Sustainable energy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Clean energy)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sustainable energy is the practice of using energy in a way that "meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."[1][2]

When referring to methods of producing energy, the term "sustainable energy" is often used interchangeably with the term "renewable energy". In general, renewable energy sources such as solar energy, wind energy, geothermal energy, and tidal energy, are widely considered to be sustainable. However, particular renewable energy projects, such as the clearing of forests for production of biofuels, can lead to similar or even worse environmental damage when compared with using fossil fuel energy. There is considerable controversy over whether nuclear energy can be considered sustainable.

Sustainable energy sources can be used to generate electricity, to heat and cool buildings, and to power transportation systems and machines. Costs of sustainable energy sources have decreased immensely throughout the years, and continue to fall. Increasingly, effective government policies support investor confidence and these markets are expanding.

Sustainable energy strategies generally involve both the use of sustainable energy sources, and improvements in energy conservation. The organizing principle for sustainability is sustainable development, which includes the four interconnected domains: ecology, economics, politics and culture.[3] Sustainability science is the study of sustainable development and environmental science.[4]

History[edit]

Definitions[edit]

The concept of sustainable development was described by the World Commission on Environment and Development in its 1987 book Our Common Future.[1] Its definition of "sustainability", now used widely, was, "Sustainable development should meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."[1]

In its book, the Commission described four key elements of sustainability with respect to energy: the ability to increase the supply of energy to meet growing human needs, energy efficiency and conservation, public health and safety, and "protection of the biosphere and prevention of more localized forms of pollution."[5] Various definitions of sustainable energy have been offered since then which are also based on the three pillars of sustainable development, namely environment, economy, and society.[citation needed]

  • Environmental criteria include greenhouse gas emissions, impact on biodiversity, and the production of hazardous waste and toxic emissions.
  • Economic criteria include the cost of energy, whether energy is delivered to users with high reliability, and effects on jobs associated with energy production.
  • Socio-cultural criteria include the prevention of wars over the energy supply (energy security) and long-term availability of energy.[citation needed]

Green energy is energy that can be extracted, generated, and/or consumed without any significant negative impact to the environment.[citation needed] The planet has a natural capability to recover which means pollution that does not go beyond that capability can still be termed green. It represents those renewable energy resources and technologies that provide the highest environmental benefit. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency defines green power as electricity produced from solar, wind, geothermal, biogas, biomass and low-impact small hydroelectric sources.[6]

Renewable energy sources[edit]

When referring to sources of energy, the terms "sustainable energy" and "renewable energy" are often used interchangeably, however particular renewable energy projects sometimes raise significant sustainability concerns. Renewable energy technologies are essential contributors to sustainable energy as they generally contribute to world energy security, reducing dependence on fossil fuel resources,[7] and providing opportunities for mitigating greenhouse gases.[7] Various Cost–benefit analysis work by a disparate array of specialists and agencies have been conducted to determine the cheapest and quickest paths to decarbonizing the energy supply of the world, with the topic being one of considerable controversy, particularly on the role of nuclear energy.[8][9][10][11][12]

Hydropower[edit]

Among sources of renewable energy, hydroelectric plants have the advantages of being long-lived—many existing plants have operated for more than 100 years. Also, hydroelectric plants are clean and have few emissions. Criticisms directed at large-scale hydroelectric plants include: dislocation of people living where the reservoirs are planned, and release of significant amounts of carbon dioxide during construction and flooding of the reservoir.[13]

Hydroelectric dams are one of the most widely deployed sources of sustainable energy.

However, it has been found that high emissions are associated only with shallow reservoirs in warm (tropical) locales, and recent innovations in hydropower turbine technology are enabling efficient development of low-impact run-of-the-river hydroelectricity projects.[14] Generally speaking, hydroelectric plants produce much lower life-cycle emissions than other types of generation. Hydroelectric power, which underwent extensive development during growth of electrification in the 19th and 20th centuries, is experiencing resurgence of development in the 21st century. The areas of greatest hydroelectric growth are the booming economies of Asia. China is the development leader; however, other Asian nations are installing hydropower at a rapid pace. This growth is driven by much increased energy costs—especially for imported energy—and widespread desires for more domestically produced, clean, renewable, and economical generation.

Hydroelectric dam in cross section

Geothermal[edit]

One of many power plants at The Geysers, a geothermal power field in northern California, with a total output of over 750 MW.

Geothermal energy can be harnessed to for electricity generation and for heating. Technologies in use include dry steam power stations, flash steam power stations and binary cycle power stations. As of 2010, geothermal electricity generation is used in 24 countries,[15] while geothermal heating is in use in 70 countries.[16] International markets grew at an average annual rate of 5 percent over the three years to 2015, and global geothermal power capacity is expected to reach 14.5–17.6 GW by 2020.[17]

Geothermal power is considered to be a sustainable, renewable source of energy because the heat extraction is small compared with the Earth's heat content.[18] The greenhouse gas emissions of geothermal electric stations are on average 45 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour of electricity, or less than 5 percent of that of conventional coal-fired plants.[16] As a source of renewable energy for both power and heating, geothermal has the potential to meet 3-5% of global demand by 2050. With economic incentives, it is estimated that by 2100 it will be possible to meet 10% of global demand.[19]

Biomass and biofuel[edit]

Sugarcane plantation to produce ethanol in Brazil
A CHP power station using wood to provide electricity to over 30.000 households in France

Biomass is biological material derived from living, or recently living organisms. As an energy source, biomass can either be burned to produce heat and to generate electricity, or converted to various forms of biofuel. Liquid biofuels such as biodiesel and ethanol are especially valued as energy sources for motor vehicles.

