646-3333 | (2021)
Hi, I'm Vanessa. I recommend Rafael Gomez as a lawyer to everyone if you need help with anything, for simple cases, actually for anything you need.
------------...
Hi, I'm Vanessa. I recommend Rafael Gomez as a lawyer to everyone if you need help with anything, for simple cases, actually for anything you need.
------------------------------------------------------------------
CHARLES W. STRUNCK, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CARMEN M. FIGUEROA, Defendant-Respondent.
No. A-1224-14T4.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted October 20, 2015.
Decided May 3, 2016.
Begelman, Orlow & Melletz, attorneys for appellant (Marc M. Orlow and Daniel S. Orlow, on the briefs).
The Micklin Law Group, attorneys for respondent (Brad M. Micklin and Richard M. Muglia, on the brief).
Before Judges Fisher and Espinosa.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff Charles W. Strunck, III, appeals from an order that denied his motion to enforce litigant's rights. We affirm.
On August 31, 2011, plaintiff and defendant Carmen M. Figueroa were granted a divorce by the Court of Common Pleas in Pennsylvania. The divorce decree awarded plaintiff the sum of $23,369 to be transferred from defendant's "Fidelity account" by way of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO). The divorce decree directed that plaintiff be responsible for the preparation and cost for the QDRO. However, defendant withdrew all funds from the Fidelity account before the divorce decree was entered and filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition on December 6, 2011.
Schedule F (Creditors Holding Unsecured Nonpriority Claims) of defendant's bankruptcy petition lists plaintiff as a creditor, states the $23,269 claim was incurred in August 2011 and provides the following description: "Matrimonial judgment — This judgment is not a domestic support obligation under Section 523(a)(5) of the Code." Plaintiff does not dispute that he received notice of the bankruptcy petition and the inclusion of the $23,369 as an unsecured claim in that petition.
Plaintiff states he consulted with a bankruptcy attorney who advised him that, "as a practical matter, [he] was better off not pursuing legal action against the Defendant for her failure to comply with the terms of the [divorce decree]."
Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, a creditor may contest the dischargeability of a debt by filing "a complaint . . . objecting to the debtor's discharge . . . no later than 60 days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors under § 341(a)," or as extended by the court. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4004(b).
Plaintiff did not file an adversary complaint to challenge the dischargeability of the $23,369 claim. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4007(a). Defendant was granted a discharge of this and all other debts listed on her petition in March 2012. See 11 U.S.C.A. § 727.
English sites:
https://lucasalexnet.blogspot.com/
https://bankruptcylawyernj.blogspot.com/
http://lucasalexnet.weebly.com/
https://hackensackbankruptcylawyer.weebly.com
https://lucasalexmax259.wixsite.com/lucasalex
https://njbankruptcylawyer.wixsite.com/njbankruptcylawyer
https://njbankruptcylawoffice.wordpress.com
Spanish sites:
http://lucasalexespanol.weebly.com/
https://lucasalexespanol.wixsite.com/espanol
https://lucasalexnet.wordpress.com
http://lucasalexbancarrota.wordpress.com
https://lucasalexnetespanol.blogspot.com/
Portuguese sites:
https://njadvogadodefalencia.wordpress.com
https://lucasalexnetportugues.blogspot.com/
Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/lucasalexlawoffice
https://www.facebook.com/lucasalexnetbancarrota
INSTAGRAM: @lucasalex_bankruptcylawyer
INSTAGRAM: @lucasalex_bancarrota
https://wn.com/Landlord_Tenant_Court_In_New_Jersey_Hackensack_07601_|_201_646_3333_|_(2021)
Hi, I'm Vanessa. I recommend Rafael Gomez as a lawyer to everyone if you need help with anything, for simple cases, actually for anything you need.
------------------------------------------------------------------
CHARLES W. STRUNCK, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CARMEN M. FIGUEROA, Defendant-Respondent.
No. A-1224-14T4.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted October 20, 2015.
Decided May 3, 2016.
Begelman, Orlow & Melletz, attorneys for appellant (Marc M. Orlow and Daniel S. Orlow, on the briefs).
The Micklin Law Group, attorneys for respondent (Brad M. Micklin and Richard M. Muglia, on the brief).
Before Judges Fisher and Espinosa.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff Charles W. Strunck, III, appeals from an order that denied his motion to enforce litigant's rights. We affirm.
On August 31, 2011, plaintiff and defendant Carmen M. Figueroa were granted a divorce by the Court of Common Pleas in Pennsylvania. The divorce decree awarded plaintiff the sum of $23,369 to be transferred from defendant's "Fidelity account" by way of a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO). The divorce decree directed that plaintiff be responsible for the preparation and cost for the QDRO. However, defendant withdrew all funds from the Fidelity account before the divorce decree was entered and filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition on December 6, 2011.
Schedule F (Creditors Holding Unsecured Nonpriority Claims) of defendant's bankruptcy petition lists plaintiff as a creditor, states the $23,269 claim was incurred in August 2011 and provides the following description: "Matrimonial judgment — This judgment is not a domestic support obligation under Section 523(a)(5) of the Code." Plaintiff does not dispute that he received notice of the bankruptcy petition and the inclusion of the $23,369 as an unsecured claim in that petition.
Plaintiff states he consulted with a bankruptcy attorney who advised him that, "as a practical matter, [he] was better off not pursuing legal action against the Defendant for her failure to comply with the terms of the [divorce decree]."
Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, a creditor may contest the dischargeability of a debt by filing "a complaint . . . objecting to the debtor's discharge . . . no later than 60 days after the first date set for the meeting of creditors under § 341(a)," or as extended by the court. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4004(b).
