Abhijit Iyer-Mitra인증된 계정

@Iyervval

𝙎𝙬𝙖𝙙𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙢𝙚 𝙉𝙞𝙙𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙢 𝙎𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙮𝙖𝙝𝙖, 𝙋𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙙𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙢𝙤 𝘽𝙝𝙖𝙮𝙖𝙫𝙖𝙫𝙖𝙝𝙖 (better die defending your beliefs than capitulate) Gita 3.35

New Delhi, India
muckrack.com/abhijit-iyer-m…
가입일: 2013년 10월

트윗

@Iyervval 님을 차단했습니다

정말로 이 트윗을 보시겠어요? 트윗을 봐도 @Iyervval 님의 차단을 해제하지 않습니다

  1. 메인 트윗
    2017년 9월 9일

    Russians amazed at my exquisite ballet skills. Declared next incarnation of Natalia Besmertnova I'm invited to be Primo Don of the Bolshoi

    답글 25개 리트윗 15개 93 마음
    취소
  2. 1분 전

    Another fascinating piece on what Sardar Patel thought of Mohandas

    @d_dnair 님, @Iyervval 님에게 보내는 답글
    Even Sardar Patel opposed him.
    리트윗 3개 4 마음
    취소
  3. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    2016년 3월 20일
    님에게 보내는 답글

    Orwell on the usefulness of Gandhi for the Brits

    답글 4개 리트윗 167개 129 마음
    취소
  4. 15분 전

    400 years? God where do they find these Einsteins? “Feminist” to boot, doesn’t care about victims of sexual misconduct as long as the perp does “something great”

    The yardstick to apply perhaps is that Gandhi was instrumental in ending 400 years of subjugation. Who the fuck is ??!
    이 스레드 보기
    답글 9개 리트윗 34개 89 마음
    취소
  5. 21분 전

    All the while you fret and fume, read this fabulous piece on what Ambedkar thought of Gandhi. When you finish reading it ask yourself why is it the loudest ‘s are busy defending Gandhi and ignoring his peccadilloes. (Hint mediocrities of a feather)

    답글 8개 리트윗 138개 216 마음
    취소
  6. 46분 전

    Here’s a fun thread on Mohandas

    @Iyervval 님, @chandru_gn 님에게 보내는 답글
    I list some of his acheivements : 1)Somehow he believed that victims during Armenian Genodice/Jewish Holocaust and Moplah Massacre were morally wrong rather than the murderers. 2)Thrashed his wife, when she refused to clean the toilets of South African Whites
    답글 11개 리트윗 90개 137 마음
    취소
  7. 59분 전

    A fantastic series of articles on Mohandas Karamchand, Do read, Do share “British stooge, pathological liar, no ideology save power - his own, tecieved regular intel on INC president Bose from the Brits”.... etc etc

    Replugging our series on Mohandas Gandhi which establishes through his writings that he was a British stooge, a pathological liar, an anti Hindu and had no ideology except power-his own. In short, Modi of today. Rebut through facts if u disagree:
    답글 16개 리트윗 121개 191 마음
    취소
  8. 1시간 전

    The depths of Gandhi’s depravity. Tut tut tut

    True! The terrible assassination of Swami Shraddhanand of Arya Samaj in 1926 by a Muslim fanatic Abdul Rashid was vociferously defended by Gandhi who called assassin "brother" n refused to even blame him for the crime. Ironically n sadly he faced exactly same fate 22 yrs later!
    답글 10개 리트윗 58개 167 마음
    취소
  9. 2시간 전

    Well the coward is trying to have his “outstanding scholarship” kept secret you see. I for my part am waiting to get my hands on it

    eagerly awaiting your dissection of this thesis! 😜
    답글 16개 리트윗 88개 339 마음
    취소
  10. 2시간 전

    😂 well see this is what spit roast swine looks like

    This loud-mouth moron has not changed even after spending more than a month in Odisha prison. How on earth is India tolerating while he is alleging Father of the Nation as a horrific sexual predator? - Will you stop this nonsense, please!
    이 스레드 보기
    답글 61개 리트윗 235개 823 마음
    취소
  11. 2시간 전

    An interesting discussion on national security, especially the thinking that went into the INC’s security strategy document between Gen Hooda & . Do watch with an open mind

