Wednesday, September 09, 2020

Covid-19 conspiracy theories pose a danger to public health that cannot be dismissed lightly – Martyn McLaughlin
A Scottish group protesting against wearing masks and the use of vaccines is couching its hardline conspiracy theories with moderate messages and familiar slogans. That should concern all of us, writes Martyn Mclaughlin

Tuesday, 8th September 2020
Paddy Hogg addresses the Saving Scotland rally outside the Scottish Parliament. 
Picture: Lisa Ferguson


There is an understandable temptation to dismiss or downplay the anti-mask, anti-vaccine Saving Scotland demonstration held outside the Scottish Parliament at the weekend, which railed against so-called globalist hoaxes and sought to propagate conspiratorial tropes involving Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation, which have been circulating online for months.


With lockdown restrictions tightening across swathes of the country, there is an appreciable fatigue and frustration at how Covid-19 continues to turn ordinary life upside down. People are seeking out respite from a chaotic reality. There will be several more detours and delays on Scotland’s route map out of the pandemic before we can say with any confidence that the home straight is in sight.


The Holyrood protest, however, was not simply the symptom of public irritation. Several hundred people turned out to hear dangerous misinformation being peddled, with speakers attempting to refute the scientific evidence for social distancing. But more than that, it provided a platform for those who pointed the finger at Scotland’s political class, and called for MSPs to be held to account at next year’s Holyrood elections.


Anti-mask Covid-19 Holyrood demo organised by councillor who claims 'no one' is being infected


What made this particular rallying call striking was the fact it emanated from an elected politician who has held public office for eight years – Paddy Hogg, who represents the Cumbernauld East ward on North Lanarkshire Council. I ran a story on Monday detailing how Mr Hogg was the ringmaster of Saturday’s event, during which he chided the mainstream media for refusing to give Saving Scotland’s views prominence. At the time of writing, more than 24 hours have passed since I emailed Mr Hogg and left him a voicemail. He has yet to reply.


Perhaps he is too busy developing what he calls his “different narrative” around coronavirus. Or perhaps he is simply attending to his public duties. As well as promoting conspiratorial nonsense and alternative health theories, Mr Hogg is a member of North Lanarkshire Council’s community safety partnership forum, and its education and families committee.


The fine people of Cumbernauld will have to wait until 2022 before deciding whether Mr Hogg is fit to continue to represent them. In the meantime, it is galling that the local authority has not condemned his reckless views, instead observing that councillors are free to express their own opinions. That is an established and valued protocol, but at a time when a pandemic is raging, with a sharp spike in cases in the very region Mr Hogg serves, it seems a meek and negligent response on the part of a public body with myriad statutory duties.


Like many who have passed through Motherwell, Mr Hogg may in any case aspire to greater things. He has promised that he and the Saving Scotland movement will be waging more “campaign battles” in the future, which is an interesting choice of phrase. What exactly is the end game of those who seek to harness the growing distrust among coronavirus ‘truthers’. Could it mutate into, or inspire, a political force?















If the very idea seems laughably implausible, consider how absurd it would have sounded back in 2015 to air the notion that, in just five years’ time, the president of the United States would be praising the followers of QAnon, a group which claims 5G mobile networks are spreading the coronavirus, and insists a cabal of Satanic politicians and A-list celebrities are working with governments the world over to engage in child sex abuse.

Much is made of the role of the internet and social media in furthering disinformation and conspiracy theories, and while that is one of the defining dilemmas of our age, the Covid-19 example is not exceptional. The psychological trigger for such nonsense is as old as the hills.

A key element is what is known as group attachment; in other words, people side with factions, believing their group’s aims to be just and right, and those of the opposing side to be malicious and deceitful. It’s a simple enough conceit, and a recognisable one in the hyper-partisan battleground of Scottish politics.

It has been interesting – and concerning – to see the language with which anti-mask and anti-vaccine groups have been amplifying their messages. Buzzwords and well-worn rallying calls from the independence movement have been co-opted and weaponised. ‘Freedom over fear’ is one slogan mentioned on the Saving Scotland Facebook page.

The familiarity – and indeed, the power – of such phrases can garner unthinking support, particularly among those already inclined to turn their backs on our shared reality at a time when there are no straightforward answers. There is also a danger of conspiracists using more moderate messages to draw in an audience and create the illusion of credibility.

The Saving Scotland group is a good example. On its newly launched website, it makes a series of demands of the Scottish Government. The mix includes a slew of suitably vague and middle-of-the-road behests, such as a national reconstruction plan for jobs and the economy, and a national campaign of food independence, realised through the creation of thousands of allotments. Granted, the last one sounds a bit like on-the-hoof, Thick of It-style policy plucking, but it could sit easily in a mainstream political party’s manifesto without raising an eyelid.

Which is not to say they would obscure the group’s primary motivations – an insistence that there be no mandatory wearing of face masks or Covid-19 vaccinations, and a call for an independent inquiry into “WiFi radiation health damage in schools” – but they certainly serve to sugar the pill.

