Category Archives: China

Left-Wing Political Prisoner in Australia Hospitalised With Serious Diabetic Condition

Chan Han Choi Pleads: “They Are Indirectly Trying to Murder Me”

Left-Wing Political Prisoner Hospitalised with Serious Diabetic Condition
after Australian Regime Refuses Him Medical Care for Months

18 September 2020 – Socialist political prisoner Chan Han Choi is in Sydney’s Prince of Wales Hospital battling serious complications from his diabetes. He is under tight guard. The Australian regime have used their classification of Choi as a “National Security Interest” to block any kind of access to him. Unlike other prisoners who are hospitalised, Choi is not able to even receive phone calls from friends and family. Moreover, hospital medical staff told those close to Choi that staff have been ordered not to reveal any details about Choi’s medical condition because of his “special status.” Amidst this wall of secrecy, all that those close to Choi have been able to ascertain is that Choi had been hospitalised due to “issues” surrounding his diabetes. He has been in hospital for the last 11 days. This duration of hospitalisation indicates that Choi’s medical condition is serious if not even worse.

Chan Han Choi has been imprisoned by the Australian regime since December 2017 on charges of trying to organise trade deals to help the people of North Korea bypass crippling United Nations economic sanctions. He is currently imprisoned without being convicted. By the time that Choi finally goes to trial next February, he would have spent three years and two months in prison! All the charges against Choi refer to his alleged attempts to help North Korea export its produce abroad except for one charge of allegedly attempting to help North Korea import petroleum products. All opponents of imperialism, supporters of socialism and partisans of workers rights should stand by Chan Han Choi regardless of whether the allegations against him are true or not. As Trotskyist Platform spokesman, Samuel Kim, stated at a March 9 united front rally to demand freedom for Choi:

“If Choi turns out to be `guilty’ as charged that means that he sacrificed his freedom to help the people of North Korea bypass these killer sanctions. That would make him a great humanitarian. A humanitarian who should be freed from prison immediately. And if he is found not guilty, he should never have been imprisoned in the first place.”

For months Choi had been pleading to be seen by a prison doctor at the jail where is incarcerated: Long Bay Prison Hospital. As well as housing inmates on remand like Choi, Long Bay Prison Hospital holds prisoners with medical conditions. Therefore, there are actually more doctors assigned to treat inmates at that particular prison. Yet, the authorities repeatedly refused to allow Choi to see a prison doctor. This is despite the fact that he submitted at least five written applications to have a doctor’s consultation: on May 28, June 26, June 30, July 12 and August 12.

It would have been visually obvious to prison authorities that Choi was unwell. His friends who had Audio-Visual Link (AVL) “visits” with him over the last few months reported that Choi had lost much weight and that his face looked gaunt. Furthermore, the symptoms that Choi was complaining about – severe weight loss, rashes all over his body and “toilet problems” – are all classic symptoms of diabetes,  a condition that prison authorities knew that Choi was already afflicted with. In August last year, prison doctors prescribed him the oral diabetic medication Metformin.

It was only after Choi sent a protest letter to the director of Justice Health last month stating that “they are indirectly trying to murder me” by denying him medical treatment, that the authorities finally allowed Choi to see a doctor for the first time in about a year. That consultation occurred on around August 27. At that time, a prison doctor determined that his diabetes had become more severe and that he now needed insulin injections. However, given that he was suffering from the very same symptoms for months and was not provided with insulin during that time (because he was prevented from even being able to see a doctor) that meant that his diabetes had not been adequately treated for a lengthy period. Untreated diabetes can cause damage to the eyes, kidneys and nerves, increases the risk of strokes and heart attacks and can cause diabetic emergencies involving a serious reduction of a person’s consciousness. Meanwhile, the sudden onset of treatment after it has not been provided in due time can cause unconsciousness or even permanent brain damage. One of Choi’s friends informed that when Choi first spoke to him after finally receiving insulin treatment, Choi reported that his blood sugar levels still had not stabilized. By the following weekend, Choi’s condition had deteriorated even further. His friend reported that at his AVL “visit” on September 6, Choi was extremely confused and had such serious amnesia that he could not even remember why he was in prison! The following day he was admitted to Prince of Wales hospital under guard. Eleven days later and those close to Choi still have no idea what his actual medical condition is. The hope is that the severe amnesia that Choi showed just prior to being admitted to hospital was a temporary phenomenon caused by a serious imbalance in his blood sugar levels. However, those close to Choi are terrified that, given how secretive authorities have been about Choi’s condition, there is a possibility that he has suffered a diabetes-induced stroke or a degree of permanent brain damage caused by his diabetes through other means.

The Australian regime knows full well the growing support for Choi that there is amongst pro-working class and anti-imperialist activists. They had better realise that should Choi’s health have suffered any permanent degradation due to their months-long denial of medical care to him, Choi’s supporters in both Australia and abroad would surely take their revenge out on Australia’s authoritarian capitalist regime. We would do so by quadrupling our efforts to expose the unjust persecution of Chan Han Choi; and by working still harder to lay bare the connection between the regime’s persecution of this political prisoner and the other crimes that it commits in its relentless drive to further the interests of the exploiting class. Choi’s supporters would be energised to struggle all the more feverishly to unmask the deception behind the regime’s claims to stand for “human rights” and the “rule of law.” We would with renewed vehemence expose to the masses, both here and abroad, the Australian regime’s persecution in the courts of scores of staunch trade union activists (especially those working in the construction industry), their brutal racist killings of Aboriginal people in state custody, their prosecution of whistleblowers and journalists, their McCarthyist repression of those sympathetic to socialistic states, their arrogant trampling of the peoples of the South Pacific and the horrific execution-style murders of unarmed civilians and children that their Nazi and Confederate-flag waving, special forces troops commit in Afghanistan.

Australia’s Authoritarian Capitalist Regime Has Been
Torturing This Socialist Political Prisoner

The repeated denial of medical care to Choi was a blatant violation of Rule 25 of the UN’s Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, which states that: “The medical officer shall have the care of the physical and mental health of the prisoners and should daily see all sick prisoners, all who complain of illness, and any prisoner to whom his attention is specially directed” (https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/TreatmentOfPrisoners.aspx). Let’s remember that the UN is a capitalist-dominated agency that the Australian regime claims to uphold and that it is in the very name of enforcing UN sanctions that the regime here is persecuting Choi. Yet Australia’s authoritarian capitalist regime violates the UN’s own rules. The UN further states that: “The intentional withholding of medical treatment from persons in places of detention or in other State institutions such as orphanages or from persons injured by an act attributable to public officials falls within the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on torture” (https://www.bak.gv.at/en/Downloads/files/UNO/UNO_Folter_Konvention.pdf).  In other words, under the UN definition of torture, by repeatedly withholding medical care to Chan Han Choi over a lengthy period, the Australian regime has been torturing this political prisoner

The withholding of medical care is hardly the only violation of Choi’s rights that the Australian regime has been guilty of. They have made it extremely difficult for Choi’s friends and family to speak to him. The few people able to visit Choi report that it originally took them four to five months to gain approval to visit him and that they then need to get re-approved each year which takes a further couple of months each time. However, the authorities have still banned Choi from making telephone calls to these friends. Moreover, Choi has been prevented from speaking to his infant grand-daughters because Corrective Services NSW blocked his application to make telephone calls to his daughter-in-law. All this is a gross violation of Rule 92 of the UN’s Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, which states that: “An untried prisoner shall be allowed to inform immediately his family of his detention and shall be given all reasonable facilities for communicating with his family and friends, and for receiving visits from them, subject only to restrictions and supervision as are necessary in the interests of the administration of justice and of the security and good order of the institution.” This rule should obviously apply to the authorities detaining Choi. He is clearly an untried prisoner – indeed he has already spent two and three quarter years in custody without being tried. And Choi is definitely no threat to the “security and good order” of the prison: not only does he have no criminal record he is not even charged with committing or attempting to commit any sort of violent act or indeed any sort of act against a victim full stop.

The Australian regime has also violated Rule 90 of the UN’s rules on prisoners, which states that: “An untried prisoner shall be allowed to procure at his own expense or at the expense of a third party such books, newspapers, writing materials and other means of occupation as are compatible with the interests of the administration of justice and the security and good order of the institution.” In particular, the regime blocked repeated attempts by Choi’s friends to pass through the prison system to him issues of the popular Australian Korean-language community newspapers, Hanho Daily and Korean Today, some of which contained articles about Choi’s own case.

One of the most striking violations of Australian citizen Choi’s rights has been the Australian regime’s obstruction of his access to lawyers. They do this, in part, by requiring lawyers to go through a months-long special approval process before they can again access to Choi. As a result, Choi’s new lawyers, who were engaged at his instructions by his friends nearly two months ago, to this very day, have not only not been able to visit Choi but have even been prevented from speaking to him over the telephone! Moreover, in a 3 November 2019 letter to Choi’s previous lawyers, the Commissioner of Corrective Services NSW (CSNSW), Peter Severin, admitted that his officers had been listening in on their privileged communications (see: https://www.trotskyistplatform.com/socialist-political-prisoner-cannot-get-a-fair-trial-in-australia/). He stated that: “phone calls with `national security interest’ (NSI) inmates, such as Choi, are monitored by CSNSW officers to ensure that they are in English and are with approved contacts.” Such monitoring of phone calls are a blatant violation of Rule 93 of the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners which states that: “Interviews between the prisoner and his legal adviser may be within sight but not within the hearing of a police or institution official.”

Chan Han Choi: A Victim of the New McCarthyist Witch-Hunt

The withholding of medical care to Chan Han Choi recalls the Australian regime’s record of very frequently refusing to grant Aboriginal prisoners timely medical care. Many Aboriginal people have died in state custody after police or prison guards fatally delayed granting them access to urgently needed medical care. Kamilaroi man, Eric Whittaker, died of a ruptured brain aneurysm on 2 July 2017 after guards at Parklea Correctional Centre refused to give him medical care for some three and a half hours after he first started making desperate appeals to get access to care. Thirty-six year-old Whittaker made 20 emergency calls begging for help from 4.52am but guards murderously ignored his pleas. When staff finally attended to Whittaker at 8.08am, he was found crouched in the rear of his cell shouting “please help me” and having urinated, vomited and defecated on himself (https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/please-help-me-eric-whittaker-made-20-emergency-calls-before-he-died-in-custody-20191014-p530gg.html). Fifteen months later, another thirty-six year-old Aboriginal man, Nathan Reynolds, also died after authorities again fatally delayed giving him medical care. A diagnosed serious asthmatic, Reynolds had repeatedly buzzed for help and screamed out, “I can’t breathe.” Other distressed inmates started buzzing for help as they could see Reynolds deteriorating before their very eyes and turning blue in the face. It took forty minutes for help to arrive. One hour and twenty minutes after crying out for help the Anaiwan father of one was dead (https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/aug/25/why-does-it-take-so-long-the-desperate-wait-for-answers-after-a-death-in-custody). Earlier in August 2014, 22 year-old Aboriginal woman, Julieka Dhu, died in police custody in WA of a bacterial infection because police criminally prevented her from getting the medical care that she so desperately cried out for. The night before she died, Ms Dhu had cried out in pain all night but police refused her pleas to see a doctor. They continued to murderously obstruct her getting medical care the next morning even after she vomited repeatedly for over an hour. Instead, a cop threateningly told her, “you will f_cking sit this out.”

Aboriginal people suffer the most intense racist state oppression in Australia. As a person of Asian background, racism is no doubt a factor in Choi’s ill-treatment too. However, there is another more over-riding reason why Choi is suffering the same intense brutality that the racist, rich people’s regime unleashes against Aboriginal people. That is because he is being persecuted for his sympathy for a socialistic state – in this case the DPRK (the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, i.e. “North Korea”). The last few years has seen an escalating anti-communist witch hunt in Australia. This persecution of supporters of the DPRK and more often those sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) is part of the Australian rulers’ role in the U.S.-led Cold War drive against the socialistic PRC and her socialistic neighbour and ally, the DPRK. This witch hunt mirrors the 1950s campaign in the U.S. and Australia against communists and others who expressed even the slightest sympathy towards the then Soviet Union – and to a lesser extent back then also the PRC and the DPRK. A large number of communists, trade unionists, artists and intellectuals, including those who had merely not been “condemnatory enough” of communism, ended up being jailed or purged from their jobs. The ideology of the witch hunt became known as McCarthysim, after the U.S. senator Joseph McCarthy who helped drive the witch hunt with smear tactics and unsubstantiated accusations (extreme right wing federal Liberal MP and Chair of the Parliamentary Committee on Intelligence and Security, Andrew Hastie, is a modern day Australian equivalent of Joseph McCarthy).

The McCarthyist nature of Chan Han Choi’s all-sided persecution has been most evident during his bail applications. In their submissions opposing each of Choi’s bail applications last year, the Crown made Choi’s stated sympathy for the DPRK a central point of their argument. Indeed, they listed as the very second point of their argument on why they claim that, “the Applicant’s alleged offending is objectively serious,” “the Applicant’s repeated statements that he is a loyal subject of the DPRK ….” In other words, because of this Australian citizen’s political sympathy for a socialistic state, the Australian regime insists that he should have less rights – in this case the right to bail – than other people. That is simply an expression of the very basic premise of McCarthyism. And that very same McCarthyist premise was very evident in the judges’ rejection of his bail applications. Two different judges rejected Choi’s two bail bids even though he is not even accused of killing anyone, sexually assaulting anyone, bashing anyone, stealing from anyone, any terrorist acts, espionage or even planning any of these things. By contrast, accused murderers and pedophile high-ranking priests are readily granted bail in Australia.

Chan Han Choi is not the only victim of the new McCarthyist witch hunt. International students from China who organised a thousands-strong demonstration in Sydney in August 17 last year that opposed the anti-PRC forces in Hong Kong were interrogated and intimidated by Australian security agencies (https://news.have8.tv/2636880.html). Australian regime agents told a key female organizer of the march that her actions may have violated Australia’s foreign interference laws and threatened that she could face visa problems. When the Australian secret police intrusively asked her about her family and she responded, “You all know a lot!” the cops menacingly retorted, “Yes, so you have to be careful” and settle down [and stay out of politics!]. Then, less than three months ago, Australia’s ASIO secret police and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) – the very agencies spearheading the persecution of Chan Han Choi – raided the homes of four PRC journalists based in Sydney (http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-09/12/c_139361950.htm).  They interrogated the reporters, seized their computers and smartphones and even demanded that they not report the raids.

Most infamously, the Australian ruling class and its media have launched a witch hunting campaign against NSW upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane. Moselmane was pilloried by the mainstream media, Liberal politicians and leaders of his own Labor Party for having the temerity to praise China’s highly successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, on April 6, Moselmane was forced to step down from his position as assistant president of the NSW Legislative Council. Then, just seven weeks later, ASIO and the AFP raided Moselmane’s home and parliamentary office. The more than 12 hour-long operation was unleashed under the pretext that “Chinese government agents” had infiltrated his office and were using him as part of a “foreign interference” operation. It has now been revealed who these “agents” are and what their supposed “foreign interference operation” was. The “agents” – the Chinese media reporters who were raided in Sydney and a part-time staffer for Moselmane, John Zhang – supposedly “interfered” because they were in the same social media chat group as Moselmane and had had contact with China’s Sydney Consul. How utterly ridiculous is it to portray that as some sort of sinister “foreign interference”! Yet the Australian media and regime depicted Moselmane as a traitor even though he was not even a suspect in the authoritarian raid. NSW politicians forced him to take leave from his elected position as a state senator and, to this very day, those NSW voters who elected Moselmane remain disenfranchised from their voice in parliament.

Let’s Work Harder to Demand Freedom for Chan Han Choi

The McCarthyist witch hunting is all about silencing the voices of anyone who speaks favourably, however mildly in the case of Moselmane, about a socialistic country. That is, after all, why the Australian regime have been denying Choi medical care, refusing him bail and stripping him of his rights. Because Choi has stood by his political beliefs and even from prison bravely spoke out about his love for the egalitarianism of North Korean society and against the unfairness of the UN economic sanctions on North Korea, the Australian authoritarian regime wants to punish him, isolate him and demoralise him into submission. They also don’t want him getting bail as they know that this would enable him to speak more easily to the world about the injustice of the UN sanctions and the cruelty of his treatment while in prison.

Yet behind the capitalist ruling class’ strong state repression is, actually, fear. However, it is not Chan Han Choi, PRC journalists, international students from China, Moselmane or Chinese social organisations that they are ultimately most scared of. No, who they are ultimately scared of are the entire working class masses that they exploit. Australia’s capitalists know all too well that on average for every $100,000 of value that a worker adds to an enterprise, they, the capitalists, steal a full $50,000 out of that amount in profit. They know that young workers are frustrated that more than half of them do not have a stable job – and are, instead, consigned to being either unemployed, having less work hours than they want or to working as insecure casuals, gig workers or employees on short-term contract. The capitalist rulers know too that low-income people are angry at the lack of affordable low-rent accommodation. The regime is nervous that Aboriginal people and other anti-racists are furious at ever worsening racist state brutality. They know too that politically aware workers are seething at the job cuts and reduced work hours that workers have copped during the pandemic even as corporate profits surge through the roof. So, the capitalist exploiters are terrified that anyone speaking positively about the world’s largest socialistic country, that is the PRC – or even about her much maligned, small but staunch DPRK neighbour – could make the masses here realise that there is an alternative to capitalism. The capitalist rulers are fearful that this would, in turn, cause an explosion in mass resistance against them. Therefore, the lances that the capitalist regime is stabbing Choi and others with in their Cold War witch hunts are actually meant to pierce right through their immediate victims and onto the rebellious hearts of the broader oppressed masses. That is why it is very much a matter of self defence for the working class and oppressed in Australia to oppose the McCarthyist repression. Let us mobilise in action to demand: Free Chan Han Choi – Drop all the charges now! Down with the persecution of Chinese journalists, pro-PRC international students and parliamentary staffer, John Zhang! Repeal Australia’s draconian “Foreign Interference” laws!  Stop the witch hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane – allow this elected MP to resume his seat in parliament immediately!

Chan Han Choi is not merely a victim of Cold War persecution. His arrest, then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull’s fanatical tirade against Choi at the time of his arrest and the media hysteria surrounding this supposed “North Korean economic agent” were meant to help propel the witch hunt. And it has! Just six months after Choi’s arrest, the Australian government rammed through its authoritarian “foreign interference” laws. These laws will not only attack those with sympathies for the PRC and the DPRK – its main immediate targets – but also dissident journalists as well as leftists and trade unionists with international connections. And that is a crucial point. The Cold War witch hunt is creating such an obsession with “national security” that its victims are already starting to be much broader than simply those who speak positively about the PRC and DPRK. It is notable that while ASIO first raided the homes of remorseful former Australian spy, Witness K, and his lawyer Bernard Collaery in 2013 – for revealing to the media and the East Timorese government that Australia’s ASIS spy agency had planted listening devices in Timorese government buildings to give the Australian government the advantage in negotiations over an oil and gas dispute with East Timor – the Australian regime did not feel that they could actually lay charges against the two until June 2018, that is in the months following the red scare hysteria that surrounded Choi’s arrest and after the China-bashing campaign had reached new heights. Similarly, military lawyer, David McBride, who faces up to 50 years in jail for informing the media of horrific war crimes by Australian elite forces in Afghanistan and the ABC journalist, Dan Oakes, who broke the story – whom the AFP have called to be charged – are indirect victims of the “national security” obsession that the Cold War witch hunt has created, even though they are not themselves accused of any sympathy for a socialistic state. We should add that the “national security”-obsessed climate created by the new McCarthyist campaign has made it easier, too, for the Australian regime to brush off its despicable complicity in Washington and London’s persecution of Australian Wikileaks journalist, Julian Assange.

That is why those within the political Left who think that they do not need to defend Choi and oppose the new McCarthyism, just because they are not amongst the sections of the Left courageous enough to stand by the socialistic PRC and DPRK, had better think again. Just like the original 1950s McCarthyist witch hunt, its contemporary version is creating such a stifling, repressive political climate that it will eventually target all sections of the Left. Already in the U.S., Trump and his fascistic hard-core supporters brand staunch supporters of black liberation or proponents of universal public health care as China-loving communists. If the new Cold War repression is not resisted, inevitably in Australia, in the future, supporters of public housing, nationalisation of the banks and public ownership of industry will be attacked as “agents of Red China-like and North Korea-like policies.”

The ruling class’ fear-mongering surrounding Chan Han Choi and their railings against “Communist Chinese influence” are meant to also justify their foreign policy agenda. And top of that agenda is to increase military and political pressure on socialistic China and her socialistic North Korean ally and neighbour. Two and a half months ago, the right wing Australian government announced a massive $270 billion defence upgrade targeting the PRC and DPRK. The military build up would see Australia acquire long-range missiles. Why is the Australian ruling class doing this? Crushing socialistic rule in China and North Korea would, by dashing hopes that there is a viable alternative to capitalism, help secure the rule of exploitation by Australia’s capitalist class. However, such a victory for capitalism would be disastrous for working class people. For although socialistic rule in both China and North Korea is fragile and bureaucratically deformed, the PRC and DPRK are, nevertheless, workers states formed through the overturn of capitalist rule by the toiling classes and with economies based on the dominant role of socialist public ownership. Seventy years of socialist rule have brought immense benefits to China’s masses and are an inspiration to every downtrodden person around the world who aspires for justice and a better life. When it comes to uplifting people out of poverty, providing decent health care to all and advancing social equality for women, Red China has far surpassed the other populous countries that were also raped by colonialism but which have remained under capitalist rule (such as India, Indonesia, Pakistan, the Philippines, Egypt, Brazil and Peru) – whether these capitalist developing countries be nominal “democracies” or ones administered by notoriously strong state regimes. Today, the PRC and even the sanctions-ravaged DPRK, along with the other workers states in Cuba, Vietnam and Laos, have been far more effective in protecting their people from the deadly COVID-19 pandemic than most of the capitalist world. The continued existence of these workers states gives hope to the most politically aware activists
– amongst the 90% of Australia’s people who would benefit from the overturn of capitalist rule – that we can eventually achieve such a revolutionary victory. In standing by one of these workers states, Chan Han Choi has, thus, bravely stood by 90% of Australia’s people. We must now in turn stand by him!

The Australian regime’s torture of Choi (through their withholding of medical care) proves that there is no way that he can get a fair trial – not even a fair trial under the unjust laws that he is charged under. And the capitalist regime’s violation of many of Choi’s rights as a defendant and untried prisoner prove the very same thing too. Like all capitalist states, the Australian state is a state biased towards the interests of the rich exploiting class and biased against the interests of the working class and those like Choi who stand by the socialist system that favours the working class masses. And if someone like Choi could never get a fair trial in capitalist Australia this is triply so during the current atmosphere of intense anti-communist witch hunting. That is why it is up to class conscious workers, anti-imperialists and opponents of increasing state repression in Australia to stand by Chan Han Choi. In the lead up to Choi’s trial next February, let us work ever harder to build the campaign to demand freedom for this political prisoner – a prisoner who has suffered so much cruelty for his pro-socialist beliefs.

UPDATE, 22 September 2020: On either last Saturday (19 September), or late on the day before, Chan Han Choi was returned from Prince of Wales Hospital to Long Bay jail. A friend of Choi had an Audio-Visual Link (AVL) meeting with Choi on the weekend. This friend of Choi informed that Choi’s memory had recovered significantly from when he last had contact with the outside world on September 6. However, his memory was still shaky and he could not remember some details about his case and about some other aspects he seemed confused. In terms of his physical condition, Choi was not aware (likely he has not been told) of his exact diagnosis and what the actual complications he had that caused him to be admitted to hospital for some 12 days. He did say that since he returned from hospital to the prison, a prison nurse is monitoring his blood sugar levels three times a day.

The Last Cold War and the New One Against Socialistic China

Defend Socialistic Rule in China!

The Last Cold War Against the Soviet Union
and the New One Against Socialistic China

28 May 2020: What a last few months it has been in terms of Australia’s “relations” with its biggest trade partner, the Peoples Republic of China (PRC)! Firstly, even after the PRC had effectively squashed the coronavirus spread by late February, Canberra continued to maintain a discriminatory travel ban almost exclusively on PRC citizens, while for weeks allowing large numbers of infected people to enter from the U.S.A and Europe without any screening and quarantine. Then two months ago, the mainstream media, right wing politicians and members of his own Labor Party launched a hysterical witch-hunt against senior NSW upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane, for simply having the temerity to state what many infectious disease specialists had already explained: that China had taken effective measures that had fought and contained the coronavirus threat. All the while, the mainstream media could not let a week pass without “finding” – or rather manufacturing – a story on which to attack the PRC. It was just like in the days of the last Cold War against the then Soviet Union. Then last month, senior government politicians, like home affairs minister Peter Dutton, stepped up their campaign to despicably blame China for the virus outbreak. Associated with this propaganda campaign, the Australian regime spearheaded the push for a witch-hunting anti-PRC “inquiry” into the virus’ origins which the foreign minister said would involve “investigators” acting like weapons inspectors, thus evoking the notorious “weapons inspections” that were the prelude to the 2003 U.S./British/Australian invasion of Iraq.

It is pretty evident that we are now no longer merely facing the threat of a new Cold War. We are actually now in a new Cold War – a Cold War directed mainly against socialistic China and those living in the West with even the slightest sympathy for her. Thus, it is worth looking back at the last Cold War. That Cold War was also focussed against the most powerful socialistic country of the time, which was then the Soviet Union. It is a myth that the capitalist powers’ hostility to the Soviet Union only began around 1947. In fact, it actually started in late 1917 from the very moment that the working class and other toilers of Russia overthrew their exploiters and took state power into their own hands. Soon after this October 1917 Socialist Revolution, over a dozen foreign states including Britain, Australia, Japan, the U.S. and France sent troops to assist Russian counter-revolutionaries seeking to restore capitalist rule there through bloody civil war. The capitalist powers understood that the 1917 triumph of the working class in Russia would inspire revolutionary struggles of workers around the world. So they resolved to crush socialism before it could establish itself and spread. However, after the invading capitalist armies and their Russian counter-revolutionary allies were defeated in the Civil War, the capitalist powers became partially engrossed in their own inter-imperialist rivalries. Later they were also focussed on trying to crawl out of the 1930s Great Depression that had wreaked havoc across the capitalist world. All the imperialists still wanted to crush the Soviet workers state. However, with the Soviet Union then much weaker, the British and French capitalists were equally concerned about the resurgence of their German imperialist rival. But the outcome of World War II and its aftermath changed all that. The strength of the Soviet Union and of pro-communist movements became greatly enhanced. The heroic victory of the Soviet Red Army and her communist partisan allies over the Nazis had led to the foundation of new socialistic states allied to the Soviet Union in Poland, Hungary, East Germany and other parts of Eastern Europe. Furthermore, local communist partisans with the assistance of the Soviet Army had overturned capitalist rule in North Korea and Yugoslavia. Moreover, although 75 years later, Western propaganda has managed to obscure this truth from many people, everyone at the time knew that it was the Red Army and her allies who had largely defeated fascist Germany. The overwhelming majority of the fighting against the Nazis was in the Eastern Front where the Red Army and her allies stood up to the Nazis and their allies. Of all the casualties in the European and North African theatres of the war, more than 90% were in the Eastern Front. The U.S., Britain and their allies did not make a serious attempt to defeat the Nazis until they saw the Soviets winning in the Eastern Front. Although they partly sold their war as a “war against fascism”, the Allies’ opposition to Hitler, in as much as it existed, was driven by imperialist competition. And their main reason for finally opening up a second front against Hitler was to get to Germany before the Soviet Union did. Many people at the time could see through all this. They were only too aware of how the bulk of the French capitalist class and that of many other Western capitalist classes had collaborated with the German and Italian fascists. As a result, many of the capitalist classes in Europe and around the world were discredited, tainted with fascism and threatened with working class revolts at home. In contrast, the Soviet Union’s predominant role in crushing the hated Nazis greatly increased her authority. Around the world, Communist parties grew in numbers and anti-colonial movements influenced by Marxist ideas emerged. Alarmed by all this, the capitalist regimes moderated their rivalries in order to unite against their common threats: communist movements, the Soviet Union and the other socialistic states. In 1947, the U.S. imperialists backed up by the weakened West European and Japanese capitalist rulers and capitalist regimes in Australia and elsewhere unleashed a Cold War to contain and crush communism and the socialistic states.