Biomass is extremely versatile and one of the most-used sources of renewable energy. It is available in many countries, which makes it attractive for reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels. If the production of biomass is well-managed, carbon emissions can be significantly offset by the absorption of carbon dioxide by the plants during their lifespans. If the biomass source is agricultural or municipal waste, burning it or converting it into biogas also provides a way to dispose of this waste.[20]

As of 2012, wood remains the largest biomass energy source today.[21] If biomass is harvested from crops, such as tree plantations, the cultivation of these crops can displace natural ecosystems, degrade soils, and consume water resources and synthetic fertilizers.[20][22] In some cases, these impacts can actually result in higher overall carbon emissions compared to using petroleum-based fuels.[22][23]

Use of farmland for growing fuel can result in less land being available for growing food. Since photosynthesis is inherently inefficient, and crops also require significant amounts of energy to harvest, dry, and transport, the amount of energy produced per unit of land area is very small, in the range of 0.25 W/m2 to 1.2 W/m2.[24] In the United States, corn-based ethanol has replaced less than 10% of motor gasoline use since 2011, but has consumed around 40% of the annual corn harvest in the country.[22] In Malaysia and Indonesia, the clearing of forests to produce palm oil for biodiesel has led to serious social and environmental effects, as these forests are critical carbon sinks and habitats for endangered species.[25]

Wind[edit]

In Europe in the 19th century, there were about 200,000 windmills, slightly more than the modern wind turbines of the 21st century.[26] They were mainly used to grind grain and to pump water. The age of coal powered steam engines replaced this early use of wind power.

Wind power: worldwide installed capacity [27]

Wind power has high potential and have already realised relatively low production costs. At the end of 2008, worldwide wind farm capacity was 120,791 megawatts (MW), representing an increase of 28.8 percent during the year,[28] and wind power produced some 1.3% of global electricity consumption.[29] Wind power accounts for approximately 20% of electricity use in Denmark, 9% in Spain, and 7% in Germany.[30][31] However, it may be difficult to site wind turbines in some areas for aesthetic or environmental reasons, and it may be difficult to integrate wind power into electricity grids in some cases.[7]

Solar heating[edit]

Solar heating systems generally consist of solar thermal collectors, a fluid system to move the heat from the collector to its point of usage, and a reservoir or tank for heat storage and subsequent use. The systems may be used to heat domestic hot water, swimming pool water, or for space heating.[32] The heat can also be used for industrial applications or as an energy input for other uses such as cooling equipment.[33] In many climates, a solar heating system can provide a very high percentage (20 to 80%) of domestic hot water energy. Energy received from the sun by the earth is that of electromagnetic radiation. Light ranges of visible, infrared, ultraviolet, x-rays, and radio waves received by the earth through solar energy. The highest power of radiation comes from visible light. Solar power is complicated due to changes in seasons and from day to night. Cloud cover can also add to complications of solar energy, and not all radiation from the sun reaches earth because it is absorbed and dispersed due to clouds and gases within the earth's atmospheres.[34]

Sketch of a Parabolic Trough Collector

Solar thermal power stations have been successfully operating in California commercially since the late 1980s, including the largest solar power plant of any kind, the 350 MW Solar Energy Generating Systems. Nevada Solar One is another 64MW plant which has recently opened.[35] Other parabolic trough power plants being proposed are two 50 MW plants in Spain, and a 100 MW plant in Israel.[36]

Solar electricity[edit]

Solar electricity production uses photovoltaic (PV) cells to convert light into electrical current. Photovoltaic modules can be integrated into buildings or used in photovoltaic power stations connected to the electrical grid. They are especially useful for providing electricity to remote areas.

Large national and regional research projects on artificial photosynthesis are designing nanotechnology-based systems that use solar energy to split water into hydrogen fuel.[37] and a proposal has been made for a Global Artificial Photosynthesis project[38] In 2011, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) developed what they are calling an "Artificial Leaf", which is capable of splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen directly from solar power when dropped into a glass of water. One side of the "Artificial Leaf" produces bubbles of hydrogen, while the other side produces bubbles of oxygen.[39]

Most current solar power plants are made from an array of similar units where each unit is continuously adjusted, e.g., with some step motors, so that the light converter stays in focus of the sun light. The cost of focusing light on converters such as high-power solar panels, Stirling engine, etc. can be dramatically decreased with a simple and efficient rope mechanics.[40] In this technique many units are connected with a network of ropes so that pulling two or three ropes is sufficient to keep all light converters simultaneously in focus as the direction of the sun changes.

Research is ongoing in space-based solar power, a concept in which solar panels are launched into outer space and the energy they capture is transmitted back to Earth as microwaves. A test facility for the technology is being built in China.[41]

MIT's Solar House#1 built in 1939 used seasonal thermal energy storage (STES) for year-round heating.

Ocean energy[edit]

The world's first commercial[42] tidal stream generatorSeaGen – in Strangford Lough. The strong wake shows the power in the tidal current.

Portugal has the world's first commercial wave farm, the Aguçadora Wave Park, under construction in 2007. The farm will initially use three Pelamis P-750 machines generating 2.25 MW.[43][44] and costs are put at 8.5 million euro. Subject to successful operation, a further 70 million euro is likely to be invested before 2009 on a further 28 machines to generate 525 MW.[45] Funding for a wave farm in Scotland was announced in February, 2007 by the Scottish Executive, at a cost of over 4 million pounds, as part of a £13 million funding packages for ocean power in Scotland. The farm will be the world's largest with a capacity of 3 MW generated by four Pelamis machines.[46] (see also Wave farm).

In 2007, the world's first turbine to create commercial amounts of energy using tidal power was installed in the narrows of Strangford Lough in Northern Ireland, UK. The 1.2 MW underwater tidal electricity generator takes advantage of the fast tidal flow in the lough which can be up to 4m/s. Although the generator is powerful enough to power up to a thousand homes, the turbine has a minimal environmental impact, as it is almost entirely submerged, and the rotors turn slowly enough that they pose no danger to wildlife.[47][48]

Enabling technologies for variable renewable energy[edit]

In a pumped-storage hydroelectricity facility, water is pumped uphill electricity generation exceeds demand. The water is later released to generate hydroelectricity.

