ga('send', 'pageview');
John Passant

Site menu:

September 2011
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Tags

Archives

RSS Oz House

Share

Authors

Subscribe to us

Get new blog posts delivered to your inbox.


RSS Blog RSS

Site search

Miniposts

My interview Razor Sharp 18 February
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp on Tuesday 18 February. http://sharonfirebrace.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/18-2-14-john-passant-aust-national-university-g20-meeting-age-of-enttilement-engineers-attack-of-austerity-hardship-on-civilians.mp3 (0)

My interview Razor Sharp 11 February 2014
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace on Razor Sharp this morning. The Royal Commission, car industry and age of entitlement get a lot of the coverage. http://sharonfirebrace.com/2014/02/11/john-passant-aust-national-university-canberra-2/ (0)

Razor Sharp 4 February 2014
Me on 4 February 2014 on Razor Sharp with Sharon Firebrace. http://sharonfirebrace.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/4-2-14-john-passant-aust-national-university-canberra-end-of-the-age-of-entitlement-for-the-needy-but-pandering-to-the-lusts-of-the-greedy.mp3 (0)

Time for a House Un-Australian Activities Committee?
Tony Abbott thinks the Australian Broadcasting Corporation is Un-Australian. I am looking forward to his government setting up the House Un-Australian Activities Committee. (1)

Make Gina Rinehart work for her dole
(0)

Sick kids and paying upfront

(0)

Save Medicare

Demonstrate in defence of Medicare at Sydney Town Hall 1 pm Saturday 4 January (0)

Me on Razor Sharp this morning
Me interviewed by Sharon Firebrace this morning for Razor Sharp. It happens every Tuesday. http://sharonfirebrace.com/2013/12/03/john-passant-australian-national-university-8/ (0)

I am not surprised
I think we are being unfair to this Abbott ‘no surprises’ Government. I am not surprised. (0)

Send Barnaby to Indonesia
It is a pity that Barnaby Joyce, a man of tact, diplomacy, nuance and subtlety, isn’t going to Indonesia to fix things up. I know I am disappointed that Barnaby is missing out on this great opportunity, and I am sure the Indonesians feel the same way. [Sarcasm alert.] (0)

Advertisement

Links:

Fighting oppression is not anti-Semitic

There is a political fight over the term “anti-Semitic” writes Rick Kuhn in Socialist Alternative. Supporters of Israel want to shift its meaning from hatred of Jews to include criticism of the Israeli state. They use the word to smear anyone who rejects Zionism, the idea that there should be a country which gives special rights to Jews.

Zionists have had some success in the campaign to transform this slander into common sense. From 1961, Webster’s Third International Dictionary, the standard reference to English in the United States, defined anti-Semitism as both “hostility toward Jews” and “opposition to Zionism: sympathy with opponents of the state of Israel.”

In 2005, an agency of the European Union adopted a definition of anti-Semitism that included “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.” The US State (i.e. foreign affairs) Department has embraced this definition.

This verbal manoeuvre dumps Nazis and those who support the Palestinian cause into the same bucket of shit. It licences apologists for Israel to claim that everyone who wants a single, secular state for Jews and Palestinians on current Israeli and Palestinian territories are the same as Hitler.

The equation of hatred of Jews with criticism of Israel reinforces the Zionist claim that the interests of Jews and Israel are identical. In practice, this subordinates the security of Jews to Israel. It invites people outraged by Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians to target Jews, on the false assumption that they are the same. In doing so it gives credibility to the real anti-Semites who simply hate Jews.

The partisan definition of anti-Semitism favoured by apologists for Israel justifies labelling anti-racist activists as anti-Semites while treating overt racists as allies. But for many Zionists, whether they are Jews or not, fighting racism is not important or is a much lower priority than defending the existence and policies of the Israeli state.

Friends of Israel in Australia have, for example, been prepared to tolerate fascists at their mobilisations to undermine the campaign against Israeli-owned Max Brenner chocolate shops. In the United States, amongst the most vehement supporters of Israel are fundamentalist Christians who regard Jews as Christ-killers. They believe that the restoration of the biblical Jewish kingdom in the Middle East is a precondition for the second coming of Jesus.