It may be that Mr Hogg and Saving Scotland do not seek to field candidates joining their chorus of moon howling. It may be that they don’t have to. Conspiracy narratives are being shoehorned into the mainstream political discourse across established democracies, and we should not be so complacent as to presume that we are somehow immune.

There is no simple solution to countering this, but those peddling wild, conspiratorial views which endanger others must be explicitly and repeatedly condemned, especially if they occupy public office.





US election: Donald Trump's Soviet-style personality cult is a dystopian nightmare for America – Henry McLeish

After a Republican Convention was described by one commentator as a ‘culture war grievance fest’, it is clear the US election will be a choice between hate and decency, fear and hope, writes Henry McLeish

By Henry McLeish
Monday, 31st August 2020, 4:45 pm
Supporters of Donald Trump held a car parade Saturday from Clackamas to Portland, Oregon (Picture: Paula Bronstein/AP)

Last week, a surreal Republican Convention confirmed President Trump as the official Republican candidate for the 2020 election, reaffirmed his absolute control over the once “Grand Old Party” and exposed how the power of populism, personality and propaganda is being ruthlessly used to degrade America, devalue its democracy and deceive voters.

A headline in the magazine Vanity Fair suggested the convention was a “culture war grievance fest”. Trump is the master of tapping into victimhood. This political freakshow, more reminiscent of Stalin’s Soviet Union or Kim Jong Un’s North Korean regime, portrayed Joe Biden as an enemy of America, accusing him of seeking to rig the election and offering a dark, menacing, dystopian socialist future.

Among his supporters, Trump is worshipped as the saviour of Western civilisation, “the bodyguard” of a troubled world, the protector of America and, for some, chosen by God to lead the most precious country in the world to the promised land. Relentless propaganda is disguising the obvious truth of a President and party bonded together and completely detached from reality and totally dependent on a seemingly immovable base of loyalists.





Even more remarkable, this was a Republican convention without a policy platform. Four years ago, there were 54 pages of policy, but now this ego-driven President is more convinced of his unique policy, first mooted in 2016 that, “I alone can fix America”!


The first Republican Party Convention took place in Philadelphia in 1856. But at least they got down to business and adopted a platform of formal opposition to the extension of slavery and supported Congress “in prohibiting those twin relics of barbarism – polygamy in the Mormon settlements, and slavery everywhere”. The party of principle, purpose, and policy no longer exists.

Biden is not left wing

The pre-convention publicity offered something different. There were to be daily themes – land of opportunity, land of promise, land of heroes and, for Trump’s acceptance speech, land of greatness.Each of the four days produced contributions from Trump and his family. The White House, usually free from party political campaigning, hosted Trump’s acceptance speech on Thursday night. Each day, highly divisive figures were wheeled out to speak directly to Trump’s base and to ignore and insult the rest of the country.

But this Republican Convention always had limited focus: to galvanise support for the ‘cult of the dear leader’, regardless of his record and behaviour; to demonise Joe Biden and attack his mental health. Trump, the self-proclaimed “stable genius”, is not in a strong position to judge whether someone is more or less unhinged than he is; to lie about the economic achievements of his presidency, despite the worst economic crisis in US history, with 31 million Americans out of work, that has left his claims in ruins; to attack Biden and Kamala Harris for being in the pocket of the “far left” of the Democratic party – Biden is not left wing; or to evangelise about how he has protected America by becoming a foreign policy rebel, ignoring the fact that its status in the world has diminished.

The convention was, unsurprisingly, light on apologies or remorse or indeed discussion on Trump’s catastrophic handling of the coronavirus pandemic – for him the “China virus ... is what it is” – as deaths are heading towards a staggering 200,000 with nearly six million cases.

Absurdly cynical

It is always useful to remember that Trump is not the fictional character in some Orwell or Atwood novel of the future. This is the nightmare of America today.

The party conventions are over. The general election, just over two months away, has officially begun, and the tactics are clear. Trump wants to exploit fear, hate, cultural differences, identity and intolerance and win the election by pitting his largely white minority base against multiracial, majority America.

Biden seeks instead to unite and heal the country and restore respect and trust and the belief in the idea of one America. This election sees the ego and autocracy of ‘super-celebrity’ Trump take on the empathy, decency and hope of Biden. There is no common ground in this election.

America is faced with a choice between actual reality and Trump’s alternative reality. Trump is asking voters to erase from their minds the last six months of unimaginable chaos resulting from the pandemic health crisis and economic crash. Donald Trump Jr captured the essence of an absurdly cynical convention when he said, “it’s almost like this election is shaping up to be church, work and school versus rioting, looting and vandalism”.

Writing in his book, The Soul of America, Jon Meacham said that, “in the Presidency of Donald Trump, the alienated are being mobilised afresh by changing demography, by broadening conceptions of identity”.