The Cold War became more intense in 1949 after the toiling masses of China led by Mao Ze Dong’s Communist Party of China (CPC) overthrew the landlords, imperialist-puppets and capitalists of China and set about on a socialistic path. Then after socialistic North Korea and her Red Chinese allies humiliated the U.S., Australian and other imperialists by holding them to a stalemate in the 1950-53 Korean War, Cold War fears reached fever pitch. In many countries a McCarthyist anti-communist witch-hunt – named after U.S. senator Joseph McCarthy who played a key role in inciting it – was unleashed. In the U.S. in the late 1940-1950s, thousands upon thousands of teachers, wharfies, seamen, university academics and government employees were driven out of their jobs on the basis of the slightest alleged sign of communist association or lack of adequate hostility to the Soviet Union. Large number of Hollywood actors, writers and directors were also forced out of their jobs and blacklisted. Hundreds of communists and alleged communists were jailed. Meanwhile, in Australia, several Communist Party of Australia (CPA) leaders were imprisoned alongside communist trade unionists. The government even raided CPA offices in the midst of a witch-hunting atmosphere that almost saw the CPA banned in 1951.

Internationally, in the 1950s and 60s, the main target of the Cold War was the Soviet Union followed by the other socialistic countries: China, North Korea, North Vietnam, Cuba and the East European countries. However, in the early 1970s, PRC leader Mao betrayed the socialist cause and his own laudable role in leading China’s 1949 anti-capitalist revolution by entering into an alliance with U.S. and Western imperialism against the Soviet Union. Treacherously enlisting in the Cold War against the Soviet Union was the price that the national-centred CPC leadership paid for dubious “guarantees” of peace and reduced hostility from the capitalist powers. However, after capitalist counterrevolution drowned the Soviet and East European workers states in the 1989-1992 period, the PRC itself became the main target of imperialist hostility.

Why Capitalist Hostility to Red China Has
Grown So Much Over the Last Three Decades

In the early 1990s, the level of imperialist opposition to the PRC was somewhat muted in comparison to today. At that time, it had only been just over 40 years since the Chinese Revolution. Thus, China then still had a very long way to catch up from the horrific poverty and backwardness of its pre-1949 days when it was a brutally subjugated neo-colony of the imperial powers. The capitalist powers did not see the Red China of the early 1990s, now without the presence of the Soviet Union, as much of a serious force to be reckoned with as they do, indeed, today. Moreover, drunk with triumphalism following their defeat of the Soviet Union and encouraged by the right-wing market reforms in China renewed by then PRC leader Deng Xiaoping in 1992, many capitalist strategists expected that it was only a matter of time before the emergence of a sizable private sector in China would open the way to capitalist counterrevolution there the way that Gorbachev’s perestroika had opened the road to the same in the Soviet Union. However, nearly three decades on, imperialist perspectives about China have changed considerably.

There was no one single event, equivalent to the outcome of World War II in terms of the previous Cold War against the Soviet Union, that hardened the attitude of the capitalist powers against the PRC. Rather there has been a series of events and processes. One was the way that the PRC sailed through the 1997 Asian financial crisis. That economic implosion seriously buffeted the capitalist economies in East and Southeast Asia, including the so-called “tiger” economies. By contrast, the PRC dealt with the crisis with ease. This alarmed Western ruling class analysts. Meanwhile, they grew steadily concerned at the rapid rate of economic development in the PRC, which was – and is – still based on a dominant socialistic public sector. In the late 1990s – early 2000s, China’s GDP was growing at around 10% per year. This was much faster than that of any of the capitalist countries. Then Beijing’s successful – and indeed spectacular – hosting of the 2008 Olympic Games heralded socialistic China’s emergence as a world power. Soon after, the then worst economic crisis since the Great Depression hit the world. The late noughties Great Recession caused massive job losses and economic contraction in the capitalist world. Many countries, especially in Europe, not only took a very long time to recover but in some sense have never fully recovered from this economic shock. In contrast, the PRC stormed through the crisis by bringing the advantages of her socialistic system to bear. Her GDP growth rate never even dropped below 6% per year.

There was another development that equally worried capitalist ruling classes. Far from their predictions that market reforms would gradually see China move towards capitalist restoration, by the mid-2000s China started to move in the opposite direction. Pushed by mass working class protests and struggles and demands by people on the left-wing of the CPC, the PRC’s leaders’ curbed privatisations and helped fortify her socialistic state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Far from becoming obsolete, these SOEs were becoming increasingly successful and powerful. Moreover, the period from about 2005-2012 saw a wave of crackdowns on capitalist tycoons within China and nationalisations and re-nationalisations of privately owned companies. Indeed, the period from 2008 to 2011, in particular, was in many ways China’s most left-wing period in four decades. So when Xi first took office in 2012, pro-capitalist strategists and academics hoped that he would renew rightist reforms. However, some three to four years later those hopes became dashed too.

Meanwhile, the rise of Red China was having an effect on the world that infuriated the imperialists. These imperialists have always plundered the so-called “Third World.” When “engaging” with these semi-colonial and neo-colonial countries, the imperialists demand as a condition for granting access to capital, technology and markets, their “right” to exploit labour, plunder natural resources, set a low price for purchased produce and leach huge profits through debt service payments. However, over the last decade and a half, China started engaging in large-scale, mutually beneficial and respectful cooperation with these ex-colonial countries. Her socialistic SOEs would hand over capital and technology to these countries as well as access to the huge Chinese market without robbing these countries blind or demanding that they privatise their public sectors or introduce grinding austerity. The Australian imperialists, in particular, were enraged at this as governments in the South Pacific, buttressed by these new found relations with the world’s only non-imperialist power, now felt more confident to sometimes resist Australian imperialist bullying. Famously, Fijian prime minister, Frank Bainimarama pushed back against the arrogant bullying of Australian prime minister, Scott Morrison, at the August 2019 Pacific Islands Forum. Asked if Morrison’s approach might cause some Pacific leaders to look to China, Bainimarama responded [1]:

“After what we went through with Morrison, nothing can be worse than him.

“China never insults the Pacific. You say it as if there’s a competition between Australia and China. There’s no competition, except to say the Chinese don’t insult us. They don’t go down and tell the world that we’ve given this much money to the Pacific islands. They don’t do that. They’re good people, definitely better than Morrison, I can tell you that.

“The prime minister was very insulting, very condescending, not good for the relationship.”

That is why despite making huge profits from exports to China, which is by far Australia’s largest export market, the Australian imperialists are bristling at how Red China’s “interference” in Australia’s “neighbourhood” is interfering with what they see as their “right” to trample over, patronise and squeeze every last bit of natural wealth out of the former colonies of the South Pacific and beyond.

Yet the emerging outcome of the COVID-19 crisis is likely to turn out to be by far the biggest single factor that leads to the ratcheting up of imperialist hostility to the PRC. In particular, there is the fact that while the capitalist countries have met the pandemic with at best a flawed, and more often a disastrous, response, socialistic China has implemented a strikingly effective response. The rulers of the capitalist powers are furious that the pandemic is ending up doing more damage to their own economies than it is to the PRC. Moreover, they are fearful that their own populations have seen China’s more successful response and are worried that they will draw pro-socialist conclusions from this.

Despite the obvious similarities between the last Cold War and this one there are also some notable differences. Pre-1949 China had been kept so backward – her per capita GDP was barely more than half of India’s at the time – that even after seven decades of catching up, China’s per capita economic strength is still weaker relative to that of the imperialist powers than the 1970s-1980s Soviet economy was relative to these same powers. Moreover, while the Soviet Union had basically achieved military parity with the strongest capitalist power, the U.S., by the end of the last Cold War, the PRC’s military remains much weaker than that of the U.S. Thus, while today the U.S. has well over 6,000 nuclear weapons, China has under 300 such warheads [2]. More crucially, communist and left-wing movements are much weaker today in the capitalist world than they were during the last Cold War. All this makes socialistic rule in the PRC all the more precarious; and by extension that makes the position of the working class in the capitalist world more vulnerable, because for all the bureaucratic deformations and excessive concessions to capitalism within China, the PRC remains a workers state whose success will mean great advancement for the masses of China and inspiration for the toilers of the world but whose demise would be a catastrophe for the working people of both China and the rest of the world.

On the other hand, one factor that makes the socialist and working class side in this Cold War stronger than the last one is China’s sheer population size. Today, the world’s biggest socialistic country encompasses one in five of the world’s people. Secondly, the capitalist economies are far more fragile than they were during the last Cold War. Moreover, the late noughties Global Recession has left a lasting crisis of self-confidence amongst the capitalist ruling classes around the world – something that has only been amplified by their failed and callous response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This is what has made them so panicked about Red China’s rise and made them so hysterical about Chinese “interference” undermining their ability to “freely” rape the peoples of the South Pacific, Africa, the Middle East, South America and key chunks of Asia. As a result, the imperialist powers have become ever more provocative in their efforts to exert military pressure on China – such as through ever more aggressive U.S., British and Australian incursions through contested waters in the South China Sea and bigger arms sales to Taiwan – more brazen in their backing of anti-communist forces within China and ever shriller in their witch-hunting of anyone at home “guilty” of being soft on Red China.

Ironically, there is one aspect of Cold War fears of socialistic powers that actually brings some benefits to the working class masses in the capitalist world. During the last Cold War, in order to make the Soviet Union less attractive to their own masses relative to their own capitalist system, the capitalist rulers in the West conceded certain welfare state provisions and rights to their own workers in excess of what they actually wanted to. Once they managed to destroy the Soviet Union they, of course, began rolling back these concessions. However, today as they grow more concerned about the potentially attractive power of a giant rising socialistic power, they are posed with the need to make new concessions to their own working people. This was seen most clearly with the response of some capitalist countries to the COVID-19 pandemic. The impulse of most of the capitalist powers was to avoid excessive economic shutdowns and social distancing measures that could hurt corporate profits. Their initial inclination was to adopt a “herd immunity” strategy of basically letting most people get infected – on the grounds that the society would then get immunised – so that economic damage could be minimised. This “herd immunity” strategy was in effect a callous program to cull the herd of millions of old, ill and poor people, the people most likely to die if infected. However, with socialistic China having already responded to the pandemic with measures that put her peoples’ lives above that of her economy, some capitalist rulers felt compelled to partially retreat from the “herd immunity” strategy in order to not seem so heartless and ineffective relative to Red China.  This only infuriated the Western capitalist rulers even more as they feel that the PRC has, in effect, “cornered” them into taking measures harmful to their own beloved stock markets.

Socialists in the Capitalist World Must
Mobilise against Cold War Attacks on the PRC

If some of the capitalist regimes have felt the need to not appear so inhumane in comparison with the PRC’s people’s first approach to COVID-19 by reluctantly replicating, in part, some of her economic shutdown measures, we had better consider what would have happened if there had been no socialistic giant on the planet like the PRC. What if the capitalist powers knew that people would not have any sizable non-capitalist country to compare these rulers’ response to COVID-19 with? If they could administer a “herd immunity” “strategy” and then tell people that this is all that can be done and that is what everyone is doing anyway? What if most governments thought that they could get away with replicating the worst of Trump’s so-called responses to the pandemic, with unleashing the callous “herd immunity” “strategy” that Britain’s Boris Johnson implemented at the start and which social democratic-administered Sweden and the fascistic Brazilian regime of Jair Bolsonaro alike are catastrophically still set on today? As disastrous as the response of most capitalist countries has been today, how many tens of millions of people would already be dead if that scenario played out? And consider how events would have played out in China itself had socialistic rule already been overturned there. Would China even have been the first country to detect the virus? Would the health system have been so devastated in China, as it has been in Russia since the 1991-92 capitalist counterrevolution, that tens of thousands of people would have died in Wuhan before anyone even noticed? Would a capitalist China have replicated the disastrous “response” of capitalist Brazil which is, after all, a country with a similar per capita GDP to China? How many millions of people would then have died in China from the virus?

If one ponders these questions then it becomes crystal clear just how much is at stake in the outcome of this new Cold War. And most importantly it shows just how crucial it is that those concerned with the interests of the working class masses and the fate of humanity stand by socialistic rule in China today. That means that we must oppose all the military pressure that the imperialists are unleashing against the PRC. We must demand that the U.S. and Australian navies stop their provocative naval runs through the South China Sea, that the U.S. troops stationed in Darwin, which are aimed against the PRC and her socialistic North Korean neighbour, get out and that the joint U.S.-Australia spy bases at Pine Gap and Geraldton are closed. The Left and workers movement must also oppose the massive political, financial and media support that the U.S., British and Australian governments are giving to forces within China seeking to undermine socialistic rule there – whether they be the violent pro-colonial, rich people’s opposition in Hong Kong, pro-capitalist “dissidents” on the mainland or the rabidly right-wing, anti-secular forces based on a minority of the Uygur community in China’s north-west. We need to energetically resist the propaganda war against the PRC.

We should understand that just as the 1991-92 capitalist counterrevolution in Russia strengthened capitalist exploiting classes everywhere, the defeat of socialistic rule in China would embolden the capitalist rulers in this country and around the world to further attack workers’ rights, push through still more privatisations and further slash public housing and other services most needed by working class people. However, if the Left is not to lose this new Cold War like we lost the last one we must learn the bitter lessons of that previous defeat. Socialistic rule in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe was crushed by the combined weight of imperialist military, economic and political pressure. Serious defects in the structure of those workers states – including the lack of workers democracy and the existence of material privileges for the administering bureaucracy both of which depoliticised the masses and undermined their commitment to defend socialism – made these workers states more vulnerable to the immense capitalist pressure bearing down upon them. However, from the point of view of leftists living in the capitalist world, the most important lesson from the last Cold War to grasp is that a key reason why socialistic rule in Russia and Eastern Europe was destroyed is because the workers movement in the West failed to come to the defence of these workers states. Indeed, the mass social democratic parties within the capitalist world – including the ALP in Australia – actually supported the anti-communist Cold War drive against the Soviet Union. Treacherously, so did much of the Far Left. In Australia, the group inspired by the theories of late British leftist Tony Cliff, the International Socialist Organisation (ISO) – the parent group of today’s Cliffite groups Solidarity and Socialist Alternative – enthusiastically supported every major anti-communist movement that worked to destroy the Soviet Union. Their excuse for taking this stance was to ridiculously claim that the Soviet Union was merely just another form of capitalist state – even as the real capitalists did everything in their power to crush the Soviet Union precisely because it was not capitalist! Unlike the Cliffite ISO, the Democratic Socialist Party, the forerunner of today’s Socialist Alliance, accepted that the Soviet Union and her East European allies were workers states of some form. Yet, bending to Cold War pressures, they too supported the key imperialist-backed counter-revolutionary movements that destroyed these workers states. Thus, they joined the ISO in hailing Poland’s anti-communist Solidarnosc movement and then supporting arch-counterrevolutionary Boris Yeltsin’s August 1991 counter-coup, the decisive event in the defeat of the Soviet Union.

There were some in the left in Australia, like the old SPA (Socialist Party of Australia) – the fore-runner of today’s Communist Party of Australia (the SPA changed its name to the Communist Party of Australia in 1996) – that did at least have enough political courage and understanding to stand by the Soviet Union. However, intimidated by the intense anti-Soviet “public opinion” at the time, they did not promote their pro-Soviet politics too aggressively within left milieus. Most notably, they largely refrained from building actual actions on the streets in defence of the Soviet Union. Instead, the pro-Soviet component of Australia’s Left tried to make common cause with left-liberal peaceniks who, while opposed to the war-mongering of their own rulers, were at best neutral on the Cold War and were opposed to any overt displays of sympathy for the Soviet Union. Thus shackled by this alliance – or at least this quest for an alliance – with pacifist members of the upper middle class, middle class and even tiny clots of the capitalist class, the pro-Soviet elements were unable to connect the need to defend the Soviet Union with the class struggle interests of the Australian working class and were reluctant to mobilise any defiant street actions in solidarity with the Soviet Union. A similar dynamic took place within most of the imperialist countries. And so the Soviet masses looking abroad at the capitalist powers saw only hostility – from governments, the mass social democratic parties and much of the Far Left – or at best neutrality (from the left-liberal pacifists and class-collaborationist pro-Soviet elements following in their tails). This, on the one hand demoralised the pro-socialist workers within the Soviet Union and, on the other, emboldened those seeking capitalist counterrevolution. We cannot let the same thing happen to the Peoples Republic of China! It is the duty of those within the Australian Left who understand the need to defend the PRC workers state to build actions here in solidarity with socialistic rule in China. We must show staunchly pro-communist elements within China, seeking to defend socialistic rule there, that they are not alone, that they have support even within the imperialist centres.

We in Trotskyist Platform (TP) are proud to be the left group in Australia that is most actively building actions on the streets in solidarity with the PRC workers state. Unfortunately, the proportion of the Far Left in Australia that has any sympathy for the PRC is even less than the proportion that was pro-Soviet during the last Cold War. The Cliffites – this time in the form of Solidarity and Socialist Alternative – are at it again in effectively lining up on the side of imperialism in the Cold War. Just look at what they say about Covid-19 whenever they mention China! Although they have criticised some of the more bonkers anti-China conspiracy theories of the Far Right, they are repeating most of the talking points attacking the PRC pushed by the mainstream capitalists and their media. They claim that China tried to cover up the outbreak, had a “botched response,” failed to act decisively in the early days of the outbreak and even when they are forced to acknowledge China’s success in curbing the pandemic put it down to “brutal lockdowns” and “authoritarianism.” Why bother looking at a nominally socialist website to find such rubbish when you can read it all the time in the Murdoch and Fairfax (now owned by Peter Costello-headed Nine Entertainment) papers, hear it on 2GB or watch it incessantly on Channel Nine or the ABC? Somewhat differently, Socialist Alliance has simply avoided commenting on the attacks on the PRC over Covid-19. One could say that this is not as harmful as the actions of the Cliffite-based groups. However, putting one’s head in the sand when one’s “own” ruling class and its U.S. superpower ally is waging an intense campaign against the world’s biggest socialistic state is hardly what socialists should be doing. Moreover, like Solidarity and Socialist Alternative, Socialist Alliance continue to fervently back the Washington-backed, anti-communist opposition in Hong Kong.   

Other than for TP, the only other active, bona-fide left group in Australia to defend the PRC is the Communist Party of Australia (CPA). We must note with encouragement that in the last period, the CPA – and, in particular, the Editorial section of its newspaper The Guardian – has taken a stronger position in defence of the PRC than their more perfunctory stance previously. In part this may be because a section of their party, including their former general secretary, who had anti-PRC views left the CPA a year ago. Those who left founded a new party called the Australian Communist Party which seems to have near identical positions as the CPA except on one gigantic issue: on the issue of China the new group shares the same pro-imperialist hostility to the PRC as do the Cliffite groups. For the CPA, it seems that with some anti-PRC elements having left their ranks and leadership and faced with the unmistakable need to take a stand in the face of an escalating new Cold War, they are strengthening their pro-PRC stance. Nevertheless, the CPA has still not adequately turned their pro-PRC written position into action on the streets. They would still rather talk about the more popular socialistic state in far-away Cuba and the more amenable to the social democratic-left, leftist government in Venezuela than about the need to defend the workers states most intensely targeted by Australian imperialism: the PRC and the DPRK. From the outside it seems that on the positive side there is the CPA’s Brisbane Branch and chunks of their Sydney membership who strongly want to defend the PRC. On the other hand, it seems that there are still individuals within the CPA who hold at best a neutral attitude to the PRC and others who believe that the issue should be downplayed so as not to interfere with a quest to build a “people’s front” alliance with the Greens and other anti-PRC progressive-liberals. To this we would say that the defence of socialistic rule in the world’s most populous country – especially when Cold War hostility to that state so dominates this country’s political life – cannot be made an optional extra for anyone calling themselves a Marxist-Leninist or a communist. This is not a question one can simply “agree to disagree on” while amicably existing in the same party. It should be absolutely mandatory for communists to actively stand in defence of the PRC and the other remaining workers states against imperialist attacks and internal counterrevolutionaries.

We look forward to in the future joining with the CPA and the many pro-PRC leftists who are not part of any political group in united front actions in solidarity with the PRC and in opposition to military, political and propaganda attacks on her. By pointing to the policies facilitated by the existence of a workers state in China that would be attractive to working class activists in Australia – like the widespread availability of public housing, the crackdown on housing speculation, the nationalisation of China’s banks, the dominance of public ownership over China’s finance sector, ports, airlines, car plants, infrastructure construction, steel industry, mining, energy, shipping etc, the jailing of bosses for deadly workplace accidents and the frequent crackdowns on greedy capitalists – we can connect the need to defend the socialistic PRC with the class struggle against capitalism here. One thing that we must realise is that because the interactions between Australia and China are far greater than those that existed between Australia and the Soviet Union – i.e. there is far more travel and tourism between China and Australia, there are far more international students from both China and Australia studying in the other country, far more people from each country working in the other country and, additionally, there are a large number of PRC immigrants living in Australia – what happens here with respect to China will have much political influence on events within China. The stakes are thus higher in terms of the stance that leftists take in Australia with respect to the new Cold War. On the negative side, word about any demonstrations supporting the anti-PRC, pro-colonial rioters in Hong Kong, in which the likes of Solidarity, Socialist Alternative and Socialist Alliance have been participating, will get back to China. On the positive side, word about any mobilisations supporting the socialistic PRC will also quickly get back to the Chinese masses. An example of the latter was seen on the Labour Day public holiday in NSW last October, when in an action built largely by the Australian Chinese Workers Association and Trotskyist Platform, around 60 socialists from a range of political backgrounds marched through the streets of Sydney behind a banner saying, “WORKING CLASS PEOPLE IN AUSTRALIA & THE WORLD: STAND WITH SOCIALISTIC CHINA!” and “DEFEAT HONG KONG’S PRO-COLONIAL, ANTI-COMMUNIST MOVEMENT!” 

For socialists, a Cold War political climate can be intimidating and isolating. But we must stand strong! And we must never forget that the same Australian capitalist ruling class that has managed to, at this stage, deceive a considerable section of the working class masses into backing their Cold War drive are the very ones who now threaten these same workers with new cuts to their pay and conditions under the cover of “rebuilding the economy,” who increasingly drive working class youth into insecure casual jobs, who throw out of work at will the very same workers who made them their fortunes whenever they can’t make enough of a profit out of these workers and who have allowed rental accommodation to become cruelly expensive for most working class people. After all, it is precisely because they know that their own masses have such grievances that the Australian ruling class is so fearful of the existence of a socialistic giant in its Asian neighbourhood.

In responding to the new Cold War we should never be put off by the fact that socialistic rule is currently flawed in China. The Chinese workers state is bureaucratically deformed and more seriously, the CPC leadership have allowed the emergence of way too much of a private sector. Dangerously, the CPC tops have allowed some of the new capitalists to gain too much influence. Thus, just like in the case of the former Soviet Union, socialistic rule in the PRC is fragile and her transition to complete socialism is far from assured. Yet that only makes it more crucial that we stand in defence of the PRC workers state. As we wrote in Issue 8 of our journal 13 years ago:

“The fact that the Chinese proletarian [i.e. workers] state is bureaucratically deformed actually makes that state more in need of global workers support and not less. When a structure is distorted it is able to carry less load. So too, the points of deformations of the PRC can cause that workers state to collapse when the heavy weight of imperialism is bearing down on it. But if the action of the international labour movement relieves that load, it gives a chance for workers to repair the deformed structure. When that happens, the Chinese working people will build a glowing, ‘peoples oriented’ society. A society that will be a huge landmark that will help map out all of humanity’s march towards socialism. When that global march becomes unstoppable and when the Chinese toilers are able to complete the work that they began in 1949, by finally chiselling out and throwing away the last remnants of exploitation of man by man, then we can truly speak of a harmonious socialist society. We will then be able to speak of ‘social harmony’ because the class struggle would have been completed to the extent that there are no longer any classes. And from such a harmonious socialist society, humanity, in all its beautiful diversity, can dance merrily towards a glorious communist future. However, for this not to be a mere dream, militant unionists and leftists in the West must act now. Act now to counteract the imperialist pressure bearing down upon the Chinese workers state. A state, that however divergent from the ‘ideal,’ is still today saving 20% of the world’s population from the tender mercies of capitalist rule.”


References

  1. Kate Lyons, Fiji PM accuses Scott Morrison of ‘insulting’ and alienating Pacific leaders, The Guardian website, 17 August 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/16/fiji-pm-frank-bainimarama-insulting-scott-morrison-rift-pacific-countries
  2. Arms Control Association, Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance, Arms Control Association website, July 2019, https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat (accessed 9 May 2020)

COVID-19 is Causing Far More Suffering in Australia Than It Should

Photo Above: Police roughly arrest a mother for attempting to visit her children who are residing in one of Melbourne’s locked down public housing towers.

A Deadly Tale of Nationalist Arrogance, Capitalist Greed,
Cold War Fear Mongering and Dog Whistling to Racism

COVID-19 is Causing Far More
Suffering in Australia Than It Should

  • “First World” Arrogance and Callous Indifference for the Poor, Ill and Elderly
  • “Herd Immunity” Means Culling of the Herd
  • The Victorian ALP Government’s Cruelly Implemented Lockdown of Public Housing Tenants
  • U.S., Britain, Australia and the Inherent Deficiencies of the Capitalist System
  • The Politically Motivated Selection of Travel Restrictions Caused the Death of Scores of Australians
  • All the Ugliness Comes Out
  • For United Working Class Struggle!