What of Jews who regard Israel as a racist state? We are “self-hating”, suffering from severe personality defects. So what we say is to be taken no more seriously than the objections to Israeli apartheid raised by anti-Zionists who aren’t Jews.

The Catholic Church promoted anti-Jewish sentiment and banned Christians from charging interest on loans for centuries. Feudal rulers used this prejudice to squeeze Jewish money lenders and sometimes to divert attention from problems of their own making. In 1290, Edward I expelled Jews from England in a deal with the aristocracy to overcome the huge debts of the crown.

Only during the second half of the nineteenth century was this religious oppression of Jews transformed into modern anti-Semitic racism. As the advance of capitalism was opening politics up to mass participation, anti-Semitism enabled reactionaries, especially in eastern and central Europe, to build mass support. The Tsarist regime in Russia, supporters of the authoritarian German state and populist politicians targeted Jews as an alien race. They mobilised support by acknowledging that the lives of ordinary people were crap. But, they explained, the problem wasn’t capitalism, undemocratic monarchies and vicious landowners; it was Jews.

Faced with more intense persecution and pogroms, many Jews, a large and often readily identifiable minority in much of eastern Europe, joined a broader flow of people to countries with higher living standards further west in Europe and across the Atlantic.

Among Jews, there were two activist, political responses to anti-Semitism. Zionism assumed that Jews and gentiles cannot live together: that persecution of Jews is inevitable. So the Jews needed a homeland in order to be safe. Zionism as a political movement emerged in the mid 1890s under the leadership of Theodor Herzl. In March 1912 in Berlin, it was not Hitler but Chaim Weizmann, later president of the World Zionist Organization and later still the first president of the state of Israel, who said “each country can absorb only a limited number of Jews, if she doesn’t want disorders in her stomach. Germany already has too many Jews.”

Herzl’s fundamental strategy was to find an imperialist sponsor for the Zionist project. He even tried to interest the Tsar even though anti-Semitism was promoted by the Russian state. In 1917, the Zionist movement found the backing it was looking for. Lloyd George’s Liberal-Conservative coalition government in Britain supported Zionist colonisation of Palestine as an element in its plans to take over territories ruled by Turkey in the Middle East. An alliance with imperialism remains the core policy of the Israeli ruling class today, in the form of its relationship with US governments.

Most Jewish socialists did not regard anti-Semitism as inevitable. They saw it as a consequence of capitalism. The struggle against anti-Semitism was as much a part of the fight for socialism as strikes to defend and improve wages and conditions. The Bund (the General Jewish Workers Union of Lithuania, Poland and Russia) only recruited Jewish workers but was the largest Marxist organisation in Russia until the explosive growth of the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks during the Russian revolution of 1905-06. In the face of pogroms, Bundists did not encourage Jews to flee to Palestine but organised armed resistance.

Principled socialists, Jews and non-Jews, in other European parties also stressed the importance of fighting anti-Semitism and other forms of oppression in order to overcome divisions in the working class. As early as 1883, the German Social Democratic Workers Party very successfully stood Paul Singer, a Jew, as a candidate in the elections for the Berlin city council, during an early upsurge of anti-Semitism , encouraged by the regime.

Already hostile to anti-Semitism, radical socialists (including the membership of the Bund) also opposed political Zionism from the start. For them, it was a diversion from the struggle against oppression and capitalism. They distinguished between Jews as a religious and cultural group and Zionism as a political movement supported by some Jews and gentiles.

Zionist organisations, with British patronage, started to discriminate against Palestinians in their own country. From that point on, Zionism was no longer just an accommodation with anti-Semitism: it became a movement for oppression.

Israel was established as a racist, apartheid state. Its founders proclaimed it the state of all Jews, everywhere in the world. The armed forces of the new state and the militia which supported it drove hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homes. That “ethnic cleansing”, the further expansion of Israel’s boundaries and the institutionalised state bias against Palestinians who are Israeli citizens, amount to a policy of genocide.