Solar and wind are intermittent energy sources that supply electricity 10-40% of the time, depending on the weather and the time of day. Most electric grids were constructed for non-intermittent energy sources such as hydroelectricity or coal-fired power plants. In general, up to around 30% of the energy supplied to an electric grid can be easily converted to intermittent sources.[49]

If intermittent sources make up a larger percentage of the energy supply for a given electric grid, there are several possible approaches to ensuring that electricity generation can meet ongoing demand:

  • Reducing demand for electricity at certain times through energy demand management and use of smart grids.
  • Using hydroelectricity or natural gas generation to produce backup power
  • Importing electricity from other locations through long-distance transmission lines. For example, TREC has proposed to distribute solar power from the Sahara to Europe. Europe can distribute wind and ocean power to the Sahara and other countries. In this way, power is produced at any given time as at any point of the planet as the sun or the wind is up or ocean waves and currents are stirring.

As of 2019, the cost and logistics of energy storage for large population centres is a significant challenge, although the cost of battery systems has plunged dramatically.[50] For instance, a 2019 study found that for solar and wind energy to meet energy demand for a week of extreme cold in the eastern and midwest United States, energy storage capacity would have to increase from the 11 GW currently in place to 277.9 GW.[50]

Some costs could potentially be reduced by making use of energy storage equipment the consumer buys and not the state. An example is batteries in electric cars that would double as an energy buffer for the electricity grid. Energy storage apparatus' as car batteries are also built with materials that pose a threat to the environment (e.g. Lithium). The combined production of batteries for such a large part of the population would still have environmental concerns.

To provide household electricity in remote areas (that is areas which are not connected to the mains electricity grid), energy storage is required for use with renewable energy. Energy generation and consumption systems used in the latter case are usually stand-alone power systems.

Energy from renewable sources can also be stored as heat or cold, through thermal energy storage technologies. For instance, summer heat can be stored for winter heating, or winter cold can be stored for summer air conditioning.

Non-renewable energy sources[edit]

There is considerable controversy over whether nuclear power can be considered sustainable. Some forms of nuclear power (ones which are able to "burn" nuclear waste through a process known as nuclear transmutation, such as an Integral Fast Reactor, could belong in the "Green Energy" category). Nuclear power plants can be more or less eliminated from their problem of nuclear waste through the use of nuclear reprocessing and newer plants as fast breeder and nuclear fusion plants.

Some people, including early Greenpeace member Patrick Moore,[51][52][53] George Monbiot,[54] Bill Gates[55] and James Lovelock[56] have specifically classified nuclear power as green energy. Others, including Greenpeace's Phil Radford[57][58] disagree, claiming that the problems associated with radioactive waste and the risk of nuclear accidents (such as the Chernobyl disaster) pose an unacceptable risk to the environment and to humanity. However, newer nuclear reactor designs are capable of utilizing what is now deemed "nuclear waste" until it is no longer (or dramatically less) dangerous, and have design features that greatly minimize the possibility of a nuclear accident. These designs have yet to be commercialized. (See: Molten salt reactor)

In theory, the greenhouse gas emissions of fossil fuel power plants can be significantly reduced through carbon capture and storage, although this process is expensive. Some believe that fossil fuel burning, with carbon capture and storage, may have a role in a sustainable energy system.

Energy efficiency[edit]

Moving towards energy sustainability will require changes not only in the way energy is supplied, but in the way it is used, and reducing the amount of energy required to deliver various goods or services is essential. Opportunities for improvement on the demand side of the energy equation are as rich and diverse as those on the supply side, and often offer significant economic benefits.[59]

Efficiency slows down energy demand growth so that rising clean energy supplies can make deep cuts in fossil fuel use. A recent historical analysis has demonstrated that the rate of energy efficiency improvements has generally been outpaced by the rate of growth in energy demand, which is due to continuing economic and population growth. As a result, despite energy efficiency gains, total energy use and related carbon emissions have continued to increase. Thus, given the thermodynamic and practical limits of energy efficiency improvements, slowing the growth in energy demand is essential.[60] However, unless clean energy supplies come online rapidly, slowing demand growth will only begin to reduce total emissions; reducing the carbon content of energy sources is also needed. Any serious vision of a sustainable energy economy thus requires commitments to both renewables and efficiency.[61]

Clean cookstoves[edit]

In developing countries, an estimated 3 billion people rely on traditional cookstoves and open fires to burn biomass or coal for heating and cooking. This practice causes harmful local air pollution and increases danger from fires, resulting in an estimated 4.3 million deaths annually.[62] Additionally, serious local environmental damage, including desertification, can be caused by excessive harvesting of wood and other combustible material.[63] Promoting usage of cleaner fuels and more efficient technologies for cooking is therefore one of the top priorities of the United Nations Sustainable Energy for All initiative. Thus far, efforts to design cookstoves that are inexpensive, powered by sustainable energy sources, and acceptable to users have been mostly disappointing.[62]

Trends[edit]

Climate change concerns coupled with high oil prices and increasing government support are driving increasing rates of investment in the sustainable energy industries, according to a trend analysis from the United Nations Environment Programme. According to UNEP, global investment in sustainable energy in 2007 was higher than previous levels, with $148 billion of new money raised in 2007, an increase of 60% over 2006. Total financial transactions in sustainable energy, including acquisition activity, was $204 billion.[64]

Investment flows in 2007 broadened and diversified, making the overall picture one of greater breadth and depth of sustainable energy use. The mainstream capital markets are "now fully receptive to sustainable energy companies, supported by a surge in funds destined for clean energy investment".[64] The increased levels of investment and the fact that much of the capital is coming from more conventional financial actors suggest that sustainable energy options are now becoming mainstream.[65]

Purchasing green electricity[edit]

A solar trough array is an example of green energy.
Public seat with integrated solar panel in Singapore-anyone can sit and plug in their mobile phone for free charging

In several countries with common carrier arrangements, electricity retailing arrangements make it possible for consumers to purchase "green" electricity from either their utility or a green power provider. Electricity is considered to be green if it is produced from a source that produces relatively little pollution, and the concept is often considered equivalent to renewable energy.[66]

In many countries, green energy currently provides a very small amount of electricity, generally contributing less than 2 to 5% to the overall pool of electricity offered by most utility companies, electric companies, or state power pools. In some U.S. states, local governments have formed regional power purchasing pools using Community Choice Aggregation and Solar Bonds to achieve a 51% renewable mix or higher, such as in the City of San Francisco.[67]

By participating in a green energy program a consumer may be having an effect on the energy sources used and ultimately might be helping to promote and expand the use of green energy. They are also making a statement to policy makers that they are willing to pay a price premium to support renewable energy. Green energy consumers either obligate the utility companies to increase the amount of green energy that they purchase from the pool (so decreasing the amount of non-green energy they purchase), or directly fund the green energy through a green power provider. If insufficient green energy sources are available, the utility must develop new ones or contract with a third party energy supplier to provide green energy, causing more to be built. However, there is no way the consumer can check whether or not the electricity bought is "green" or otherwise.