9 July 2020: In just the last week, Australia has had well over a thousand people newly infected with COVID-19. The coronavirus is spreading quickly in Melbourne’s working class suburbs. Migrant workers, in particular, often work in crucial frontline roles – as supermarket workers, cleaners, transport workers, health sector employees etc – where it is harder to protect oneself from catching infectious diseases. Rather than responding to the virus spread in migrant working class areas with compassion and support, the Australian ruling class, from its politicians to its media to its police enforcers, have responded with stigmatisation and cruelty.

Worldwide, the current pandemic has killed over half a million people. Such infectious diseases have caused immense suffering to humans since time immemorial. The H1N1 influenza A pandemic that started in the latter months of World War 1 killed between 21 million and 100 million people! That outbreak “originated” in the U.S. and was then carried by infected troops to Europe [1]. The virus was colloquially known as the “Spanish Flu” but this was only because Spain, a neutral country during the war, did not censor reports on the epidemic.  

The emergence of a disease that causes widespread death is a natural disaster that could “originate” anywhere. Naturally, on sheer probability, a disease is more likely to start in one of the countries with the largest populations. However, speaking about “where a disease started” is a misnomer. For new viruses and bacteria are merely mutations of previously existing ones. These organisms are constantly evolving. Some animal-hosted viruses may jump from animal to human in a form already quite adapted to a human host, while others may mutate within humans for long periods before becoming infectious. Therefore, speaking about “where a virus started” depends on how far you want to go back in time.

The outbreak of an infectious disease is impossible to stop at its source. Before the first people infected become ill enough to seek treatment they would have likely passed the disease onto others. Moreover, before there is enough cases for doctors to notice the new threat, the disease would have spread still further. This is especially the case for COVID-19, which while being truly deadly for many only produces mild symptoms in most. Once there is a spread of a new disease, the amount of suffering that it causes, as with any natural disaster, depends much on the efforts of humans and our social systems. As a result, the level of suffering caused by the new virus has varied greatly from country to country.

All the above indicates just how unscientific was the right-wing Australian government’s proposal for an international “inquiry” focused solely on the “origin” of COVID-19. Those issues are of scientific interest. However, the far more important issue is that part of the pandemic that can actually be controlled: that is once there was an initial spread how effective were the measures taken to contain it. Fortunately, the focus of the government’s proposal was in fair part rejected by most countries [2]. Instead, the World Health Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution to investigate the overall response to the pandemic rather than on only its origins. The Australian government’s rebuffed emphasis, which had been fully backed by the ALP “opposition,” was not simply a scientific error. It was politically motivated. Their aim was to help themselves and their U.S. allies to score propaganda points against China, the world’s largest socialistic country, where they claim that the virus “originated” from (although recent evidence may suggest otherwise). They had another aim too. By getting everyone obsessed with the “origins” of the virus, Australia’s rulers wanted to divert people from the fact that their own response to the pandemic has been deeply flawed and that of their key allies, the U.S. and Britain, downright catastrophic [3] [4].

Australian authorities endlessly boast about their “successful” response to the coronavirus threat. However, their boast is true only in comparison with the likes of the U.S., Brazil, Britain, Russia, Sweden and India which have had really failed responses. Australia’s death toll per resident from the pandemic is now 30% higher than China’s despite Australia having had the huge advantage of having time to prepare for the arrival of the virus [5] [6]. Furthermore, while China has thus far avoided a large second wave, Australia’s second biggest city is experiencing just such a virus resurgence. Moreover, in comparison with some countries with more difficult circumstances, including many of those that share borders with China and, thus, were more vulnerable to a virus spread from Wuhan, the suffering caused by COVID-19 is far worse in Australia. It is important to note that five of the countries that share borders with China have thus far had no deaths from COVID-19 whatsoever!

Three of these countries sharing borders with China and currently having no COVID-19 deaths are socialistic countries like China itself. Those countries are Vietnam, North Korea and Laos [7] [8] [9]. The socialist system, in which the key means of production are under collective ownership, enables resources to be pooled to respond to natural disasters. Nevertheless, two of the countries bordering China that currently have had no coronavirus deaths – Mongolia and Bhutan [10] [11] – are not socialistic. This shows that, although a country burdened by capitalist rule would not be able to replicate the response that socialistic China made had they been faced with similar circumstances of a previously unknown disease spreading quickly, even a capitalist country could, with correct policies, make an effective response provided they had forewarning that the virus was on its way, as Australia certainly did. Other lower income countries have also responded more successfully to the virus than Australian authorities have. Rwanda has had just three COVID-19 deaths so far compared to the 106 in Australia [12].

That COVID-19 has not, at this time, devastated Australia to the extent that it has the U.S and Britain is more due to this country’s geography rather than good management. Firstly, Australia is an island and islands are a lot easier to implement quarantine measures in. Thus, many island nations have fared comparatively well during this pandemic. Many of Australia’s island neighbours have not had a single death from the coronavirus including Fiji and New Caledonia [13] [14]. The second factor that should have made it relatively easy to deal with a virus threat here is the fact that Australia has one of the world’s lowest population densities. This matters, because when people are living more tightly together diseases naturally spread more quickly. Thus, Thailand faced difficult circumstances because not only was she the second country to report a coronavirus case, Thailand has a population density that is 39 times that of Australia. Yet Thailand has had only slightly over half the number of deaths as in Australia, despite having nearly three times Australia’s population [15].

“First World” Arrogance and Callous Indifference for the Poor, Ill and Elderly

The Australian government exaggerated their capacity to deal with the pandemic. On February 28, Morrison insisted that because his government had “acted quickly”, “there is no need for us to be moving towards not having mass gatherings of people” [16]. It took a whole 50 days after Australia had reported its first case before the government implemented any social distancing measures [17] [18]. As professor at the University of New South Wales, Bill Bowtell said of the government’s response [19]:

“Let’s cut to the chase, they were warned 12 weeks ago by WHO and others what was coming. They did not accumulate test kits. They did not accumulate the necessary emergency equipment. They did not undertake a public education campaign. They gave no money to science, no money to research, no money to the International Vaccine Institute, no money to WHO. They diligently did not do anything useful.”

So what drove the leaders of Australia and other “like-minded countries” to be so tardy in responding to COVID-19? Arrogant over-confidence is part of the story. On March 11, still four days before any social distancing measures were implemented, health minister Greg Hunt boasted for the umpteenth time [20] [21] [22] that “we are as well prepared as any country in the world” [23]. In the following two months alone, a further 94 people would tragically lose their lives to the disease in Australia.

The leaders of the imperialist countries were clouded by a condescending attitude to the former colonies and semi-colonies that they saw initially affected by the virus. They saw their own systems as superior. So they thought that they did not need to quickly implement social distancing and urgently build up stocks. Moreover, they swallowed their own propaganda about China. They thought: surely we will be able to respond more effectively than a socialistic country. History sure did prove them wrong!

However, there was also something even more sinister than imperial arrogance that held back the American, Australian and other Western leaders from responding quickly enough to the pandemic. On February 25, Trump made a tweet whose last sentence gave the game away [24]:

“The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA…. Stock Market starting to look very good to me!”

Trump and his ilk downplayed the virus threat and therefore delayed the implementation of social distancing because they did not want measures that would disrupt business activity and harm the stock market. In short, the U.S. rulers put the profits of capitalists way ahead of the well-being of the masses. This became even more pronounced once it became clear who the virus was especially killing: black and brown people as well as frontline workers who were often from black and migrant communities themselves [25]. Egged on by extreme white supremacists, right-wing politicians demanded the end of lockdowns despite the virus continuing to spread like wildfire. This is what Republican and Democrat state governors have done. As a result, the virus is now spreading even more disastrously in the U.S.

“Herd Immunity” Means Culling of the Herd

In Britain, the unashamed indifference to the loss of lives caused by COVID-19, which in the U.S. was expressed by far-right lunatics, entirely shaped the policy of authorities there in the early phase of the pandemic. In mid-March, the British regime revealed that its “strategy” was to get 60% of the population infected “to build up some kind of herd immunity so more people are immune…” [26] [27]!  This would have resulted in between 400,000 and 1.4 million residents of Britain dying to achieve “herd immunity” so that its economy would not be hurt by second waves of infection! In practice such a pursuit of “herd immunity” actually means a culling of the herd. A culling of those too elderly or ill to any longer pull the cart of the capitalist big wigs. A culling of those working in low-skilled frontline jobs more vulnerable to being infected but whom the exploiting class considers more easily replaceable by other “beasts of burden”. A culling of the poor population living in over-crowded housing where diseases transmit easily and who are thought of as “surplus” herd by a good number of the ruling class.

It was not until late March that the conservative British government led by Boris Johnson changed their strategy and began implementing social distancing. It seems that the ruling class realised that although it was low-paid workers, Britain’s black population and working-class Asian communities that were being hit hardest, even some members of the ruling class were also being affected. Yet by the time that the British regime instituted restrictions on gatherings, over 11,000 people in England alone had already been infected [28]. It was way too late. The disease had already spread rampantly and could no longer be contained easily. That is why, other than for a couple of tiny countries, Britain has the second highest number of deaths per person in the world from the coronavirus [29].

It has been not only countries with conservative governments that implemented callous “herd immunity” strategies. So did the social democrat-run, capitalist state in Sweden. The result was disastrous [30]! The Australian government also seriously flirted with a “herd immunity” policy three months ago. In mid-March, Morrison mentioned “herd immunity” was a reason for keeping schools open [31]. Later, the government pulled back after condemnation from health experts. It seems that the Liberal government’s widely denounced response to last summer’s bushfires has made them concerned to appear like they are showing more support for those who could be impacted by the pandemic. Moreover, with the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) already having taken an approach that put their population health’s ahead of business profits, the Australian regime, obsessed as it is with scoring propaganda points against its socialistic adversary, felt constrained to put a greater weight on curbing the virus than they otherwise would have in order to not to appear callous in comparison. Yet, in capitalist societies the masses face a double-edged sword during a pandemic. On the one hand, governments could delay introducing preventative measures leading to enormous loss of life. Yet if governments do implement social distancing, given that bosses in capitalist states have the unrestricted right to lay off workers, huge numbers of workers lose their jobs or have their number of shifts slashed.

After Australian authorities belatedly implemented some of the necessary measures to curb the pandemic and maintained them for a period, as lockdowns ate into business profits, capitalists, big and small, clamoured for a rapid re-opening. As a result the federal government and state Liberal and ALP governments alike, who ultimately all serve the capitalist class, engaged in a risky rollback of measures even while significant levels of infections remain in the community. In the two weeks prior to most of Australia beginning major re-opening on June 1, this country with a population of 25 million had 144 new cases [32] [33]. By contrast, in the two weeks prior to China’s significant re-opening of the worst affected city of Wuhan on April 8, that country had 580 new cases [5] in a country with a population 57 times larger than Australia’s. That means that Australian governments attempted a rollback of social distancing when the virus was spreading 14 times more intensely than it was in China when she implemented similar re-openings. This recklessly quick re-opening is the primary cause of Melbourne’s second wave of infections.

The Victorian ALP Government’s Cruelly Implemented
Lockdown of Public Housing Tenants

Among those hardest hit by the virus second wave are public housing tenants living in tower blocks. This is due to the negligence of the Daniel Andrews-led, Victorian Labor government. Victorian authorities failed to ensure adequate disinfection of common areas in these towers. Even regular cleaning of such common areas is minimal as governments across Australia cut down spending on public housing maintenance in order to help fund tax cuts for the rich and ever increasing budgets for police, ASIO and the military. Since COVID-19 struck, large public housing blocks have only been provided with one hand sanitiser dispenser per tower, if at all, and these are often left empty [34]. What has also made tenants especially vulnerable to virus transmission is that they have often been made to stay in over-crowded units because successive Labor and Liberal governments across the country have sold off so much public housing that those able to access it have had to accept being squeezed into tiny apartments.

After residents in public housing blocks were inevitably hit with the consequences of such negligence, the Andrews government responded by banning thousands of residents in public housing towers in Flemington and North Melbourne from leaving their units. The harsh manner in which authorities have implemented the hard lockdown indicates that this measure is not mainly about trying to genuinely protect the low income public housing tenants, many of whom are from African, Middle Eastern, Asian and Islander backgrounds. Public health workers were not sent in to explain the decision or to inform tenants of what needed to be done to protect their lives. Instead, residents first knew that they were being locked in when large hordes of police appeared at their buildings and started stopping residents from leaving. Given that many of the tenants have previously suffered racist harassment from Australian cops – and some earlier from refugee detention centre guards – the presence of massive numbers of police keeping them locked up has been very frightening for many of the locked down tenants. These police have been rude and harsh. Over the first two days of the lockdown, they even prevented volunteers and friends from leaving food, medicine and other supplies for hungry tenants to pick up [35]. Most despicably, police brutally arrested a member of a charity trying to leave food for residents. It was only after loud protests from social workers that police released their hold on the arrested charity worker as the terrified dark skinned man cried out desperately, “I can’t breathe.” Police have also arrested frustrated tenants trying to hold impromptu protests against the cruelty of lockdown conditions.

Tenants have been left hungry and scared after the supplies of food and other essentials promised by the government did not even start to be provided until some 36 to 48 hours after the start of the lockdown. When supplies finally arrived they were often grossly inadequate to feed families in the apartments. The food deliveries typically consisted of tins of out of date food. Fresh food and vegetables were not provided. The only decent meals that some locked down residents were finally able to receive came through the generous efforts of volunteer social organisations and trade unions.

In the midst of a pandemic we support restrictions genuinely made to protect people from being infected. However, aside from the incredible cruelty at the way that this lockdown has been implemented and the stigmatisation involved with only applying a hard lockdown to low-income tenants who are overwhelmingly people of colour, its actual value in terms of protecting residents is questionable. With the coronavirus likely to spread through aerosol droplets and with low-income tenants unable to afford the heating expenses that would arise from keeping their windows open to let infected air disperse, having COVID positive and negative cases alike locked into cramped tiny apartments in a packed tower block is a recipe for virus spread both within households and through airflow under and around doors from room to room. If authorities were actually serious about protecting Melbourne public housing residents they would ensure that infected people could be moved into safer quarantine at hospitals or hotels. It seems that this lockdown is not about protecting the interests of tenants but has more than a whiff of being a measured aimed at sacrificing the well-being of low-income, overwhelmingly non-white skinned residents in order to stop the virus spreading to wealthier neighbourhoods.

The contrast between this Melbourne hard lockdown of public housing and the earlier lockdown in China’s hard-hit Wuhan could not be more different. Firstly, that lockdown in Wuhan did not single out low-income people but applied equally to everyone regardless of how wealthy they were. Moreover, the success of that lock down was achieved because, after Chinese health experts realised how easily the virus spreads among family members and among residents in the same apartment blocks, PRC authorities moved all COVID positive people into hospitals both to give them proper care and to ensure that they did not unwittingly transmit the virus onto others. Thirdly, rather than being implemented through police repression, the Wuhan lockdown was based on grass-roots mobilisation. Teams consisting of volunteers, neighbourhood collective representatives and community workers went door to door to explain pandemic measures and ascertain residents’ needs. As a result the overwhelming majority of people complied with measures. In the tiny percentage of cases where a person tried to violate lockdowns it was primarily these grassroots forces rather than police who would enforce measures. Therefore, those who tried to violate Wuhan’s lockdown were, for the most part, not arrested but usually escorted – and in a very small number of cases literally dragged – back to their homes by grassroots activists who were often their very own neighbours. Harsh police repression in China was really only meted out – and rightly so – to business owners trying to profiteer from the crisis by jacking up prices. Fourthly, the PRC government and local Communist Party branches ensured that Wuhan residents were actually given the supplies promised including fresh fruit and vegetables. Social media photos show many people there eating famously tasty Chinese meals during their lockdown.

Perhaps the biggest difference between the hard lockdown of certain public housing towers in Melbourne and the earlier lockdown in Wuhan is in the differing attitudes of the ruling establishments in the two countries to the locked down residents. Here, locked down tenants have been subjected to despicable racist and anti-working class insults by white supremacist politicians like Pauline Hanson and by right-wing mainstream media outlets. In contrast, China’s state media heaped praise on the residents of Wuhan for enduring a lockdown that would reduce the spread of the virus to other parts of China and would buy time for the rest of the world to respond to the virus threat. Iconic Chinese landmarks in major cities were lit up with signs expressing solidarity with the people of Wuhan [36]. China’s president repeatedly praised Wuhan’s people as “heroic” [37]. We suggest that people don’t hold their breadth waiting for Scott Morrison to praise the locked down public housing residents of Melbourne as “heroic” or for the Sydney Opera House to light up with a solidarity message for these tenants!

U.S., Britain, Australia and the Inherent Deficiencies of the Capitalist System

Even if governments in the U.S.A, Australia and other Western countries hypothetically set aside their disdain for the interests of working class people and their racial bias and truly sought to implement all the policies necessary to suppress the coronavirus threat, the amount that they could actually achieve is hampered by the structure of their societies. In capitalist societies the key means of production are owned by wealthy individual capitalists with total “freedom” to determine production. In the manufacturing sector, these capitalist bosses largely calculated that it was not profitable enough for them to quickly switch over their production to make vitally needed pandemic relief goods. The few that did mostly did so too slowly. As a result, in the crucial early period of the pandemic here, health workers were bitterly complaining about the shortage of masks and other PPE (personal protective equipment). Ironically, given the Morrison regime’s attacks on China over the pandemic, the medical mask shortage was only relieved after the Australian government procured a big quantity of masks from China in mid-April [38]. However, there remains an inadequate amount of protective suits here. Therefore, Australian health workers and others working in areas of high risk of contracting, or passing on, COVID-19 have often not been able to wear the highly effective head-to-toe, spacesuit-style protective gear that nurses, doctors and sanitation workers in socialistic China were equipped with. This is a major cause of the deadly virus spread centered around Tasmania’s North West Regional Hospital three months ago and the later outbreak at Anglicare Sydney’s nursing home in Penrith. It is also the key reason for the clusters of cases that originated when the virus jumped from returned travelers quarantined at Melbourne’s Stamford Plaza onto contractors working at the hotel.

Similarly, in the crucial earlier period of the pandemic, there were not enough testing kits available. Even people with symptoms could not get tested unless they had recently returned from overseas or if they had contact with a known case. As a result the virus spread here in that period partly undetected.

The Politically Motivated Selection of Travel Restrictions
Caused the Death of Scores of Australians

On February 1, Canberra banned non-citizens and non-permanent residents from any part of China from entering Australia. This is despite China having already quarantined off Wuhan and other hard hit cities in Hubei Province, meaning that people from the part of China where the virus was concentrated could not enter Australia anyway. At the end of February, the Australian government continued to maintain this travel ban specifically only on all of China. Yet by then, the coronavirus was spreading much more quickly in South Korea [39] and Italy [40] than in China outside of quarantined-off Hubei. One did not even need to look at China’s data to know this. At the end of February, Australia’s Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Professor Paul Kelly, informed that of the 40,000 people re-entering Australia from China in February not one single person had tested positive for COVID-19 [41].

Now we do not seek the “evening out” of xenophobic measures by having travel bans introduced more uniformly! We are opposed to outright bans on foreign nationals from any country. We note that, despite the virus being far better contained in China today than in almost every other large country, China itself has not imposed an outright ban on arrivals from any country. However, in cases of a pandemic where there is a significantly higher prevalence of a disease in an overseas country then it is reasonable for measures to be taken to screen arrivals from that country and place them into quarantine for a period.

It was not until March 1 that the Australian government introduced restrictions on arrivals from another country other than China. But that country was again a state whom the Australian government saw as an adversary (although in this case not a socialistic country)! That country was Iran, the country whom the Australian government sought to intimidate in January by joining a threatening U.S. naval operation in waters
nearby to Iran. The Australian state’s selective adoption of Iran as the second country from whom arrivals would face special restrictions seemed to be motivated, at least in part, by an effort to create fear of Iran. After all, while Iran had 733 cases in the three days prior to the ban [42], South Korea and Italy which both have smaller populations had, respectively, 1,970 cases [39] and 1,047 cases [40] in that same period.

Finally on March 5, the Australian government imposed a travel ban on a country that was not an adversary: that is, South Korea. However, while capitalist South Korea is certainly an ally of Australian imperialism, nevertheless as a rule Koreans are still not white. So for a regime cynically selecting the countries that it imposes travel bans on out of political considerations, they no doubt saw listing South Korea as at least subtly contributing to a fear of Asians. The Morrison government sees such underhanded fear-mongering as “useful” in order to divert people’s frustrations at the lack of secure jobs, the shortage of affordable rental accommodation and other hardships caused by their system onto a soft target.

Meanwhile, by the time that the travel ban on South Korea was imposed, the virus was spreading more than a hundred times faster per person in Italy than in China [5] [40]. Yet the Australian government was delaying introducing any quarantine requirements on arrivals from Italy while maintaining a travel ban on arrivals from China. On March 9, Australia’s chief medical officer, Brendan Murphy, struggled to answer reporters’ questions on why the ban was imposed on China but not Italy [43]. Murphy stated that, “… we know we can’t really just put bans in place for an increasing number of countries.” But why choose to have the ban on China and not other countries when the virus was actually spreading massively faster in those other countries – arrivals from which Australia did not even then require to self-quarantine?  Perhaps Murphy struggled with the question because it was the Morrison government that pressured the health bureaucrats to “advise” such a politically-motivated choice of countries to impose travel bans on. On the other hand, it could simply be that these highly paid bureaucrats see the world through the same lens as the rich people’s government they serve under.

It was only on March 11 as the death rate in Italy soared even more alarmingly that the government imposed the same measures on arrivals from Italy that were imposed on those from China. In the meantime, the coronavirus was also now spreading much faster in other European countries and in the U.S. than it was in China. In the three days up to March 15, for example, Germany, which has a population 17 times smaller than China’s, had 3068 new cases [44] as opposed to just 47 in all of China. Meanwhile, in Spain the number of new cases in the previous three days was 3,200 times higher per person than in China [45] [5]. Yet it was not until March 20 that the Morrison government placed the same restrictions on entrants from other countries that it had imposed on arrivals from China seven weeks previously.

The delay by the government in introducing any quarantining of people entering from the virus-ravaged United States and Europe, even while maintaining a China travel ban, led to some spectacular instances of “First World” arrivals spreading the virus here. Many cases can be traced back to a high-society party in the U.S. luxury resort of Aspen hosted by Australian tycoon and Liberal Party powerbroker, Andrew Abercrombie [46]. Around a dozen of the rich attendees, many of whom were Victorians, contracted the virus there. The infected Australians then returned in March and spread the virus to dozens upon dozens of others. One couple, confirmed as being infected at the high-society event, defied directions and visited shops in Victoria’s Mornington Peninsula, likely causing the sudden outbreak of 35 cases in the area. Another person from the U.S. resort cluster infected many others after attending a 21st birthday party in a wealthy Melbourne suburb [47]. However, she was merely following the health advice at the time, which did not require arrivals from the U.S. to even self-isolate. Earlier, in events un-connected to the Aspen party, a doctor returning to Melbourne from the U.S. with a runny nose then treated 70 patients before being diagnosed with COVID-19 a week after his arrival [48]. However, it is not the doctor who was only at fault here. Well into March, the Australian government was still asking only people who arrived from certain “high-risk countries” (which they then deemed to be only China, Iran and South Korea) to get tested should they have symptoms.

Prior to the implementation of quarantining of arrivals from all countries, Australian passengers from cruise ships, which had already proven to be petri dishes of disease growth, were also often not tested upon arrival. On March 19, Australian authorities failed to screen 2,700 passengers, many of whom were ill, who disembarked from the Ruby Princess cruise ship.  The hapless passengers then infected others when they travelled home on trains, buses and flights. At least twenty-two passengers ended up dying from COVID-19. People infected aboard the ship also unwittingly passed the virus onto staff at Tasmania’s North West Hospital, starting a massive outbreak in the region.

The fact is that a large proportion of cases came into Australia from America, Europe or cruise ships. Just how large? Up to April 30, the last day that Australian authorities published the chart “confirmed cases who acquired COVID-19 overseas by region” [49], a whopping 85% of all overseas acquired cases entered from the Americas, Europe or cruise ships! Given that Australian Department of Health data showed that up to April 30 there were in total 4,295 overseas acquired cases [50], this meant that 3,651 coronavirus-infected people entered Australia from Europe, America or cruise ships up to April 30. By contrast, the department’s infographic [49] showed that just 36 cases (a tiny 0.83% of all overseas acquired cases) entered from the entire North-East Asian region that includes China as well as South Korea and Japan! It is worth noting too that since arrivals from China had been carefully screened from the very start of the pandemic and that those still able to enter after the travel ban were forced to quarantine, arrivals from China did not cause any of the virus spread within Australia at all. The opposite was true, however, for arrivals from Europe and America. This is especially the case for the nearly two thousand infected people who arrived from these regions prior to the implementation of concentrated quarantining on March 29. Not only were they not required to even undergo home quarantining until mid-March (unlike arrivals from China, Iran and later South Korea), authorities did not even tell them to get tested until well into March even if they had symptoms! As a result many did not even know that they were infected until much later and, thus, passed the virus onto others. Other than for the likes of the upper class snobs returning from the high society Aspen party who refused directions to self-quarantine, this was of course not their fault at all. These people, just like the Ruby Princess passengers, were themselves victims of government policy. Not knowing that they were at high risk meant that they did not seek out early treatment meaning that their symptoms often became worse than they should have. Nevertheless, it was these thousands of COVID-19 cases arriving from Europe and America, along with infections caused by the Ruby Princess that became the source of most of the community transmission within Australia in its first wave.

The Australian government’s own data showed that the overwhelming majority of overseas acquired coronavirus cases entered Australia from Europe, America or cruise ships. Just a tiny 0.8% of cases entered Australia from the entire North-East Asian region that includes China and also South Korea & Japan.

Australian authorities were well aware that COVID-19 was mostly entering from Europe and America. Why then did they not move to stop the importation of cases from these regions much sooner even as they maintained a travel ban on China well after she had almost completely suppressed the virus threat?  Certainly there must have been some First World chauvinism – and a degree of underlying racial prejudice – at play. But that cannot fully explain a policy so at variance with the science. There was a factor still more sinister. For in order to achieve their goal of portraying Red China negatively, the Australian regime had to maintain their specific travel ban on only China for as long as possible. And then when they were compelled to have to bring in quarantining measures on other countries, they needed to ensure that this was implemented on as few countries as possible so that as much suspicious focus could still be maintained on China. Australia’s capitalist exploiting class are obsessed with demonising socialistic China because they want to make the Australian masses acquiesce to the Australian regime’s authoritarian moves to increase the powers of the ASIO secret police, further increase funding for spy agencies and arm their military with $270 billion of new long-range missiles.

