Articles

William Hulton: the man who sent the Yeomanry in at Peterloo & lifelong Tory

In Uncategorized on August 12, 2019 by kmflett

William Hulton: the man who sent the Yeomanry in at Peterloo & lifelong Tory

This week we mark the 200th anniversary of the Peterloo Massacre.

The event itself took place on Monday 16th August 1819 in central Manchester (very close to where the GMex conference hall now is). A peaceful protest for the vote left up to 18 dead and many hundreds injured as the local Yeomanry, military volunteers on horseback armed with sabres, were sent in to disperse the crowd after Magistrates determined that the meeting, as it  was deemed a tumultuous gathering, was illegal.

The Magistrate who gave the order to send the Yeomanry in was William Hulton (1787-1864).

It may be thought that I have been making a partisan political point in calling for Boris Johnson to apologise for Peterloo 200 years on. Partisan, no doubt, but also historically accurate.

In a review of books published to mark the 150th anniversary of Peterloo in 1969 EP Thompson noted that Hutton’s mother had a prize horse called ‘Church and King’ providing a flavour of what the family was like. He noted that when it came to events like Peterloo it was not so much that Hulton would lie about what took place (he did) but that he was simply not interested in what the ‘plebs’, those fighting for the vote, said or did.

Hulton nevertheless had an interesting and lengthy life.

Educated at Brasenose College Oxford, in 1811 he became High Sheriff of Lancashire. In this capacity he sentenced four Luddites to hang at Lancaster Castle for arson at Westhoughton mill.

Hulton was then 24 but such was his reputation as a class warrior that by 1819 he was chair of Lancashire and Cheshire magistrates.

He was in charge of the magistrates that sat in a house overlooking St Peters Field in central Manchester on that late August Monday almost 200 years ago as protesters gathered. EP Thompson suggests that it is likely that he had already had the backing of Home Secretary Sidmouth to disperse the crowd using force come what may.

Between 1.15 and 1.45 on the day, that is exactly what the Yeomanry on his order did.

The Peterloo Massacre as those events are known meant that Hulton became notorious and it meant that standing for public office was not an easy option for him.

Given his family background however this was not a problem.

The family estate Hulton Park was the site of no less than seven coal mines. In fact such was the extent of the workings that even before the Stockton to Darlington railway had been built George Stephenson had been engaged to build a rail line to take the coal to market.

In 1824 Hulton became Chair of the Leigh and Bolton railway company.

Hulton’s relations with his mining workforce were predictably dreadful. He paid them not in money but in kind until forced to change by the 1831 Truck Act. He refused entirely to countenance mining trade unionism.

In the twentieth century in 1910 there was a mining disaster leaving 344 dead at one of Hulton’s mines.

Matters did not however go well for the Hulton family. The mines were nationalised in 1947 and while compensation was paid the family source of continuing income was removed. By 2000 the Hulton family estate was up for sale.

Hulton left another legacy. As EP Thompson notes in 1832 the Reform Act, a result of Peterloo in 1819, saw the Tories lose South Lancashire. Hulton was one of those who met in a beer house to form the South Lancashire Conservative Association dedicated to defending, like the family horse, Church and King.

That organisation was one of the forerunners of the modern Tory Party.

Advertisements

Articles

The Ambridge Socialist: The ‘Glorious Twelfth’. Has Brian Aldridge read the 1831 Game Act?

In Uncategorized on August 12, 2019 by kmflett

The Ambridge Socialist

The Glorious Twelfth in Ambridge: Has Brian Aldridge read the 1831 Game Act?

12th August

Game Keeper William Grundy

The 12th August termed ‘glorious’ by some is the start of the annual grouse shooting season. It is a matter of considerable controversy focused around whether grouse moors create rural jobs and boost the economy or simply drain off public subsidies and destroy the environment. That’s without considering the grouse who may cease to exist as a result..

Ten years ago in 2009 Brian Aldridge was found planning a day’s shooting of Partridge later in August. Ambridge has no moorland, or grouse, but it certainly has shooting and game birds to shoot, at least if game keeper Will Grundy has been doing his job and his father hasn’t poached them.

Yet under the 1831 Game Act the Partridge shooting season doesnt start until 1st September.

The Daily Telegraph became quite excited about Brian 2009 faux pas:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/6087808/The-Archers-mistakes-Glorious-Twelfth-for-start-of-partridge-season.html

After certain events which saw Brian narrowly avoid jail he is no longer Chair of Borsetshire Land  and no longer responsible for gamekeeper Will Grundy.

