Twitter | Search | |
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust
HEALTH JUSTICE NOW: Single Payer & What Comes Next. , .
41,732
Tweets
2,799
Following
27,362
Followers
Tweets
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust retweeted
Dave Hendricks 5h
. says construction equipment that will be used to build the border wall may start arriving in the Rio Grande Valley on Monday
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 5h
oh i keep doing that, dying, reloading, and then killing him again and dying. fantastic game. i enjoy every minute of it
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 5h
Replying to @kathbarbadoro
im gonna kill hitler in a videogame
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust retweeted
Death Panel 11h
y’all just.. print drug ads right on filled prescriptions now, huh what fresh hell is this
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 8h
The thing we want will never be offered to us by elected officials. It must be demanded from below. This is the only thing which has ever worked.
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 8h
Replying to @RedThunderAudio
i think you mistake me saying "this doesn't do this" as me saying "i don't want to do this."
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust retweeted
libby watson 13h
i wrote about why a public option is not an acceptable alternative to medicare for all/single payer
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 8h
Replying to @KEXPdrummers
It's that last one -- the stapler. Just kidding!! I typoed. Should be HCBS. Home and Community Based Services. Basically -- get care at home, or in your community, instead of being forced into a nursing home
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 9h
Replying to @crulge
If the goal is to remove profit from health, or reject health as a market good -- M4A doesn't do that. (Nor would an NHS). It is just a tool by which we force the payor, finally, to be accountable for the costs of health injustice--then articulate, and reach, something better
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 9h
Replying to @crulge
Lastly, the mandate that all for-profit providers become not-for-profit is good, and I like it, but it's also worth noting that it is insufficient. Some of the most flagrant excesses and exploitation in US health happen at non-profit providers.
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 9h
Replying to @crulge
There's also things like payment methods and budgeting standards for which I think there is room for flexibility (though I think global budgeting, or One Budget Per Year, is compelling).
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 9h
Replying to @crulge
on long-term-care (LTC)--fastest-growing job in the US, I think it's also warranted to regulate who provides that care and how. Insurance cos providing private LTC contracted out to Medicaid at bottom-dollar rates is insufficient and inhumane -- to the worker and to the recipient
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 9h
I distill the core components of Medicare for All/single-payer, as: - A single, compulsory risk pool: all are included, nobody can opt out - Comprehensive coverage, including LTC/HCSS - Standards, payment, and oversight at the federal level. - Local implementation and flexibility
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 9h
Ultimately proponents of "Medicare Advantage for All" just want to keep having private insurance that's subsidized by public money. Virtually every plan that isn't explicit single-payer is similar
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 9h
A good comparison would be a charter school that's given federal money for each student, plus a state-subsidized laptop per kid, plus free textbooks, but which returns similar graduation% as the more cash-strapped public school
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 9h
But ultimately it costs more money to return similar outcomes as traditional Medicare, and it has high churn (sick people drop out of it and go to Medicare + supplemental insurance). It's a big waste of money, frankly, and it has been given MANY advantages over regular Medicare
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 9h
Medicare Advantage is a different thing. It's a privatized form of Medicare which has been given significant advantage (+ public finding) over traditional Medicare program, making it -- and further privatization -- more tempting to Medicare recipients
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 9h
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 10h
Replying to @crulge
the only advertising i get on my scrips is for being an organ donor. which is certainly a generic placement ("this consumer has organs"). or, if i'm feeling wild paranoia, is nefarious targeted advertising ("this consumer has a high suicide rate + will leave behind young organs")
Reply Retweet Like
kill πŸ’€ tim πŸ’€ faust 10h
Replying to @crulge
A friend showed me her pharma pickup receipt. Walgreens printed an advertisement for Xeljanz (a $5,000/mo arthritis/colitis drug) on the receipt for picking up a prescription for an immunosuppressive cancer drug. This is impressively crooked direct-to-consumer drug targeting
Reply Retweet Like