In a major speech three weeks ago, foreign minister Marise Payne, stung by China calling out rampant racism within Australia, said that “disinformation” during the pandemic “will cost lives.” She was right! Except that disinformation is coming not from China but from the Australian regime – most notably through using the skewed application of country-specific quarantine measures – and is aimed at misleading people into thinking that the main danger of virus importation was from China. This distortion of pandemic policy to meet Cold War disinformation agendas cost the lives of dozens of Australians who would not have caught the disease from community transmission had authorities taken the scientifically mandated course of introducing earlier testing and quarantining of arrivals from the U.S., Italy, Germany, Britain etc. Let’s not forget, however, that it is not only the Morrison government that is culpable here. As Anthony Albanese has often remarked, “the Labor Party was at one with the government on this one.”

All the Ugliness Comes Out

Assisted by the daily negative stories about socialistic China spread by the tycoon and government-owned media, the false impression that the Morrison regime created that COVID-19 was introduced into Australia by arrivals from China was a shot in the arm for those already filled with white supremacist prejudice. These boosted-up racists then proceeded to unleash a horrific wave of physical attacks, abuse and threats of violence against ethnic Chinese people throughout Australia. Other people of Asian background have inevitably also been targeted.

In the face of the Chinese government warning its tourists and international students of the danger of racist attack in Australia, the Morrison government has tried to greatly downplay the threat to Asian people posed by racist violence.  For those living in fear of copping such attacks this is infuriating to even be denied recognition of what they are going through. Of course, the government, the ALP opposition and top bureaucrats earlier did manage to on a rare occasion state that they were “appalled” by reports of racist assaults. However, the government and the opposition knew full well that such attacks would be the inevitable result of their earlier insistence on singling out China in the application of travel restrictions and of their later crude attempts to join hard right bigot Trump in blaming China for the pandemic. Their behaviour can be compared to that of state governments throughout this country who help throw tens of thousands of people into homelessness by selling off low-rent public housing … but then try to look good by providing some modest funding for homelessness services!

If the powers that be wanted to they could let the tyres out of the far-right drive to incite hatred against Asian people. They could simply explain to people the facts about where COVID-19 actually entered this country from. However, although Morrison did on one day casually drop the truth that a lot of cases were coming from the U.S., politicians from all the parliamentary parties refused to inform the public what a tiny proportion of overseas-acquired cases originated from China. Of course, it should not matter what country a disease is transmitted from. Viruses do not carry passports! To blame any country or people for the entry of a virus is no more valid than blaming the people of a country through which a cyclone that entered Australia had previously passed. However, in the context of there being a terrifying level of racist violence against people of Chinese appearance and the prior existence of widespread bigotry in Australia against Asian people, explaining the truth that arrivals from China did not spread the virus into the community at all is vitally needed. Instead, Australian authorities moved to actually censor their own infographic that proved this fact. From the beginning of May, the Department of Health, without explanation, suddenly stopped showing on its website the pie chart, “confirmed cases who acquired COVID-19 overseas by region.” Although largely ignored by most of the mainstream media, the department had been publishing the chart daily up to that time. Moreover, a few days after they stopped showing the chart, the department obliterated the chart from its own archives so that it could no longer be found unless someone had earlier saved the exact web address of the infographic! It is very likely that the Australian regime censored its own previously published data because it undermined their attempts to blame China for the virus spread here (see: https://www.trotskyistplatform.com/australian-data-proves-chinas-pandemic-response-success/). An inevitable by-product of that censorship is that it helped extreme racists to fill the vacuum of facts with divisive lies.

Now more than ever, people need to be told the facts that stand out from the Australian regime’s censored infographic: that just 0.7% of all overseas acquired cases in Australia arrived from Sub-Saharan Africa, just over 2% from North Africa and the Middle East and just 7.5% from all of Asia, whereas seventeen out of every twenty cases entered from Europe, America or cruise ships. These facts need to be known because racist politicians, Rupert Murdoch’s Sky News and right-wing shock jobs have been disgustingly blaming Asian, African, Muslim and Middle Eastern communities for the renewed virus spread in Melbourne. The entire mainstream media have fed into this racist upsurge by selectively choosing to report on the source country of an infected returned traveller almost exclusively only when that person happens to arrive from Asia, the Middle East and Africa, which is only where a small minority of cases have arrived from. Victoria’s Labor health minister, Jenny Mikakos, was guilty of the same thing last month when she stated that many of the COVID-infected returned travellers had arrived from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh [51]. Had she ever bothered to inform us earlier that the overwhelming majority of returned travellers infected with the virus then were arriving from Europe and America?! And although the Victorian ALP premier, in deference to his party’s working class base, has framed his hard lockdown of public housing residents in heavily migrant areas as a measure aimed to protect tenants, the brutally repressive manner in which it was implemented was an obvious play to redneck elements and will surely encourage white supremacist sentiments. The reality of all of these coded and open appeals to racist prejudices is that the horrific violence and abuse that rednecks have unleashed against Chinese and other East Asian people throughout this pandemic is likely to now also be turned against people of African, Muslim, South Asian, Pacific Islander and Middle Eastern backgrounds.

Meanwhile, two weeks ago, the Australian ruling class focussed on attacking yet another scapegoat for the spike in COVID-19 infections. Health minister Hunt ridiculously claimed that the mass anti-racist protests held last month were to blame [52]. This despite his own top health official saying the very opposite [53]. It is not surprising that the Australian government would make this accusation. After all, despite Hunt’s devious claim that he thought the “subject matter” of the protests “noble”, these very necessary protests were aimed not only against killer cops but against his racist, right-wing government and against racist state governments of all stripes. The truth is that not only have just four people who attended the Black Lives Matter rallies been found to have COVID-19, none of these people actually picked up the virus at the protests. The Black Lives Matter marches were outdoor events where dispersal of droplets into open air reduces the probability of virus spread. Far more dangerous is the crowding of people into indoor shops, bars and restaurants. Yet while Liberal and ALP federal and state governments tried desperately to quell the anti-racist protests aimed against them, they have been cavalier in allowing people to again crowd into dangerous, virus-spreading indoor environments.

So as you can see, the oft-repeated assertion by governments and media that “Australians have come together at this time of crisis” is simply not true. To be sure, many working class people, especially trade unionists shaped by an understanding of the need for collective action and solidarity, have responded to the crisis by upholding pandemic suppression regulations and by volunteering their time to help neighbours in need. However, many a capitalist boss has failed to provide adequate PPE for their workers or otherwise ensure COVID-safe workplace environments. Moreover, as soon as business owners were hit with any loss in revenue, these bosses did not hesitate to lay off or cut the shifts of the very workers whose toil over the years made these capitalists their fortunes. Meanwhile, some self-employed tradies, imbued with the individualistic spirit of small business owners, have continued to do jobs when pandemic restrictions have been in place and have done so in a way that recklessly ignores social distancing directives.

The dog-eat-dog nature of the capitalist economic system has created a self-centred culture that shows its most harmful side at times like these. Many people in Australia violated coronavirus social-distancing rules. This included not only beach goers but often people of wealth and power. There were not only the super-rich people returning to Victoria infected from the U.S. Aspen high society party but also Australian defence soldiers [54] and officers and recruits of the Australian Federal Police [55] who grossly violated pandemic response measures. Of course, the media and parliamentarians never highlighted that most of those violators happened to be white-skinned. Nor should they. However, when they then only focus on the ethnicity of a person who breaches social distancing guidelines when that person happens to be a person of colour, then these influencers of public opinion are consciously acting to foment racist hostility to already victimized communities.

For United Working Class Struggle!

All the prejudice and selfishness within capitalist Australian society has certainly come to the fore during this pandemic. However, something very different has been on display too. This has been evident over the last few days in the way that our trade unions, the Australian Muslim Social Services Agency, the Sikh Volunteers Australia and other community groups have organised food and supplies for locked down public housing residents in Melbourne. Such mutual aid amongst working class people and victimised ethnic groups points to the possibility of something much more powerful: working class people and all the oppressed uniting in action to oppose the racist scapegoating, fight for the measures actually needed to curb the virus spread and struggle to ensure that working class people are not made to carry the economic burden of the pandemic.

Right now we must especially stand by our sisters and brothers locked down in Melbourne public housing towers by demanding:

  • Police out of the public housing neighbourhoods! Send in public health and community workers instead!
  • The same quality food for locked down public housing tenants as those given to the more affluent returned travellers who had been quarantined in five-star hotels.
  • For all locked down public housing tenants to be given the option of serving their quarantine in luxury five-star hotels with all expenses provided. Let them stay in more spacious, safer rooms! Let those forced into a hard lockdown enjoy good conditions instead of being stigmatised and forced to endure further hardship!
  • For all electricity and gas charges to be removed until the end of winter. Let tenants turn on their heaters in full so that they can open the windows and let infected air disperse safely.
  • No to discriminatory imposition of hard lockdowns on public housing tenants!

More broadly the workers movement and all our allies need to fight for:

  • Mandatory temperature testing of everyone attending workplaces of more than two people.
  • Paid pandemic sick leave for all workers (including those currently casuals) and the immediate conversion to permanency of all those currently employed as casuals.
  • Secure jobs for all workers. That means demanding firstly that those companies still profitable – including supermarkets, construction firms and manufacturers – be forced to increase hiring at the expense of their profits; and secondly that the owners of previously profitable companies that are experiencing reduced operations be forced to pay their workers in full out of the massive profits that they have leached from these workers over the years.

Such a program can only be won through mass struggle against the capitalist exploiters and their governments. To advance this struggle it is vital that we discredit the capitalist regime by exposing just how flawed and anti-working class has been their response to the pandemic. The fact is that especially given that this land is both an island and a country with a low population density, other than for those who caught the virus abroad and could not be saved once they entered here, there should have either been just a tiny handful of COVID-19 deaths here or none at all.  That people are now dying in a virus second wave is caused by Australian governments winding back social distancing measures too quickly, in deference to their capitalist masters, by their all-round neglect of the health and housing needs of public housing tenants and by the inability of the profit-driven system to ensure sufficient PPE for frontline workers. The first wave, on the other hand, was mainly caused by the Australian regime delaying introduction of mandatory testing and quarantining of arrivals from Europe, America and cruise ships and they did this in order to ensure that, for as long as possible, the focus of travel bans would be on China. As a result of this manoeuvre to create fear of socialistic China amongst the population, the virus was allowed to be brought into the community from Europe, America and cruise ships in large doses in late February and March and spread dangerously from there on in. Australia’s capitalist rulers caused dozens of people to die who otherwise would have been alive today – including the nineteen residents who tragically died at the Anglicare nursing home in Western Sydney and the eleven people who perished from the Ruby Princess-triggered North-West Tasmanian outbreak. Those close to the people who died should be furious that their precious family members and friends perished because the Australian regime distorted health policy to meet its Cold War agenda. So should all the workers who have been retrenched or lost shifts because the pandemic has been allowed to spread into the community far more widely than it should have.

References

  1. John M Barry, The site of origin of the 1918 influenza pandemic and its public health implications, Journal of Translational Medicine, Vol. 2, 20 January 2004,  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC340389/#
  2. Dian Septiari, Indonesia steers clear of COVID-19 resolution ‘politicization’, The Jakarta Post website, 21 May 2020, https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/05/21/indonesia-steers-clear-of-covid-19-resolution-politicization.html
  3. Worldometers, Coronavirus, United States,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/ (accessed 14 June 2020)
  4. Worldometers, Coronavirus, United Kingdom,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/uk/ (accessed 14 June 2020)
  5. Worldometers, Coronavirus, China,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/china/ (accessed 14 June 2020)
  6. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Australia,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/australia/ (accessed 14 June 2020)
  7. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Vietnam,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/viet-nam/ (accessed 14 June 2020)
  8. Oliver Hotham, No reason to doubt North Korea’s claims to be coronavirus-free, ambassador says, NK News website, 20 May 2020, https://www.nknews.org/2020/05/no-reason-to-doubt-north-koreas-claims-to-be-coronavirus-free-ambassador-says/
  9. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Laos,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/laos/ (accessed 14 June 2020)
  10. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Mongolia,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/mongolia/  (accessed 14 June 2020)
  11. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Bhutan,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/bhutan/ (accessed 14 June 2020)
  12. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Rwanda,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/rwanda/ (accessed 14 June 2020)
  13. Worldometers, Coronavirus, New Caledonia,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/new-caledonia/ (accessed 14 June 2020)
  14. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Fiji,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/fiji/  (accessed 14 June 2020)
  15. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Thailand,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/thailand/  (accessed 14 June 2020)
  16. Kunal Gaurav, Australian PM Downplays Coronavirus Threat, Says ‘you Can Still Go To Cricket’, Republic World website, 27 February 2020, https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/rest-of-the-world-news/australian-pm-scott-morrison-downplays-coronavirus-threat.html
  17. Scott Morrison, Transcript – Press Conference, Prime Minister of Australia website, Home » Media » Transcript – Press Conference, 15 March 2020, https://www.pm.gov.au/media/transcript-press-conference
  18. Greg Hunt (Minister of Health), First confirmed case of novel coronavirus in Australia, Australian Government Department of Health website, Home > Ministers > The Hon Greg Hunt MP > Minister Hunt’s media, 25 January 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/first-confirmed-case-of-novel-coronavirus-in-australia
  19. Mike Seccombe, What Morrison did wrong on coronavirus, The Saturday Paper website, Edition 293, 21-27 March 2020, https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/politics/2020/03/21/what-morrison-did-wrong-coronavirus/15847092009555
  20. Greg Hunt (Minister of Health), Interview on the Today Show about coronavirus (COVID-19) 2 March 2020, Australian Government Department of Health website, Home > Ministers > The Hon Greg Hunt MP > Minister Hunt’s media, 11 March 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-on-the-today-show-about-coronavirus-covid-19
  21. Greg Hunt (Minister of Health), Interview on Sky News First Edition about coronavirus (COVID-19), Australian Government Department of Health website, Home > Ministers > The Hon Greg Hunt MP > Minister Hunt’s media, 4 March 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-on-sky-news-first-edition-about-coronavirus-covid-19
  22. Greg Hunt (Minister of Health), Interview on the Today Show about coronavirus (COVID-19) 5 March 2020, Australian Government Department of Health website, Home > Ministers > The Hon Greg Hunt MP > Minister Hunt’s media, 5 March 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-on-the-today-show-about-coronavirus-covid-19-5-march-2020
  23. Greg Hunt (Minister of Health), Interview on the Today Show about coronavirus (COVID-19) 11 March 2020, Australian Government Department of Health website, Home > Ministers > The Hon Greg Hunt MP > Minister Hunt’s media, 11 March 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/interview-on-the-today-show-about-coronavirus-covid-19-11-march-2020
  24. PolitiFact and Jon Greenberg, ‘We have it totally under control.’ A timeline of President Donald Trump’s response to the coronavirus pandemic, Poynter website, 24 March 2020, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2020/we-have-it-totally-under-control-a-timeline-of-president-donald-trumps-response-to-the-coronavirus-pandemic/
  25. Adam Serwer, The Coronavirus Was an Emergency Until Trump Found Out Who Was Dying, The Atlantic website, 8 May 2020, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/05/americas-racial-contract-showing/611389/
  26. Katherine Dunn and Jeremy Kahn, Even while canceling mass gatherings, the U.K. is still aiming for deliberate ‘herd immunity’, Fortune website, 14 March 2020, https://fortune.com/2020/03/14/coronavirus-uk-cases-herd-immunity-covid-19/
  27.  Benjamin Mueller, As Europe Shuts Down, Britain Takes a Different, and Contentious, Approach, The New York Times, 13 March 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/world/europe/coronavirus-britain-boris-johnson.html
  28. UK government, Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the UK, https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/ (accessed 20 June 2020)
  29. Worldometers, Coronavirus, https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries (accessed 20 June 2020)
  30. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Sweden,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/sweden/ (accessed 30 June 2020)
  31. Stephanie Bedo, Should we be keeping schools open?, The Chronicle, 17 March 2020, https://www.thechronicle.com.au/news/why-its-smart-to-keep-schools-open/3973701/
  32. Australian Government Department of Health, Coronavirus (COVID-19) at a glance – 1 June 2020, Australian Government Department of Health website, 2 June 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/06/coronavirus-covid-19-at-a-glance-1-june-2020.pdf
  33. Australian Government Department of Health, Coronavirus (COVID-19) at a glance – 18 May 2020, Australian Government Department of Health website, 19 May 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/05/coronavirus-covid-19-at-a-glance-18-may-2020-coronavirus-covid-19-at-a-glance-infographic.pdf
  34. ABC News, Police arrest protesters outside public housing estate, MSN News website, 8 July 2020, https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/police-arrest-protesters-outside-public-housing-estate/vp-BB16sg71
  35. Margaret Simons and Matilda Boseley, ‘They change the rules’: confusion reigns for frightened and stressed Melbourne public housing residents, The Guardian Australia website, 7 July 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/jul/07/they-change-the-rules-confusion-reigns-for-frightened-and-stressed-melbourne-public-housing-residents
  36. Xinhua, City landmarks across China light up in solidarity with Wuhan, Xinhua website, 9 February 2020, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-02/09/c_138768233.htm
  37. Xinhua, Xi Focus: Xi vows to win people’s war against novel coronavirus, Xinhua website, 11 February 2020, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-02/11/c_138771934.htm
  38. Melissa Clarke, Healthcare workers fighting coronavirus to receive millions of new face masks after Australia’s stocks are boosted, ABC News website, 18 April 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-18/coronavirus-ppe-australia-gets-58-million-face-masks/12161922
  39. Worldometers, Coronavirus, South Korea,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/south-korea/ (accessed 27 June 2020)
  40. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Italy,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/ (accessed 27 June 2020)
  41. Australian Government Department of Health, Deputy Chief Medical Officer’s interview on ABC Radio National about coronavirus (COVID-19), Australian Government Department of Health website, 28 February 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/news/deputy-chief-medical-officers-interview-on-abc-radio-national-about-coronavirus-covid-19
  42. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Iran,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/iran/ (accessed 27 June 2020)
  43. Australian Government Department of Health, Chief Medical Officer’s interview on ABC Radio Melbourne, Australian Government Department of Health website, 9 March 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/news/chief-medical-officers-interview-on-abc-radio-melbourne
  44. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Germany, https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/germany/  (accessed 27 June 2020)
  45. Worldometers, Coronavirus, Spain,  https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/spain/ (accessed 27 June 2020)
  46. Cameron Houston, The cough that crossed the globe: Andrew Abercrombie’s ill-fated party, Brisbane Times website, 3 April 2020, https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/politics/victoria/the-cough-that-crossed-the-globe-andrew-abercrombie-s-ill-fated-party-20200403-p54gp9.html
  47. Dana McCauley and Cameron Houston, ‘Throw the book at them’: Health Minister addresses Aspen controversy, The Age website, 31 March 2020, https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/throw-the-book-at-them-health-minister-addresses-aspen-controversy-20200331-p54frd.html
  48. Merran Hitchick, ‘Flabbergasted’: Melbourne doctor with coronavirus symptoms continued seeing patients, The Guardian Australia website, 7 March 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/07/flabbergasted-melbourne-doctor-with-coronavirus-symptoms-continued-seeing-patients
  49. Australian Government Department of Health, Australian confirmed cases who acquired COVID-19 overseas, by region, 30 April 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/images/publications/2020/04/covid-19-cases-acquired-overseas-by-region-or-country-acquired_29.png (accessed 30 June 2020)
  50. Australian Government Department of Health, Coronavirus (COVID-19) at a glance – 30 April 2020, Australian Government Department of Health website, 2 May 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-at-a-glance-30-april-2020
  51. Will Jackson and Leonie Thorne, Why is Victoria experiencing an increase in coronavirus cases and other states aren’t?, ABC News website, 18 June 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-18/why-is-victoria-experiencing-an-increase-in-cases/12366884
  52. Nick Baker, Greg Hunt says Black Lives Matter protests contributed to Melbourne coronavirus spike, SBS website, 25 June 2020, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/greg-hunt-says-black-lives-matter-protests-contributed-to-melbourne-coronavirus-spike
  53. Nick Baker, Did Australia’s Black Lives Matter protests cause a spike in COVID-19 cases?, SBS website, 23 June 2020, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/did-australia-s-black-lives-matter-protests-cause-a-spike-in-covid-19-cases
  54. 9 News, Australian Army soldiers busted attending Queensland house party over Easter weekend, 9 News website, 15 April 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/townsvillebased-australian-army-soldiers-busted-over-easter-weekend-party-amid-covid-19-restrictions/5fb3dfcd-5baa-4196-a4ce-1788a4fe74e9
  55. Andrew Greene and Georgia Hitch, AFP recruits and staff sanctioned for breaching coronavirus social-distancing rules at college party, ABC News website, 7 May 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-07/coronavirus-afp-recruits-sanctions-after-illegal-party-canberra/12223808

Australian Data Proves China’s Pandemic Response Success

Australian Government Censors Its Own Infographic After…

Australian Data Proves China’s Pandemic Response Success

20 June 2020: In a high-profile speech four days ago, Australia’s foreign minister, Marise Payne accused China of spreading “disinformation” around COVID-19. In particular, the right-wing senator asserted that Australia had been “very clear in rejecting as disinformation the Chinese government’s warnings that tourists and students should reconsider coming here because of the risk of racism.” The conservative Morrison government has clearly been stung by the warnings about travel to Australia that China had very understandably given to its tourists and students. The travel warnings resulted from a frightening surge in the already large number of racist attacks taking place in Australia against people of Chinese background and other people of East Asian appearance.

In a further attack aimed against China, Payne claimed that it was “troubling that some countries are using the pandemic to undermine liberal democracy and promote their own, more authoritarian models” and boasted that Australia would resist and counter efforts at disinformation “through facts and transparency.” So let us do some examination at who has been “transparent” and who has been “spreading disinformation” during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Those Conspiracy Theories About China’s COVID-19 Numbers

The most contentious issue when it comes to “disinformation” around COVID-19 is the claim by the likes of that master of disinformation, Donald Trump that China’s infection numbers are grossly downplayed. Right wing shock jocks in Australia have peddled a similar line. In the course of the witch-hunt that they helped propel against NSW Labor upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane, for stating that the PRC had taken effective countermeasures that had contained the COVID-19 threat, 2GB radio’s Ray Hadley and Sky News presenter, Peta Credlin, put out claims that the real death toll in China is actually around 40,000 and that the number of infected people there is more than ten times higher than reported. More “centrist” media have also claimed that China has under-reported the virus impact without providing any estimate of what they think the real number of infections and deaths there are. None of those putting forward such conspiracy theories have actually provided any evidence to back their claims.

Now there has been under-reporting of deaths in some countries. The U.S. top infectious disease official, Dr. Anthony Fauci, admitted at a Senate hearing on May 12 that the U.S. death count is almost certainly higher than reported [4]. Not all of this is because of conscious under-reporting. Many people are not counted in official U.S. figures because they died before they were positively identified with the coronavirus. Especially when health systems are overwhelmed such under-reporting is possible. After China had largely suppressed the virus threat in mid-April, the authorities there did a detailed investigation of the death toll by comparing figures from hospitals, funeral sites and public health agencies. They increased the death toll figure by 38% after accounting for people who had died at home during the initial surge in the outbreak when the hospital system was stretched, deaths not recorded by overwhelmed medical staff during that period who were focused instead on saving patients and deaths missed because of some hospitals not having been linked to the central recording site.

In the U.S., as well as unintentional under-reporting there have also been cases of deliberate under-reporting. Some of this is in states like Florida, Georgia and Arizona that have been recklessly re-opening businesses even as the virus runs rampant. Governments have sought to downplay new virus cases in order to justify the re-opening. The authorities have even driven out public health officials who have refused orders to manipulate data [5], [6]. There have been credible estimates that the real U.S. death toll is up to 50% higher than officially reported – both due to innocent under-reporting and deliberate under-reporting – and in some local areas the actual death toll may be as much as twice what is officially reported. However, to suggest that any country, including China, could get way with reporting a pandemic death toll more than ten times lower than the actual numbers is plainly bonkers. This is especially the case once a country gets the upper hand on the virus spread, which is now the case in China. Social distancing measures are eased and people again re-connect with family, social networks and work colleagues. In that situation no modern country could get away with under-reporting a death toll by a factor of ten. This particularly applies to densely populated, urban societies where populations are more interlinked and what happens in one neighbourhood is quickly known in other adjacent neighbourhoods. Wuhan, where most of the deaths in China occurred, definitely is such a society. Moreover, this is true more so for China, with its collectivist, more community-connected society, than for the more individualistic U.S. and Australia. People in China tend to be closely linked to each other through neighbourhood collectives, community organisations and a social workplace culture. This includes the elderly, the section of society hardest hit by the pandemic, who in China are known for joining together in mass social activities like group tai-chi sessions and even late-night, street dance parties. Where people have strong social ties to each other, it is simply impossible for any government to cover up deaths from a disease outbreak to the degree suggested by the conspiracy theorists, even if a government wanted to.

Fortunately, we can actually evaluate those claims that China has massively downplayed the extent of its coronavirus outbreak by looking at the Australian government’s own figures. The first figure to consider is the number of people who were found to have the coronavirus out of the Australian citizens and permanent residents brought out of Wuhan into quarantine in Australia in those “evacuation” flights. The first two groups of 278 Australian residents (242 + 36) brought out of Wuhan in chartered flights organised by the Australian government were cruelly required to endure their quarantine at the Australian regime’s remote Christmas Island immigration prison from the start of February [7]. The other group of 266 Australian residents flown out of Wuhan were quarantined at a facility in Darwin from February 9 [8]. Given that these groups, numbering a total of 544 people, were brought out of the city that is universally acknowledged to have been the hardest hit part of China and given that they flew out of Wuhan when the virus spread was at its most rampant there, one would expect that a large number of these people would test positive for COVID-19 if the conspiracy “theories” about the scale of the virus impact in China are true. On his April 2 morning show on 2GB, radio shock jock, Ray Hadley, claimed that the real number of infected people in Wuhan is actually over 800,000 [9]. Given that Wuhan has a population of 11 million, Hadley’s claim is equivalent to saying that over 7.3% of Wuhan’s population became infected. If that were true, we would then expect on probability that at least 40 of the 544 people brought out of Wuhan by the Australian government would be found by Australian health authorities to have COVID-19. But guess how many of these people ended up being found to have COVID-19? None at all! That’s right: a big fat zero [10] [11] [12]. Now this should be contrasted with the infection rate of the much smaller group of 164 Australians evacuated from the Diamond Princess cruise ship moored off Japan and moved into quarantine in Darwin on February 20 [13]. Despite all the Australians aboard the cruise ship already found to have the virus being transferred into isolation wards in Japan [14] and those at the last minute found to be infected also stopped from boarding the evacuation flight [15], ten of the 164 Diamond Princess evacuees still tested positive for the virus while in quarantine [16].

