(via chadwick-the-party-mage)
Critics of the unrest argue in bad faith.
They don’t want to listen or think of change. They don’t even want to have the conversation.
(Source: liberalsarecool, via saywhat-politics)
If you’re wearing a helmet, facial recognition can’t peg you!
this is the way
I mean to be honest I’m not a fan of burning buildings, but I’m really not a fan of getting murdered, and it would be misleading in the extreme not to see that interest in burning down police stations sure seems to spike right after those same police just murdered somebody.
reactions to riots will aim to sever them from their context, presenting a world in which people are just itching to set fire to shit on any day of the week but sadly don’t have a valid excuse, then they see an itty bitty mistake by an innocent policeman and boom it’s off to the races, they don’t really care about any of the stuff they put on signs and chant in the streets, they’re just troublemakers!
every riot is a genuine failure of governance and law enforcement, not a failure to control or suppress or disperse the riot, but a failure to give people a better option than rioting.
that’s the first positive framing of riotprotests I’ve seen that’s actually compelling, thanks
it always comes down to context and framing, doesn’t it.
if you see someone setting fire to cars and smashing windows then without further context that’s pretty fucked up, but if you broaden the frame a little bit and see it as a response to someone getting choked to death or shot without any recourse suddenly the property damage looks like a moderate and reasonable method of raising the cost of brutality, as well as an unmissable signal that the local government has lost its monopoly on violence due to being perceived as illegitimate.
“if these protests continue they will damage the fabric of society / someone might get hurt” rings false when the protests only started due to someone getting hurt in a way that damages the fabric of society.
I remember when the London riots happened and someone pointed out that the media’s emphasis on looting is always funny because not paying for something is such an oh so unforgivable crime while giving people money so they can pay for things is unthinkable.
(via masked-up)
Anonymous asked:
Are you going to any protests?
nice try FBI; if anybody gets a message like this don’t be stupid and share anything about whether or not you’ll be attending a specific action. spreading the word from official social medias of your local BYP100/black lives matter chapters is one thing (though still be careful), don’t fuck around with sharing info about your location, who you’re going with to actions, etc.
HOLY SHIT. This was extremely informative. Please everyone READ THIS!!!
Teen Vogue still hitting it out of the park, I see.
While people are inclined to whip out their phones and film when they see something alarming happening, those videos are not always recorded in a way that can be used as evidence in a legal proceeding or to support advocacy tactics.
At the human rights organization WITNESS, where I work as the senior U.S. program coordinator, we’ve learned that video has a greater chance of making an impact when it’s filmed ethically and strategically, and released in coordination with advocacy and legal efforts. Using the camera in your pocket can be a valuable way to ensure the world bears witness to abusive policing and systemic racism, help hold authorities accountable, and advocate for the real safety of our communities.
(via glumshoe)
just something I’ve noticed but if you’re going to share time-sensitive info on tumblr about the protests (like police location, escalation, etc) make sure to include the date/time. I keep seeing posts circulate for days saying to gtfo of an area bc it’s not safe with no date or context at all.
(via pileofknives)