In some countries such as the Netherlands, electricity companies guarantee to buy an equal amount of 'green power' as is being used by their green power customers. The Dutch government exempts green power from pollution taxes, which means green power is hardly any more expensive than other power.

Green energy and labeling by region[edit]

European Union[edit]

Directive 2004/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on the promotion of cogeneration based on a useful heat demand in the internal energy market[68] includes the article 5 (Guarantee of origin of electricity from high-efficiency cogeneration).

European environmental NGOs have launched an ecolabel for green power. The ecolabel is called EKOenergy. It sets criteria for sustainability, additionality, consumer information and tracking. Only part of electricity produced by renewables fulfills the EKOenergy criteria.[69]

A Green Energy Supply Certification Scheme was launched in the United Kingdom in February 2010. This implements guidelines from the Energy Regulator, Ofgem, and sets requirements on transparency, the matching of sales by renewable energy supplies, and additionality.[70]

United States[edit]

The United States Department of Energy (DOE), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the Center for Resource Solutions (CRS)[71] recognizes the voluntary purchase of electricity from renewable energy sources (also called renewable electricity or green electricity) as green power.[72]

The most popular way to purchase renewable energy as revealed by NREL data is through purchasing Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs). According to a Natural Marketing Institute (NMI)[73] survey 55 percent of American consumers want companies to increase their use of renewable energy.[72]

DOE selected six companies for its 2007 Green Power Supplier Awards, including Constellation NewEnergy; 3Degrees; Sterling Planet; SunEdison; Pacific Power and Rocky Mountain Power; and Silicon Valley Power. The combined green power provided by those six winners equals more than 5 billion kilowatt-hours per year, which is enough to power nearly 465,000 average U.S. households. In 2014, Arcadia Power made RECS available to homes and businesses in all 50 states, allowing consumers to use "100% green power" as defined by the EPA's Green Power Partnership.[74][75]

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Green Power Partnership is a voluntary program that supports the organizational procurement of renewable electricity by offering expert advice, technical support, tools and resources. This can help organizations lower the transaction costs of buying renewable power, reduce carbon footprint, and communicate its leadership to key stakeholders.[76]

Throughout the country, more than half of all U.S. electricity customers now have an option to purchase some type of green power product from a retail electricity provider. Roughly one-quarter of the nation's utilities offer green power programs to customers, and voluntary retail sales of renewable energy in the United States totaled more than 12 billion kilowatt-hours in 2006, a 40% increase over the previous year.

In the United States, one of the main problems with purchasing green energy through the electrical grid is the current centralized infrastructure that supplies the consumer’s electricity. This infrastructure has led to increasingly frequent brown outs and black outs, high CO2 emissions, higher energy costs, and power quality issues.[77] An additional $450 billion will be invested to expand this fledgling system over the next 20 years to meet increasing demand.[78] In addition, this centralized system is now being further overtaxed with the incorporation of renewable energies such as wind, solar, and geothermal energies. Renewable resources, due to the amount of space they require, are often located in remote areas where there is a lower energy demand. The current infrastructure would make transporting this energy to high demand areas, such as urban centers, highly inefficient and in some cases impossible. In addition, despite the amount of renewable energy produced or the economic viability of such technologies only about 20 percent will be able to be incorporated into the grid. To have a more sustainable energy profile, the United States must move towards implementing changes to the electrical grid that will accommodate a mixed-fuel economy.[79]

Several initiatives are being proposed to mitigate distribution problems. First and foremost, the most effective way to reduce USA’s CO2 emissions and slow global warming is through conservation efforts. Opponents of the current US electrical grid have also advocated for decentralizing the grid. This system would increase efficiency by reducing the amount of energy lost in transmission. It would also be economically viable as it would reduce the amount of power lines that will need to be constructed in the future to keep up with demand. Merging heat and power in this system would create added benefits and help to increase its efficiency by up to 80-90%. This is a significant increase from the current fossil fuel plants which only have an efficiency of 34%.[80]

Small-scale green energy systems[edit]

A small Quietrevolution QR5 Gorlov type vertical axis wind turbine in Bristol, England. Measuring 3 m in diameter and 5 m high, it has a nameplate rating of 6.5 kW to the grid.

Those not satisfied with the third-party grid approach to green energy via the power grid can install their own locally based renewable energy system. Renewable energy electrical systems from solar to wind to even local hydro-power in some cases, are some of the many types of renewable energy systems available locally. Additionally, for those interested in heating and cooling their dwelling via renewable energy, geothermal heat pump systems that tap the constant temperature of the earth, which is around 7 to 15 degrees Celsius a few feet underground and increases dramatically at greater depths, are an option over conventional natural gas and petroleum-fueled heat approaches. Also, in geographic locations where the Earth's Crust is especially thin, or near volcanoes (as is the case in Iceland) there exists the potential to generate even more electricity than would be possible at other sites, thanks to a more significant temperature gradient at these locales.

The advantage of this approach in the United States is that many states offer incentives to offset the cost of installation of a renewable energy system. In California, Massachusetts and several other U.S. states, a new approach to community energy supply called Community Choice Aggregation has provided communities with the means to solicit a competitive electricity supplier and use municipal revenue bonds to finance development of local green energy resources. Individuals are usually assured that the electricity they are using is actually produced from a green energy source that they control. Once the system is paid for, the owner of a renewable energy system will be producing their own renewable electricity for essentially no cost and can sell the excess to the local utility at a profit.