    답글 3개 리트윗 7개 50 마음
    취소
  12. 3시간 전

    Again, READ the definition of terrorism. “Indiscriminate” being the decider. Here they picked the target, that they misidentified the target doesn’t negate “indiscriminate”

    Can someone also highlight the fact that Bhagat Singh & co. were pathetic assasins and they killed the wrong guy and got hanged for that.
    리트윗 25개 92 마음
    취소
  13. 5시간 전

    Churchill won WW2 for Britain .... ergo the engineered Bengal famine was right? This is my issue with “artistic” types discussing issues way over their limited comprehension levels

    Yeah. They are basically the same. One got India freedom and the other... Oh wait...
    답글 27개 리트윗 185개 470 마음
    취소
  14. 5시간 전

    UNSC resolution 47 is actually a great weapon for India. It means no referendum can be held till Chinese occupied Kashmir, Aksai Chin & territories north even of India’s territorial claim are not handed over to india FIRST! Everything else is sequential

    @RaufMahr 님, @Iyervval 님에게 보내는 답글
    Pakistan has messed it up , they cry referendum without knowing it's them who haven't comply first necessity of referendum , referendum can be hold on united kashmir , which include all regions laddakh, jammu , gilgit etc along with valley
    답글 17개 리트윗 312개 707 마음
    취소
  15. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    5시간 전
    님, 님에게 보내는 답글

    “Rahulie”... New entry in Fauxford fictionary of

    답글 3개 리트윗 13개 72 마음
    취소
  16. 5시간 전

    A plebiscite is not a recognition of occupation. By that measure every bi/multi ethnic/lingual state one group is “occupied”. Occupation is occupation and plebiscite is plebiscite.

    @Iyervval 님에게 보내는 답글
    The right of self-determination of Kashmiris has been accepted by UNSC under resolution 47 when India (who approached UN) was asked to appoint a plebiscite administrator nominated by the UN to conduct a free and impartial plebiscite. Why plebiscite if there is no occupation?
    답글 9개 리트윗 27개 121 마음
    취소
  17. 6시간 전

    Who’s the “Feku” now?

    이 미디어는 민감한 콘텐츠를 포함할 수 있습니다. 자세히 알아보기
    답글 153개 리트윗 1,603개 3,460 마음
    취소
  18. 6시간 전

    Absolutely sir. Except in India’s case both Britain and India+Pakistan recognised said occupation. In Kashmir’s case the UN doesn’t recognise it as occupation. Ditto Tibet. Ergo they both have a right to peaceful protest, not armed protest

    @Iyervval 님에게 보내는 답글
    And so is Kashmir’s armed struggle against their occupants (on both sides of the LOC). Right sir?
    답글 6개 리트윗 44개 154 마음
    취소
  19. 6시간 전

    An assassin is not a terrorist. One fundamental aspect of Terrorism is the killing should be INDISCRIMINATE (plus the mala proibita & mala in se definitions which don’t apply here)

    @Iyervval 님에게 보내는 답글
    Godse was a nationalist, he assassinated MK Gandhi, he was not terrorist. Whatever other labels people use, will not change history.
    답글 10개 리트윗 69개 202 마음
    취소
  20. 7시간 전

    Did he kill an Indian? Last I checked John Saunders was a Brit. The UN charter (applied here retroactively) recognises the right of armed resistance to an occupation.

    @Iyervval 님에게 보내는 답글
    You should also make it clear whether Bhagat Singh was a murderer and his "deshbhakti" doesn't absolve him.
    답글 12개 리트윗 56개 214 마음
    취소
  21. 7시간 전

    Let’s be clear, Godse was a muderer. His “deshbhakti” doesn’t absolve him. Let’s be equally clear that Gandhi was a horrific sexual predator. His “deshbhakti” doesn’t absolve him either Apply the same yardstick to both else you’re a hypocrite

    답글 513개 리트윗 3,742개 6,639 마음
    취소

@Iyervval 님은 아직 트윗이 없습니다.

로딩하는데 시간이 지연되고 있습니다.

트위터의 트래픽이 폭주했거나 일시적인 문제가 발생했을 수 있습니다. 다시 시도하거나 트위터 상태 페이지를 방문하여 자세한 내용을 확인해 보세요.

    관심사 추천:

    ·