Trump cannot see the racial injustice

Trump is interested in the fate of white America and his own, and that means fostering fear and shunning hope. In his first inaugural address in 1861, Abraham Lincoln said: “We are not enemies, but friends. Though passions may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearth stone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.” Biden is best described as being guided by the “better angels of our nature”.

The President is immune to racial injustice, black lives matter and honest protest. For Trump, these are law and order issues to be used to deepen the fears and heighten the anger of his base. Dystopian imagery is captured in his every speech, in his talk of “the smouldering ruins of Minneapolis, the violent anarchy of Portland and the blood stained sidewalks of Chicago”: little comfort to the family of yet another black man, Jacob Blake, shot by police in Wisconsin last week.

America’s nightmare is stark. Trump has a stranglehold on his base and consequently the country. His base represents a minority of voters. In 2016, 56 per cent of US citizens turned out to vote. Of that vote, 46 per cent voted for Trump.

This is a democratic crisis where less than half of just over half of the adult population supported the President. But, partly because of the piece of absurdity that is the Electoral College, this was enough to put Trump in the White House.

Out of his depth, with no scope for improvement, and dragging the country under, the President should reflect on the words of JF Kennedy, who said, “only the President represents the national interest”, and “upon him alone converge all the needs and aspirations of all parts of the country... all nations of the world”.





Donald Trump Nobel Peace Price: Why US President's nomination is a far-right publicity stunt
It is regarded as the world’s pre-eminent honour, conferred upon the greatest minds who have dedicated their lives to the pursuit of progress, justice, and a lasting peace.

By Martyn Mclaughlin
Wednesday, 9th September 2020
President Donald Trump has now been nominated twice for the Nobel Peace Prize - by the same right-wing politician. Picture: AP/Evan Vucci

Thanks to its wide-ranging and easily-exploited nomination process, however, the Nobel Peace Prize is also a vehicle that is prone to manipulation by those seeking a quick burst of publicity.

If there is anything at all newsworthy about the fact the US president Donald Trump has been nominated for the 2021 award - a development that is being widely reported around the world - it has only to do with the person who put his name forward.

In Mr Trump’s case, that individual is Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a far-right Norwegian parliamentarian and member of the country’s Progress Party. His name may not be familiar to international audiences, but until today Mr Tybring-Gjedde’s highest-profile action was, well, nominating Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Yes, that’s right. In 2018, the 57-year-old and his colleague, Per-Willy Amundsen, nominated Mr Trump for the same honour, citing the “huge and important step" he had taken towards peace in the Korean peninsula.

This time around, Mr Tybring-Gjedde - who is fiercely anti-immigration and was investigated by police after he delivered a controversial speech on multiculturalism - cited the 73-year-old’s efforts to broker peace between Israel and the United Arab Emirates.

If you are starting to notice a pattern, it is entirely deliberate. Mr Tybring-Gjedde has already appeared on Fox News - Mr Trump’s network of choice - to talk him up.

Prominent Trump supporters in the US, including Mark Levin, Lou Dobbs, and Dean Browning, have also been sharing news articles reporting the nomination and offering their congratulations.

For an American audience idly flicking through their social media feeds without the time or inclination to read further, it looks as if Mr Trump is about to receive the ultimate honour. In truth, it is little more than a gimmick which will puff up his ego and distract from day to day events.

It did not take Mr Trump long to greet the commendation with his characteristic reserve and modesty, tweeting multiple links to coverage of his nomination, and offering thanks to well-wishers.

There seems little doubt that he covets the prize. Only last year, he claimed Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe had nominated him for the award. Mr Abe, it should be pointed out, has never confirmed this was the case.

Either way, Mr Trump did not win, but the prospect of a sitting prime minister nominating him - instead of a hardline parliamentarian on the fringes of Norwegian democracy - would have lent his candidacy greater weight.

Which brings us to the fundamental problem with the nominations system for the Nobel Peace Prize - it is a meaningless indicator of false glory.

The roll call of people eligible to submit a nomination is not inexhaustible, but it is extensive, and it extends far beyond individuals like Mr Tybring-Gjedde, who happen to serve on a national parliament or assembly.

That particular category alone captures tens of thousands of politicians around the world, many of whom - like Mr Tybring-Gjedde - have forged a career from divisive rhetoric and cheap publicity stunts.

As well as parliamentarians and government ministers, the nomination process is open to university professors, professors emeriti and associate professors of history, social sciences, law, philosophy, theology, and religion, as well as university rectors and university directors or their equivalents.

The academic field alone spans a field of potential nominators as broad as several hundred thousand-strong. In the US alone, research by the National Centre for Education Statistics indicated that there are more than 300,000 individuals who hold the status of professor or associate professor.

While the actual award itself continues to be held in the highest esteem, the result of the wide-open nominations process has allowed a miscellany of tyrants and celebrities to make the shortlist down the years.

The Norwegian Nobel Institute says that the international scope of the award and the “broad eligibility” of nominators helps to ensure that “a great variety of candidates from all corners of the world” are brought forward to the committee’s attention every year.