A 01 KiloWatt Micro Windmill for Domestic Usage

In household power systems, organic matter such as cow dung and spoilable organic matter can be converted to biochar. To eliminate emissions, carbon capture and storage is then used.[citation needed]

Sustainable energy research[edit]

There are numerous organizations within the academic, federal, and commercial sectors conducting large scale advanced research in the field of sustainable energy. Scientific production towards sustainable energy systems is rising exponentially, growing from about 500 English journal papers only about renewable energy in 1992 to almost 9,000 papers in 2011.[81]

Biofuels[edit]

Cellulosic ethanol has many benefits over traditional corn based-ethanol. It does not take away or directly conflict with the food supply because it is produced from wood, grasses, or non-edible parts of plants.[82] Moreover, some studies have shown cellulosic ethanol to be potentially more cost effective and economically sustainable than corn-based ethanol.[83] As of 2018, efforts to commercialize production of cellulosic ethanol have been mostly disappointing, but new commercial efforts are continuing.[84] [85]

Algae fuel is an alternative to liquid fossil fuels that uses algae as its source of energy-rich oils.[86] During the biofuel production process algae actually consumes the carbon dioxide in the air and turns it into oxygen through photosynthesis.[87] In addition to its projected high yield, algaculture— unlike food crop-based biofuels — does not entail a decrease in food production, since it requires neither farmland nor fresh water. Between 2005 and 2012, dozens of companies attempted to commercialize production of algae fuel. By 2017, however, most efforts had been abandoned or changed to other applications, with only a few remaining.[88]

Thorium[edit]

There are potentially two sources of nuclear power. Fission is used in all current nuclear power plants. Fusion is the reaction that exists in stars, including the sun, and remains impractical for use on Earth, as fusion reactors are not yet available. However nuclear power is controversial politically and scientifically due to concerns about radioactive waste disposal, safety, the risks of a severe accident, and technical and economical problems in dismantling of old power plants.[89]

Thorium is a fissionable material used in thorium-based nuclear power. The thorium fuel cycle claims several potential advantages over a uranium fuel cycle, including greater abundance, superior physical and nuclear properties, better resistance to nuclear weapons proliferation[90][91][92] and reduced plutonium and actinide production.[92] Therefore, it is sometimes referred as sustainable.[93]

Solar[edit]

Currently, photovoltaic (PV) panels only have the ability to convert around 24% of the sunlight that hits them into electricity.[94] At this rate, solar energy still holds many challenges for widespread implementation, but steady progress has been made in reducing manufacturing cost and increasing photovoltaic efficiency. In 2008, researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) developed a method to store solar energy by using it to produce hydrogen fuel from water.[95] Such research is targeted at addressing the obstacle that solar development faces of storing energy for use during nighttime hours when the sun is not shining. In February 2012, North Carolina-based Semprius Inc., announced that they had developed the world’s most efficient solar panel. The company claims that the prototype converts 33.9% of the sunlight that hits it to electricity, more than double the previous high-end conversion rate.[96] Major projects on artificial photosynthesis or solar fuels are also under way in many developed nations.[97]

Wind[edit]

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory projects that the levelized cost of wind power in the U.S. will decline about 25% from 2012 to 2030.[98]

Wind energy research dates back several decades to the 1970s when NASA developed an analytical model to predict wind turbine power generation during high winds.[99] The Field Laboratory for Optimized Wind Energy (FLOWE) at Caltech was established to research renewable approaches to wind energy farming technology practices that have the potential to reduce the cost, size, and environmental impact of wind energy production.[100] The president of Sky WindPower Corporation thinks that wind turbines will be able to produce electricity at a cent/kWh at an average which in comparison to coal-generated electricity is a fractional of the cost.[101]

A wind farm is a group of wind turbines in the same location used to produce electric power. A large wind farm may consist of several hundred individual wind turbines, and cover an extended area of hundreds of square miles, but the land between the turbines may be used for agricultural or other purposes. A wind farm may also be located offshore.

Many of the largest operational onshore wind farms are located in the USA and China. [102] Europe leads in the use of wind power with almost 66 GW, about 66 percent of the total globally, with Denmark in the lead according to the countries installed per-capita capacity.[103]

Wind power has expanded quickly, its share of worldwide electricity usage at the end of 2014 was 3.1%.[104]

Geothermal[edit]

Geothermal energy is produced by tapping into the thermal energy created and stored within the earth. It arises from the radioactive decay of an isotope of potassium and other elements found in the Earth's crust.[105] Geothermal energy can be obtained by drilling into the ground, very similar to oil exploration, and then it is carried by a heat-transfer fluid (e.g. water, brine or steam).[105] Geothermal systems that are mainly dominated by water have the potential to provide greater benefits to the system and will generate more power.[106] Within these liquid-dominated systems, there are possible concerns of subsidence and contamination of ground-water resources. Therefore, protection of ground-water resources is necessary in these systems. This means that careful reservoir production and engineering is necessary in liquid-dominated geothermal reservoir systems.[106] Geothermal energy is considered sustainable because that thermal energy is constantly replenished.[107]

Hydrogen[edit]

Over $1 billion of federal money has been spent on the research and development of hydrogen and a medium for energy storage in the United States. (2012)[108] Hydrogen is useful for energy storage, and for use in airplanes and ships, but is not practical for automobile use, as it is not very efficient, compared to using a battery — for the same cost a person can travel three times as far using a battery electric vehicle.[109] Regardless of that opinion, Japanese car manufacturers Toyota and Honda currently offer hydrogen fuel-cell powered passenger vehicles for sale in Japan and the U.S.A. Experimental hydrogen fuel-cell city buses are currently operative in two U.S. transit districts, Alameda/Contra Costa county, California, and in Connecticut.[110]. See List of fuel cell vehicles.

