Share

How Does Wealth Beget Wealth? Evidence from Sweden

By , and ·August 4, 2020
Columbia University, University College, Dublin and Lund University

The Issue:

Wealthy parents tend to raise children who grow up to be wealthy, just as children whose parents have few assets are likely to possess little wealth in adulthood. However, little is known about the extent to which this relationship is determined genetically, by environmental factors, or by some combination of both.

The Facts:

  • Wealth is much less equally distributed compared to education and income. And considering wealth is strongly correlated across generations, it can have a persistent negative impact on socio-economic mobility over the long-term.
  • Wealth could be correlated across generations through the genetic inheritance of skills, attitudes, and preferences that are associated with higher wealth in each generation. This channel suggests that children from wealthy families are inherently more talented and would be wealthier than others regardless of inheritances, or the advantages of growing up with wealthier parents. 
  • Alternatively, wealthier parents may invest more in their children’s education, help them get better jobs, provide funding for business startups, give financial gifts, or influence child preferences or attitudes towards savings and investments. This channel suggests that wealth correlations arise through opportunities provided by the environment the child grows up in, and any child given these opportunities would benefit. 
  • Looking at data from Sweden on the wealth of adopted children, their biological parents, and their adoptive parents, we find that — even before any inheritance — there is a substantial role for environmental factors and a much smaller role for pre-birth factors in explaining wealth outcomes. 
  • Using a Swedish register that identifies both biological and adoptive parents of adopted children, our research allows us to assess the relative impact of nature and nurture on a range of characteristics correlated with wealth (see chart). The factors that are above the diagonal line are more strongly influenced by the environment, while those below are more strongly influenced by biology. Wealth, income, and attitudes towards investment and savings of adoptive children appear more closely related to those of their adoptive parents than to their biological parents. In contrast, the educational attainment of biological parents seems to have a greater influence on the educational attainment of the children.

What this Means:

Our research highlights that children with wealthy parents benefit not just from good genetics but, more importantly, from growing up with more advantages. This is true in a relatively egalitarian society with a strong social safety net, suggesting a likely larger role for the environment in less equal societies such as the United States. As wealth and consumption become more unequally distributed, children from poorer families have fewer opportunities relative to children from wealthier families, suggesting an important role for policy to equalize opportunities and to mitigate intergenerational disparities.

Read more
Required reading

Share

The Importance of Childcare in Reopening the Economy

By , and ·July 29, 2020
Northeastern University

The Issue:

COVID-19 has severely disrupted the nature and availability of childcare options. Even now, many daycares and summer camps have not reopened due to the challenges of complying with state-imposed restrictions and many schools are planning hybrid or fully online education programs for the fall. In addition, parents are left wondering if informal or unpaid caregiving arrangements with relatives, such as grandparents, are safe — particularly in states with high or resurging COVID-19 caseloads. Evidence is beginning to show the extent to which disruptions to childcare have already affected the hours and employment of parents.

The Facts:

  • About one third of the workforce, or an estimated 50 million workers, has a child under 14 in their household. Prior to the pandemic, almost 60% of children under age 5 participated in regular, weekly care arrangements with a non-parental provider. School becomes the most important care arrangement for children ages 5-14. 
  • We conducted a national panel survey of 2,557 working parents with PureSpectrum between Mother’s Day (May 10) and Father’s Day (June 21) this year and found that 13.3% of working parents report that they have lost a job or reduced their hours due to a lack of childcare. Among respondents who lost a job, over a quarter of women attribute it to lack of childcare compared with one eighth of men (see chart). The gender difference for reduced work hours due to the lack of childcare was much smaller.
  • Like almost every system in our economy, the pandemic has exacerbated pre-existing inequalities across families seeking affordable, high-quality daycare for their children. Daycare was expensive for many families prior to the pandemic but is likely to be even more so as the number of slots decreases and the cost per child increases due to space constraints, cleaning, and inability to share toys/supplies. 
  • Before the pandemic, the childcare industry was already operating under very thin margins; COVID-19 has made these margins even thinner and has driven costs and tuition fees upward. Absent adequate investment, there is a concern that many temporary childcare closures will become permanent ones, hampering the economic recovery in the short-term and economic growth in the log-run.

What this Means:

Childcare is a critical piece of our economic infrastructure that enables parents to “get to work” just like roads and bridges do for commuters. The obstacles that childcare imposes on workers during the COVID-19 crisis are widespread and not limited to just a few key industries or certain geographic areas. Many families were able to find short-term solutions during the initial round of daycare and school closures by reducing hours, taking paid or unpaid leave to care for children, or alternating schedules with another adult in the household. Even if parents are able to juggle working from home, they are not likely to be as productive. However, these stopgap measures were based on the assumption that the fall would bring a return to school and organized childcare and are simply unsustainable for the long-term. The longer that the childcare crisis continues, it is likely that more parents, primarily women, will need to drop out of the labor force to care for children. A full economic recovery simply cannot happen without adequate childcare.

Read more

Share

Growing Racial Wealth Disparities Among Families with Children

By and ·July 27, 2020
Northwestern University and Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University

The Issue:

Racial and ethnic disparities in wealth – assets like home equity, savings, and retirement accounts, minus debts –are even larger than racial gaps in income. Gaps in wealth are particularly important for households with children because wealth plays a key role in children's life chances, which makes racial and ethnic gaps in wealth all the more alarming.

The Facts:

  • Racial wealth gaps are larger for households with children than for households without children. Our study offers the first analysis of racial/ethnic disparities in wealth focused on child households, which are defined as households with at least one resident child under the age of 19.
  • In 2016, Black and Hispanic households with children had median household incomes that were 47 percent and 48 percent as high, respectively, as white median incomes. For wealth, the gap is strikingly larger: Black and Hispanic households with children had only 1 and 8 percent, respectively, of median white household wealth in 2016 (see chart). 
  • Racial and ethnic gaps in wealth for households with children have been growing over time. Relative to 2004, the black-white income gap for child households is virtually the same, whereas the wealth gap has increased nearly ten-fold.
  • Educational debt and low homeownership rates contribute to the enormous racial wealth gap for families with children. 
  • Black households with children now have lower wealth levels than Hispanic households with children, which is a reversal of pre–Great Recession patterns. In 2004, at the median, Black households with children had $1.56 in wealth for every $1 in wealth for Hispanic households with children; by 2016, black child households had 8 cents.

What this Means:

The stability in racial income gaps — which are large, but have not changed much — compared to the increase in Black-white wealth gaps underscores the distinctiveness of wealth inequality. It also suggests the need for policy solutions that specifically target wealth. Given low levels of intergenerational wealth mobility and the importance of wealth in educational attainment, the wealth fragility of today’s Black families with children will likely impede social mobility for generations to come.

Read more

Share

The Politics of Pandemics

By and ·July 24, 2020
Harvard University and Fletcher School, Tufts University

Beyond the obvious effects on health and the economy, COVID-19 has also had an effect on politics; and, in turn, politics has affected the spread of the disease and its economic consequences. In this episode of EconoFact Chats, Michael Klein and Jeffry Frieden at Harvard discuss the links between politics and economics in the COVID-19 era.

Read more