That is indeed true. Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Joseph Stalin received five nominations between them. In more recent times, Vladimir Putin has also been nominated for the prize. Elsewhere, the late pop star, Michael Jackson, was also nominated, part of a trend which has seen the number of nominees swell to more than 300 in any given year.

Generally, however, it is difficult to know exactly who has been nominated, unless the nominator breaks cover and makes it public. Otherwise, the complete list of eligible nominees of any year’s prizes is kept a closely guarded secret, and is not disclosed for 50 years, a restriction imposed by the Nobel statutes.

It barely requires pointing out, but neither the Fuhrer, the King of Pop, or any of the other nominees above went on to win the prize, and the same fate may befall Mr Trump, whose extensive list of personal honours includes the Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor, a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, and membership of the WWE Hall of Fame.

If he is unable to add the Nobel to that list, he can at least console himself with the knowledge that he will be in good company. Previous occupants of the White House, including Taft, Harding, Hoover, Roosevelt, Truman, and Eisenhower, were all nominated for the prize.

Alas, all were destined to remain bridesmaids. And all were denied the chance to make the WWE Hall of Fame.

Fallen Troops Send Anti-Trump Message From Beyond The Grave

 In New Jim Carrey Art

The actor hit back at Trump's reported insults of U.S. service members killed in combat.

\Image   


Jim Carrey hit back at President Donald Trump’s reported insults of America’s war dead with his latest cartoon.

The actor-artist drew a headstone with a message from fallen troops reading: “We were ‘losers’ and ‘suckers’ according to Trump, honor our fallen don’t vote for that chump.” Carrey captioned the image with the hashtag #BidenHarris.

The Atlantic reported last week that Trump, during a 2018 visit to France, referred to U.S. service members who were killed in combat during World War I as “suckers” and “losers.” The insults were later confirmed by multiple media outlets, including Fox News. The president denied making them.

The latest cartoon from Carrey, whose anti-Trump art has in recent years been extensively covered by HuffPost, came just days after he penned a blistering essay for The Atlantic in which he warned the U.S. “faces catastrophe” if Trump beats Democratic rival Joe Biden in the 2020 election.

“In November, we must vote in historic numbers, gathering all the ‘snowflakes’ until there’s a blizzard on Capitol Hill that no corrupt politician can survive,” Carrey wrote. “We must vote for decency, humanity, and a way of life that once again captures the imagination of kids all over the world — kids like me.”

UPDATED




Despite Trump Tweet, Order to Dissolve Stars and Stripes Not Yet Rescinded
By Carla Babb
September 09, 2020 


A portion of the Stars and Stripes home page.



WASHINGTON - Despite a tweet from President Donald Trump vowing to reverse his own administration’s budget plan to cut government funding for an independent military newspaper, Stars and Stripes employees say they remain worried because the order to defund the news outlet has not yet been rescinded by the Pentagon. 

“There’s a great deal of anxiety in the staff,” Max Lederer, the publisher of Stars and Stripes since 2007, told VOA Tuesday. “A little less anxiety since Friday, but since it (the funding decision) is still not final, there’s a lot of concern.” 

The Department of Defense spending plans, released in February, cut out all government funding for the paper for the 2021 fiscal year, which begins on October 1. 

On Friday, President Trump tweeted that he planned to reverse the planned Pentagon budget cuts that would have ended the Stars and Stripes publication. 

“The United States of America will NOT be cutting funding to @starsandstripes magazine under my watch. It will continue to be a wonderful source of information to our Great Military!” Trump tweeted.


The United States of America will NOT be cutting funding to @starsandstripes magazine under my watch. It will continue to be a wonderful source of information to our Great Military!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 4, 2020

The tweet came mere hours after media outlets reported on the Pentagon’s plans to dissolve the publication. 

But the president’s tweets alone do not indicate policy or dictate law, and Lederer said the Pentagon is “still discussing” the status of the budget order. 

The House of Representatives passed the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2021 on July 31, 2020, which included additional funding for the publication. The Senate did not include funding for the publication in its defense spending bill, but both houses of Congress have resolutions supporting its mission. 

A Defense Department memo by Defense Media Activity Acting Director Army Col. Paul Haverstick last month instructed the Stars and Stripes publisher to provide a plan of action “no later than September 15” to discontinue Stars and Stripes publications and dissolve the news organization “no later than January 31, 2021.” 

In the case of a continuing resolution (CR) from Congress, which would prevent a government shutdown and extend funding temporarily, the memo (obtained by VOA) instructed the publisher to plan the “last date for publication of the newspaper” “based on the end of the CR or other circumstances.” 

A bipartisan group of 11 Democratic and four Republican senators sent a letter to Defense Secretary Mark Esper last week, calling on the Department of Defense to maintain funding for the publication, which has more than 1 million readers. 