Government promotion of sustainable energy[edit]

Comparing trends in worldwide energy use, the growth of clean energy to 2015 is shown by the green line[111]

Around the world many sub-national governments - regions, states and provinces - have aggressively pursued sustainable energy investments. In the United States, California's leadership in renewable energy was recognised by The Climate Group when it awarded former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger its inaugural award for international climate leadership in Copenhagen in 2009.[112] In Australia, the state of South Australia - under the leadership of former Premier Mike Rann - has led the way with wind power comprising 26% of its electricity generation by the end of 2011, edging out coal fired generation for the first time.[112] South Australia also has had the highest take-up per capita of household solar panels in Australia following the Rann Government's introduction of solar feed-in laws and educative campaign involving the installation of solar photovoltaic installations on the roofs of prominent public buildings, including the parliament, museum, airport and Adelaide Showgrounds pavilion and schools.[113] Rann, Australia's first climate change minister, passed legislation in 2006 setting targets for renewable energy and emissions cuts, the first legislation in Australia to do so.[114]

Also, in the European Union there is a clear trend of promoting policies encouraging investments and financing for sustainable energy in terms of energy efficiency, innovation in energy exploitation and development of renewable resources, with increased consideration of environmental aspects and sustainability.[115]

In October 2018, the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) released its annual "State Energy Efficiency Scorecard." The scorecard concluded that states and electric utility companies are continuing to expand energy efficiency measures in order to meet clean energy goals. In 2017, the U.S. spent $6.6 billion in electricity efficiency programs. $1.3 billion was spent on natural gas efficiency. These programs resulted in 27.3 million megawatt hours (MWh) of electricity saved.[116]

Related journals[edit]

Among scientific journals related to the interdisciplinary study of sustainable energy are:

See also[edit]

  • GA Mansoori, N Enayati, LB Agyarko (2016), Energy: Sources, Utilization, Legislation, Sustainability, Illinois as Model State, World Sci. Pub. Co., ISBN 978-981-4704-00-7

Bibliography[edit]

