Abstract
This article formulates precise questions and ‘rules of engagement’ designed to advance our understanding of the role populism can and should play in the present political conjuncture, with potentially significant implications for critical management and organization studies and beyond. Drawing on the work of Ernesto Laclau and others working within the post-Marxist discourse-theory tradition, we defend a concept of populism understood as a form of reason that centres around a claim to represent ‘the people’, discursively constructed as an underdog in opposition to an illegitimate ‘elite’. A formal discursive approach to populism brings with it important advantages. For example, it establishes that a populist logic can be invoked to further very different political goals, from radical left to right, or from progressive to regressive. It sharpens too our grasp of important issues that are otherwise conflated and obfuscated. For instance, it helps us separate out the nativist and populist dimensions in the discourses of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), Trump or the Front National (FN). Our approach to populism, however, also points to the need to engage with the rhetoric about populism, a largely ignored area of critical research. In approaching populism as a signifier, not only as a concept, we stress the added need to focus on the uses of the term ‘populism’ itself: how it is invoked, by whom and to what purpose and effect. This, we argue, requires that we pay more systematic attention to anti-populism and ‘populist hype’, and reflect upon academia’s own relation to populism and anti-populism.
References
Arditi, B. (2007) ‘Post-Hegemony: Politics Outside the Usual Post-Marxist Paradigm’, Contemporary Politics 13(3): 205–226. Google Scholar | |
Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
Bale, T., van Kessel, S., Taggart, P. (2011) ‘Thrown around with Abandon? Popular Understandings of Populism as Conveyed by the Print Media: A UK Case Study’, Acta Politica 46(2): 111–31. Google Scholar | ISI | |
Banerjee, S. B., Fleming, P. (2016) ‘When Performativity Fails: Implications for Critical Management Studies’, Human Relations 69(2): 257–76. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
Beasley-Murray, J. (2006) ‘Review of ‘On Populist Reason’ (Ernesto Laclau) and ‘Populism and the Mirror of Democracy’ (Panizza, Francisco (ed)), Contemporary Political Theory 5: 362–367. Google Scholar | |
Betz, H. G. (1994) Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar | |
Bloom, P. N., White, P. J. (2016) ‘The Moral Work of Subversion’, Human Relations 69(1): 5–31. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
Contu, A. (2017) ‘…The Point Is to Change It’ – Yes, but in What Direction and How? Intellectual Activism as a Way of ‘Walking the Talk’ of Critical Work in Business Schools’, Organization 25: 282–93. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
Contu, A., Willmott, H. (2005) ‘You Spin Me Round: The Realist Turn in Organization and Management Studies’, Journal of Management Studies 42(8): 1645–62. Google Scholar | ISI | |
Csigó, P. (2016) The Neopopular Bubble: Speculating on the People in Late Modernity. Budapest: CEU Press. Google Scholar | |
Dallyn, S., Marinetto, M., Cederstrom, C. (2015) ‘The Academic as Public Intellectual: Examining Public Engagement in the Professionalised Academy’, Sociology 49(6): 1031–46. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
De Cleen, B . (2017) ‘Populism and Nationalism’, in Kaltwasser, C. R., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P.. (eds) Handbook of Populism, pp. 342–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
De Cleen, B., Stavrakakis, Y. (2017) ‘Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse-Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism’, Javnost: The Public 24(3): 301–19. Google Scholar | |
du Gay, P . (2008) ‘Keyser Süze Elites: Market Populism and the Politics of Institutional Change’, Sociological Review 56: s180–82. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
Dyrberg, T. B. (2003) ‘Right/Left in Context of New Political Frontiers: What’s Radical Politics Today?’, Journal of Language and Politics 2(2): 339–42. Google Scholar | |
Dyrberg, T. B. (2006) ‘Radical and Plural Democracy: In Defence of Right/Left and Public Reason’, in Tønder, L., Thomassen, L. (eds) Radical Democracy: Politics between Abundance and Lack, pp. 167–84. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar | |
Gabriel, Y. (2015) ‘The Caring Leader: What Followers Expect of Their Leaders and Why?’, Leadership 11(3): 316–34. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
Glynos, J. (2008) ‘Ideological Fantasy at Work’, Journal of Political Ideologies 13(3): 275–96. Google Scholar | |
Glynos, J. (2012) ‘Body, Discourse, and the Turn to Matter’, in Bahun, S., Radunovic, D. (eds) Language, Ideology, and the Human: New Interventions, pp. 173–92. London: Ashgate. Google Scholar | |
Glynos, J., Howarth, D. (2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
Glynos, J., Mondon, A. (2016) ‘The Political Logic of Populist Hype: The Case of Right-Wing Populism’s ‘Meteoric Rise’ and Its Relation to the Status Quo’, Populismus Working Paper Series No. 4. Retrieved from http://www.populismus.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/WP4-glynos-mondon-final-upload.pdf Google Scholar | |
Herkman, J. (2016) ‘Construction of Populism: Meanings Given to Populism in the Nordic Press’, Nordicom Review 37: 147–61. Google Scholar | |
Jäger, A. (2016) ‘The Semantic Drift: Images of Populism in Post-War American Historiography and Their Relevance for (European) Political Science’, Populismus Working Papers No. 3. Retrieved from http://www.populismus.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WP3-jaeger-final-upload.pdf Google Scholar | |
Katsambekis, G. (2014) ‘The Place of the People in Post-Democracy: Researching “Antipopulism” and Post-Democracy in Crisis-Ridden Greece’, Postdata 19(2): 555–82. Google Scholar | |
Katsambekis, G. (2016) ‘Radical Left Populism in Greece: Syriza’s Trajectory from Minoritarian Opposition to Power’, Constellations 23(3): 391–403. Google Scholar | ISI | |