Grundy now reports to the even more dubious Martyn Gibson.

The Ambridge Socialist will be listening to the Archers with particular interest over the next few weeks to see if any shoots of game birds do take place

 

Articles

August 12th marks the 180th anniversary of the start of the 1839 Grand National Holiday

In Uncategorized on August 12, 2019 by kmflett

August 12th marks the 180th anniversary of the start of the 1839 Grand National Holiday

With Boris Johnson reportedly cancelling all leave for advisors the neo-liberal imperative to abolish the idea of holidays (though no doubt Mr Johnson will still manage one) is gathering pace.

Yet 180 years ago at the start of the development of the liberal market economy the Chartists tried a very different kind of idea of a holiday

The Grant National Holiday has been Ignored or derided as a failure by many historians but it was an early attempt at a General Strike- its aim being to bring down capitalism.

The ‘Holiday’ was the idea of William Benbow. Like many radical activists in the nineteenth century he ranged across a variety of occupations, from pornographer to coffee house keeper to grocer and journalist, to survive.

He had been pushing the idea of a Sacred Month for decades in radical circles with no great immediate impact. He did however publish it as a pamphlet in the early 1830s and this can be freely accessed on the internet today

Benbow’s plan might well have stayed simply an interesting idea were it not for the fact that the Chartist Convention of summer 1839 adopted it as policy and determined to put it into operation in August of that year, starting on the 12th of the month.

It is very much a view of the early labour movement. We are familiar with General Strikes around the world which are in protest at something or which are demanding specific things. The Grand National Holiday was neither of these. It simply planned to disengage from capitalism until the system stopped working.

This meant that not only was no work to be done, but that supporters of the Sacred Month should withdraw any savings they had in banks or other institutions. They were also required to abstain from all excisable articles such as drink and tobacco. On 12th August 1839 in many, mainly northern areas, the pubs were shut.

It was argued that aside from anything else this prevented any disorder and drunkenness as the month got underway.

How was the call for the Sacred Month implemented?

Again as with more recent General Strikes it was not and could not be a matter of trade unions issuing instructions to members to stop work, mounting picket lines and so on. The labour movement infrastructure for this did not exist in 1839.

Instead the method used- and it was one to be echoed in the 1842 General Strike, which is better known to history-was different.

The weekly Chartist newspaper The Northern Star for the 17th and 24th August 1839 reports meetings across the north, often with very large turnouts comprising a majority of the working population of particular areas, which then proceeded to march to surrounding locations to pull others out in support of the Sacred Month.

Perhaps the best way of describing it is a mass flying picket, but before the motor vehicle, the only way to do this was to march on foot.

There is not a uniform picture of how long people stayed out for- some days in a number of areas- but not the whole month. Again the logistics were complicated. With so many out, and long before any kind of welfare system, people had to balance support for the holiday with the need to survive in terms of eating and providing for those unable to work.

Perhaps some had small holdings that allowed them to survive without wage labour, possibly being only recently agricultural workers. This was part of the project that became in the later 1840s the Chartist Land Plan, but for the Sacred Month itself detail on this remains, as yet, scarce.

Even in areas where the strike did not take hold there was at least symbolic support. In London on 12th August there was a mass Chartist meeting on Kennington Common for example.

Why did the strike fail?

Firstly because many leading Chartists were preoccupied with State persecution, arrests and trials, relating to the 1839 Convention.

Secondly because the 1839 Metropolitan Police Act had seen the introduction of new police forces in some areas. For example in Manchester the police, known as the ‘bludgeon men’ attacked and arrested strikers.

Yet this was not the last of the Chartist Challenge. The Sacred Month was just part of a repertoire of strategies that were being tried, mostly for the first time anywhere in the world, to see which might succeed in bringing an end to capitalism.

In November 1839 in Newport South Wales there was an attempt at armed revolution. It almost succeeded.

 

 

 

Articles

The Ambridge Socialist poll: which Ambridge residents should be in jail?

In Uncategorized on August 11, 2019 by kmflett

The Ambridge Socialist

11th August

Unlike Boris Johnson the Ambridge Socialist is no great fan of sending people to jail but that doesnt mean we’d abolish jails entirely.