  • Edenhofer, Ottmar (2014). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change : Working Group III contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-05821-7. OCLC 892580682.
  • Smil, Vaclav (2017). Energy Transitions: Global and National Perspectives. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger, an imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC. ISBN 978-1-4408-5324-1. OCLC 955778608.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Kutscher, Milford & Kreith 2018.
  2. ^ Renewable Energy & Efficiency Partnership (August 2004). "Glossary of terms in sustainable energy regulation" (PDF). Retrieved 19 December 2008.
  3. ^ James, Paul; Magee, Liam; Scerri, Andy; Steger, Manfred B. (2015). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.; Liam Magee; Andy Scerri; Paul James; Jaes A. Thom; Lin Padgham; Sarah Hickmott; Hepu Deng; Felicity Cahill (2013). "Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach". Environment, Development and Sustainability. Springer.
  4. ^ Lynn R. Kahle, Eda Gurel-Atay, Eds (2014). Communicating Sustainability for the Green Economy. New York: M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-0-7656-3680-5.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). "Chapter 7: Energy: Choices for Environment and Development". Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-282080-8. OCLC 15489268.
  6. ^ "Green Power Defined | Green Power Partnership | US EPA". Epa.gov. 28 June 2006. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
  7. ^ a b c International Energy Agency (2007). Renewables in global energy supply: An IEA facts sheet, OECD, 34 pages. Archived 12 October 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  8. ^ "THE NET BENEFITS OF LOW AND NO-CARBON ELECTRICITY TECHNOLOGIES. MAY 2014, Charles Frank PDF" (PDF).
  9. ^ "Comparing the Costs of Intermittent and Dispatchable Electricity-Generating Technologies", by Paul Joskow, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, September 2011".
  10. ^ Brook Barry W (2012). "Could nuclear fission energy, etc., solve the greenhouse problem? The affirmative case". Energy Policy. 42: 4–8. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.041.
  11. ^ Loftus, Peter J.; Cohen, Armond M.; Long, Jane C. S.; Jenkins, Jesse D. (2015). "A critical review of global decarbonization scenarios: what do they tell us about feasibility?". Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 6: 93–112. doi:10.1002/wcc.324.
  12. ^ "A critical review of global decarbonization scenarios: what do they tell us about feasibility? Open access PDF" (PDF).
  13. ^ Hydroelectric power's dirty secret revealed New Scientist, 24 February 2005.
  14. ^ Ferris, David (3 November 2011). "The Power of the Dammed: How Small Hydro Could Rescue America's Dumb Dams". Retrieved 4 January 2012.
  15. ^ Geothermal Energy Association. Geothermal Energy: International Market Update May 2010, p. 4-6.
  16. ^ a b Moomaw, W., P. Burgherr, G. Heath, M. Lenzen, J. Nyboer, A. Verbruggen, 2011: Annex II: Methodology. In IPCC: Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (ref. page 10)
  17. ^ "The International Geothermal Market At a Glance – May 2015" (PDF). GEA—Geothermal Energy Association. May 2015.
  18. ^ Rybach, Ladislaus (September 2007), "Geothermal Sustainability" (PDF), Geo-Heat Centre Quarterly Bulletin, Klamath Falls, Oregon: Oregon Institute of Technology, 28 (3), pp. 2–7, ISSN 0276-1084, retrieved 9 May 2009
  19. ^ Garretson, Peter (Spring 2012). "Solar Power in Space?" (PDF). Strategic Studies Quarterly. Retrieved 21 May 2015.
  20. ^ a b Tester 2012, p. 512.
  21. ^ [1] Retrieved on 12 April 2012.
  22. ^ a b c Smil 2017, p. 162.
  23. ^ Edenhofer 2014, p. 616.
  24. ^ Smil 2017, p. 161.
  25. ^ Lustgarten, Abrahm (20 November 2018). "Palm Oil Was Supposed to Help Save the Planet. Instead It Unleashed a Catastrophe". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
  26. ^ "Wind powered factories: history (and future) of industrial windmills". LOW-TECH MAGAZINE.
  27. ^ "Global Wind Report Annual Market Update". Gwec.net. Retrieved 21 August 2013.
  28. ^ "Wind energy gathers steam, US biggest market: survey". 2 February 2009. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
  29. ^ World Wind Energy Association (2008). Wind turbines generate more than 1 % of the global electricity Archived 22 November 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  30. ^ "Global wind energy markets continue to boom – 2006 another record year". Retrieved 30 January 2015.
  31. ^ "European wind power companies growing in U.S. – The Mercury News". 25 April 2007.
  32. ^ Solar water heating energy.gov
  33. ^ "Solar assisted air-conditioning of buildings". Archived from the original on 5 November 2012. Retrieved 5 November 2012.
  34. ^ Energy and the Environment, Jack J Kraushaar and Robert A Ristinen, section 4.2 Energy from the Sun pg.92
  35. ^ "Solar One is "go" for launch". Archived from the original on 14 May 2009. Retrieved 12 August 2007.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
  36. ^ "Israeli company drives the largest solar plant in the world". Isracast.com. 13 March 2005. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
  37. ^ Collings AF and Critchley C. Artificial Photosynthesis- from Basic Biology to Industrial Application. WWiley-VCH. Weinheim (2005) p xi.
  38. ^ Faunce, Thomas A.; Lubitz, Wolfgang; Rutherford, A. W. (Bill); MacFarlane, Douglas; Moore, Gary F.; Yang, Peidong; Nocera, Daniel G.; Moore, Tom A.; Gregory, Duncan H.; Fukuzumi, Shunichi; Yoon, Kyung Byung; Armstrong, Fraser A.; Wasielewski, Michael R.; Styring, Stenbjorn (2013). "Energy and environment policy case for a global project on artificial photosynthesis". Energy & Environmental Science. 6 (3): 695. doi:10.1039/C3EE00063J.
  39. ^ "MIT creates first Solar Leaf". geek.com. 30 September 2011.
  40. ^ "Concepts for new sustainable energy technologies". Pitb.de. Retrieved 21 August 2013.
  41. ^ "Solar farms in space could be renewable energy's next frontier". NBC News. Retrieved 4 June 2019.
  42. ^ Douglas, C. A.; Harrison, G. P.; Chick, J. P. (2008). "Life cycle assessment of the Seagen marine current turbine" (PDF). Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment. 222 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1243/14750902JEME94.
  43. ^ Sea machine makes waves in Europe BBC News, 15 March 2006.
  44. ^ Wave energy contract goes abroad BBC News, 19 May 2005.
  45. ^ Ricardo David Lopes (1 July 2010). "Primeiro parque mundial de ondas na Póvoa de Varzim". Jn.sapo.pt. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
  46. ^ Orkney to get 'biggest' wave farm BBC News, 20 February 2007.
  47. ^ "Turbine Technology Turning The Tides Into Power".
  48. ^ "SeaGen Turbine Installation Completed". Renewableenergyworld.com. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
  49. ^ American Physical Society Panel on Public Affairs. "Integrating Renewable Electricity on the Grid" (PDF). American Physical Society. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  50. ^ a b "100% Renewable Energy Needs Lots of Storage. This Polar Vortex Test Showed How Much". InsideClimate News. 20 February 2019. Retrieved 4 June 2019.
  51. ^ Moore, Patrick (16 April 2006). "Going Nuclear". The Washington Post. Retrieved 8 January 2013.
  52. ^ "Greenpeace International: The Founders (March 2007)". Archived from the original on 3 February 2007. Retrieved 21 August 2013.
  53. ^ "Co-Founder of Greenpeace Envisions a Nuclear Future". Wired News. Retrieved 8 January 2013.
  54. ^ Monbiot, George (20 February 2009). "George Monbiot: A kneejerk rejection of nuclear power is not an option | Environment". London: theguardian.com. Retrieved 21 August 2013.
  55. ^ "Has Bill Gates come up with a safe, clean way to harness nuclear power?". The Independent. Retrieved 9 January 2013.
  56. ^ Lovelock, James (2006). The Revenge of Gaia. Reprinted Penguin, 2007. ISBN 978-0-14-102990-0
  57. ^ "End the nuclear age | Greenpeace International". Greenpeace.org. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
