Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Europe’s future

This film clip shows what future Europe will face before long with this enormous influx of people from the Middle East and Africa, and with politicians that just talk and lack the ability to take action.

This applies in particular to Swedish politicians. The Swedish Prime Minister, Stefan Löfven, repeats like a parrot his worn mantra: “The other EU countries must take their responsibility”.

Yes, the other EU countries actually do take their responsibility, but for their own citizens, i.e. for those who pay the politicians salaries. In Sweden, such an argument are labelled Fascist.

Advertisements

In this film clip, an immigrant, that regularly posts video clips in Swedish, finally decided to post a clip in English. His nickname is “An Angry Wog talks” (En arg blatte talar). This indicates his frustration over the state of affairs here in Sweden.

Here he tells the world how unique Sweden is in its insanity. Watch it and se how the Swedish people are treated in their own country. Feel the horror!

Time for yet another video clip. This time it is the Former Swedish Minister of Finance, Mr Anders Borg, that makes a statement at the Peterson Institute meeting in 2013.

He acknowledges what people in Sweden have suspected for a long time: the US make war in the Middle East, and Sweden gets (most of) the refugees.

As a Swedish citizen, we were never, and are never, told that the influx is so enormous. We always hear that an influx is good, but we are never told officially that we outdo all the other European countries to this extent.

The big influx is something that the politicians conceal, and so do the media, who work alongside the politicians against the people. People who try to debate this fact are immediately called “racists” by the politicians, the media and their henchmen (Antifa and the like). This is an easy way of muzzling a whole nation.

So listen to the truth, that was easily conveyed to foreigners, but was never unmasked onshore:

 

Here in Sweden, life is a kind of Kafka dream, or rather a Kafka nightmare. When you thought that nothing else that is even more extreme happen, it suddenly does!

Believe it or not – the local government in Stockholm has decided to help returning ISIS warriors to adapt to the society by granting them allowances and priority over other in the housing queue!

Listen to this video – it is all true. Yes, it is! You would burst out laughing, if it weren’t for the fact that IT IS TRUE. I just say: only in Sweden!

 

I do not often post anything on this blog anylonger. Sometimes there are things that have to be reblogged or published, though. This clip is such a product. It summarizes what is going on in Sweden and the atmosphere under which Swedes are living. Take a deep breath – you won’t be the same person after having seen this film!

I cannot help publishing this video clip from the American CBN News on Sweden. As a dissident I must admit that this is a depiction that hits the mark completely, at least to all the inhabitants that have seen through media’s dishonest reporting, which is the case for more and more Swedes today. Sweden has become a mental prison for those who do not agree with the establishment.

The clip has – of course – not been mentioned in Swedish mainstream media. This is the ordinary mode of procedure, when the establishment (of which media is a part here) is criticized.

Furthermore, to have the nerve to use the regime-critical news blog Exponerat as a source (quickly viewed at the beginning when citing the UN report) would give any mainstream media journalist the creeps and make them refuse to involve in any debate.

For this is media’s new strategy. Their new catchphrase is:

dare to refuse taking the debate

This is what they keep on repeating in order to pursuade themselves that they are good people. In that way they avoid touch upon the fact that the core mission of a journalist is to debate and discuss. Their ability to expressing insults like “racists”, “nazis” and “xenophobic” and suchlike is however as vigorous as ever.

The Danish editor Hedegaard at the end is fully correct when he says:

That is a very bad situation because you live then in a country where you cannot solve any problems. You cannot even meniton the problems.

I do not post texts very often any longer. But don’t think that everything in the Swedish garden is lovely. On the contrary, Sweden is becoming more and more insane as time passes. This time, I cannot help publishing a text that has already been written and published, because I do not want my international readers to miss this one. You can say that the text shows what is the first step towards a Swedish dictatorship. You won’t believe your eyes!

If you want to read the text where it was first published, the on-line news paper Fria Tider, please click here.

Adelsohn-Liljerot

Minister for Culture, Lena Adelsohn-Liljeroth

Swedish minister for Culture, Lena Adelsohn-Liljeroth (Liberal), is critical of a Parliamentary committee and its decision to uphold the rules stating that press subsidies may not depend on newspapers’ political content. According to the responsible minister, a “democracy clause” should be included in the new legislation, barring “immigrant-critical” news outlets from receiving the statutory subsidies.

”One example is the debate that occurred while the pronounced immigrant-critical newspaper Nationell Idag received press subsidy” Adelsohn-Liljenroth writes in an article published on SVT Debatt [the offcial site of Swedish television, where I, by the way, have been banned from commenting].

She notes that it was against this background [that Nationell Idag was granted press subsidy] that she gave the Parliamentary Committee on Press Subsidies the directive to determine whether rules should call for ”respect for the ideals of democracy” or otherwise ensure that subsidies are justified from a ”democratic perspective”. The wordings denote the sharing of views on migration policy proposed by the Swedish government, most political parties and mainstream media. However, the ministerial directive to the committee resulted in an unwelcome conclusion. Mrs. Adelsohn-Liljeroth: ”The Committee concluded that such a requirement could be seen as a way to hinder the printed word. I disagree with that assessment”.

Now the government threatens to introduce a political section in the subsidy rules nevertheless – even though all members of the relevant parliamentary committee oppose it. ”I am now awaiting the respondents’ views on the proposal of the Press Subsidies Committee. I hope the responses provide a basis for imposing a democracy clause in the new press subsidy regulation,” Adelsohn-Liljeroth concludes.