Except it didn’t, it was in kind
-
-
-
and why does it matter if they did?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Too right!
-
There's probably been boardroom lunches in the commercial TV sector that have cost more.
-
Yep and that doesn't include the wine.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Actually it didn’t. It was an exchange transaction ‘in kind’ with no money changing hands. The Australian is such a scurrilous rag.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course it is. Unadulterated truth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Uh yeah. I'd have scrounged the money myself to have it broadcast. Worth every penny
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Worth every cent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is a bargain.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure was. That’s a story to always remember.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
0.02c/Australian - Money well spent.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I watched it on YouTube. Before it aired on the ABC.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
who really cares? and not one word from you guys
@australian about J. Assange.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cool. It was in the public interest. Or would you like to leave the decision up to Peter Dutton?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.