Determining Infection Rates Based on
Screening Tens of Thousands of Arrivals from China

Now, a person rationally examining the fact that none of the 544 Australians removed from what was by far the worst hit part of China (Wuhan) at the very height of her coronavirus outbreak were found to have COVID-19, would say that this is indeed strong evidence that the virus outbreak in China is no worse than China reported but then say, show me some more numbers with a bigger sample size just to be sure. Indeed, we can do just this. On the second last day of February, Australia’s Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Professor Paul Kelly, provided the following information in a radio interview on ABC Radio National [17]:

“We’ve done a lot of testing as people have come from China into Australia. Over 40,000 people have arrived Australians have arrived since the 1st February not a single one of those have proved to be positive for the virus.”

Now this is very telling! Over 40,000 Australian citizens and permanent residents entered Australia from China during basically the worst four weeks of China’s outbreak (i.e. in February) and not a single one of them tested positive for the coronavirus. Now to put that in perspective, in roughly the four worst weeks, thus far, of Australia’s outbreak the number of infections rose from just under 300 on March 16 [18] to 6313 on April 12 [19]. That’s more than 6,013 infection in four weeks out of a total Australian population of 25.4 million. So in that four week period, we would expect that for every 40,000 Australian residents, on average, ten would test positive for COVID-19. Yet out of the 40,000 people who arrived from China during the worst four weeks of her outbreak, none at all tested positive for COVID-19! In other words, the Australian government’s own figures confirm that the virus spread in China during the most severe period of her outbreak was significantly less than in Australia during the peak of the outbreak here.

Now 40,000 people is a very large sample size on which to base the above conclusion. But we can examine the infection rate among a still bigger number of people arriving from China. We can, in fact, look at the number of infections amongst all the people who have arrived into Australia from China in the first four months of this year. The Australian government’s Department of Health records the number of COVID-19 cases coming from various regions and the government’s Australian Bureau of Statistics records the number of residents and visitors arriving in Australia every month from each separate overseas country. By dividing the number of people infected with COVID-19 who have arrived in Australia from China by the number of arrivals from China we can get a sense of China’s infection rate. This number can then be compared with China’s official infection rate. We must say from the outset, however, that the infection rate that we obtain from Australian government figures may be somewhat of an over-estimate of the real infection rate in China. This is because a disproportionately high amount of the people entering Australia from China (that is Australian Chinese households returning from visits to family in China, Chinese international students studying in Australia, Australians returning from study and work in China and Australians who tour China) return from travel or residency in China’s cities rather than from her rural areas. Yet it is in China’s cities (in most parts of the world, including Australia, urban areas have been hardest hit by the virus) where the virus impacted far more greatly that in the less densely populated rural areas.

To get an estimate of the number of people infected with COVID-19 who entered Australia from China we need to look at the pie chart that the Australian government’s Department of Health had been publishing daily on its website titled, “Australian confirmed cases who acquired COVID-19 overseas, by region.” Mysteriously, after April 30, the Australian government not only stopped publishing this chart on its Department of Health website but then made the existing data basically impossible to find online (we will have more to say on this). Fortunately, we saved the practically impossible to find link that contains the data. Here is the link: https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/images/publications/2020/04/covid-19-cases-acquired-overseas-by-region-or-country-acquired_29.png [20] (hopefully the link still works by the time that you read this article but we will re-print the screenshot of the chart as well just in case). Examine this chart using an angle measuring instrument (protractor) and you will see that this Australian government chart shows that just a tiny 0.83% of all COVID-19 cases in Australia that were acquired overseas were infected with the virus in the North-East Asian region that includes China (as the chart shows the overwhelming majority of overseas acquired cases actually came from Europe, America and cruise ships). Now researching the Australian government’s “Coronavirus (COVID-19) at a glance infographic’, still published daily, for April 30 shows that up to that date, 63.6% of the total 6753 virus cases in Australia at the time were acquired overseas [21]. That means that up to 30 April, 4295 of Australia’s COVID-19 cases in total were acquired overseas. Given that the pie chart shows that 0.83% of these cases were acquired in the North East Asian region, this means that the Australian government’s own figures show that just 36 of the overseas acquired COVID-19 cases came from the region that includes China.

Unfortunately, the Australian government has not published the break down in case numbers originating from the various countries in North-East Asia. However, examining media reports in the earlier period of the outbreak when China was hard hit, we find that 15 people entered Australia from China that were later found to be COVID-19 positive. So 15 is the minimum number of cases that entered from China. But what is the maximum possible number of people who entered from China who had acquired the virus while there? To obtain this upper limit, we need to deduct from the figure of 36 – that is, the total number of people who contracted COVID-19 in the entire North-East Asian region – those that are known to have contracted the virus in the North-East Asian places other than in mainland China: that is in Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Mongolia, Macao and Hong Kong. Looking at the individual media reports about new cases from the first period of the outbreak in Australia, we find that in total at least five people later found to have coronavirus entered Australia from North-East Asian places outside the mainland PRC: that includes a person who arrived from South Korea and a person who arrived from Japan who were both announced to have the virus on March 3 [22], a 58 year-old man who arrived in South Australia from Taiwan on March 3 [23] and a woman in her 40s returning from South Korea and a man in his 20s returning from Hong Kong who were announced to have COVID-19 on March 10 [24]. As the number of infected people in Australia rose, from after about March 10 media stopped reporting on the sources of individual cases originating from overseas. However, the NSW Government’s Health website details air flights where passengers later found to be carrying COVID-19 had travelled on (as part of attempts to trace those sitting close to the infected passengers). Examining this data for cases after March 10 we find that a further, at least, ten people infected with COVID-19 entered Australia from flights originating from North East Asian countries other than China and which flew non-stop into Australia [25] [26]: this includes five people arriving from Japan on flights arriving between 22 March and 13 April, four people arriving from Hong Kong between 12 March and 23 March and one person arriving from Taiwan on 17 March. That means in total at least 15 (5 + 10) of the 36 people with COVID-19 who entered Australia from the North-East Asian region travelled from countries outside the mainland PRC. Unfortunately, other state government health websites, unlike the one for NSW Health, no longer show data for earlier flights where passengers later found to be infected with COVID-19 had travelled on. However, if we assume that, other than for the 15 coronavirus-infected people confirmed to have come from Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea and Japan, all the remaining of the 36 cases who entered Australia from North-East Asia came from the mainland PRC, then at the very most just 21 people who entered Australia from mainland China had COVID-19. Put another way, based on Australian federal and state government data, one can ascertain that the number of people from the mainland PRC who entered Australia with COVID-19 in the first four months of this year is between 15 and 21.

To finally determine the infection rate of people entering Australia from China we now just need to ascertain the total number of people who entered Australia from China in the period from the time that the epidemic broke out at the start of this year until the end of April (which is the date up to which we have Australian data for the source countries of COVID-19 cases originating from overseas). We know that up to the end of January, both Chinese citizens (including international students, workers and tourists) as well as Australian citizens and permanent residents were able to enter Australia from China. After the Morrison government instituted its China travel ban, Australian permanent residents and citizens were still able to return here from China as well as a small number of Chinese citizens (and other foreign citizens arriving from China) arriving as special exemptions. Now Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show that up to the end of April, a total of 322,510 people – including both Australian and foreign residents – entered Australia this year from mainland China. This includes 205,930 visitors who entered Australia from mainland China (156,610 in January, 21,330 in February, 27,940 in March and 50 in April [27]) and 116,580 Australian residents who returned to Australia from mainland China (72,530 in January, 40,000 in February, 3,670 in March and 380 in April [28]).

If we now divide the number of people who entered Australia with COVID-19 from China, which as we have detailed is between 15 and 21, by this total number of arrivals from China of 322,510 we get an infection rate of people entering Australia from China, based on Australian government data, of between 0.0047% and 0.0065% or between 47 and 65 COVID-19 cases per million people. If we take the average of this range, we find that the infection rate of people entering Australia from mainland China, based on Australian government data, is approximately 56 cases per million people. This is actually slightly lower than China’s infection rate given by the Chinese government of 58 cases per million people. Moreover this calculated infection rate, based on Australian government data, of the arrivals into Australia from China, which is in turn an indication of the overall infection rate within China itself, is three and a half times lower than the number of actively infected people in Australia at the peak of its outbreak (which was 194 active cases per million people on April 4 – from 4935 active cases [29] divided by a 25.4 million population). This confirms just how effectively China has combated the virus threat. It also proves that contrary to the fears incited by Far Right racists, people entering Australia from China have been much less likely to be infected with COVID-19 than other people living here!

Now let us do exactly the same calculation based on Australian government data for people entering Australia from Europe and from America. The Department of Health’s pie chart [20] shows that up to 30 April a whopping 34% of the overseas acquired COVID-19 cases came from Europe and 22% came from the Americas. We find now that the infection rate of people entering Australia from Europe has been 2,966 COVID-19 cases per million people. The infection rate of people entering Australia from the Americas is 1,548 COVID-19 cases per million people (and if the Australian government provided data for infected people entering specifically from the U.S. the infection rate of people entering from just the U.S. would surely be found to be even higher than this). To put all this in perspective this means that, Australian government data shows that the infection rate of people who entered Australia from Europe in the first four months of this year was 53 times higher than the rate of infection of people entering from China in that period, while the infection rate of people entering Australia from the Americas in the first four months of this year was 28 times higher than the infection rate of people entering Australia from China in that period.

The above contrast between the infection rate of arrivals from, on the one hand, China and, on the other, Europe and America is actually understated because until well into March, people entering Australia from Europe and America were not screened for COVID-19 and were not even told to consult their doctor if they had symptoms – only those who arrived from China, South Korea and Iran were [22]. That meant that many infected people who entered from the U.S. and Europe were not detected as having the virus. Moreover, while new cases in China are now down to barely a trickle relative to her huge population, the pandemic has continued to spread rapidly in Europe and the Americas in the weeks following the end of April, especially in the U.S., Brazil, Britain, Sweden and Russia. Furthermore, due to travel restrictions and disruptions, the arrivals from overseas during the January to April period is weighted heavily towards the beginning of that period. For example, more than nine times as many people entered Australia from China in January and February as they did in March and April; and similarly nearly ten times as many people entered Australia from Europe in the first two months of this year as in the subsequent two months. Yet, the first two months of this year were precisely when the coronavirus was spreading rapidly in China and had not yet begun its rampant spread through Europe; whereas in March and April, the virus was largely contained in China but spreading like wildfire in Europe.

Fortunately, we can actually compare the rate of infections of those entering Australia from China in January and February when the pandemic was worst there with the infection rate of those entering from Europe (and the Americas) in just the March and April period when the pandemic was worse there. Statements from Australian health officers indicate that there were 15 people who turned out to be infected with COVID-19 who arrived from China in January, although some of these people did not develop symptoms and become detected until early February [30]. And as noted earlier in this article, Australia’s Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Professor Paul Kelly, has informed us that none of the people who entered Australia from China in February were found to have COVID-19 [17]. Thus in January and February combined there were only 15 people who entered Australia from China infected with the coronavirus. Now the Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show that a total of 290,470 people entered Australia from China in January and February [27] [28]. Therefore, the proportion of people entering Australia from China who were coronavirus-infected during the first two months of this year, the worst months of the pandemic there, was 0.0052% or 52 cases per million people. The Department of Health’s pie chart [20] showing that, up to 30 April, 34% of the overseas acquired COVID-19 cases came from Europe combined with the fact that there were (as shown earlier in this article) 4,295 cases from abroad by April 30, demonstrates that, up to the end of April, 1,460 virus-infected people entered Australia from Europe. Statements by Australia’s minister of health and health officials in early March indicated that up to then none of the COVID-19 cases detected in Australia came from arrivals from Europe [31]. To be sure, this does not mean that there were not any coronavirus-infected people who entered Australia from Europe in January and February. People who entered Australia from Europe in this period and became ill were neither tested nor asked to be tested. So even if they actually had COVID-19 they were not detected and thus not included in Australian government figures. Therefore, all the 1,460 COVID-19 cases listed by Australian government data as having arrived from Europe up to 30 April came to Australia in either March or April. Noting that there were in total 147,490 residents and visitors arriving into Australia from Europe in March and April [27] [28], then the proportion of arrivals into Australia from Europe who were infected with COVID-19 in March and April was 0.9899% or 9,899 cases per million people. That is a massive 190 times greater than the proportion of people arriving from China who were infected with COVID-19 during the worst two months of the pandemic in China! Note this is what Australian government data is saying.

Given that the rate of infection of people entering from a country is a strong indicator of the extent of the virus spread in that country itself, we can say in summary that the Australian government’s own data confirms what the WHO and most serious infection disease specialists – and indeed ostracised NSW Labor MP Shaoquett Moselmane – have said: that the Peoples Republic of China has been incredibly successful in containing the COVID-19 outbreak.

Australian Regime Hides Embarrassing Data

As we pointed out earlier in this article, the Australian government’s Department of Health had been publishing daily on its website that pie chart titled, “Australian confirmed cases who acquired COVID-19 overseas, by region.” However from April 30, without explanation, the Australian government agency stopped publishing this data. For a few days after this, the pie chart could still be found, with considerable difficulty, through doing a search on the Department of Health’s website. We saved the exact link to this pie chart (which at the time of writing still works) and saved the screenshot. However, soon after, the pie chart stopped appearing even on a search on that Australian government department’s website. The chart has been simply obliterated from the department’s search database! Moreover, one cannot find the latest version of this infographic even through a Google search with the name of the infographic as the search term.

As we explained above, you can only find the latest (i.e. April 30) version of the chart if you type in its exact web address. But you will only know that address if you had saved the exact address of the infographic previously! In other words, nearly everyone now trying to find this pie chart, “Australian confirmed cases who acquired COVID-19 overseas, by region,” will not be successful in accessing this data online. Is this the kind of “transparency” that Marise Payne is talking about! Today, if one does a Google search with the name of the chart as the search term, one can only find a small number of earlier versions of the chart (i.e. before April 30) with old data. In these search results, older versions of the chart that had been previously screenshot by a media outlet are reproduced: like this earlier version of the chart that was shown on the 7 News website with data up to March 30: https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/coronavirus-australia-the-latest-cases-and-trends-c-770380 [32]. Australian regime officials have well and truly “disappeared” from cyberspace their own pie chart showing the breakdown in regions from where COVID-19 cases entered Australia from overseas.

The pie chart on the source regions of overseas acquired COVID-19 cases in Australia that the Australian government’s Department of Health had been publishing daily. This is the last published version of the chart containing data up to April 30. After that, the government department, without explanation, stopped publishing the chart. Then, a few days later, they completely censored all links to the chart from their website’s search archives. This has no doubt much to do with the fact that the chart shows just how tiny a percentage of the overseas acquired cases within Australia came from the North-East Asian region that includes China and just how overwhelming the percentage of overseas acquired cases that arrived from Europe, America and cruise ships are.

Now why would Australian officials want to hide their own infographic that for weeks they had been showing us daily? Well the date that they last showed the graph, April 30, is telling. This was when the U.S. and Australian government’s witch-hunt against socialistic China over the coronavirus outbreak was at its height. It was within two weeks of Australia’s home affairs minister Peter Dutton demanding “transparency from China” in the context of lending credence to the nutcase far-right conspiracy “theory” that the coronavirus was leaked out of a Chinese lab; followed by foreign minister, Marise Payne, calling for a witch-hunting “inquiry” into the origins of COVID-19 after having already blamed China for the outbreak and then ratcheting up her attack further by calling for the “inquiry” to have weapons inspectors-like powers (thus associating the proposed “inquiry” with the “inspections” that paved the way for the 2003 invasion of Iraq). However, the entire premise of this anti-PRC witch-hunt and the claim that the proposed “inquiry” is in Australia’s “national interest” (there is actually no such thing as “national interest” – there is only the interests of Australia’s capitalist exploiting class and the counterposed interests of Australia’s working class, the latter being synonymous with the interests of workers of the world), is blown apart by the reality that only a tiny proportion of the imported COVID-19 cases came into Australia from China. The overwhelming majority of cases that entered Australia from overseas came from Europe and America and from cruise ships. This truth then illustrates that the focus of investigating how the virus came into Australia should not be about the “origins” of the virus – and it has not even been definitely established that the virus “originated” in China – and its first known spread within China but rather on why governments in Europe and America failed so miserably to contain the virus; and on why the Australian government allowed large numbers of people to enter with the virus from Europe, America and cruise ships without proper screening even while they barred non-citizens from China (and later Iran and South Korea) from entry altogether. In other words the infographic, “Australian confirmed cases who acquired COVID-19 overseas, by region” that the Australian government’s Department of Health had once been publishing daily, both blew apart the Washington-Canberra attacks against China over the coronavirus outbreak and exposed the serious flaws in the Australian government’s own handling of the pandemic. That is almost certainly why the Australian regime has decided to not only stop publishing this infographic daily but, moreover, then totally obliterate their own infographic from their own website’s archival searches. Talk about “authoritarian”!

Regrettably, we will never know for sure the Australian regime’s reasons for disappearing this embarrassing pie chart and just who ordered it unless someone comes forward as a whistle blower. However, many Australian public health officials who might be wanting to expose this blatant attack on the professional integrity of their work would know that whistle blowers are fiercely repressed by the Australian regime. They may well be aware of the Australian regime’s severe prosecutions going on against whistle blowers Bernard Collaery, “Witness K” and David McBride that could see these people jailed for long periods. Moreover, any one thinking of being a whistle blower or an exposer of Australian regime corruption must look on in trepidation as they see the way that the Australian government has been complicit in the American and British regime’s cruel persecution of Julian Assange.

Nevertheless, despite all this repression going on, we call on anyone with a strong conscience working in Australia’s Department of Health to risk their careers and blow the whistle on why, how, on whose orders and over whose objections, the Department of Health stopped publishing and then “disappeared” from its search database its own, formerly daily, infographic on the sources of COVID-19 cases acquired overseas. We ask such people to be inspired by those in the U.S. who have blown the whistle on the manipulation of COVID-19 data by states seeking to justify re-opening: like Rebekah Jones of the Florida Department of Public Health who for the sake of Florida’s people – and humanity more generally – exposed how she had been ordered to “manually change data to drum up support for the plan to reopen” [5] [6]. If you follow in the footsteps of such courageous whistle blowers, history will not forget you and even if you face retribution for such brave deeds you can be sure in the knowledge that you are advancing humanity’s cause. You would be – in Marise Payne’s own words but in the exact opposite direction – countering efforts at disinformation “through facts and transparency.” Moreover, please remember that the Australian regime’s cover up of the fact that so few of the COVID-19 cases came from Asia is helping to fuel the horrific violence and abuse against Asian origin people in Australia under the guise of pandemic fears. By helping to expose this cover up you will be able to contribute to resisting rabid racist forces who are using the coronavirus outbreak to incite fear and hatred against Asians and other people of colour.

However, regardless of whether we do eventually find out for sure why the Australian government is now making it almost impossible to find its own infographic on the sources of overseas-acquired COVID-19 cases, the reality is that this data, alongside the fact that none of the 40,000 arrivals into Australia from China during the peak of the pandemic there in February were found to have COVID-19 and the fact that none of the 544 Australian residents brought out of Wuhan at the height of the outbreak there tested positive for COVID-19, all show how effectively the Peoples Republic of China has contained the virus threat. Moreover, this examination of the Australian government’s own data has completely demolished the whacko conspiracy “theory” that China has concealed the true extent of the COVID-19 impact there. All the insults thrown at NSW MP Shaoquett Moselmane for rightly praising China’s response to the pandemic can now be thrown back in the face of Ray Hadley and the other media personalities claiming that China has covered up the true toll of the outbreak there. It is Ray Hadley and his ilk who are the “imbeciles,” “jerks,” and “lunatics”! The false claim that “China has spread disinformation” by “greatly under-reporting its COVID-19 infection toll” turns out to be the only actual disinformation that is going on. It is the U.S. and Australian capitalist ruling classes and their media who are the ones guilty of spreading disinformation around COVID-19. As for “transparency”: try finding the Australian government’s latest data on sources of overseas-acquired COVID-19 cases that they had previously themselves published (without using the direct web address that we have given you)!

References

  1. Lily Kuo, Beijing lockdown tightens as new coronavirus outbreak spreads, The Guardian Australian edition website, 15 June 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/15/beijing-lockdown-tightens-as-new-coronavirus-outbreak-spreads
  2. Tom Daly and Xiao Han, Beijing tests food and parcel couriers as coronavirus checks widen, Reuters website, 20 June 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china/beijing-tests-food-and-parcel-couriers-as-coronavirus-checks-widen-idUSKBN23R06P
  3. Australian Government Department of Health , Coronavirus (COVID-19) at a glance – 19 June 2020, Australian Government Department of Health website, https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/06/coronavirus-covid-19-at-a-glance-19-june-2020.pdf
  4. Ken Bredemeier, US COVID Death Toll ‘Almost Certainly Higher’ Than Reported, Fauci Tells Senate, VOA (Voice of America) website, 13 May 2020, https://www.voanews.com/usa/us-covid-death-toll-almost-certainly-higher-reported-fauci-tells-senate
  5. Dan Vergano, Scientists Studying The Coronavirus Say Some States Are Censoring Them, BuzzFeed News website, 20 May 2020, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/danvergano/florida-arizona-georgia-coronavirus-data-censorship
  6. Theresa Waldrop, Rosa Flores and Joe Sutton, Florida and Georgia facing scrutiny for their Covid-19 data reporting, CNN website, 20 May 2020, https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/20/us/florida-georgia-covid-19-test-data/index.html
  7. Paul Osborne, Latest facts and figures on coronavirus, Newcastle and Lake Macquarie Star website (article from Australian Associated Press), 18 February 2020, https://www.newcastlestar.com.au/story/6635405/latest-facts-and-figures-on-coronavirus/
  8. Robyn Wuth, Coronavirus update: Six Australians evacuated from Diamond Princess test positive for the deadly virus, AAP/7 News,  22 February 2020, https://7news.com.au/travel/coronavirus/coronavirus-updates-six-australians-evacuated-from-diamond-princess-test-positive-for-the-deadly-virus-c-710890
  9. Ray Hadley, Ray Hadley call on NSW Labor MP Shaoquett Moselmane to resign, OnmyStudio website, 2 April 2020, https://omny.fm/shows/the-ray-hadley-morning-show/ray-hadley-call-on-nsw-labor-mp-shaoquett-moselman
  10. BBC, Coronavirus: More than 200 Australians flown home after 14-day quarantine, BBC News website, 17 February 2020, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-51538711
  11. Greg Roberts, Cruise ship Australians arrive in Darwin, Illawara Mercury website, 22 February 2020, https://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/6639684/cruise-ship-australians-arrive-in-darwin/?cs=12
  12. Australian Government Department of Health, Chief Medical Officer press conference on novel coronavirus, Australian Government Department of Health website, 23 February 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/news/chief-medical-officer-press-conference-on-novel-coronavirus
  13. Australian Government Department of Health, Two Diamond Princess passengers positive for COVID-19, Australian Government Department of Health website, 21 February 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/news/two-diamond-princess-passengers-positive-for-covid-19
  14. Jake Sturmer and Yumi Asada, Coronavirus quarantine finally ends for Australians on Diamond Princess, but isolation in Darwin awaits, ABC News website, 20 February 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-20/thousands-finally-free-to-leave-coronavirus-cruise-ship/11981018
  15. The New Daily, Aussies rescued from virus-stricken cruise ship arrive in Darwin, The New Daily website, 20 February 2020, https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2020/02/20/diamond-princess-evacuation-darwin/
  16. SBS, Coronavirus-hit cruise ship evacuees allowed to leave quarantine near Darwin, SBS News website, 6 March 2020, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/coronavirus-hit-cruise-ship-evacuees-allowed-to-leave-quarantine-near-darwin
  17. Australian Government Department of Health, Deputy Chief Medical Officer’s interview on ABC Radio National about coronavirus (COVID-19), Australian Government Department of Health website, 28 February 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/news/deputy-chief-medical-officers-interview-on-abc-radio-national-about-coronavirus-covid-19
  18. Australian Government Department of Health, Deputy Chief Medical Officer’s press conference about COVID-19 on 16 March, Australian Government Department of Health website, 16 March 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/news/deputy-chief-medical-officers-press-conference-about-covid-19-on-16-march
  19. Australian Government Department of Health, Coronavirus (COVID-19) at a glance – 12 April 2020, Australian Government Department of Health website, 12 April 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-at-a-glance-12-april-2020
  20. Australian Government Department of Health, Australian confirmed cases who acquired COVID-19 overseas, by region, 30 April 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/images/publications/2020/04/covid-19-cases-acquired-overseas-by-region-or-country-acquired_29.png (accessed 18 June 2020)
  21. Australian Government Department of Health, Coronavirus (COVID-19) at a glance, Australian Government Department of Health website, 30 April 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/04/coronavirus-covid-19-at-a-glance-30-april-2020.pdf (accessed 25 May 2020)
  22. Melissa Davey, Coronavirus: two more cases in NSW after residents return from Japan and South Korea, The Guardian website, 3 March 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/03/coronavirus-two-more-cases-in-nsw-after-residents-return-from-japan-and-south-korea
  23. Emily Olle, Two new coronavirus cases emerge in SA, including a baby, 7 News website, 5 March 2020, https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/coronavirus-sa-two-new-cases-including-a-baby-test-positive-c-730972
  24. AAP-SBS, Sydney coronavirus cluster investigated as NSW cases jump to 55, SBS website, 10 March 2020, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/sydney-coronavirus-cluster-investigated-as-nsw-cases-jump-to-55
  25. NSW Government Health, Recent flights with confirmed cases of COVID-19, NSW Health website, https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Pages/flights.aspx (accessed 25 May 2020)
  26. NSW Government Health, Other known flights with confirmed cases of COVID-19, NSW Health website, https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Pages/flights-archive.aspx#nsw-int (accessed 25 May 2020)
  27. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 3401.0 – Overseas Arrivals and Departures, Australia, Apr 2020 (download Table 5), Australian Bureau of Statistics website, https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3401.0Apr%202020?OpenDocument (accessed 18 June 2020)
  28. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 3401.0 – Overseas Arrivals and Departures, Australia, Apr 2020 (download Table 9), Australian Bureau of Statistics website, https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3401.0Apr%202020?OpenDocument (accessed 18 June 2020)
  29. Worldometers, Australia Coronavirus Cases, https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/australia/ (accessed 22 May 2020)
  30. Australian Government Department of Health, Deputy Chief Medical Officer press conference: update on novel coronavirus, Australian Government Department of Health website, 8 February 2020,
    https://www.health.gov.au/news/deputy-chief-medical-officer-press-conference-update-on-novel-coronavirus
  31. Australian Government Department of Health, Chief Medical Officer and Minister Hunt’s joint press conference on coronavirus (COVID-19), Australian Government Department of Health website, 3 March 2020,
    https://www.health.gov.au/news/chief-medical-officer-and-minister-hunts-joint-press-conference-on-coronavirus-covid-19
  32. Allie Godfrey, Coronavirus Australia: The latest cases and trends, 7 News website, 30 March 2020, https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/coronavirus-australia-the-latest-cases-and-trends-c-770380

Cold War Repression in Australia Gets Even More Vicious

Photo Above: Shaoquett Moselmane with students and teachers from a Riverwood language school

Condemn the Witch-Hunt of NSW
Upper House MP Shaoquett Moselmane

Cold War Repression in
Australia Gets Even More Vicious

26 June 2020: Today, Cold War repression in Australia dramatically escalated. Around a dozen officers of Australia’s ASIO secret police and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) made an hours-long raid on the home of NSW Labor Party upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane. The raid was made under the ridiculous claim that “Chinese government agents” had infiltrated his office and were using him as part of a “foreign interference” operation. Moselmane has not been charged and the claims against him are completely fabricated. Moselmane is being witch-hunted because he has had the temerity to praise China’s achievements in poverty alleviation and because he more recently dared to speak positively about China’s successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic and to rightly call out the Australian media for inciting racist attacks on people of Chinese background.