Susan Carter, who herself has done prison time, opined this week that Ed Grundy should go to jail for getting mixed up with Tim Oatey’s illegal pesticides trade. Ed cant rest assured however that by the time PC Knacker Burns has investigated the matter he will be drawing his old age pension.

Meanwhile the only person recently jailed in the village has been Freddie Pargetter, part of the Ambridge ruling orders.

The wider question who in Ambridge really deserves to spend time in jail?

Articles

The late Joe Strummer named Best Sideburns wearer of all time for second year running

In Uncategorized on August 11, 2019 by kmflett

Beard Liberation Front

11th August 2019

Contact Keith Flett 07803 167266

The late Joe Strummer named Best Sideburns wearer of all time

The Beard Liberation Front, the informal network of beard wearers, has said that with National Sideburns Day on Sunday the late Joe Strummer has retained the title he first won in 2018 of Best Sideburns Ever in an on-line poll.

The seventh National Sideburns Day is on 11th August, reflecting the growing popularity of a range of facial hair styles.

National Sideburns Day was originally held to mark Bradley Wiggins Olympic victory in 2012

The campaigners say that sideburns, sometimes known as mutton chops, and named after US Civil War General Ambrose Burnside were often worn by Victorian politicians

Bradley Wiggins reinvented the post-1945 tradition of sideburns from Elvis Presley to Noddy Holder and the late Lemmy and Alvin Stardust, turned them into something no self-respecting hipster would be without

BLF Organiser Keith Flett said, this year National Sideburns Day underlines the resilience of the style over centuries of changing facial hair fashions, and the second victory for Joe Strummer makes the point that in 2019 sideburns remain an iconic style

Best Sideburns ever poll 2019 List

Noddy Holder (musician)

Lemmy (musician)

General Burnside

Alvin Stardust (singer)

Bradley Wiggins (sportsman)

Glen Campbell (singer)

Isaac Asimov (author)

Elvis Presley (singer)

Jack Nicholson (actor)

Tom Jones (singer)

Joe Strummer (musician)

Henry Winkler (The Fonz)

Brian Hibbard (Flying Pickets)

Amos Brearly (Emmerdale)

Merv Hughes (cricketer)

Ray Dorset (Mungo Jerry)

Trevor Bolder (musician)

Articles

Campaigners welcome lifting of 101-year old beard ban in the RAF

In Uncategorized on August 11, 2019 by kmflett

Beard Liberation Front

11th August

Contact Keith Flett 07803 167266

Campaigners welcome lifting of 101-year old beard ban in the RAF

The Beard Liberation Front, the informal network of beard wearers, has welcomed the news that the RAF has lifted its 101-year old ban on beards.

The RAF has said it has made the move to ‘help broaden the recruitment pool, promote inclusivity and help retain skilled personnel’.

The are still restrictions around the style and length of beard and a need to get permission which the BLF says it hopes will disappear over time leaving it up to the good common sense of airmen and women as to what is appropriate.

BLF Organiser Keith Flett said, we welcome the RAF’s move to greater inclusivity and we suspect that behind it in part lies a recognition that face masks now exist that can without question be worn safely with beards

https://www.forces.net/news/raf-personnel-be-allowed-grow-beards

 

 

 

Articles

200 years on: is it time for the Tories to apologise for Peterloo?

In Uncategorized on August 11, 2019 by kmflett

Many thousands had come from surrounding towns and villages to hear speakers including Henry ‘Orator’ Hunt at a demonstration demanding the right to vote held on St Peters Field in central Manchester on 16th August 1819.

They were cut down by Yeomanry on horseback using sabres and numbers died or were injured.

Much work is underway in Manchester to mark the 200th anniversary this Friday and Mike Leigh has made a film.

In the meantime its worth recalling a couple of points that EP Thompson made about Peterloo in the Making of the English Working Class.

Thompson notes ‘the actual bloody violence of the day. It really was a massacre.. there is no term for (it) but class war. But it was a pitifully one-sided war…Eleven* were killed or died from their wounds’.

The second point Thompson makes is ‘the sheer size of the event, in terms of its psychological impact.. it was without question a formative experience in British political and social history’.

A great deal more could be said.

As Boris Johnson is now the Tory Prime Minister perhaps it is time 200 years on for the Tories to stop forgetting the events of Monday 16th August 1819 and for him to make a public apology for Peterloo.  Wlliam Hulton the Chair of the Magistrates on the day who gave the order to send in the Yeomanry, was a lifelong Tory after all

*now thought to be 18