First, I’ve been busy working on two talks – one in Glasgow and another in Edinburgh. I’ve posted a couple of new articles: Precursors of Syndicalism II (on the I.W.P.A. and the “Chicago Idea”) and a review of Rupturing the Dialectic by Harry Cleaver. In addition, I added something to the AFAQ blog on The Symbols of Anarchy, revisited and something on the Proudhon blog entitled Hal Draper on Proudhon: the anatomy of a smear.
The last is something I’ve addressed elsewhere a couple of times, but when I saw (yet again!) the same cherry-picked Proudhon quote in a book chapter praising that numpty Hal Draper I thought I should go into it again, but in more detail. Draper seems to be considered something of an academic by some Marxists, personally he comes across as a hack – a hack with an irrational hatred of anarchism. His biases are clear enough, but I guess he says what Marxists want to hear and so they regurgitate him as he regurgitated Schapiro. Suffice to say, I’ve addressed some his claims in AFAQ (and elsewhere) and it is very easy – and quick – to refute his assertions. Not exactly what I would call a great scholar…
This particular cherry-picked quote does the rounds and it comes as no real surprise to discover Proudhon did not, as such, actually write the quote Schapiro presents and which Draper repeats. But, then again, making up and tampering with Proudhon quotes has been the case since Marx in 1847. I doubt that this will make much difference, but it shows the time and energy required to just a single quote! And Schapiro’s article is full of similar inventions and distortions.
Second, book news. PM Press has now published a new edition of Voline’s The Unknown Revolution which includes a lengthy introduction by yours truly. It , I hopes, fills in some gaps in Voline’s account as well as showing how subsequent research has confirmed his analysis. Also, Freedom Press has confirmed it will be publishing my collection of George Barrett pamphlets and articles from Freedom later this year. I’m glad this is happening, as his Anarchist Revolution and Objections to Anarchism are good, clear, accounts of anarchism. Both projects, incidentally, were finished while I was on strike last year.
Third, an update on A Libertarian Reader. I’ve selected the texts, written the introduction and am now working through the document adding introductory paragraphs to the texts and appropriate footnotes. As noted before, due to the quality and quantity of the texts I’ve decided to turn it into two volumes. Here is the contents of volume 1:
As can be seen, I’ve tried to include people from all schools of libertarian socialism – mutualism, collectivist-anarchism, communist-anarchism, individualist anarchism, Guild Socialism, revolutionary syndicalism, council communism, situationism, other forms of libertarian Marxism and, of course, the occasional individual outwith specific categories. It also, I hope, will show the origins of revolutionary anarchism in the First International, with translations of French texts which show the influence of Proudhon far better than the English translations of the time. As is clear, the bulk of the texts are from the revolutionary anarchist tradition – as this is historically accurate in terms of numbers, but also expresses my own political preferences. Also, from a personal perspective as a fan of Proudhon, it is interesting to note (or footnote, in this case) the clear links between later forms of anarchism (collectivism and communism) with mutualism. Notions raised by him are echoed later by many, many others – sometimes unknowingly, I am sure, but still it indicates how he addressed issues of concern for all socialists and raised many of the same solutions.
I tried to include rare texts, in the main, ones which are not in other books. Obviously, some works above are a chapter or extracts of the books indicated by their titles. Talking of which, I have preferred to include the whole article or chapters in question, and so have only rarely excluded text (and have included cuts with “[…]”). I’ve included many anarchists who have become less well-known over the years. And, yes, I’ve included people who did not remain libertarians – why forget their contributions? I’ve tried to include key events and organisations, showing that libertarians were involved in mass movements and history shaping events. There are also a few songs… but no poems! A lot is newly translated, including new versions of texts available elsewhere.
The introduction is complete. It is based, perhaps needless to say, on 160 Years of Libertarian but supplemented by later research, including Propertarianism and Fascism. It also draws upon Anarchist Organisation – Practice as Theory Actualised (talking of which, I should get around to completing the longer version of this, which was the first draft).
I’m happy with the texts selected, they give – I think – a good overview of libertarian ideas and they show how disgraceful is the right-wing appropriation of the word is. The libertarians of the 1920s and 1930s were fighting fascism, while the likes of von Mises were supporting it. Not to mention that even the briefest look at the notions advocated by right-“libertarians” shows that they are hardly libertarian – property is their concern, not liberty. Hence all the injustices and authoritarian social relations which drove the original libertarians are usually ignored by the propertarians – when not defended by them!
What also comes across is just now positive and constructive libertarian socialism is, why it inspired mass movements. To see it associated with a bunch of authoritarians seeking to defend their preferred private hierarchies is beyond sad – but, then, we are talking about the right and their grasp of ethics has always been slight (even in their own terms, as shown by their knowing theft of the word libertarian from the left shows).
The second volume will cover from 1937 to 2016 – many of these texts have already been identified, but I am sure more will be added. Also, there will be short biographies of all the individuals and groups included, along with summarises of the various schools of libertarian thought. I will also cover the question of ideological overlap and evolution. However, these are thoughts for later this year. I need to get volume 1 complete and sent to PM Press!
Until I blog again, be seeing you…