At a push - and a bit of hair dye - the Pat McCourt Story, but Jinky?
James McAvoy is a beautiful man but he could never pull off the portrayal of the beauty that was Jimmy Johnstone.
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20210304132639im_/http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0ZRnirp_1fQ/TP6UwY7ZObI/AAAAAAAAD7w/k0hA5Nmsp7c/s200/James%2BMcAvoy%2B%252B%2BGlasgow%2BCeltic.jpeg)
![](http://web.archive.org./web/20210304132639im_/http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0ZRnirp_1fQ/TP6UwPKXW_I/AAAAAAAAD7o/3Wdz_lbfiDM/s200/Jimmy%2BJohnstone%2B%252B%2BDundee.jpeg)
What next? Jude Law in the Ralph Coates Story?
At a push - and a bit of hair dye - the Pat McCourt Story, but Jinky?
James McAvoy is a beautiful man but he could never pull off the portrayal of the beauty that was Jimmy Johnstone.
What next? Jude Law in the Ralph Coates Story?
Via Lew H. over at the SPGB's discussion list:
Wikipedia has launched an appeal for funds. Below is a interesting tribute from a donor:
"Wikipedia stands for the principle that no one owns knowledge, that people cooperating voluntarily and without external incentives (such as greed or fear) can produce a public good useful to all of a caliber as high if not higher than commercially driven and created sources -- not merely in accuracy but in accessibility of use and excellence of design. Wikipedia is living refutation of those who assert that wide-scale, complex, long-term cooperation by a large number people working on a very large enterprise requires hierarchy, subordination, authoritative supervision, or motivation by money or even less savory incentives. In many ways it's not too much of an exaggeration that the Wiki principle exemplifies the animating principle of a different kind of society, and by Wiki's persistence and longevity shows that a cooperative order is not a utopian fantasy, but as real as your computer and as close as the Wiki URL. Thanks, Jimmy! And all of you whose work, unrewarded except by the knowledge that it is constructive, well done, and helpful, make this project possible."
But isn't 'Jimmy' a Rand'ite? I'm confused.
What's Helen Mirren doing on the front cover of the NME back in '76? (Looking like Hazel O'Connor in the grainy image, I might add.)
Just stumbled across that startling fact via this anorak page over at wiki. That page would be a thousand times better if the person who wrote up the page also scanned in a few of the front covers as well. I had to find the grainy image to your left via eBay. The paper is yours for a fiver, apparently. Get clicking.
Update
OK, did a bit of internet digging, and I'm guessing that Helen Mirren is on the front cover because of 'Teeth 'N' Smiles', a David Hare play from the mid-seventies that's apparently "a searing look at the madness and excesses of the rock n’ roll years.". (More tangential info about 'Teeth 'N' Smiles' over here.)