Kim, S. (2017) ‘The Populism of the Alternative for Germany (AfD): An Extended Essex School Perspective’, Palgrave Communications 3: 5. Google Scholar | |
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R.. (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
Laclau, E. (1977) Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism, Fascism, Populism. London: New Left Books. Google Scholar | |
Laclau, E. (1990) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso Books. Google Scholar | |
Laclau, E. (2005a) On Populist Reason. London: Verso Books. Google Scholar | |
Laclau, E. (2005b) ‘Populism: What’s in a Name’, in Panizza, F. (ed.) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, pp. 32–49. London: Verso Books. Google Scholar | |
Laclau, E., Mouffe, C. (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, 2nd ed. London: Verso Books. Google Scholar | |
Mény, Y., Surel, Y. (2000) Par le peuple, pour le peuple: le populisme et les démocraties. Paris: Fayard. Google Scholar | |
Moffitt, B. (2015) ‘How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism’, Government and Opposition 50(2): 189–217. Google Scholar | ISI | |
Moffitt, B. (2016) The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar | |
Moffitt, B., Tormey, S. (2014) ‘Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style’, Political Studies 62(2): 381–97. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
Mondon, A. (2013) A Populist Hegemony? The Mainstreaming of the Extreme Right in France and Australia. Farnham: Ashgate. Google Scholar | |
Mondon, A. (2017) ‘Limiting Democratic Horizons to a Nationalist Reaction: Populism, the Radical Right and the Working Class’, Javnost: The Public 24(3): 355–74. Google Scholar | |
Mudde, C. (2004) ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition 39(4): 541–63. Google Scholar | ISI | |
Mudde, C. (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
Mudde, C., Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017) Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
Müller, J. W. (2016) What Is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar | |
Nunes, R. (2014) Organisation of the Organisationless. Lüneburg: Mute and PML Books. Google Scholar | |
O’Doherty, P., Willmott, H. (2001) ‘Debating Labour Process Theory: The Issue of Subjectivity and the Relevance of Poststructuralism’, Sociology 35(2): 457–76. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
Ostiguy, P. (2009) ‘The High and the Low in Politics: A Two-Dimensional Political Space for Comparative Analysis and Electoral Studies’, Kellogg Institute Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series 360. Retrieved from http://nd.edu/~kellogg/publications/workingpapers/WPS/360.pdf Google Scholar | |
Panizza, F. (ed.) (2005) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso Books. Google Scholar | |
Robinson, S., Bristow, A. (2017) ‘Populist Responses to Austerity and Cultural Change: Brexit, Trumpism and Beyond’, Call for Papers Special Paper Series of Organization. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/pb-assets/cmscontent/ORG/CFP-Populist-Responses.pdf Google Scholar | |
Rooduijn, M. (2017) ‘What Unites the Voter Bases of Populist Parties? Comparing the Electorates of 15 Populist Parties’, European Political Science Review 1-18. doi:10.1017/S1755773917000145. Google Scholar | |
Rydgren, J. (2017) ‘What’s Populism Got to Do with It?’ Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 495–96. Google Scholar | |
Ryner, J. M. (2006) ‘International Political Economy: Beyond the Poststructuralist/Historical Materialist Dichotomy’, in De Goede, M. (ed.) International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics, pp. 139–56. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar | |
Sartori, G. (1990[1968]) ‘The Sociology of Parties: A Critical Review’. In Mair, P (ed) The West European Party System. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar | |
Speed, E., Mannion, R. (2017) ‘The Rise of Post-Truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy’, International Journal of Health Policy and Management 6(5): 249–51. Google Scholar | Medline | |
Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., Kärreman, D. (2016) ‘Extending Critical Performativity’, Human Relations 69(2): 225–49. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
Spicer, A., Böhm, S. (2007) ‘Moving Management: Theorizing Struggles against the Hegemony of Management’, Organization Studies 28(11): 1667–98. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
Stanley, B. (2008) ‘The Thin Ideology of Populism’, Journal of Political Ideologies 13(1): 95–110. Google Scholar | |
Stavrakakis, Y. (2004) ‘Antinomies of Formalism: Laclau’s Theory of Populism and the Lessons from Religious Populism in Greece’, Journal of Political Ideologies 9(3): 253–267. Google Scholar | |
Stavrakakis, Y. (2017a) ‘Discourse Theory in Populism Research: Three Challenges and a Dilemma’, Journal of Language and Politics 16: 523–34. Google Scholar | |
Stavrakakis, Y. (2017b) ‘How Did ‘Populism’ Become a Pejorative Concept? And Why Is This Important Today? A Genealogy of Double Hermeneutics’, Populismus Working Paper Series No 6. Retrieved from http://www.populismus.gr/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/stavrakakis-populismus-wp-6-upload.pdf Google Scholar | |
Stavrakakis, Y., Katsambekis, G. (2014) ‘Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA’, Journal of Political Ideologies 19(2): 119–42. Google Scholar | |
Stavrakakis, Y., Katsambekis, G., Kioupkiolis, A.. (2017) ‘Populism, Anti-Populism and Crisis’, Contemporary Political Theory. Published online before print August 2, doi: 10.1057/s41296-017-0142-y. Google Scholar | |
Stookey, S. (2008) ‘The Future of Critical Management Studies: Populism and Elitism’, Organization 15(6): 922–24. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
Taguieff, P. A. (1998) ‘Populismes et antipopulismes: le choc des argumentations’, Les Mots 55: 5–26. Google Scholar | |
Van Ostaijen, M., Scholten, P. (2014) ‘Policy Populism? Political Populism and Migrant Integration Policies in Rotterdam and Amsterdam’, Comparative European Politics 12: 680–99. Google Scholar |