“The $15.5 million currently allocated for the publication of Stars and Stripes is only a tiny fraction of your Department’s annual budget, and cutting it would have a significantly negative impact on military families and a negligible impact on the Department’s bottom line,” said the letter, signed by the senators. 

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, also sent a letter opposing the budget cut, citing strong support for Stars and Stripes in Congress. 

“As a veteran who has served overseas, I know the value that the Stars and Stripes brings to its readers,” Graham wrote. 

Stars and Stripes started during the Civil War as a publication for Union troops. Today, it distributes to U.S. service members stationed across the globe, including in war zones. 

Most recently, the publication shed light the Defense Department’s failure to shut down schools on U.S. military installations in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite Japanese public schools ruling shutdowns as necessary to stop the spread of the coronavirus. 

“Stars and Stripes tells the military’s story like no other publication can. It was held by GIs in the trenches of World War II and held by special forces members at remote outposts in Syria after being flown in by Osprey in the battle against ISIS,” Tara Copp, a reporter for McClatchy who was the Pentagon correspondent for Stars and Stripes from 2015-2017, told VOA. 

“It is a rounding error (an inconsequential amount) to DOD, but it is much, much more than that to the men and women and their families who read it,” she added. 

Copp said that the publication provides the time and resources to look into stories many other outlets do not. 

For example, her in-depth investigation into the 2000 Osprey crash at Marana Regional Airport near Tucson, Arizona, for the publication in 2015 led to former Deputy Secretary of Defense Bob Work exonerating the two Marine Corps pilots who had been blamed for the crash. 

Donald Trump Pledges Continued Funding For ‘Stars And Stripes’ After Reports Of The Publication’s Forced Closure 

By Greg Evans
Associate Editor/Broadway Critic
U.S. soldiers reading Stars and Stripes, South Vietnam, Sept. 10, 1969
AP Photo


UPDATED, with Trump response: President Donald Trump is retreating from his reported efforts to defund the venerable military newspaper Stars and Stripes.

Without an outright denial of allegations that he has sought to withdraw funding for the newspaper, or disputing charges that the Pentagon has ordered the closure of the publication by September 30, Trump tweeted this afternoon, “The United States of America will NOT be cutting funding to @starsandstripes magazine under my watch. It will continue to be a wonderful source of information to our Great Military!”

The Pentagon, according to reports in USA Today and other news organizations today, has ordered the shutdown of the military newspaper (not a magazine), with the Trump Administration said to be seeking total defunding of the 159-year-old independent publication.

USA Today contributor Kathy Kiely cited a recent Pentagon memo that ordered the Stars and Stripes publisher to present a plan by September 15 for the dissolution of the newspaper, both print and online, and a “specific timeline for vacating government owned/leased space worldwide.” The memo, written by Col. Paul Haverstick Jr., says the “last newspaper publication (in all forms) will be September 30, 2020.”

The Society of Professional Journalists on Friday condemned the requested closing of Stars and Stripes and called for funding to be restored.

“We are disgusted at this latest attempt by this administration to destroy the free press in this country,” said SPJ national president Patricia Gallagher Newberry. “Stars and Stripes has been a lifeline and the source of much needed information, inspiration and support for troops all over the world, including places where communication with the outside world is at a minimum or nonexistent. To destroy such an important American institution is a travesty.”

The news of a planned shutdown — and Trump’s seeming about-face — comes as the president is battling a barrage of bad press over a report in The Atlantic that the president called U.S. troops killed in battle “losers” and “suckers,” sought to prevent disabled veterans from taking part in parades because “nobody wants to see that” and denigrated John McCain after the senator and Vietnam War hero’s death. The Atlantic report, as well as Trump’s denials, have been picked up by the military newspaper.

Haverstick’s memo asserts that the administration has the authority to defund the publication under the president’s fiscal-2021 Defense Department budget request, specifically the $15.5 million annual subsidy for Stars and Stripes — a tiny fraction of the Pentagon’s $700 billion budget.


The United States of America will NOT be cutting funding to @starsandstripes magazine under my watch. It will continue to be a wonderful source of information to our Great Military!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 4, 2020

Congress has not yet approved the request, and a House-approved version of the budget would restore Stars and Stripes‘ funding. A bipartisan group of 11 Democratic and four Republican senators wrote to Defense Secretary Mark Esper this week objecting to the “proposed termination of funding” for Stars and Stripes, noting the “significantly negative impact on military families” such the closure would have.

Trump ally Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) also has opposed the shutdown, writing a letter to Esper in late August describing Stars and Stripes as “a valued ‘hometown newspaper’ for the Armed Forces, their families, and civilian employees across the globe.” Graham wrote that, “as a veteran who has served overseas, I know the value that the Stars and Stripes brings to its readers.”

Stars and Stripes, a military publication independent of Pentagon editorial control, was first published in 1861 and has published regularly since World War II with a current readership of 1.3 million.