Plaintiff did not file an adversary complaint to challenge the dischargeability of the $23,369 claim. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4007(a). Defendant was granted a discharge of this and all other debts listed on her petition in March 2012. See 11 U.S.C.A. § 727.
English sites:
https://lucasalexnet.blogspot.com/
https://bankruptcylawyernj.blogspot.com/
http://lucasalexnet.weebly.com/
https://hackensackbankruptcylawyer.weebly.com
https://lucasalexmax259.wixsite.com/lucasalex
https://njbankruptcylawyer.wixsite.com/njbankruptcylawyer
https://njbankruptcylawoffice.wordpress.com
Spanish sites:
http://lucasalexespanol.weebly.com/
https://lucasalexespanol.wixsite.com/espanol
https://lucasalexnet.wordpress.com
http://lucasalexbancarrota.wordpress.com
https://lucasalexnetespanol.blogspot.com/
Portuguese sites:
https://njadvogadodefalencia.wordpress.com
https://lucasalexnetportugues.blogspot.com/
Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/lucasalexlawoffice
https://www.facebook.com/lucasalexnetbancarrota
INSTAGRAM: @lucasalex_bankruptcylawyer
INSTAGRAM: @lucasalex_bancarrota
- published: 23 Aug 2021
- views: 99
1:09:07
SHOCKING: Woman Calls 911 To Ambush Police Officers
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgISFlWDATayhFZb6-k-3eA/join
Last November, 21-year old Daziana "Dazi" Natasha Lewis...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgISFlWDATayhFZb6-k-3eA/join
Last November, 21-year old Daziana "Dazi" Natasha Lewis called 911 in the early morning asking for police to respond to her location at a closed K-Mart. When the Greenville County Sheriff's Office arrived, a stand-off occurred. Officers tried to talk her down, but she met them with silence. See the twist ending and how it relates to two other cases we've already covered.
The Comm Center offers expert insights into true crime and emergency response from seasoned professionals. Drew, a retired law enforcement officer with 29 years of experience as a detective, police supervisor, and 911 center administrator, joins Jon, an active 911 dispatcher with over 10 years in dispatch, plus experience as a corrections supervisor and retail theft prevention officer. Together, they provide trusted analysis and a rare look into real-life law enforcement and dispatch work. Subscribe for in-depth, reliable perspectives from those who know the job firsthand.
988 National Suicide Prevention Hotline
Reaching out for support and help is now accessible through a new 3-digit phone number, 988. It’s a direct connection to compassionate and professional support for anyone who might be struggling with emotional distress, experiencing suicidal thoughts, or those with concern about a family member or friend with a mental health or substance use issue.
#dazianana #greenvillecountysheriffsoffice #988
Subscribe to @thecommcenter
Check out our website: https://thecommcenter.com/
Another way to help support the show: CHECK OUT Drew's new Amazon Storefront. He receives a commission if you buy linked products.
https://amzn.to/4gck8K6
______________________________
SUBSCRIBE on https://www.youtube.com/@thecommcenter?sub_confirmation=1
FOLLOW on https://twitter.com/commcenterpod/
FOLLOW on https://www.facebook.com/thecommcenter911/
FOLLOW on https://www.instagram.com/the_comm_center/
FOLLOW & RATE on https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thecommcenter
FOLLOW & RATE on https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-comm-center-with-drew-breasy/id1715396970
_______________________________
Want to be part of the conversation? Leave a voicemail and we will play it on the show! The number is (848) COMM-911
From abroad: +1 848-266-6911
From within the U.S.: (848) 266-6911
https://wn.com/Shocking_Woman_Calls_911_To_Ambush_Police_Officers
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgISFlWDATayhFZb6-k-3eA/join
Last November, 21-year old Daziana "Dazi" Natasha Lewis called 911 in the early morning asking for police to respond to her location at a closed K-Mart. When the Greenville County Sheriff's Office arrived, a stand-off occurred. Officers tried to talk her down, but she met them with silence. See the twist ending and how it relates to two other cases we've already covered.
The Comm Center offers expert insights into true crime and emergency response from seasoned professionals. Drew, a retired law enforcement officer with 29 years of experience as a detective, police supervisor, and 911 center administrator, joins Jon, an active 911 dispatcher with over 10 years in dispatch, plus experience as a corrections supervisor and retail theft prevention officer. Together, they provide trusted analysis and a rare look into real-life law enforcement and dispatch work. Subscribe for in-depth, reliable perspectives from those who know the job firsthand.
988 National Suicide Prevention Hotline
Reaching out for support and help is now accessible through a new 3-digit phone number, 988. It’s a direct connection to compassionate and professional support for anyone who might be struggling with emotional distress, experiencing suicidal thoughts, or those with concern about a family member or friend with a mental health or substance use issue.
#dazianana #greenvillecountysheriffsoffice #988
Subscribe to @thecommcenter
Check out our website: https://thecommcenter.com/
Another way to help support the show: CHECK OUT Drew's new Amazon Storefront. He receives a commission if you buy linked products.
https://amzn.to/4gck8K6
______________________________
SUBSCRIBE on https://www.youtube.com/@thecommcenter?sub_confirmation=1
FOLLOW on https://twitter.com/commcenterpod/
FOLLOW on https://www.facebook.com/thecommcenter911/
FOLLOW on https://www.instagram.com/the_comm_center/
FOLLOW & RATE on https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thecommcenter
FOLLOW & RATE on https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-comm-center-with-drew-breasy/id1715396970
_______________________________
Want to be part of the conversation? Leave a voicemail and we will play it on the show! The number is (848) COMM-911
From abroad: +1 848-266-6911
From within the U.S.: (848) 266-6911
- published: 17 Jan 2025
- views: 118