Judaism is the established religion of Israel. Hebrew is the state language. Palestinians, whose first language is Arabic, suffer from systematic discrimination in the education system, employment, the provision of public services and the right to own land. Within Israel’s borders Jews are first class citizens; Palestinians are second class citizens. Recent legislation has forbidden Palestinians from preserving their history by publicly mourning the Nakba, the catastrophe of Israel’s establishment in 1948.

The fundamental definition of a Jew, used by the Israeli authorities, is based on inheritance. If your mother was a Jew, you are a Jew. Anyone who can establish Jewish descent in this way can become an Israeli citizen. This is a racist criterion. It justifies giving people whose ancestors may have lived in the Middle East thousands of years ago, and many Jews none of whose forebears ever lived there, the “right of return”.

It explains why there are so many people in Israel today who were born in Russia. Most of them left Russia in the decades from the 1970. By proving their Jewish descent, they could become citizens of Israel. There are a million former Russians in the Israeli population of less than eight million. Many were, understandably, attracted by the much higher living standard in Israel and had no commitment to Judaism as a religion. Some have established Russian Orthodox churches.

On the other hand, Palestinians, who were born in what is now Israel but were driven out during the ethnic cleansing that accompanied the establishment of the new state between 1947 and 1949, have no “right of return”.

The tragedies of Jewish history, from the Roman destruction of Jerusalem, through medieval persecution to modern anti-Semitism and the holocaust, are not a get-out-of-jail-card-free for those who claim to act in the interests of Jews. Israel has not made Jews there or elsewhere in the world safer.

Israel’s oppressive policies at home and aggression abroad has led to resistance and armed conflict that has made the populations of Israel, the territories it occupies and neighbouring states less secure. As a result, Israel is a highly militarised society, preoccupied with real and imagined threats. Outside the region, the false identification of Israel with Judaism reinforces the anti-Semitic claim that all Jews are the same and invites naïve opponents of Zionist policies to target individual Jews, rather than the Israeli state and its powerful backers.

It is possible to oppose anti-Semitism on a narrow basis, that the racist persecution of Jews is wrong. A broader and far more effective approach strengthens the fight against anti-Semitism by treating it as part of the struggle against all forms of racism and oppression. From this perspective, the front line of the battle against anti-Semitism today is the campaign against apartheid Israel.

Rick is a member of Jews against Oppression and Occupation.

Advertisement

Comments

Comment from Terrance
Time September 14, 2011 at 9:02 am

Just read today’s newspapers – 21 killed in Syria, including a 12 year old boy. It got one paragraph.

21 million Pakistanis still displaced by the floods and foreign aid has dried up.

Congo civil war death toll now estimated at 5.1 million – about the same as the poulation of Israel/Palestine.

C’mon John. I’m a leftie and always will be, but this isn’t the issue that dominates our lives. The left seem so obsessed with israel that it forgets about the rest of the world.

Can I ask for your take on the DR Congo and what role we can play in ending the worst conflict since 1945.

And Pakistan – talk about no future for working people. These needs major coverage.

Let’s focus of the big picture.

Comment from John
Time September 14, 2011 at 2:28 pm

We were at the Syrian demo. The floods in Pakistan – did you read my previous article on that? The Middle East is the key to defeating US imperialism and helping the people of Pakistan, Syria and the Democratic republic of the Congo liberate themselves. Israel is the key attack dog and defender of US interests int eh region and a very cheap one at that. It saves the US having to spend hundreds of billions to do the same job through its military. You think big picture. Your arguments are exactly the same ones conservatives used against us as their police bashed and arrested us over apartheid demos. To mention one doesn’t mean we exclude other struggles. hence my attendance and that of my comrades at same sex marriage demos, refugee rallies, and the Arab Spring demos. See you there sometime to encompass the big picture?

Comment from Terrance
Time September 14, 2011 at 3:43 pm

No worries, didn’t know about the demo. Shouls have looked first, I like to go to thes ethings. thanks for heads up.

And hey, I’m on your side big fella, I’m not one of those ratbags who use this site to push some agenda. Don’t have to ‘go’ me, was only mentioning stuff I think gets a bit left off the agenda sometimes.

Cheers

Comment from John
Time September 14, 2011 at 6:50 pm

Yeah, I know, but your ongoing criticism based on misconceptions can be annoying.

Write a comment