In a tweet following a USA Today report, Stars and Stripes reporter Steve Beynon assured readers his work would continue. “I read Stars and Stripes on a mountain in Afghanistan when I was a 19 year old aspiring journalist,” Beynon wrote in a tweet that was later retweeted by the official Stars and Stripes Twitter account. “Now I work there. This doesn’t stop the journalism. I’m juggling 3 future news stories today.”

I read Stars and Stripes on a mountain in Afghanistan when I was a 19 year old aspiring journalist. Now I work there. This doesn’t stop the journalism. I’m juggling 3 future news stories today. https://t.co/z9ZEHWa7mW
— Steve Beynon (@StevenBeynon) September 4, 2020

After criticism, Trump says Pentagon will not shut down military newspaper


(Reuters) - After an outcry from U.S. lawmakers, President Donald Trump on Friday said his administration would not be shutting down the Stars and Stripes military newspaper as announced by the Pentagon earlier this year.



FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump delivers a campaign speech at Arnold Palmer Regional Airport in Latrobe, Pennsylvania, U.S., September 3, 2020. REUTERS/Leah Millis

“The United States of America will NOT be cutting funding to @starsandstripes magazine under my watch,” Trump, who is running for re-election in November, said on Twitter.

“It will continue to be a wonderful source of information to our Great Military!” he added.

The independent military newspaper had been expected to stop publishing at the end of September after the Pentagon announced in February that it would be cutting its funding.


Trump’s tweet comes a day after the Atlantic reported that he had referred to Marines buried in an American cemetery near Paris as “losers” and declined to visit in 2018 because of concern the rain that day would mess up his hair.

Trump, who has touted his record helping U.S. veterans, has strongly denied the report.

Earlier this week, more than a dozen Democratic lawmakers wrote a letter to Defense Secretary Mark Esper urging him to reconsider closing the newspaper, which provides print and online news to U.S. troops around the world.

Esper, who has clashed with Trump on a number of issues, had defended the decision to defund the newspaper earlier this year.


Stars and Stripes receives funding from the Defense Department but is editorially independent.

There is increasing concern that Trump is politicizing America’s military, which is meant to be apolitical, ahead of the election.

Those concerns came to a head in the past month after Trump threatened to deploy active duty troops to quell civil unrest in U.S. cities over the killing of George Floyd, a Black man who died on May 25 after a Minneapolis policeman knelt on his neck.


Reporting by Idrees Ali; Editing by Sonya Hepinstall

Trump says he's reversing decision to shutter Stars and Stripes newspaper
John Fritze USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump on Friday reversed a decision to cut funding to Stars and Stripes, a newspaper that has served American soldiers since the Civil War, in an announcement that came hours after the outlet's demise was revealed. 

“The United States of America will NOT be cutting funding to @starsandstripes magazine under my watch,” Trump tweeted Friday. “It will continue to be a wonderful source of information to our Great Military!”

In a previously unpublicized memo cited by USA TODAY on Friday, the Pentagon delivered an order to shutter the newspaper and cease publication after Sept. 30. 

Press advocates decried the move, arguing it was the latest in a series of decisions by the Trump administration to undermine independent reporting. The initial order followed Trump's appointment of an ally to Steve Bannon, his former top adviser, to head the agency that oversees Voice of America.

The appointee, Michael Pack, has drawn criticism for firing top staff. 

"We are disgusted at this latest attempt by this administration to destroy the free press in this country," said Society of Professional Journalists President Patricia Gallagher Newberry.

"Stars and Stripes has been a lifeline and the source of much needed information, inspiration and support for troops all over the world, including places where communication with the outside world is at a minimum or nonexistent," she said.

More:The Pentagon has ordered Stars and Stripes to shut down for no good reason

The decision to reverse course comes as the White House is facing a firestorm after a report in The Atlantic that details a history of Trump insulting members of the U.S. military who have been captured or killed. The story, citing unnamed officials, said Trump disparaged the military and described America's war dead as "losers" and "suckers" – accusations he has angrily denied.

The White House spent much of Friday vehemently denying the report. Trump described the unnamed sources making the claim as "low lifes" and "liars."

Contributing: Kathy Kiely

The Pentagon has ordered Stars and Stripes to shut down for no good reason

Trump wants to pull funding from Stars and Stripes, a newspaper for American troops that began in the Civil War and has been serving our soldiers.

Kathy Kiely
Opinion contributor

Even for those of us who are all too wearily familiar with President Donald Trump’s disdain for journalists, his administration’s latest attack on the free press is a bit of a jaw-dropper.

In a heretofore unpublicized recent memo, the Pentagon delivered an order to shutter Stars and Stripes, a newspaper that has been a lifeline and a voice for American troops since the Civil War. The memo orders the publisher of the news organization (which now publishes online as well as in print) to present a plan that “dissolves the Stars and Stripes” by Sept. 15 including "specific timeline for vacating government owned/leased space worldwide.”

“The last newspaper publication (in all forms) will be September 30, 2020,” writes Col. Paul Haverstick Jr., the memo’s author.

