autcore:

beyond-mogai-pride-flags:

Allo-curiosity (alo-curiosity or zed-curiosity): wishing to experience attraction or considering to experiment sexual relations while you don’t feel attraction; feeling curious attraction; doubting whether you will continue not showing interest; unsure whether you’re anattractional or allo-/zed-/z-/alo-.

Colors from alloaro and alloace flags, but zedcurious/alocurious is regardless of orientation (it’s mostly for a-spec people feeling curious about attraction, while they don’t experience it at all). [Image: two stripes of a dark-ish solar yellow, two stripes with light-ish yellows, two white stripes, two light-ish reds and two stripes of a desaturated red]

~Ap

You might wanna make it more clear in the name of the term that it pertains to curiosity about allosexuality rather than alloromanticism. “Allo” on its own implies both alloromantic and allosexual, to assume “allo” alone means allosexual and not alloromantic is to assume aro terminology is less important and can be ignored.

Are you referring to the “sexual relations” part? Because it’s one of the definitions. I can had put affectional if you want.

coxinhadoce47-art:

coxinhadoce47-art:

Just a small mlm + nblm flag combo for a thing im planning to do, but I’m not sure yet if I’ll do it

—

Só um combo das bandeiras mlm + nblm pra uma coisa que eu tô planejando, mas ainda não tenho certeza se vou fazer isso mesmo

And here’s the original one, with only the flower symbol being what was edited to not look two colored, but basically i just put the vincian/mlm flag, then i put above it the nblm/toric flag at 50% opacity and that’s how i got the colors

officialfemme:

on terms like ‘bi lesbian’

it’s easy to separate bi and lesbian if you use rigid definitions. it’s easy to ignore any overlap between the two and to say people can’t be both. it is so easy to gatekeep identities like this, when you say lesbianism is women who are attracted to women, and bisexuality is attraction to men and women.

and it’s understandable. that’s what we have learned are the definitions. that’s what’s acceptable in a world that likes to stick to a rigid gender binary, a world that forces everyone and everything into it.

but not everyone fits that binary. and when you begin to open up definitions to reflect that, you get more grey areas. after you’ve accepted that bi actually means attraction to two or more genders, you realize that not all bi people are attracted to men.

and then you open up more definitions, because still yet more people have complicated relationships with gender. you shift the definition of lesbianism, so it’s non-men exclusively attracted to other non-men. this also helps to include nonbinary lesbians, who don’t consider themselves women but do consider themselves lesbian.

and once you have opened up your mind to these definitions, once you have accepted that neither bisexuality or lesbianism are inherently binary, you start to notice the grey area between the two identities. you notice the spot where the two combine into one, like a Venn diagram.

you realize there is indeed overlap. you see it in non-men who are attracted to women and nonbinary people. those whose sexuality fits that description are those who exist in that grey area. for they fit lesbian: they are not men, and they are exclusively attracted to other people who are not men. and they fit bi: they are attracted to more than two genders.

and it’s once you’ve understood that gender is not binary, and once you’ve understood that sexuality can be inclusive, that you believe that the grey area between bi and lesbian is valid.

and after you believe that, you no longer make the two identities completely separate. you no longer tell people they can’t be both. you no longer have so much hatred for terms like “bi lesbian” or “m-spec lesbian” or related terms.

and to those who live in that grey area, like I do, you can use both bi and lesbian. you can choose one or the other. you can choose neither. you can choose another label altogether. whatever you choose is valid, because your identity is valid.

Addition 13 August: this is how I view and define my identity of bi lesbian. Not every bi lesbian has the same view/definition, but we each deserve respect.

(via goodpositivitylgbt)

beyond-mogai-pride-flags:

Polygynandry or Polyandrogyny: A mating strategy in which both males and females have multiple mates at the same time; An androgynous polyamory, wherein all members are androgyne; The mutual combination of polygyny and polyandry.

See also: polyanthropy, pandrogyne, equiamory.

-Ap

beyond-mogai-pride-flags:

Polyanthropy: the mix or gender-neutral of polygyny and polyandry; umbrella term for polygamy and polyamory. A poly- relationship orientation in which a folk has more than one person (multiple folks), amorously or gamously.

Also on plurian and nonmonoamory spectrums. ~ ap

To go with my queerfag flag

bixah:

BRASILIAN FLAG

this flag is for lgbt brazilians, for when you have brazilian ethnicity and/or nationality, are a brazilian diaspora or is of brazilian descent, and are also lgbt. it is inclusive of every brazilian and their lgbt identity.

the first three stripes were based on actual skin tones some brazilians may have. the other stripes are based on the colors of the brazilian flag (“verde e amarela”).

it is fine to make icons/stimboards with this flag, but i ask you to not use this if youre not a lgbt brazilian yourself, or if you fit in my dni.

bixah:

BICHA FLAG

this flag is for mlm/nblm and transfems who identify with the term bicha or bixa, which is used in derogatory way to refer more commonly to effeminate gay men/male aligned people and transfeminine people. it is inclusive of cis mlm/nblm, transfems (mlm/nblm or not), camab nb mlm/nblm, and transmasc mlm/nblm.

i ask you not to use it if youre not a brazilian mlm/nblm or transfem, or if you fit in my dni. do not make content with this flag unless youre a brazilian mlm/nblm or transfem, as this is a reclaimation of a derogatory term.