  58. ^ "The Case Against Nuclear Power - Greenpeace International" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015.
  59. ^ InterAcademy Council (2007). Lighting the way: Toward a sustainable energy future p. xvii.
  60. ^ Huesemann, Michael H., and Joyce A. Huesemann (2011). Technofix: Why Technology Won’t Save Us or the Environment, Chapter 5, "In Search of Solutions: Efficiency Improvements", New Society Publishers, ISBN 978-0-86571-704-6.
  61. ^ American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (2007). The Twin Pillars of Sustainable Energy: Synergies between Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Technology and Policy Report E074.
  62. ^ a b "These cheap, clean stoves were supposed to save millions of lives. What happened?". Washington Post. 29 October 2015. Retrieved 1 March 2019.
  63. ^ Tester 2012, p. 504.
  64. ^ a b Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2008 Archived 8 September 2008 at the Wayback Machine p. 8.
  65. ^ United Nations Environment Programme and New Energy Finance Ltd. (2007), p. 17.
  66. ^ Green power, fueleconomy.gov
  67. ^ San Francisco Community Choice Program Design, Draft Implementation Plan and H Bond Action Plan, Ordinance 447-07, 2007.
  68. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 November 2009. Retrieved 12 September 2009.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
  69. ^ "The European ecolabel for electricity". EKOenergy. Retrieved 21 August 2013.
  70. ^ Green Energy Supply Certification Scheme website, accessed 16 December 2010
  71. ^ "Center for Resource Solutions". Center for Resource Solutions.
  72. ^ a b "Insights into the Voluntary Renewable Energy Market". Renewable Energy World. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
  73. ^ "Health & Wellness Consumer Market Research. Strategic Consulting". Nmisolutions.com. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
  74. ^ "Green Power Partnership". EPA.gov. Archived from the original on 22 April 2014.
  75. ^ "How It Works". ArcadiaPower.com.
  76. ^ "Green Power Partnership | US EPA". Epa.gov. 28 June 2006. Retrieved 8 July 2010.
  77. ^ U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.[2]
  78. ^ "Energy Distribution" U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.[3][permanent dead link]
  79. ^ [Whittington, H.W. "Electricity generation: Options for reduction in carbon emissions". Philosophical transactions in mathematics, physical, and engineering sciences. Vol. 360, No. 1797. (15 August 2002) Published by: The Royal Society]
  80. ^ Romm, Joseph; Levine, Mark; Brown, Marilyn; Peterson, Eric. "A road map for U.S. carbon reductions". Science, Vol. 279, No. 5351. (30 Jan. 1998). Washington
  81. ^ Rizzi; et al. (2014). "The production of scientific knowledge on renewable energies: Worldwide trends, dynamics and challenges and implications for management. In". Renewable Energy. 62: 657–671. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.08.030.
  82. ^ M.R. Schmer, K.P. Vogel, R.B. Mitchell, R.K. Perrin; Vogel; Mitchell; Perrin (2008). "Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (2): 464–469. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105..464S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704767105. PMC 2206559. PMID 18180449.CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
  83. ^ Charles E. Wyman (2007). "What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol". Trends in Biotechnology. 25 (4): 153–157. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.02.009. PMID 17320227.
  84. ^ Rapier, Robert. "Cellulosic Ethanol Falling Far Short Of The Hype". Forbes. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  85. ^ "Clariant bets big on cellulosic ethanol". Chemical & Engineering News. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  86. ^ Briggs, Michael (August 2004). "Widescale Biodiesel Production from Algae". UNH Biodiesel Group (University of New Hampshire). Archived from the original on 24 March 2006. Retrieved 2 January 2007.
  87. ^ "How Algae Biodiesel Works". 18 June 2008.
  88. ^ Wesoff, Eric (19 April 2017). "Hard Lessons From the Great Algae Biofuel Bubble". Retrieved 5 August 2017.
  89. ^ Armaroli, Nicola; Balzani, Vincenzo (2011). "Towards an electricity-powered world. In". Energy and Environmental Science. 4 (9): 3193–3222. doi:10.1039/c1ee01249e.
  90. ^ Kang, J.; Von Hippel, F. N. (2001). "U‐232 and the proliferation‐resistance of U‐233 in spent fuel". Science & Global Security. 9: 1. doi:10.1080/08929880108426485. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 December 2014. Retrieved 2 March 2015.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
  91. ^ Nuclear Materials FAQ
  92. ^ a b Robert Hargraves; Ralph Moir (January 2011). "Liquid Fuel Nuclear Reactors". American Physical Society Forum on Physics & Society. Retrieved 31 May 2012.
  93. ^ "Th-ING: A Sustainable Energy Source | National Security Science Magazine | Los Alamos National Laboratory". lanl.gov. 2015. Retrieved 1 March 2015.
  94. ^ "NREL Photovoltaic Efficiency Chart". NREL. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
  95. ^ "'Major discovery' from MIT primed to unleash solar revolution". MIT News. Retrieved 17 April 2012.
  96. ^ "Breakthrough: World's most efficient solar panel". SmartPlanet. Retrieved 17 April 2012.
  97. ^ Faunce, Thomas; Styring, Stenbjorn; Wasielewski, Michael R.; Brudvig, Gary W.; Rutherford, A. William; Messinger, Johannes; Lee, Adam F.; Hill, Craig L.; Degroot, Huub; Fontecave, Marc; MacFarlane, Doug R.; Hankamer, Ben; Nocera, Daniel G.; Tiede, David M.; Dau, Holger; Hillier, Warwick; Wang, Lianzhou; Amal, Rose (2013). "Artificial photosynthesis as a frontier technology for energy sustainability". Energy & Environmental Science. 6 (4): 1074. doi:10.1039/C3EE40534F.
  98. ^ E. Lantz, M. Hand, and R. Wiser (May 13–17, 2012) "The Past and Future Cost of Wind Energy," National Renewable Energy Laboratory conference paper no. 6A20-54526, page 4
  99. ^ "Wind energy research reaps rewards". NASA. Retrieved 17 April 2012.
  100. ^ "Wind resource evaluation at the Caltech Field Laboratory for Optimized Wind Energy (FLOWE)" (PDF). Caltech. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 December 2011. Retrieved 17 April 2012.
  101. ^ Smil, Vaclav. "Electricity From Wind." Energy Myths and Realities: Bringing Science to the Energy Policy Debate. Washington, D.C.: AEI, 2010. 120-21. Print.
  102. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2 September 2015. Retrieved 5 November 2012.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
  103. ^ Smil, Vaclav. "Electricity from Wind." Energy Myths and Realities: Bringing Science to the Energy Policy Debate. Washington, D.C.: AEI, 2010. 115-30. Print.
  104. ^ pg31
  105. ^ a b László, Erika (1981). "Geothermal Energy: An Old Ally". Ambio. 10 (5): 248–249. JSTOR 4312703.
  106. ^ a b Dorfman, Myron H. (July 1976). "Water Required to Develop Geothermal Energy". Journal (American Water Works Association). 68 (7): 370–375. doi:10.1002/j.1551-8833.1976.tb02435.x. JSTOR 41268497.
  107. ^ L. Ryback (2007). "Geothermal Sustainability". GHC Bulletin: 2–6.
  108. ^ Jeff Wise (November 2006). "The Truth about hydrogen what is hydrogen". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 17 April 2012.
  109. ^ Puma, Steve (8 February 2010). "Hydrogen is Not The Miracle Fuel of the Future". Triplepundit.com. Archived from the original on 13 November 2012. Retrieved 21 August 2013.
  110. ^ "Van Hool A300L fuel cell (bus)".
  111. ^ Statistical Review of World Energy, Workbook (xlsx), London, 2016
  112. ^ a b "The Climate Group". The Climate Group. 18 May 2016.
  113. ^ Centre for National Policy, Washington DC, 2 April 2012
  114. ^ Conservation Council of SA, 2 March 2006. "Rann's climate laws a first for Australia"
  115. ^ Farah, Paolo Davide (2015). "Sustainable Energy Investments and National Security: Arbitration and Negotiation Issues". Journal of World Energy Law and Business. 8 (6). SSRN 2695579.
  116. ^ "States, utilities see investments in energy efficiency programs grow - Daily Energy Insider". Daily Energy Insider. 10 October 2018. Retrieved 23 October 2018.