Stars and Stripes' long history

The first Stars and Stripes rolled off presses Nov. 9, 1861 in Bloomfield, Missouri when forces headed by Ulysses Grant overran the tiny town on the way to Cape Girardeau. A group of Grant’s troops who had been pressmen before the war set up shop at a local newspaper office abandoned by its Confederate sympathizer publisher. Since then Stars and Stripes has launched the careers of famous journalists such as cartoonist Bill Mauldin and TV commentator Andy Rooney. And its independence from the Pentagon brass has been guaranteed by such distinguished military leaders at Gens. John G. Pershing, George Marshall and Dwight Eisenhower. Eisenhower once reprimanded Gen. George Patton for trying to censor Mauldin cartoons he didn’t like.




Today Stars and Stripes is printed at sites around the world and delivered daily to troops — even those on the front lines, where the internet is spotty or inaccessible. As the “local paper” for the military, it provides intensive and critical coverage of issues that are important to members of the nation’s armed services and “cuts through political and military brass BS talking points,” Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., a Marine veteran, told Military.com.


It’s also arguably one of the most powerful weapons our soldiers have carried into battle with them. As a publication that’s underwritten by the military but not answerable to the brass, Stars and Stripes embodies that most American of values: the right to speak truth to power.

COLUMN:Change Confederate military base names to honor those who fought for America

As if an attack on the free press were not enough, the Trump administration’s rush to shutter Stars and Stripes also raises constitutional questions.

The memo ordering the publication’s dissolution claims the administration has the authority to make this move under the president’s fiscal year 2021 defense department budget request. It zeroed out the $15.5 million annual subsidy for Stars and Stripes. But Congress, which under the Constitution has the power to make decisions about how the public’s money is spent, has not yet approved the president’s request.

In fact, the version the House approved earlier this summer explicitly overruled the decision to pull the plug on Stars and Stripes, restoring funding for the paper.
Pushing back to keep Stars and Stripes

So far, the Senate hasn’t acted. But in a letter released earlier this week, 15 members of the chamber, including combat veteran Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., and four Republicans, called on Defense Secretary Mark Esper to “take steps to preserve the funding prerogatives of Congress before allowing any such disruption to take place.”

In a separate letter, Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican and Trump ally, makes a similar request. “As a veteran who has served overseas, I know the value Stars and Stripes brings to its readers,” he wrote, telling Esper that shutting down the paper before the Senate acts would be “premature.”

It also seems unusual. Normally, when Congress has failed to approve a budget for an agency at the end of a fiscal year (an all-too-common occurrence), a “continuing resolution,” maintains funding at the past year’s levels until the lawmakers act. But the Pentagon memo to Stars and Stripes demands a plan for dissolution anyway and says “the last date of the paper will be determined” once the continuing resolution expires.

The eagerness to kill Stars and Stripes is hard to fathom. As the senators note in their letter to Esper, the $15.5 million saved by eliminating the newspaper’s subsidy would have a “negligible impact” on the Pentagon’s $700 billion budget.

But it would have an enormously negative impact on the paper’s more than 1.3 million readers. It would eliminate a symbol of the U.S. commitment to press freedom, flout the judgment of generations of military leaders and usurp the authority that the Constitution gives Congress to make decisions about how the government spends money.

The Stars and Stripes was born in the midst of a war to decide what America stood for. Now it looks like another such battle will decide its fate.

Kathy Kiely is the Lee Hills Chair for Free Press Studies at the Missouri School of Journalism. Follow her on Twitter: @kathykiely

Pentagon calls for an end to Stars and Stripes newspaper by Sept. 30


The military newspaper Stars and Stripes, first published in 1861, was ordered closed by the Pentagon this week, effective September 30, 2020. Photo courtesy of National Stars and Stripes Museum and library

Sept. 4 (UPI) -- A Pentagon memo sent this week orders the dissolution of the military news source Stars and Stripes, calling for an end to publication by Sept. 30.

The memo demanded a "specific timeline for vacating government-owned/leased space" by Sept. 15, with the last day of September scheduled as the newspaper's final issue.

Stars and Stripes is underwritten by the Defense Department, with annual funding of about $15.5 million, but is editorially an independent voice and meant to inform U.S. soldiers around the world of military matters, particularly those without a reliable news source. It has a circulation of about 7 million, with an online presence as well.

The funding was eliminated in the $704 billion military budget of Fiscal Year 2021. Defense Secretary Mark Esper noted that the money spent on the publication should be reallocated to higher priority issues. A House appropriations bill restored the funding, but the Senate has not yet acted on it.

Hours after the funding shift was reported by several news organizations, President Donald Trump tweeted that funding for the publication would not be cut "under my watch."

"It will continue to be a wonderful source of information for our Great Military," Trump said.

Stars and Stripes' ombudsman Ernie Gates called the effort to end the newspaper a "fatal interference and permanent censorship of a unique First Amendment organization." A letter, objecting to the closure of the newspaper, was signed by 10 bipartisan senators and sent to Esper on Wednesday.