Sources say that today’s terrifying raid took place with Moselmane’s wife and son at home in the residence. The duration of the ASIO/AFP attack went over a period of some 12 to 16 hours. Today’s raids are a despicable attack on democratic rights and a further constriction of the right to progressive dissent in Australia. These raids, made with the assistance of draconian “foreign interference” laws imposed two years ago with bi-partisan support, are designed to intimidate anyone from speaking positively about socialistic China or to advocate socialist solutions to the grave problems faced by the working class masses and oppressed Aboriginal and other non-white communities in Australia.

All trade unionists, supporters of workers rights, defenders of civil liberties and opponents of racism and all genuine leftists must condemn these raids! We must cry: down with the witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane!

Outrageously, NSW Labor leader Jodi McKay wasted no time in joining the attack on Moselmane. She has suspended him from the ALP.

The mainstream media and right-wing politicians, with the acquiescence of Moselmane’s Labor colleagues, had been building up towards today’s authoritarian attack. Several weeks ago there was a hysterical witch-hunt against Moselmane that saw him driven from his post as the deputy president of the NSW upper house. Below is the article that we wrote in response to that witch-hunt. Given today’s raid, all the conclusions made in this article are magnified many times over in their urgency.

****************************************************************

6 June 2020: The ruling classes in the capitalist world are rather nervous at how much dissatisfaction there is within their own countries. Working class youth are frustrated that they are likely to only get insecure, casual jobs where they are often arrogantly bullied by their bosses. Lower income people are angry that affordable rental accommodation is so hard to find. After COVID-19 hit, huge numbers of workers are seething that they have lost their jobs after the very company owners who had made fortunes out of their workers’ labour did not hesitate to retrench these workers as soon as there was any drop in business revenue. Now, the brutal police murder of an unarmed black man in America, George Floyd, has ignited explosive anger amongst black people and other people of colour throughout the Western world at the all-sided racist oppression that they endure. In the U.S., there have been huge, sometimes militant, protests with elements of an uprising. Today in Australia, there were massive solidarity protests with America’s Black Lives Matter demonstrations. These marches focused on opposition to the horrific killings of Aboriginal people by racist police and prison guards.

At least until the recent Black Lives Matter protests, mass grievances have not led to a left-wing radicalisation within Western countries. Instead, in Australia for example, the capitalist rulers have to some degree succeeded in shifting mass frustrations into blaming immigration, guest workers, Aboriginal people, Asians, African youth, Muslims, refugees, unemployed people, climate change concerns and militant unions. Yet the capitalist exploiters remain worried that eventually sizable sections of the working class masses will again look to communism as an alternative to their current predicament. Compounding these fears is the reality that while their own economies have barely been treading water since the late noughties global recession, the world’s biggest socialistic country – the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) – relentlessly grows in economic strength, continues to lift her own people out of the poverty of China’s pre-1949 capitalist days and steadily gains greater prestige and diplomatic clout in the former colonial countries of Africa, South America, the Middle East, Asia and the South Pacific. The richer capitalist powers are not only worried that this is “interfering” with their “right” to “freely” super-exploit their former colonies. They are terrified that some of their “own” masses will start to look favourably upon socialistic China and thus conclude that capitalist rule in their own countries needs to be deposed. As a result, across the capitalist world the rulers and their media have been churning out an anti-communist, China-bashing propaganda campaign.

In the U.S. and Australia, this new Cold War campaign has also involved intimidation and even repression. In Australia, this often takes the form of the witch-hunting of any public figure, and increasingly anyone else, who has any contact with social organisations with even the vaguest links to the PRC; or who dares to make any comment praising the PRC. Such witch-hunting has intensified over the last few years and has reached new levels of hysteria since the COVID-19 pandemic struck. The latest victim is NSW Labor upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane. Now Moselmane is no communist. He is, after all, a member of the anticommunist, social democratic ALP. However, Moselmane was witch-hunted for pointing out what is demonstrably true: PRC authorities and her people had taken “timely and effective countermeasures” that had “fought and contained” the COVID-19 threat. For having the temerity to state these plain facts, Moselmane was subjected to a shrill campaign of denunciations and insults from the mainstream media, right-wing politicians and leaders of his own Labor Party. Media shock jocks branded Moselmane a “jerk”, “a train wreck”’, “a lunatic”, “a low filthy bludger” and more. They even made despicable slanders about his wife, lying that she has a material interest in him making positive comments about China. Encouraged by all these insults, rednecks and far right idiots made chilling threats against Moselmane on social media. To his credit, however, in the face of all this intimidation and demands that he resign from parliament, Moselmane has thus far refused to “apologise” for saying what he knows to be completely true. As a result, on April 6, he was forced to step down from his position as assistant president of the NSW Legislative Council. Moselmane had been elected to this position, signifying that he was the highest-ranked ALP upper house MP in NSW, less than a year earlier.

Pilloried for Telling the Truth

So what did Shaoquett Moselmane exactly say that so infuriated Australia’s ruling class establishment? The campaign against him cranked into high gear after the 30 March issue of the Sydney Morning Herald attacked him for writing on his personal website that China had made an “emphatic” and “decisive” response to the COVID-19 threat. Moselmane pointed out that China needed “tough, unswerving leadership, focused on the mammoth task ahead” in order to contain the virus’ spread. The Labor MP explained that: “For the Peoples Republic of China, President Xi stepped up and provided that leadership. He mustered the resources of the nation and together with the great people of China – fought it and contained it…. The combined phenomenal effort of the state and the people in the fight to contain the virus was breath taking.” Moselmane also contrasted China’s effective response to “the slow, and at times baffling and confused messaging by the Morrison federal government.”

What Moselmane said was simply fact. Despite being the first country in the world to detect the new virus and despite having a rapid spread of the deadly virus in Wuhan before their own scientists or any other country in the world understood the coronavirus or could ascertain just how deadly it was, the PRC so effectively responded to the threat that the proportion of China’s huge population that have died from the virus is significantly lower than Australia’s. Moreover, while Australia is just starting to open up again following stay-at-home measures and now faces the risk of a second-wave, the PRC so effectively suppressed the virus and reduced new cases to such tiny levels that for the last two months her tourist spots, cafes and restaurants have been gradually filling up with people and her streets and public transport networks are again buzzing with lively crowds.

Although Moselmane focuses a fair bit on Xi Jinping’s leadership, we understand that the main factor behind the PRC’s breath taking response to the virus was the country’s socialistic system. It was this system in which public ownership plays the backbone role and in which the economy is controlled by a state under workers rule that enabled the PRC to concentrate resources so effectively for the pandemic response. Thus, the PRC was able to, in a matter of days, both build brand new infectious disease hospitals and to convert other facilities into makeshift hospitals. It was also this people’s control of the economy that enabled the PRC to provide space suit style protective gear for her medical workers and janitors as well as large quantities of urgently needed ventilators, testing kits, infra-red thermometers and masks. Meanwhile, the PRC’s economic system – in which collective ownership and control plays the basic role – has created a more collectivist outlook in the Chinese masses that led them to, on the one hand, be overall more willing to comply with pandemic response restrictions than their counterparts in, say, the U.S. and Australia and, on the other hand, be more motivated to mobilise in grassroots campaigns to conduct pandemic response measures.

Nevertheless, leadership was also a factor in determining how countries responded to the COVID-19 threat. Just as the likes of Scott Morrison, Donald Trump, Jair Bolsonaro, Boris Johnson and Vladimir Putin are shaped by their role at the head of states designed to serve the capitalist big end of town, Xi Jinping’s actions are shaped and, indeed, constrained by his role at the head of a workers state that was created to ensure the interests of working class people. That meant that while the leaders of the capitalist countries put the fate of their stock markets and corporate profits first, China’s president Xi, for all his faults, did put the interests of people first in responding to the virus outbreak. So Moselmane is quite factually correct when he stated that “President Xi stepped up.” Within hours of Chinese scientists confirming that human to human transmission of the virus can occur, Xi made a high profile order on January 20 for Communist Party of China (CPC) committees and governments at all levels to put people’s safety and health as the top priority and take effective measures to curb the spread of the virus. Chinese state media reported on the same day that:

“Xi ordered all-out efforts to treat patients, identify the causes of the virus infection and spread at an earlier date, strengthen monitoring and standardize treatment procedures.

“Xi spoke of the need for the timely release of information and the deepening of international cooperation.”

The PRC acted early. At the time Xi made this announcement, just three people had died of the virus in a country with a population of nearly 1.5 billion people. Overseas countries then reported just a total of four cases, two in Thailand, one in South Korea and one in Japan. Just two days after Xi’s orders were broadcast, Wuhan took the unprecedented step of announcing that from the following morning all public transportation in the city of 11 million people would be suspended, all movement out of the city through airports and railway stations would be temporarily cut off, all large-scale activities were suspended and everyone was ordered to wear masks in public. These and additional decisive measures taken by the PRC in the ensuing days became a template for the social distancing measures that many other countries, albeit often very belatedly, took.

At the time that the PRC shut down Wuhan, Australia had not confirmed one single case of the new virus. Yet, by contrast to the PRC’s quick response, it took the Australian government a whole 50 days from the time that the first coronavirus case in this country was detected on January 25 until the first – and rather limited – social distancing measures were implemented on March 15. This despite having already seen how deadly the virus had been in other countries. The only early “measure” that the Morrison government took was to enact a travel ban on non-residents entering from China – which had more to do with encouraging fears of Red China than being a genuine health measure – and then enacting later bans on arrivals from Iran and then South Korea. Yet, even after China had effectively suppressed the virus, the Morrison regime maintained its politically-motivated, China-specific travel ban while for several weeks enabling people from the U.S., Italy, Spain, France, Germany and cruise ships to enter without proper testing and quarantining even after the pandemic had spread like wildfire in those places. As a result, not only was the virus allowed to spread within Australia through infections brought in overwhelmingly from the U.S., Europe and cruise ships but those infected people from these regions were not given the timely diagnosis and treatment that they needed.

Indeed, Moselmane’s comparison of the PRC’s excellent response to the new virus with “the slow, and at times baffling and confused messaging by the Morrison federal government” is actually rather understated. That has not stopped the Morrison government and this country’s top health bureaucrats from endlessly praising themselves. They have only been able to get away with this because the “response” in the likes of Trump’s America, Johnson’s Britain and Bolsonaro’s Brazil have been so frighteningly disastrous and because the mainstream media have done their best to hide and distort the successful response by the PRC and to minimize coverage of the successes of other countries that have taken effective measures to curb the virus spread, like socialistic Vietnam.

Peter Costello’s Sydney Morning Herald Leads the Charge,
Hard-Right Shock Jocks Follow

It is little surprise that it was the Sydney Morning Herald that cast the first stone in the attack against Moslemane. This paper had been targeting Moslemane ever since he made a 2018 speech hailing China’s lifting of 800 million people out of poverty. In that speech, Moselmane spoke of the need for China to gain greater influence in the global media given that this media is currently in the hands of China’s Western opponents. Moslemane pointed out how the Arab world has seen the power of Western propaganda in manipulating the public, leading to death and destruction. Alarmed that a mainstream politician had the audacity to so openly challenge the Cold War drive against the PRC and to so bluntly call out the pernicious role of Western mainstream media, the SMH looked for a way to discredit Moselmane. The best exposé that they could come up with was one seven months ago that in classic Cold War McCarthyist shock-horror fashion “exposed” how a staffer who works one day a week for Moslemane’s office once attended a training course at the Chinese Academy of Governance which the SMH says also “trains senior cadres of the Chinese Communist Party.” Big deal! What are they going to dig up next: that one of Moslemane’s staffers once ate at a Chinese restaurant where a member of the Chinese community, who had once met with a visiting Chinese Communist Party leader, once also ate at?

Led by its fanatically anti-communist Political and International editor, Peter Hartcher, the SMH has, in fact, been spearheading the Cold War fear campaign against socialistic China. It is ably assisted in this by its sister media organisations like Channel 9 and the hard right radio “news” station 2GB, all of which are part of the very same corporation that owns the SMH: Nine Entertainment Limited. The biggest stake in Nine Entertainment is held by filthy rich media mogul Bruce Gordon, with other major shareholdings owned by various wealth management funds and private equity groups. Needless to say, a media organisation owned by ultra-rich capitalists is inevitably going to produce content favourable to the political interests of the capitalist exploiting class and, thus, hostile to socialistic China. And in case anyone falls for the “balanced”, “independent” pretensions of the SMH, it is worth pointing out who the chairman of this corporation that runs it is: none other than the Treasurer in the right wing, former Howard government, Peter Costello!

The SMH journalists working under editor Peter Hartcher delight in buttressing their China-bashing propaganda by “unofficially” quoting as “sources” their mates in ASIO and other sinister Australian spy agencies. Meanwhile, Hartcher works closely in promoting anti-China hostility with Beverley O’Connor’s The World program on the ABC News channel. Peter Costello’s boy, Peter Hartcher, is also a Visiting Fellow at the Lowy Institute, the right-wing think tank that has a major influence in shaping Australian public opinion. Formed and led by Australian billionaire, Frank Lowy, and with a Board of Directors dominated by Lowy and his sons, as well as other capitalists like the chairman of the ANZ bank, the Lowy institute naturally promotes the interests of Australia’s big end of town exploiting class and, thus, is known for aggressively promoting an anti-China and broadly war-mongering agenda.

With the Lowy Institute providing the academic “expertise” and the likes of Peter Hartcher’s SMH and Beverley O’Connor’s The World providing overall political direction and a “centrist”, “liberal” cover, right-wing politicians, the Murdoch media and 2GB shock jocks are then all stocked up to sell the masses the anti-PRC agenda in sensationalist and extremist forms. And so it was with the campaign against Moselmane. In the days following the SMH’s
exposé, the anticommunist uproar against Moselmane that Peter Hartcher and Co. had hoped for duly erupted. Egged on by rabid right-wing presenters Alan Jones and Ray Hadley from 2GB and Peta Credlin from Sky News, extreme right wing politicians queued up to denounce Moselmane. Federal Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton demanded Moselmane’s removal from parliament. NSW leader of the far right One Nation party, Mark Latham, attacked Moselmane’s stance as “disgusting and indefensible.” Credlin and Hadley basically accused Moselmane of treason for simply praising another country’s response to the virus threat and for criticizing the Australian prime minister’s response. The Murdoch print media and the Daily Mail soon joined the witch-hunt too, of course. So too did hardline supporters of Israel’s genocidal oppression of Palestinian people who saw an opportunity to go after an MP known for his sympathy for the Palestinian liberation struggle. Moselmane was born in South Lebanon, the part of the Lebanon that has suffered most from the Israeli regime’s expansionist aggression.

However, it was not just the hard conservatives who went after Moselmane. The most extreme attack on him came from a minister in the former Rudd government, Stephen Conroy. Speaking on Peta Credlin’s Sky News program, Conroy branded Moselmane “an absolute disgrace to the Labor Party,” adding that it is “astonishing he’s still in parliament.” Meanwhile, NSW Labor leader Jodi McKay stabbed her upper house colleague in the back by not only refusing to defend Moselmane from the witch-hunt but, instead, fully joining in. In an interview with 2GB’s Ray Hadley, McKay viciously attacked Moselmane:

“I can assure you… he will never be in the shadow cabinet….

“His actions have been appalling, I can’t say that to you enough.”

Moselmane’s factional ally in the ALP, shadow minister for transport and corrections, Chris Minns, and Labor shadow treasurer, Walt Secord, also both joined in the attacks, respectively branding Moselmane’s comments as “inappropriate” and “extremely stupid.”

Top Scientists and Public Health Officials
Sing the Same Tune as Moselmane on China’s Response

The way that the “centrist” SMH set up Moselmane to be savaged by the Hard Right can be compared to that of the villain in an action movie who inflicts a wound on a captive and then leaves them to bleed in shark-infested waters knowing that the victim’s blood will attract killer sharks. While their sharks did their expected savaging, the SMH pretended to be serious in their coverage. To try and give authority to their attacks on Moselmane, they claimed that, “China has been widely criticised by academics and health experts for downplaying the extent of the outbreak in Wuhan.” Of course, academics and health experts are like everyone else subject to political influences. Being a middle class layer, scientists, doctors and top level academics, like other middle class layers in these reactionary times, can be quite conservative and many identify their interests with those of the ruling capitalist class. Thus, mainstream media seeking to attack Red China would no doubt always be able to find a few health experts willing to sing the tune that they would like to see amplified. Yet many serious scientists are driven by dedication to their work and to their areas of research. As a result, contrary to the misleading assertions of the SMH, the truth is that, in the face of anticommunist pressure, the majority of top Western infectious disease scientists and public health specialists have actually praised China’s response to the virus outbreak. On 19 February, 27 eminent scientists, academics, infectious disease specialists and public health officials from the U.S., Britain, Australia, Germany, The Netherlands and other regions published a “Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19” in the prestigious, peer-reviewed British medical journal, The Lancet [1]. The statement lauded China’s efforts to suppress the COVID-19 threat:

“We have watched as the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China, in particular, have worked diligently and effectively to rapidly identify the pathogen behind this outbreak, put in place significant measures to reduce its impact, and share their results transparently with the global health community. This effort has been remarkable.”

This, too, was the finding of a WHO investigation into China’s response to COVID-19 led by Canadian epidemiologist, Bruce Aylward, and consisting of 25 international experts from the U.S., Germany, Japan, Singapore, Nigeria, China, South Korea and Russia. The report by the investigative mission found that [2]:

“In the face of a previously unknown virus, China has rolled out perhaps the most ambitious, agile and aggressive disease containment effort in history.

“Achieving China’s exceptional coverage with and adherence to these containment measures has only been possible due to the deep commitment of the Chinese people to collective action in the face of this common threat. At a community level this is reflected in the remarkable solidarity of provinces and cities in support of the most vulnerable populations and communities. Despite ongoing outbreaks in their own areas, Governors and Mayors have continued to send thousands of health care workers and tons of vital PPE supplies into Hubei province and Wuhan city.”

Indeed, in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic, ABC News reporters were constantly disappointed as they posed leading questions to infectious disease specialists inviting them to attack China’s response only for the experts to respond with praise for China’s pandemic suppression efforts. Thus, the Australian government-funded broadcaster was forced to hop from interviewing one medical expert to the next in search of someone who would feed into their Cold War agenda. Yet the Australian government’s own top health bureaucrats also lauded China’s efforts. And let’s note that these are highly-paid government bureaucrats who have worked closely with the right wing Morrison government and have supported most of the Liberal government’s pandemic response strategies – including its initial politically-directed travel bans specifically focused on – and restricted to – the Australian regime’s adversaries. So they are hardly communist sympathizers! Yet, in a media conference on January 30 alongside health minister Greg Hunt, Australia’s Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Professor Paul Kelly, responded to a journalist’s question about whether Australia’s case numbers would stay at the then low level by saying [3]:

“It depends a lot on what happens in relation to China getting this under control, and they are doing a marvellous job at the moment and it’s a very different approach to what we experienced with SARS some years ago.”

Australia’s chief medical officer, Brendan Murphy, also hailed China’s efforts to stem the virus spread in an interview the following day [4]:

“Clearly, it is not yet contained in China. But they are making Herculean efforts to do so.”

Of course, Australia’s capitalist media ensured that the live interviews where these comments were made were the first and last time that these statements were aired. And they sure weren’t going to report on these comments praising China from Australia’s top public health officials! Yet it was not just senior public health officials and infectious disease specialists who were saying the same things that Moselmane would later say about China’s response to the coronavirus. None other than U.S. president, Donald Trump, the person who has most viciously been trying to blame China for the pandemic over the last few weeks and the man who is the talisman of the extreme right-wing shock jobs who savagely attacked Moselmane, heaped praise on China in the early days of the coronavirus outbreak. Thus, in a tweet on January 24, Trump said [5]:

China has been working very hard to contain the Coronavirus. The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency. It will all work out well. In particular, on behalf of the American People, I want to thank President Xi!

So why did Trump praise China and President Xi’s response to the coronavirus in late January and why was Moselmane witch-hunted for giving similar credit to China and Xi just two months later? Well, when Trump was commending China’s response, not only he but nearly the entire capitalist ruling classes in the U.S., Europe and Australia believed their own propaganda that their social system was superior to China’s and, thus, they would be little affected by the virus then ravaging China. They expected that the damage caused by the coronavirus in China would hurt her prestige, undermine the credibility of her socialist system and weaken her economy. Trump believed that he would be facing a weakened PRC opponent in political conflicts and trade disputes and it would, therefore, pay him to sound magnanimous. Two months later the reality turned out very different. The virus caused far more death and economic damage per capita to the U.S., Britain, France, Germany and Australia than it did to China. China, on the other hand, had been able to suppress the virus spread so effectively that she was now giving huge amounts of aid to developing countries to assist them with their pandemic response. This infuriated the rulers of imperialist countries like the U.S. and Australia. For it reinforced a trend where China’s mutually beneficial relations with countries in the South Pacific, Asia, Africa, South and Central America, and the Middle East was enabling these countries to eke out some greater independence from the plundering Western powers. Moreover, far from showing the relative weaknesses in the PRC’s system, the much more successful response of China to the virus threat in comparison with the capitalist countries has shown the superiority of her socialistic system. As far as the capitalist elite in the West are concerned, for anyone to point this out is taboo. For one it would make it harder to sell to their own masses their Cold War drive to “contain” and strangle socialistic rule in China. Furthermore, for anyone to highlight China’s superior response to the pandemic touches off the greatest of all fears of the rulers of Australia and other capitalist countries: that the masses in their own countries will draw the conclusion from this that they need to get rid of the capitalist system and bring socialism to their own countries. Thus, by late March, for Shaoquett Moselmane or any other high-profile person to praise China’s response to the pandemic simply became intolerable for the capitalist ruling classes. Just as significantly, those who sought to score political points against China over the pandemic hoped that by late March, the population would have forgotten all the praise heaped upon China’s response two months earlier by scientists, Australia’s top public health officials and, of all people, Donald Trump.

 “Revelations” of Moselmane’s Calling Out of White Australia Racism
Takes Witch-Hunt to White Heat

A week after their original exposé of Moselmane’s statements lauding China’s effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the SMH had a new revelation. They reported that in a February 5 opinion piece for the East China Normal University, Moselmane had attacked the Australian mainstream media for having “publicly played racist cards, offending and insulting many Australian citizens, especially Chinese residents” in actions that “further deepened the already great suffering of the victim.”

“Today, the obsolete scum of ‘white Australia’ is once again flooding, and the theory of yellow fever has once again surfaced,” Moselmane wrote.

“Some mainstream media have bred and spread these racial viruses in our multicultural community with the purpose of inciting hatred.

“Today, media xenophobia and full-scale war against China have become the norm.”

Again Moselmane’s statements are a rather accurate description of what is happening on the ground. One has to be blind to reality or in complete denial to not know that Chinese and other East Asian background people in Australia have been subjected to numerous horrific racist attacks by “the obsolete scum of ‘white Australia’” over the last few months. People of Chinese appearance have been bashed in the streets, at supermarkets and on public transport. They have had threatening racist graffiti scrawled on their homes, had rocks thrown through their house and shop windows, been verbally abused, spat and coughed on and been ordered out of shops and other public places [6] [7] [8]. Racist scum have even abused nurses, doctors and other essential service workers (like bus drivers) of East Asian background and in some cases stalked them in a threatening manner [9] [10] [11]. It is therefore very understandable – and indeed completely necessary – that China’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism last night issued an urgent alert warning Chinese tourists not to travel to Australia. The alert correctly informed that “racial discrimination and acts of violence against Chinese and Asians in Australia have increased significantly.”

It is undoubtedly true that the attacks on Chinese and other Asian people have been fueled by the mainstream media and by the anti-China rants of the likes of Peter Dutton, Pauline Hanson, far right Coalition MPs George Christensen and Andrew Hastie (both of whom have previously spoken at racist rallies infested by Neo-Nazis and other white supremacists and anti-Semites) and rabid anti-PRC Labor MP, Anthony Byrne. This is proven by the fact that many of those committing racist attacks on the streets have done so while repeating the same anti-Chinese and anti-China diatribes as the right wing shock jocks and the rabid anti-China politicians [12] [13] [14].

Yet it is not only the most rabidly anti-China politicians and the most openly racist-inciting media presenters that bear responsibility for the renewed escalation of racist attacks on Asian background people over the last few months. The more “moderate” politicians in the Liberal Party and the ALP, who largely all support the Cold War drive against the PRC, and the “centrist”, liberal media who promote hostility to Red China, like the SMH and the ABC, are also guilty of breeding and spreading racial viruses. There have always been broadly two types of white supremacists in Australia. The first type are the openly rabid ones that can scarcely hide their hostility to all non-white skinned people. The second type are the more disguised types. They claim to be, or even consider themselves, non-racist and describe themselves as “centre-right”, “liberal” or even “progressive.” Many of them even like to make themselves feel good by expressing sympathy for people of colour when the latter are victims of racism. Yet, when a non-white people organise themselves into a militant anti-racist resistance force or into a powerful country, like the PRC, that challenges Western domination of the world then they think that this is absolutely unacceptable and you see all their latent prejudice oozing out. The “liberal” and “centrist” Australian media and the mainstream Australian politicians are of this second type of white supremacist. Of course, the mainstream media and politicians attacking China are not simply driven by racism. An even bigger factor is their hostility to socialistic states. Yet ever since the 1949 Chinese Revolution brought the toiling masses to power, hostility to China in the U.S. and Australia has combined anti-communist Red Peril fears with racist Yellow Peril xenophobia.

