When I first read orientalism several years ago, I thought it was kind of dry. Rereading it now I realize that Edward Said had a unique wit and was very good at eloquent snark
This part where he’s describing an example of British orientalist literature is so incisive i love it:
Kinglake’s undeservedly famous and popular work is a pathetic catalogue of pompous ethnocentrisms and tiringly nondescript accounts of the Englishman’s East. His ostensible purpose in the book is to prove that travel in the Orient is important to “moulding of your character—that is, your very identity,” but in fact this turns out to be little more than solidifying “your” anti-Semitism, xenophobia, and general all-purpose race prejudice. We are told, for instance, that the Arabian Nights is too lively and inventive a work to have been created by a “mere Oriental,” “who, for creative purposes, is a thing dead and dry—a mental mummy.” Although Kinglake blithely confesses to no knowledge of any Oriental language, he is not constrained by ignorance from making sweeping generalizations about the Orient, its culture, mentality, and society.
It’s no wonder the knowledge-producing arm of western imperialism no longer calls itself Orientalist, like how do you come back from a criticism like this? You don’t