"Stars and Stripes is an essential part of our nation's freedom of the press that serves the very population defending that freedom," the letter says in part.

A separate letter by Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., was sent to Esper on Aug. 28.

"As a veteran who has served overseas, I know the value that the Stars and Stripes brings to its readers," Graham, a retired Air Force colonel, wrote in part.

The newspaper was founded in 1861 during the Civil War. Regular publication began during World War I, and ended with the armistice, but was restarted in 1942, during World War II. It has been published continuously since.


A MONTH AGO
Military Watchdog Stars and Stripes Fighting For Survival

By Mark Greenblatt
August 4, 2020

Bipartisan pushback is growing against a Trump administration proposal to cut all funding for the independent voice of American troops.

Stars and Stripes, the editorially independent news organization that serves the men and women of the U.S. military, is fighting for its own survival. A Department of Defense push to zero out the news organization's $15.5 million budget gained steam when the Senate passed its next budget for the Pentagon and included no money for the longtime military watchdog.

If the Senate version of the budget is adopted, it would serve a potential death blow to an entity that often scrutinizes Pentagon policies and exposes threats to troops deployed overseas.

"When I was in Iraq under the George Bush administration, Stars and Stripes was talking about the lack of armor," said former Marine and member of Congress, Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ).

"Their advocacy, their interest in that spurred Congress to act and fund us to have better armor."

In July Gallego convinced the House to restore the news organization's funding in the House version of the defense budget, known as the National Defense Authorization Act. However, the Senate followed up and passed its version of the defense budget with no funding for the news organization.

"What really happens if this passes: Stars and Stripes would just cease to exist," said Gallego.

Stars and Stripes has served the military community since the Civil War era. Today, it has more digital subscribers than those who read it in print.

The multi-platform, modern operation also connects with service members and their families through video documentaries and podcasts that go in depth on issues that have particularly high importance to the members of the military.

The news organization started a coronavirus electronic newsletter that contains information so specific to the military community it would often not be replicated by any other news source.

While Stars and Stripes is a part of the Department of Defense formally, its editorial independence is protected by Congress and it makes decisions on what to report without asking for approval.

In the midst of the coronavirus, its reporters revealed a DOD plan to keep open a military school for children of troops in Japan, even after public schools in the country had already been closed for weeks. The day after the Stars and Stripes report, DOD announced it would close the school.

"I have high regard for the major newspapers and networks of the United States. Nobody else covered that story," said Terry Leonard, editor of Stars and Stripes.

Leonard says he does not believe the DOD or Trump administration is retaliating against any one story.

"I think it is a difference of philosophy about the value of independent reporting," he said.

In responding to a question from Newsy about what would replace Stars and Stripes if it ceased to exist, the DOD emailed a statement citing the "proliferation of alternative news sources" and social media.

Russell Goemaere, a spokesperson for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, also said the Department would continue to "make available timely and accurate information" on national security and defense issues. He added, "Commanders and executive leaders throughout the Department have a responsibility to make information fully and readily available... This includes a free flow of general and military information to the men and women of the Armed Forces and their dependents."

The editor for Stars and Stripes said it was potentially "dangerous" to have troops rely too heavily on military leaders for information.

"They're only going to get the command view of what they want to know," said Leonard. "Do you really want to live in a democracy where the people, you know, the troops don't have a free flow of information? Do you really believe some people in the command would not want to shut down that information?"

Newsy has learned bipartisan support to save Stars and Stripes is growing, including in the Senate.

"I'll work very hard to make sure that the spending does continue," said Republican Sen. John Boozman, the senior senator from Arkansas.

Boozman's father served more than 20 years in the Air Force, rising to the rank of Master Sergeant.

Boozman said the loss of reporting from Stars and Stripes would ultimately harm the welfare of our troops.

"They talk about housing in the military, all of these things that simply aren't going to be covered any place else," he said.

Boozman said Congress has two ways it can act to restore the news organization's funding.

He said members of the House and Senate are already meeting in conference to resolve differences between the two versions of the Pentagon's budget.

"I will be working very hard to make sure that the House language stays in," he said.

Boozman also said the Senate Defense Appropriations subcommittee, which he is a member of, still has time to step in before authorizing funding for the DOD's next fiscal year. Boozman said he has support from other Republican Senators, who are the majority party in the Senate.

"I'm not alone by any sense," he said. "I think we're actually in good shape working towards getting it in the Senate appropriations package."

The press secretary for the minority side of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Jay Tilton, said the news organization can count on support from Sen. Pat Leahy, a Democrat from Vermont who serves as the committee's vice chairman. "Stars and Stripes has a long history of serving the men and women who serve our country and the Vice Chairman looks forward to raising this issue," he said.

Mark Greenblatt is the senior national investigative correspondent for Newsy and the Scripps Washington Bureau. Follow him @greenblattmark or email a story tip to mark.greenblatt@scripps.com
.