ABC and SMH journalists nevertheless insist that being anti-PRC does not mean that one is anti-Chinese. They are fond of claiming the authority of “experts” to push their Cold War agenda against the PRC. Yet many of the world’s leading scientists have drawn a direct link between the recent political attacks on China over the coronavirus and the racist attacks on Chinese people on the streets. Thus, a strongly worded editorial titled, “Stop the coronavirus stigma now” in the 7 April issue of the British scientific journal, Nature, the most prestigious scientific journal in the world, stated [15]:

“US President Donald Trump has repeatedly associated the virus with China. Brazilian lawmaker Eduardo Bolsonaro — the son of President Jair Bolsonaro — has called it `China’s fault’. Politicians elsewhere, including in the United Kingdom, are also saying that China bears responsibility.

“Continuing to associate a virus and the disease it causes with a specific place is irresponsible and needs to stop….

“Failing to do so has consequences. It’s clear that since the outbreak was first reported, people of Asian descent around the world have been subjected to racist attacks, with untold human costs — for example, on their health and livelihoods.”

Scott Morrison, Anthony Albanese and the “centrist”/liberal SMH and ABC have been just as guilty as Trump, Bolsonaro and many British politicians in promoting the “China’s fault” theory. They are, thus, just as guilty for inciting racist attacks on people of Asian descent. Of course these politicians and journalists would react with outraged denial if they were confronted with this truth. Yet they know full well that when they incite hostility to socialistic China they are doing it in a way that appeals to – and hence breeds – Yellow Peril racist fears. Afterwards they rub their sullied hands thoroughly with liberal doses of hand sanitiser and then, with all the “honesty” of Donald Trump, smugly express “shock” and “anger” when the rabid rednecks that they have just incited carry out racist attacks. But let us not be fooled by the “moderate” pretensions of the likes of SMH’s Peter Hartcher or the ABC’s Beverley O’Connor. Alongside their shock jock counterparts, the ruling class Australian politicians and the inherently divisive, dog-eat-dog nature of the capitalist system, these liberal media commentators share much responsibility for the terrifying rise in racist attacks on people of Chinese appearance over the last few months. Individually each of them may be personally responsible for just one or two percent of the racist attacks that have taken place. Yet given that there have been literally thousands of such attacks (most racist assaults and verbal threats are never reported but one Asian-Australian site collected details of over 300 separate attacks in just 5 weeks), each anti-China journalist or politician can be personally blamed for causing many individual attacks that would not have occurred had they not made their own contribution to the total dose of Red Peril and Yellow Peril hysteria. Put another way, several racist attacks would not have taken place had, say Peter Hartcher, not added to the incessant anti-PRC, “China is to blame” propaganda. We should keep this in mind when determining the methods by which we must resist these filthy, anti-China scum in the mainstream media.

Yet when Moselmane exposed media xenophobia against China and how Australia’s mainstream media “have publicly played racist cards”, he put his finger on a really raw, infected wound. Although capitalist rule in Australia has created one of the most racist societies on the planet, the ruling class insists on denying this. One reason is that they are well aware that their rule over this land was established through genocidal dispossession of this country’s first peoples, the Aboriginal people. They know that this truth is recalled whenever people like Moslemane, regardless of the context, speak too starkly about the reality of racism in Australia. They know that recalling this truth in turn damages the “legitimacy” of the Australian nationalist myths that they so depend on to bind the working class masses that they exploit to their self-seeking, ruling class agenda. Secondly, unlike their Western European counterparts, the immediate overseas neighbours of Australia’s ruling class are hundreds and hundreds of millions of non-white skinned peoples in the Pacific and Asia. These are the people that Australia’s imperialist rulers need for both trade and for labour to be exploited by Australian-owned multinational corporations. Any exposure of racist xenophobia within Australia damages the corporate elite’s lucrative business operations in the Asia-Pacific and their imperialist meddling in this region. For these reasons, the ruling class considers it almost as much an act of “treason” for a mainstream politician to bluntly call out White Australia racism as it is for a politician to make comments favourable to the PRC workers state. So when Moselmane’s comments attacking the mainstream media’s role in inciting racial hatred were publicised, the witch-hunt against him reached white heat. Within hours, Moslemane was forced to step down from his position as deputy president of the NSW upper house. He remains a seated member of the upper house.

The Years-Long Re-Emergence of Cold War McCarthyism

Today’s anti-China witch-hunt is, if anything, even broader in who it targets than the 1950s McCarthyist witch-hunt in the U.S. and Australia against anyone suspected of pro-communist sympathies. One does not even have to be branded a communist to be attacked today, as Moselmane found out. One has only to be a public figure who says anything positive about socialistic China. Two and a half years ago, former Labor federal senator Sam Dastyari was driven out of parliament following a 17 month-long witch-hunt for simply once saying that the South China Sea issue is an internal issue for China. However, whereas Moselmane has, to date, courageously stood by his factually correct statements applauding China’s pandemic response success, Dastyari apologised for saying what is true about the South China Sea issue and today cravenly condemns his past actions as he seeks to climb his way back into the political establishment. Yet Dastyari’s apologies at the time were not enough to stop the rabid anti-communists from howling him out of his senate seat.

Last year, there was an even more bizarre witch-hunt. The target, Gladys Liu, a Hong Kong Chinese woman is someone who is not only not a communist but actually a member of the conservative Liberal-National federal government; and a person with some pretty reprehensible right wing views to boot. Liu’s supposed “crime” is that she had once been a member of Chinese community organisations in Australia which apparently have members who are also members of other organisations that have loose ties to the Communist Party of China. For this she was viciously attacked by the media and by the ALP – the very same party that stabbed Moselmane in the back. Indeed ,the witch-hunt became so intense that members of the right wing, rabidly anti-communist Morrison government, eager to preserve their thin parliamentary majority, were able to correctly brand the ALP’s attacks on Liu as being racially-motivated and even McCarthyist.

In this stultifying anti-PRC atmosphere it is hardly just politicians who are being targeted. The capitalist media and politicians have been attacking any Chinese social organisation perceived as being sympathetic to the PRC or, otherwise, including members who are fond of Red China. In reality this means that just about any community organisation consisting of immigrants from mainland China could be targeted since the majority of migrants from mainland China are sympathetic to the PRC. 

Last year, Cold War witch-hunting increasingly targeted international students from the PRC. Especially attacked were those Chinese students who dared to express their sympathies for Red China, especially in regards to the Hong Kong events. These brave students were slandered by the mainstream media. Rabidly anti-communist academics even called for those international students that too strongly promote solidarity with China to face academic disciplinary proceedings. Then, last spring, in a move squarely aimed at silencing through repression the voice of pro-Red China international students, the Australian government announced the creation of a new taskforce to look into “foreign interference” on Australian campuses.

What do all these attacks on Australian-Chinese community organisations, pro-Red China international students and the likes of Moselmane say about the supposed “right to free speech in Australia”? Actually, attacks on dissent and whistleblowers in Australia extend beyond the persecution of those accused of being soft on socialistic China. Today, a former Australian spy, known only as “Witness K,” is facing imprisonment for having revealed that Australia had planted huge numbers of listening devices in East Timorese government buildings in order to give the Australian government the advantage in a dispute with East Timor over gas resources [16]. The Australian regime is also prosecuting Witness K’s lawyer, Bernard Collaery, and two weeks ago Collaery faced a sinister, secret pre-trial hearing [17]. Yet another whistleblower that the Australian regime is persecuting is former military lawyer, David McBride [18]. McBride faces up to 50 years in prison for leaking to the ABC details of horrific war crimes by Australian troops in Afghanistan – including the murder of unarmed civilians and children. Last June, the Australian Federal Police even raided the offices of the tame, government-funded media channel, the ABC, simply because the ABC had publicised the information from McBride [19]. It is clear that the “right to free-speech” in Australia exists in name only!

Ironically, the extreme right wing media commentators who attacked Moselmane most savagely claim to be the most strident defenders of “free speech,” especially whenever the Racial Discrimination Act is brought up. Yet the “free speech” that these people want is only the “freedom” to vilify Aboriginal people, Africans, Muslims, Asians, LGBTI communities and women’s rights activists. They want the “freedom” to incite racist riots the way that Alan Jones incited the horrific December 2005 white supremacist riot at Cronulla Beach. At the same time these shock jocks want to completely silence anyone who dares to say anything positive about socialistic China.

The truth is that the “right to free speech” in Australia has become more like the “right” to say what is tolerable to the capitalist ruling class. True, theoretically one can say what one wants… as long as one is not a whistle blower! And for people whose voice is not heard by too many people, this right can even sometimes exist in practice. But for people with a high enough profile that their voice will be heard by many, anything that they say that cuts against the exploiting class’ interests too sharply – for example, by praising socialistic China or calling out White Australia racism too bluntly – will see them vilified, threatened, hounded and ultimately driven out of their positions. Look at the way that not only Moslemane has been witch hunted but the way that Sudanese Australian media presenter, Yassmin Abdel-Magied, was abused and hounded out of this country three years ago after she made an ANZAC Day post linking the phrase “Lest we forget” to the horrific oppression of refugees in Australian detention camps at Nauru and Manus and to the brutal oppression of Palestinian people.

In many ways, the “right to free speech” in this country exists in much the same way as “democratic rights for all” does. Theoretically, everyone has an equal vote and say in “democratic Australia.” Yet in practice, under this country’s capitalist system, it is the ultra-rich big business owners who are able to mould “public opinion” and control society through their ownership of the media, through their ability to disproportionately fund political parties, pay for political advertising, finance think tanks and hire lobbyists and through their numerous ties to the upper echelons of all key state and bureaucratic institutions. And whenever their domination meets a significant challenge, they don’t hesitate to throw out any coverings of “democracy” and rely on naked state repression. This is just like how their American capitalist counterparts are today unleashing riot cops and the National Guards to viciously attack those taking part in the ongoing anti-racist resistance there.

At the same time, in a society where workers are exploited and Aboriginal people, ethnic minorities, women and LGBTI communities face such oppression, it is vital that we defend whatever limited democratic rights that we do actually have. For it is the working class masses united with all the downtrodden that is the only force that can fight against exploitation and oppression in this country. That is why it is high time that we confront the growing McCarthyist madness and rebuff the attacks on basic democratic rights. Let us say: Down with the witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane! No to the targeting of Australian-Chinese community organisations! Stop the persecution of pro-PRC Chinese international students! The right to free speech must include the right to praise – and indeed support – socialistic countries like the PRC! Drop all charges against whistle blowers David McBride, Witness K and Bernard Collaery!

Racism and Anti-PRC Witch-hunting

As with almost everything else that is negative in Australian society, anti-Red China witch-hunting feeds off and accentuates White Australia racism: that very same racial virus infecting Australia that Moselmane dared to identify. So how did this racial virus spread? For starters, one should understand that the disease of racism is actually widespread within most capitalist societies. Exploiting classes breed racism to divide multiracial working classes. They also inflame racism in order to divert mass frustrations onto racial minorities and, thus, away from the capitalist rulers themselves. Moreover, in imperialist countries like Australia, a racial superiority mentality is transmitted in order to enlist the population behind ruling class acts of military intervention, plunder and paternalism in the poorer “Third World” countries. In Australia there is also a big additional factor spawning racism. That is the fact that capitalist rule here was founded on the genocidal dispossession of this country’s indigenous first peoples, a crime that could only be organised and “justified” by spreading the most extreme form of white supremacist prejudice imaginable.

Today, it is telling that the three politicians who have been most intensely witch-hunted in recent times for supposedly being soft on China – Shaoquett Moselmane, Gladys Liu and Sam Dastyari – are all among the very few politicians in this country from people of colour backgrounds. People who are not white simply have less leeway in this racist society. While hardcore white supremacists are opposed to all people of colour all the time, the more insidious, mainstream form of white supremacy embraced by the bulk of the ruling elite sees non-white people as acceptable until they do something which is deemed “wrong”, in which case all the prejudice gushes out and they will be attacked far more severely than a white person doing the same thing. Yassmin Abdel-Magied certainly copped that when she was cruelly driven out of the country in a barely disguised, racist and misogynist witch-hunt.

All this shows the limits of “multiculturalism” as it is practiced by the ruling class. In their warped version, people from non-Anglo backgrounds are free to practice their own cultures as long as they all accept Western domination of the world and the current social order in Australia where the capitalist big end of town rules and Aboriginal people remain dispossessed. Any non-white person who does, or even says, anything even slightly contradicting this status quo is deemed disloyal and “ungrateful.” We let you into the country so the least you could do is to… such is the attitude of ruling class-created “public opinion” towards people of colour who dare question, in even the most minimal way, the myths of the current social order. All the while this mainstream still claims to stand by “multiculturalism.” This shows that, in practice, the official form of Australian “multiculturalism” sees people of colour confined to a second class status. It is far, far from a genuinely egalitarian and anti-racist multi-racialism.

The same implicit, underlying racism that added to the severity of the campaign against Moslemane has also been evident in a vicious campaign against WHO leader Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, again for having the temerity to praise China’s effective response to the coronavirus outbreak. Dr Ghebreyesus, a microbiologist of Ethiopian background, is the first WHO chief from Africa. As far as unashamed racists are concerned, Africans are not meant to hold such senior positions in international organisations. More liberal, mainstream racists could tolerate Dr Ghebreyesus in this role as long as he did not do anything that contradicted Western imperialist agendas. When Dr Ghebreyesus simply stated the facts by praising the PRC’s response to the virus, all the underlying racism gushed out and he was subjected to incredible abuse and death threats. Although the WHO is an agency under the imperialist dominated UN, Dr Ghebreyesus has shown considerable courage to stand up to racism and colonialist attitudes. When two of France’s most senior doctors despicably called on national TV for testing COVID-19 treatments on Africans [20], Dr Ghebreyesus rightly slammed the remarks as “racist” and a “hangover from a colonial mentality” [21]. Just like when it was revealed that Moselmane had called out White Australia racism, Dr Ghebreyesus’ strong stand against racism only intensified the attacks against him. Yet he stood firm against these racist attacks too and called them out:

“I can tell you personal attacks that have been going on for more than two, three months. Abuses, or racist comments, giving me names, black or Negro. I’m proud of being black, proud of being Negro.

“I don’t care, to be honest … even death threats. I don’t give a damn.

Dr Ghebreyesus also called out that many of the attacks had been associated with supporters of Donald Trump’s favourite regime, Taiwan [22]:

“Three months ago, this attack came from Taiwan. We need to be honest. I will be straight today. From Taiwan.

“And Taiwan, the Foreign Ministry also, they know the campaign. They didn’t disassociate themselves. They even started criticizing me in the middle of all that insult and slur, but I didn’t care.”

Angered by all the attacks on Dr Ghebreyesus, the African Union came to his defence [23]. A statement released by the African Union on the very same day that Dr Ghebreyesus called out Taiwanese racism, emphasised that:

“… the Chairperson of the African Union and President of the Republic of South Africa, HE Cyril Ramaphosa reaffirms his appreciation for the exceptional leadership of the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, from the very earliest stages of this unprecedented global health crisis.

 “The African Union has also commended the management of Dr Tedros in leading the global response to the pandemic.”

As an aside, we must note that it should be little surprise that many of the racist attacks on Dr Ghebreyesus should come from supporters of the Taiwanese regime, with the implicit support of the regime itself. Taiwan was created as a de facto state when leaders of the right-wing former Kuomintang regime and members of the deposed landlord-capitalist exploiting class of China fled that country’s 1949 anti-capitalist revolution and set up base in Taiwan. Since then, the Taiwanese regime has been a stalwart of support for reactionary causes. Taiwan was one of the strongest supporters of the former Apartheid regime in South Africa. Backing the Apartheid regime against those fighting for black liberation, Taiwanese ambassador to Apartheid South Africa, H. K. Yang, stated that: “South Africa and my country are joined in the fight against communism. We are in favour of free enterprise, democracy and freedom” [24]. Taiwan, the former Apartheid rulers of South Africa and the murderously racist Israeli regime established a triangular axis of collaboration on developing nuclear weapons [25]. Taiwan was instrumental in enabling the former Apartheid regime to acquire nuclear weapons.

Cold War Witch-hunting Will Lead to
Greater Repression of All Progressive Forces

The Australian ruling class has already harnessed its drive against those accused of being “soft” on Red China to power its push to constrict the rights of broader sections of society. Thus, two years ago, under the cover of contrived fears about “Chinese interference” and the supposed “threat” posed by the activities of pro-PRC members of Australia’s Chinese community, the Liberal government, with ALP support, rammed through two new laws targeting “foreign interference” that will provide pretexts for Australian regime crackdowns on protest movements and media reporting. Then, in the midst of the Australian ruling class spearheading outrageous attacks on China over the virus outbreak, last month Peter Dutton introduced into parliament the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill 2020. The proposed new laws will give the regime the “right” to prevent a person under ASIO investigation from contacting their lawyer, allow ASIO to expel an interrogated person’s lawyer if they deem the lawyer to be “interrupting questioning”, gives ASIO the power to question 14 year-old children and grants them the “right” to track people without the need for a warrant [26].

The Australian regime’s drive against Red China and those deemed to be sympathetic to her at home has fuelled a “national security” obsession that has in turn made it easier for the Australian regime to target dissenters who have no direct connection with Cold War issues. It is telling that although those who blew the whistle on the Australian state’s spying in East Timor were first raided in 2013, the Australian regime did not feel that it could get away with actually laying charges on the two whistle blowers – Witness K and Bernard Collaery – until a whole five years later. Although the anti-China crusade and the suppression of those exposing the crimes of the Australian regime in East Timor are not directly connected, it is undoubted that the “national security” fixation created by the escalation of anti-PRC witch-hunting over the last few years made the government feel more confident to pursue the prosecution of whistle blowers in 2018 than they did in 2013. It is notable too that the very same Peter Dutton who demanded Moselmane’s removal from parliament was just weeks later demanding the sacking of Victoria’s Deputy Chief Health Officer, Dr Annaliese van Diemen, for merely making a very insightful tweet comparing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic to the suffering of Aboriginal people caused by colonial invasion [27]:

“Sudden arrival of an invader from another land, decimating populations, creating terror. Forces the population to make enormous sacrifices & completely change how they live in order to survive. COVID19 or Cook 1770?”

The obsession with “protecting national interests” that the Australian ruling class have whipped up through their Cold War drive is also being used by them to justify repressive measures and laws targeting workers’ industrial action and more militant unions, both of which are branded as harmful to “national interests.”

More insightful people, even those who do not necessarily have sympathy for socialistic China are starting to see the threat of broader repression posed by Cold War witch-hunting. Thus, although no mainstream politician from any party and not a single journalist, that we know of, from the main media outlets have had the courage to publicly defend Moselmane, there were prominent community voices that did protest against his witch-hunt. Prominent left-liberal Stuart Rees, an Emeritus Professor at the University of Sydney and the founder director of the Sydney Peace Foundation issued a statement condemning the witch-hunt [28]. In it, Rees insisted that:

“Mosselmane was the victim of character assassination for questioning anti-Chinese sentiment and for praising Chinese leadership’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic in Wuhan.”

An article in the April 10 issue of the Australian Muslim Times newspaper also condemned the witch-hunt of Moselmane [29], noting that:

“The weak-kneed response of this onslaught against a colleague by the NSW Labor leader Jodi McKay MP is highly disappointing and shown to be a leader incapable of standing up for her colleagues and for what’s right.”

The article also quoted a protest letter to the NSW ALP leader by Chinese Community Council of Australia’s Dr Anthony Pun, where Pun stated that:

“…we are indebted to the Hon Shaoquett Moselmane MLC, who have shown empathy and compassion to our difficulties, particularly to racists taunts, racially vilification and hate speech…. We are aware of the recent media attempting to discredit him and saying that his remarks on China was inappropriate was unwarranted and simply wrong.”

The Australian Muslim Times article also reported on the statements of others who opposed the witch-hunt of Moselmane:

“Mr Bashir Sawalha, President of United Australian Palestinian Workers Association (UAPWA) has condemned the spiteful media attacks on Mr Moselmane and has also criticised the lack of support for him by Ms McKay.”

We welcome the fact that such a broad range of voices have condemned this McCarthyist witch-hunt. There needs to the broadest possible united-front push back against the Cold War persecution of people who make positive comments about the PRC or express support for her. And we need to the resist the broader attacks on democratic rights that such McCarthyist persecution is driving.

Ditch the ALP – Let’s Build a Workers Party That
Will Actually Stand Up to the Capitalists and their Media

Despite being stabbed in the back multiple times by his own ALP colleagues, Shaoquett Moselmane has reaffirmed his commitment to the Labor Party. He released a statement that, while expressing deepest gratitude to those who offered solidarity with him against the recent attacks, asserted that “it is through the Australian Labor Party that we can advance the wellbeing and welfare of all Australians” [30]. Yet many of the supporters of Moselmane, who is rather popular amongst working class communities of Middle Eastern, African, Asian and South American origins, may have other thoughts. They would have been horrified at how the ALP leadership joined in the witch-hunt of the person they see as the spokesman for their concerns and would have noted how few – perhaps none (!) – of his Labor parliamentary colleagues actually publicly came to his defence in a forceful, high-profile manner.

Some of Moselmane’s supporters are likely amongst the many working class people who support the ALP through gritted teeth. Such people have long ago lost faith in the Labor Party’s commitment, let alone ability, to deliver meaningful social change. Many of these people have seen Labor Party leaders time and again betray promises privately made to them to make greater efforts to reduce inequality, ease the shortage of affordable rental accommodation and genuinely oppose racist attacks on non-white communities. Nevertheless these people, many from migrant backgrounds or lower-paid workers, cling on to the ALP because they hope that a few good people there can at least make some headway in changing the ALP’s stance, however minimally, on a few issues: perhaps make the ALP take a stronger stand on opposing job slashing by bosses, more truly stand for genuine multiculturalism, curb its strident support for Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestine and wind back its fulsome adherence to the U.S.-led Cold War drive against China. Yet, as the witch-hunt of Moselmane again confirms, these have proven to be false hopes. Despite the sincerity of rank and file ALP supporters who hold these illusions, the truth is that the ALP has never sought to curb the “right” of even profitable companies to slash jobs whenever that is what it takes to further boost their own filthy profits. And the Labor Party is just as rabid in supporting Israel’s murderous oppression of Palestinian people as the Tories are and just as fervent in lining up behind the Cold War drive against socialistic China. And as for the type of “multiculturalism” envisaged by the ALP, one has only to look at the actions of the previous two leaders of the NSW ALP. At a meeting in the Blue Mountains in September 2018, former ALP leader Michael Daley incited racial prejudice when he disgustingly blamed migrants – especially from Asia – for taking local jobs and pushing young people out of Sydney [31]. Four months earlier, Daley’s predecessor Luke Foley also inflamed hostility to people of colour by despicably claiming that refugees are swamping Western Sydney leading to a “white flight” of Anglo families from these suburbs [32]. Meanwhile, just last month, the last ALP NSW premier, Kristina Keneally, now a senior member of federal Labor’s shadow ministry, was blowing out of the same dog whistle to racism as Daley and Foley as she called for a cut to migration and for local workers to get a “first go at jobs” [33].

To all those disillusioned with the ALP because it fails to actually stand up to the big end of town and refuses to fully shed its own white nationalist prejudices let alone challenge these notions, we say that it is high time to throw the ALP into the non-recyclable bin. The ALP is useless as an instrument for progressive change. And the problem is not merely that the ALP has lost its way. The bitter truth is that the ALP was never on the right track. Let’s remember that the Labor Party was founded on the principle of the White Australia Policy exclusion of Asian and other non-white immigrants. It is true that in certain periods – like the Whitlam years – the ALP oversaw some progressive reforms. But these were only ceded because the ruling class was in a weakened position –it was losing the Vietnam War to the heroic Vietnamese communists during the Whitlam period and facing a resurgent left and workers movement – and needed to grant the masses some concessions. These measures were taken by the ALP in order to stave off a much more deep-going working class radicalisation that could have conquered still greater gains for the masses. Yet, even at the best of times, the ALP’s approach has always been to try and make some piecemeal reforms for workers while retaining the acceptance of the capitalist bigwigs. This program has been a failure because the interests of the working class and those of the capitalist business owners are completely counter-posed. Every time that ALP leaders kowtow before the capitalist class and their media, they make this ruling class stronger, which in turn puts the ALP under even greater pressure to prostrate before these bigwigs. Such is logic of the ALP’s irreversible spiral downwards. For example, by pandering to the Murdoch and Fairfax media and the likes of Hadley and Credlin in their attacks on Moselmane, NSW ALP leader Jodi McKay strengthened the authority of these capitalist media outfits. So when the Murdoch media went on a crusade against today’s Black Lives Matter protests, McKay was under more pressure to bow to the wishes of Murdoch’s media than she otherwise would have been. This she duly did. Yesterday, Jodi McKay attacked Liberal premier Gladys Berejiklian from the right for not having then banned the planned protest. “Is (Premier Berejiklian) really giving her approval for a mass rally with potentially thousands of participants, when the maximum number of people allowed to visit a private home remains just five,” McKay told Murdoch’s Daily Telegraph [34]. It was this white supremacist-pandering attack by the NSW Labor leader on Berejiklian’s supposed softness on the protest that then pushed the conservative premier to move to ban today’s antiracist demonstration.

What we need is a workers party that in direct contrast to the ALP is not interested in gaining the approval or even the tolerance of any section of the capitalist class. Such a party would be based on the understanding that the interests of the working class masses can only be advanced through consistent opposition to the entire capitalist class. It would fight to restrict the “right” of capitalist bosses to slash jobs and fight for laws that would force company owners to increase their hiring of permanent workers at the expense of their profits. The workers party that we need would understand that advancing the masses interests can only come through building genuine workers unity. That means replacing the ALP’s hypocritical platitudes to “multiculturalism” and “reconciliation” with a merciless war against all outbreaks of white supremacy. It would fight for mass union/Aboriginal/Asian/Muslim/African mobilisations to crush violent redneck attacks, for the immediate jailing of all police and prison guards responsible for the deaths of Aboriginal people in custody and for the granting of all the rights of citizenship to all refugees, guest workers and international students. Such a party would also stand by all the peoples of the world subjugated by the same Australian capitalist class that exploits workers here at home, by the peoples subjugated by Canberra’s Washington big brother ally and by all those downtrodden by the reactionary regimes supported by these U.S. and Australian imperialists. That means it would oppose Australian imperialist plunder and paternalist bullying in the South Pacific and would demand the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of all U.S. and Australian troops from Afghanistan, the Persian Gulf and all of the Middle East. It would also oppose all U.N. and U.S. economic sanctions on the peoples of North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela and Iran. A true workers party would also demand the removal of all Israeli troops and settlers from all of the West Bank and Gaza and fight for the destruction of the racial-supremacist Israeli state and its replacement by a bi-national, secular workers state where Jews and Palestinians will live together in socialist harmony. Most crucially, the international policy of a party that truly defends workers interests would emphasise the unconditional defence of socialistic rule in China, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam and Laos against imperialist military pressure, lying propaganda campaigns and Western-backed anti-communist forces. This policy is essential despite the bureaucratic deformations and capitalist intrusions that distort socialistic rule in these countries. In short, what we need is a party that will defend the states where workers have achieved power abroad while fighting for workers rule here in Australia.

