@shaunmicallef 님을 차단했습니다
정말로 이 트윗을 보시겠어요? 트윗을 봐도 @shaunmicallef 님의 차단을 해제하지 않습니다
-
& finally, if I were Bridget McKenzie and my office, authority & ministerial discretion had been hijacked to further some Machiavel in the PMO with Excel and no compunction about throwing me under a bus, I'd probably be a little less amenable about the mangled wreck of my career.
이 스레드 보기감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
Also, if I was Angus Taylor and someone gave me a document that was so wrong that when I used it to try smear the Mayor of Sydney I ended up looking like a berk, wouldn't I be remotely curious as to how it came into existence and demand an explanation from whoever gave it to me?
이 스레드 보기감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
Also, if I were devoutly religious and believed in the Golden Rule of 'do unto others...', I would not be a party to increasing benefits for the unemployed by a paltry $4 a day. This would also apply if I wasn't religious and subscribed, say, to Kant's categorical imperative.
이 스레드 보기감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
If I was the PM an I'd heard about a security breach down the corridor and then heard it involved the Minister for Defence Industry's office and then heard that a staffer from my office had been sacked, I'd probably have said to someone 'Hey, what's going on?"
이 스레드 보기감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소
-
I've worked out what's wrong with our democracy. It's representational and most of us are stupid. Plus 3-4 yearly elections mean governments play a short game. What we need is an altruistic despot bent on ensuring the continued existence of human life. We should call for tenders.
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
I guess that's the last we'll ever hear from him.http://a.msn.com/01/en-au/BB1dVgx2?ocid=st …
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
I suppose that the PM is hoping a second dose will give him a higher efficacy.pic.twitter.com/nGN9IlV97M
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
#plug I was happy to recommend@monicadux's book on the back cover (bloody@JaneCaro got on the front) and am happy to do so here too. 2 alt.blurbs not used were: "A book so heretical the Pope is bound to issue a fatwa." and "Made me want to become a nun."https://www.harpercollins.com.au/9780733340819/lapsed#.YDMow0Sx2_E.twitter …감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
3rd April - raised with PMO (text) 4th April - Reynolds speaks to police (AFP) 5th April - date PM says PMO became aware before apologising that he'd misread the date and it was actually the 12th Feb '21 (Hansard). What was the 5th April ref in his notes?https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/pm-asks-for-more-checks-on-who-in-his-office-knew-about-rape-allegation-20210219-p5740i.html …
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소
-
I'm disappointed. Not so much that Mad as Hell has been banned from Facebook, but that Casey also follows The Masked Singer.https://twitter.com/CaseyBriggs/status/1362141059833233409 …
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
#plug I know I'm not at all the target audience but I still found this very funny. Original and daring scripts, great performances and direction, and it looks a million bucks (no mean feat given it was probably made for 14 cents). https://iview.abc.net.au/show/why-are-you-like-this … via@ABCTV감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
In this picture, the PM is unaware that Tanya Plibersek is speaking because no one has advised him.pic.twitter.com/ciPv6sl4j3
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
I'm no health expert, but shouldn't he be wearing gloves?pic.twitter.com/cu1FEmr483
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소
-
I wonder what his policy will be on pork-barrelling. Because paleo.pic.twitter.com/n0YjzA3qWh
감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
Ditto the newspapers. The puns, hyperbole, muck, and railing against the left all make them seem like joke-versions of what a newspaper should be. At the end of the day, I'm probably being self-serving: a lack of media diversity/ownership makes the ABC even more important. 2/2
이 스레드 보기감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
Mmmmm. Happy to concede I was perhaps being a bit naive about the whole thing. Having watched quite a bit of Sky News for work, I've always found it a bit half-arsed (especially compared with the slickness of Fox News) and so assumed no one would take it all that seriously. 1/2
이 스레드 보기감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소 -
I'm dubious. While we're capable of being just as stupid as they are over there, we're not so easily led. Nor, frankly. do we care as much. Plus, Sky News commentary is designed to be chopped up and fed to Americans via social media. It isn't meant for us.https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/feb/10/kevin-rudd-says-sky-news-is-using-fox-model-to-radicalise-politics-in-australia …
이 스레드 보기감사합니다. 보내주신 피드백은 타임라인을 개선하는 데 사용됩니다. 취소취소
로딩하는데 시간이 지연되고 있습니다.
트위터의 트래픽이 폭주했거나 일시적인 문제가 발생했을 수 있습니다. 다시 시도하거나 트위터 상태 페이지를 방문하여 자세한 내용을 확인해 보세요.