From causing a growing gap between rich and poor to its inability to provide secure, permanent jobs to its flawed response to the pandemic to the racist state brutality that it administers, capitalist rule is every day making life more miserable for the masses. The widespread revelations of racist state terror against black people and the brutal response of police to Black Lives Matter protests not only shows the true nature of capitalist “democracy” but exposes the blatant hypocrisy of capitalist regimes when they make allegations against the PRC, DPRK and other socialistic states over “human rights”. Now in the U.S., many working class people are questioning their faith in capitalist “democracy” and for the first time in a long while have begun to take the political offensive. Here in Australia, today’s mass anti-racist protests are a sign of the potential to turn around the ruling class’ decades-long offensive against Aboriginal people, other people of colour and the broader working class masses. Yet, as we look to possibly move onto the front foot, we need to guard our rear against attack. The more that we resist, the more that the exploiting class will fear the spectre of communism and, thus, the more that they will resort to Cold War witch-hunting and propaganda campaigns. That makes it doubly important to resist the Cold War attacks on those who sympathise with, or praise, the PRC and other socialistic countries. Let us condemn the witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane and demand: No to the targeting of Australian-Chinese community organisations! Stop the persecution of pro-PRC Chinese international students! Rebuff the all-sided attacks on democratic rights that the McCarthyist anti-PRC witch-hunt is fuelling!

References

  1. Charles Calisher, Dennis Carroll, Rita Colwell, Ronald B Corley, Peter Daszak, Christian Drosten, Luis Enjuanes, Jeremy Farrar, Hume Field, Josie Golding, Alexander Gorbalenya, Bart Haagmans, James M Hughes, William B Karesh, Gerald T Keusch, Sai Kit Lam, Juan Lubroth, John S Mackenzie, Larry Madoff, Jonna Mazet, Peter Palese, Stanley Perlman, Leo Poon, Bernard Roizman, Linda Saif, Kanta Subbarao and Mike Turner, Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19 (published 19 February 2020), The Lancet, Volume 395, Issue 10226, E42-E43, 7 March 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9
  2. WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), World Health Organization (WHO) website, 28 February 2020, https://www.who.int/publications-detail/report-of-the-who-china-joint-mission-on-coronavirus-disease-2019-(covid-19)
  3. Australian Department of Health, Doorstop interview about funding for mental health initiatives and novel coronavirus, Department of Health website, 30 January 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/doorstop-interview-about-funding-for-mental-health-initiatives-and-novel-coronavirus
  4. Australian Department of Health, Chief Medical Officer on ABC News Breakfast about novel coronavirus, Department of Health website, 31 January 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/news/chief-medical-officer-on-abc-news-breakfast-about-novel-coronavirus-0
  5. Tucker Higgins, Trump thanks China’s Xi Jinping for handling of coronavirus, CNBC website,  24 January 2020, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/24/trump-thanks-chinas-xi-jinping-for-handling-of-coronavirus.html
  6. Chanel Zagon, Two female students from University of Melbourne brutally bashed in CBD, Nine News website, 17 April 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/female-university-of-melbourne-students-brutally-bashed-in-cbd-assault/2ae42833-10bf-4e72-b55c-550a5ec06d91?ref=BP_RSS_ninenews_5_-disgusting–footage-shows-female-students-bashed-in-vile-attack_170420
  7. Jason Fang, Samuel Yang and Christina Zhou, Coronavirus has fuelled racism against Asian-Australians, but why isn’t official data showing it?, ABC News website, 5 May 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-05/coronavirus-racist-attacks-asian-australians-missing-data/12211630?nw=0
  8. Isobel Roe, Racism towards Chinese Australians over coronavirus condemned, ABC Radio PM program website, 11 February 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/pm/racism-towards-chinese-australians-over-coronavirus-condemned/11955286
  9. Chanel Zagon, Health authorities slam racist attacks on Royal Children’s Hospital staff, Nine News website, 27 February 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/health-authorities-slam-racist-attacks-on-royal-childrens-hospital-staff/97770fda-0540-497b-add7-949636f3b014?
  10. ABC News, Doctor calls for unity during coronavirus pandemic after being targeted in racist attack, 20 April 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-20/coronavirus-geelong-doctor-calls-for-unity-after-racist-attack/12164282
  11. Chanel Zagon, Coronavirus: Melbourne bus driver racially abused by passenger, Nine News website, 3 April 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-melbourne-bus-driver-racially-abused-by-passenger/c87d83b7-36e0-4171-8409-49dffc31c986
  12. Samuel Yang, Video shows Chinese woman being racially attacked in Melbourne over coronavirus, ABC News website, https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-06/coronavirus-woman-racist-attack-in-melbourne/12216854?nw=0
  13. Rory McClaren, Horrific racist attack on Adelaide councillor, Nine News website, 8 April 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-racist-attack-adelaide-councillor/5578323a-aa21-4dc5-933b-db0394effdf7?
  14. Eliza McPhee, Man armed with a WHIP goes on a racist rant outside Chinese Consulate in Sydney and accuses visitors wearing masks of spreading coronavirus, 2 April 2020, Daily Mail Australian Edition website, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8178421/Man-armed-WHIP-goes-racist-tirade-outside-Chinese-Consulate.html
  15. Nature Editorial, Stop the coronavirus stigma now, Nature website, 7 April 2020, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01009-0
  16. Callum Foote, Since when is it a crime to report a crime? Bernard Collaery exposes the Timor Sea betrayal, Michael West Media website, 28 April 2020, https://www.michaelwest.com.au/since-when-did-it-become-a-crime-to-report-a-crime-bernard-collaery-exposes-the-timor-sea-betrayal/
  17. Blake Foden, ‘Sad times’: Bernard Collaery laments ‘now fragile democracy’ as pre-trial hearing takes place in secret, The Canberra Times website, 25 May 2020, https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6768177/sad-times-collaery-laments-now-fragile-democracy-as-pre-trial-hearing-takes-place-in-secret/?cs=14225
  18. Associated Press, David McBride to represent himself in court because he ‘doesn’t trust’ Defence to clear lawyer, Nine News website, 7 November 2019, https://www.9news.com.au/national/australian-army-whistleblower-david-mcbride-in-court-represent-himself/0c6279c2-1fc3-4407-8a00-dae89f16dad4
  19. Elizabeth Byrne, Afghan Files leak accused David McBride faces ACT Supreme Court for first time, ABC News website, 14 June 2019, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-13/abc-raids-afghan-files-leak-accused-court-canberra/11206682
  20. Julian Kossoff, 2 top French doctors said on live TV that coronavirus vaccines should be tested on poor Africans, leaving viewers horrified, Business Insider Australia website, 3 April 2020, https://www.businessinsider.com.au/coronavirus-vaccines-france-doctors-say-test-poor-africans-outrage-2020-4?r=US&IR=T
  21. Stephanie Busari and Barbara Wojazer, French doctors’ proposal to test Covid-19 treatment in Africa slammed as ‘colonial mentality’, CNN website, 7 April 2020,  https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/07/africa/french-doctors-africa-covid-19-intl/index.html
  22. William Feuer, WHO chief addresses death threats, racist insults: ‘I don’t give a damn’, CNBC website, 8 April 2020, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/08/who-chief-addresses-death-threats-racist-insults-i-dont-give-a-damn.html
  23. African Union, African Union reaffirms its unwavering support to WHO, African Union website, 8 April 2020, https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20200408/african-union-reaffirms-its-unwavering-support-who
  24. Wikipedia, South Africa–Taiwan relations, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa%E2%80%93Taiwan_relations (accessed 9 May 2020)
  25. Judith Miller, 3 NATIONS WIDENING NUCLEAR CONTACTS, The New York Times, 28 June 1981, https://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/28/world/3-nations-widening-nuclear-contacts.html
  26. Greg Barns, New ASIO law one more step towards a totalitarian state, Sydney Morning Herald website, 13 May 2020, https://www.smh.com.au/national/new-asio-law-one-more-step-towards-a-totalitarian-state-20200513-p54smi.html 
  27. SBS, Scott Morrison, Peter Dutton slam Victorian health official over Captain Cook tweet, SBS website, 1 May 2020, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/scott-morrison-peter-dutton-slam-victorian-health-official-over-captain-cook-tweet
  28. Stuart Rees, Character Assassination as Journalism & Politics, John Menadue – Pearls and Irritations website, 5 May 2020, https://johnmenadue.com/stuart-rees-character-assassination-as-journalism-politics/
  29. Zia Ahmad, Witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane condemned, Australian Muslim Times, 10 April 2020, https://www.amust.com.au/2020/04/witch-hunt-of-shaoquett-moselmane-condemned/
  30. The World Observer Newspaper, Letter from the Hon Shaoquett Moselmane MLC, 13 April 2020, https://theworldobserver.com.au/2020/04/13/letter-from-hon-shaoquett-moselmane-mlc/
  31. Australian Associated Press, Michael Daley claims Asian workers taking young people’s jobs in Sydney, The Guardian website, 19 March 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/mar/19/michael-daley-claims-asian-workers-taking-young-peoples-jobs-in-sydney
  32. Anne Davies, Luke Foley apologises for ‘white flight’ comment, saying he now knows it’s offensive, The Guardian website, 24 May 2018, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/may/24/luke-foley-defends-white-flight-comment-but-denies-dog-whistling
  33. Euan Black, Labor’s Kristina Keneally slammed for linking immigration to unemployment, The New Daily website, 3 May 2020, https://thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2020/05/03/kristina-keneally-immigration/
  34. Jenna Benson, NSW Government Seek To Stop Tomorrow’s Protests In Sydney, WSFM radio website, 5 June 2020, https://www.wsfm.com.au/local/nsw-government-seek-to-stop-black-lives-matter-protest-in-sydney/ (accessed 7 June 2020)

No Job Cuts! No Unpaid Stand Downs!

Don’t Let Rich Business Owners Make Workers Pay for the Pandemic –
Force Them to Keep Paying Wages from the Profits
They’ve Leached From Workers Over the Years!

No Job Cuts! No Unpaid Stand Downs!

3 May 2020: Australian billionaire James Packer spent much of last year cruising around in a $200 million super yacht. He is now lazing about in his $20 million holiday mansion in a U.S. resort. Packer can afford all this. This main owner of hotel and casino operator Crown Resorts has made a fortune from leaching profits out of the hard work of Crown workers. In the last five years, Crown’s owners have extracted a total profit of $4.2 billion. Yet within hours of the March 22 announcement that clubs and casinos needed to close due to COVID-19, Packer and Co. stood down without pay thousands of workers. Around 95% of the 11,500 strong Crown workforce has been cut. This is outrageous! Consider this: assuming that the average annual wage of a Crown worker is $60,000, probably an overestimate given how badly hospitality workers are paid, then Packer and the other shareholders could pay all the stood down workers their full wages for six and a half years out of the profits that they have leached from these workers’ labour in just the last five years!

Packer is hardly alone in acting this way. Right across Australia, the owners of cafes, restaurants, gyms, airlines, tourism operations and factories are throwing onto the scrap heap the very same workers who made these capitalists their fortunes. We must not stand for this! Ultra-rich business owners should not be allowed to retrench workers or stand down workers without pay. We must force them to keep on paying us in full out of the profits that they have leached from our labour over the years.

It is Workers Who Are Bearing the Economic Pain of the COVID-19 Pandemic

For years, Australian governments – Liberal, ALP and ALP-Greens coalitions alike – have kept the dole at cruelly low levels. The right-wing media have “justified” this by insulting unemployed workers as lazy. However, with so many workers now thrown onto Centrelink queues it is hard to sell that lie. So, now the new line that the regime is selling us is that “everyone needs to share the economic pain” caused by the pandemic. Except it is workers who are being made to bear all that pain! Sure, there are also some small businesses that are not making a profit right now. But let’s not buy the line that those small business owners using hired labour are simply, innocent “battlers.” Many of these small business owners axing jobs now are the ones most notorious for illegally under-paying their staff and otherwise bullying their workers. And how many workers employed in small businesses see their supposed “battler” boss turn up each day in a flashy Mercedes or BMW!

Let’s remember that when any business using hired labour, big or small, winds up, the owners still have all their personal wealth that they have extracted from exploiting their workers as well as all the money that they will get from selling the equipment and other business assets that they had bought from the profits sweated out from workers’ labour over the years. Just look at how little the high-profile failure of Clive Palmer’s Queensland Nickel affected his wealth. After Palmer sacked 237 workers in early 2016, he then infamously refused to pay even the entitlements of the further 800 workers who lost their jobs when the company was liquidated shortly after. Today, despite his company’s collapse and all the pain borne by the axed Queensland Nickel workers, Palmer still manages to be Australia’s eighth richest person with nearly $10 billion in wealth!

Far from “sharing the pain”, many bosses are using the current crisis to, instead, inflict pain on their workers. Knowing that the massive job losses have left those still employed feeling insecure about their jobs and, thus, less willing to challenge bosses, business owners are ramming through attacks on working conditions. The conservative government is right behind them. Last week, industrial relations minister Christian Porter slashed the notice period that bosses have to give before making cuts to pay, penalty rates and leave entitlements to just 24 hours. Meanwhile, some corporate bigwigs are using the cover of the pandemic to push through job cuts. In March, ANZ bosses slashed 230 jobs as part of a long-plotted “cost cutting” drive.

Bosses Putting Workers’ Lives at Risk

Driven by this same pursuit of “cutting costs,” many business owners are putting those workers lucky enough to still have a job at risk of contracting the coronavirus. Qantas has such lax safety systems that even the limp government regulator, Safework NSW, issued the company a mandatory notice on March 2 because Qantas did not ensure that PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was provided to Sydney ground crew performing the crucial role of cleaning aircraft of wet wipes, used tissues, used face masks and sometimes even vomit and blood. Then the Transport Workers Union exposed how after a Qantas baggage handler at Adelaide Airport was found be infected with COVID-19, Qantas bosses did little to put any protections in place. As a result within 17 days, another 17 baggage handlers, three other Qantas workers and 11 close contacts became infected.

In many cases, bosses are not only putting their workers at risk but placing those they supposedly serve in danger too. At many hospitals and private aged care facilities, bosses have failed to provide workers with adequate PPE; and at best only after the virus has already spread. At a Western Sydney Anglicare nursing home, 14 residents have tragically died from COVID-19 after a worker was infected.

The higher paid strata of administrators of government-run facilities are often little better than their private sector counterparts. In Tasmania, the virus jumped from two infected North West Regional Hospital patients onto medical workers. The lack of adequate PPE, which medical workers have angrily exposed, enabled COVID-19 to then spread like wildfire amongst staff and patients at the hospital and a neighbouring private hospital. Three days ago, the twelfth person died from this particular outbreak that has infected at least 73 health workers.

Since we can’t rely on the bosses to ensure a safe workplace, the workers movement must fight for the following:

  • Union/worker safety committees at each workplace. These will struggle to ensure that each workplace is safe and has proper pandemic deterrence procedures. If any site is found to be dangerous, workers should walk off the job until the site is made safe. Workers to be fully paid during any such walk-offs.
  • Temperature testing of all workers and others entering work sites.
  • All workers at hospitals treating potential COVID-19 patients and at all aged care homes to be supplied with full head-to-toe PPE. The provision of such space-suit style PPE to nurses, janitors and doctors in China is part of why that country was so successful in responding to the COVID-19 threat.
  • All workers to be granted unlimited paid pandemic leave for COVID-19 treatment or quarantining or for caring for ill people. Instead of bosses blaming workers for outbreaks, they should pay sick leave so that workers don’t get hit with the choice between poverty and risking spreading the disease.
  • Similarly, all casual workers must be immediately granted permanency. These workers must have all the rights of permanent workers – including sick leave and guaranteed minimum work hours.

Not Bailouts of Capitalists but Jobs For All Workers At Full Pay

All of official society, business owners, media commentators, the ALP “Opposition” and even, to a significant degree, the current leaders of our trade unions – have been cheering the government’s JobKeeper scheme that pays the owners of certain businesses $1,500 per fortnight for each worker that they keep on their payrolls. However, JobKeeper does not apply to most casual workers. Yet it is precisely such workers who have suffered the biggest job cuts since they often work in the hardest hit sectors like hospitality and retail. Also, often working in these areas are international students and visa workers. Yet the scheme will not apply to them either. These people now face destitution as they are not even eligible for the dole. Despicably, Morrison’s response to their plight is to tell these people to “make your way home”! For many this is not even possible as they not only have no money to pay for airfares but often cannot do so due to travel restrictions. The workers movement must actively demand that, to the extent that JobKeeper actually helps workers keep their jobs, it should apply to all workers. Let’s stop our wages being undercut by the forcing of destitute people into illegally-low-paid jobs in the cash economy! Let’s demand:

  • Immediate permanency, with all the rights of permanent workers, for all casual employees!
  • Full citizenship rights for everyone here including international students, refugees and visa workers!

Other than those explicitly excluded from JobKeeper, there are many others that the scheme will not save the jobs of. Since it only applies to large companies that have lost more than 50% of their revenue and smaller businesses that have lost at least 30%, workers being axed by firms experiencing lesser downturns will not be helped. Moreover, since the subsidy is barely above minimum wage, many bosses are choosing not to utilise the scheme because they simply don’t want to top up any wages out of their own pockets. Other capitalists are refusing to re-hire cut workers because they wanted to “prune” staff anyway.

There is another huge problem. JobKeeper is financed not from wealthy company owners but from the public budget. And you can bet that it is working class people who are going to be made to cover most of the resulting public debt. We face cuts to public service jobs, the further sell-off of public housing, the return of the dole back to near starvation levels, more health and education services being made user pays and further privatisation. What makes this more terrible is that some of the capitalists receiving JobKeeper subsidies did not actually have plans to cut their workforce because they needed to keep exploiting their workers to protect profits or market share. Thus, many billionaire and multi-millionaire capitalists are now going to receive huge donations from the public budget that amount to a combined multi billion dollars amount. That’s why in counter-position to JobKeeper, we need to fight for jobs for all workers through forcing the bosses to retain more workers than they want to at the expense of their own profits. That requires militant, mass struggle.

Even at this time of pandemic restrictions, strike action is still possible. Last month, MUA-organised Hutchison workers walked off the job for ten days over the company’s callous indifference to the threat of a pandemic spread at its Port Botany terminal. Moreover, social distancing measures will inevitably ease, giving us more freedom to launch the mass actions so urgently needed. We should then fight to stop wealthy business owners planning to permanently shut down operations by holding mass protest occupations of their facilities (while maintaining safe social distancing) to prevent them from selling their assets. However, given that many workers being axed are at smaller sites with less industrial power, the workers movement must also unite behind common demands for laws to ensure jobs for all workers. Let us demand:

  • A ban on all job cuts or unpaid stand downs by any firm whose total profit over the previous, say seven, years exceeds any current losses.
  • A ban on all cuts to wages and conditions from pre-pandemic levels.
  • The forcing of any company still making a profit to increase its number of full-time paid employees by at least five workers for every hundred thousand dollars of monthly profit.
  • Any business that violates these measures to be confiscated and transferred into public ownership.

Workers are NOT “All in This Together” with the Greedy, Rich Bosses

To wage the desperately needed fightback, the workers movement must change the program that currently leads our unions. Right now, pro-ALP union leaders have completely bought into the “we are all in this together” mantra. They have been cheered on in this by the corporate bigwigs, the right-wing government and media commentators. The ACTU leadership has been so compliant that industrial relations minister Christian Porter called ACTU leader Sally McManus his new BFF! Even the more militant Victorian CFMEU head, John Setka, has cheered the “unprecedented co-operation” with bosses associations saying “For once, we are all in the same boat.”

But far from being “all in the same boat”, the greedy bosses are actually throwing workers off the very boats that these workers built as soon as these boats run into rough waters. It is this same “we are all in the same boat” nonsense that saw the 1980s Accord between unions, bosses and the then ALP government. The Accord was essentially a no-strike pledge by union leaders in exchange for promises of social programs. In reality, The Accord saw the then Hawke and Keating Labor governments preside over the biggest increase in inequality in Australian history. Since then a less overt, but still underlying, “all in the same boat” ideology has seen union leaders, for the most part, shy away from organising militant industrial action – a strategy that has weakened our unions and led to the undermining of working conditions and rampant casualisation of the workforce.

Central to the “we are all in this together” ideology is the myth that workers and bosses share a common “national interest” in promoting the profits of local companies. Thus, the union leadership’s long-term “strategy” to stop job cuts has been to call to protect Australian businesses from imported goods. However, the last couple of months have exposed how utterly bankrupt this protectionist strategy is. For all the recent huge job losses have absolutely nothing to do with overseas competition hurting local businesses. The job cuts have actually been concentrated in sectors – like restaurants, shops, personal care, tourism and gyms – that simply cannot by their very nature be replaced by imports or by overseas contracting. Meanwhile, not only are travel disruptions reducing imports to Australia, those cuts to imports are causing job losses here as Australian businesses are deprived of needed supplies.

So we desperately need to exorcise our union movement of the we are all in this together or common national interest myth that currently haunts it. Our unions need to be re-oriented on a program based on a clear understanding that the interests of the capitalist business owners and those of the working class are at all times counter-posed. At times of crisis, like today, this conflict of interests actually becomes even sharper. Central to such a class struggle understanding is the truth that job losses are not ultimately caused by foreign threats to local business profits but by the greed of capitalists and the irrationality of their system. Thus the fight for jobs for all requires not helping local bosses to make more profit but actually, in a sense, the very opposite: mass struggle to force these bosses to hire more workers at the expense of their profits.

One positive development that lasted for a short period is that after years of focusing on demands to keep out guest workers, our union leaders, albeit not very energetically, did rightly call for JobKeeper to be extended to visa workers and international students. However, this emphasis did not last long at all. Today, Sally McManus and some other union leaders gave legitimacy to a newspaper opinion piece by one of their ALP parliamentary mates calling to cut migration and for local workers to get a “first go at jobs.” The divisive, nationalist article was written by senior federal shadow minister, Kristina Keneally, who sounded a good deal like a Peter Dutton, Pauline Hanson or Donald Trump. Such pitting of Australian workers against international and guest workers, far from saving the jobs of local workers, only divides workers from our true allies – the workers of the world – and, thus, makes the workers movement less able to mobilise effective action to stop job slashing attacks by capitalists. It is high time that our unions strongly reject all divisive, protectionist demands that call for putting local workers ahead of our international worker comrades whether they be calls to slash immigration, demands for more “local content”, demands for “Aussie crews on Aussie ships” or calls to keep out visa workers. Instead, our unions must demand that all those working here (including on ships servicing here), no matter what their nationality, get the highest local wages and conditions, must fight to win full citizenship rights for all visa workers and international students and must make persistent efforts to unite local and international workers against job slashing bosses everywhere in the fight for jobs for all. As the threat of job losses at British magnate Richard Branson’s Virgin shows and the fact that the most powerful Australian capitalists – like James Packer, the Murdochs and Anthony Pratt – have major operations abroad highlights, we need unity and solidarity with our worker sisters and brothers around the world today more than ever.

In waging a fight for jobs for all, the working class must unite in common struggle with all downtrodden layers especially hard hit in recent weeks. Standing by those sleeping the streets, couch-surfing or struggling to pay rent, the workers movement must demand a six-month freeze to all residential rent payments, an immediate end to all public housing sell-offs and the requisitioning of all unoccupied properties of people owning more than three homes and their immediate conversion into low-rent public housing or rent-free housing for the homeless. The workers movement must also stand by Australia’s brutally oppressed Aboriginal people who face extreme racist discrimination at the best of times but who are now, with police having greater powers arising from pandemic restrictions, copping even more racist repression. That means we must strongly stand by homeless Aboriginal people being especially bullied by police. And we must join in the recent, powerful call by the families and friends of Aboriginal victims of deaths in custody to release all of our Aboriginal sisters and brothers who are languishing – now more than ever given the dangerous and repressive covid-19 conditions – in Australia’s many brutal prisons and cruel detention centres.

Don’t Let the Capitalist Rulers Blame Others
for the Suffering and Job Cuts since the Pandemic Hit

Any fightback that the workers movement tries to wage will be undermined if the ruling class succeeds in shifting the blame for the pandemic and job losses onto others. Hard right media shock jocks and coded messages from the government have despicably sought to blame Chinese people. This has led to an explosion in the already alarming number of racist attacks against people of colour in Australia. People of Chinese appearance, including medical workers, have especially been abused and violently attacked. The working class must stamp out such attacks. Workers of Asian background make up an important component of the Australian workers movement and we need to resolutely fight against racism if we are to preserve our own unity and focus the masses on who our enemy actually is. So, while workers rights activists should respect genuine social distancing regulations, when a racist attack is threatened, we should make an exception and take mass action to defend those targeted and to painfully rebuff the perpetrators.

The main way that the capitalist rulers are trying to shift blame for the deaths and economic pain caused by the pandemic is to make ridiculous smears against the People Republic of China (PRC). The fact is that China gave Australia and the world much warning about the COVID-19 threat. Indeed, Australia did not even have a single confirmed case of COVID-19 when China took the unprecedented step of shutting down a whole city of 11 million people to contain the virus. That the virus still spread so widely here is because the Liberal government, with ALP support, in order to underhandedly promote anti-China fears within the Australian population, maintained for a long period restrictions only on travellers from China (and later from South Korea too) while not taking measures then to screen and test the large number of people returning with the virus from Europe, from cruise ships and from the U.S. Furthermore, the capitalist system, in which those who control production only have things made if they can find a way to extract a profit out of it, meant that Australian manufacturers have only in a very limited way switched over to producing pandemic response items like protective suits, medical masks, infra-red thermometers and testing kits. The resulting scarcity of these items has greatly weakened Australia’ response. In the end, these shortages have only been eased after China came to the rescue in recent days with large shipments. So the attempts by Australia’s capitalist regime to blame the PRC are total rubbish. Indeed, the Liberal government’s China-bashing call for a supposed “independent inquiry” into the earliest phase of the pandemic are much like its 2014-2015 Royal Commission into the Trade Unions, a witch-hunt aimed at smearing their target and justifying attacks against it. If we allow the capitalist ruling class to deceive the population into blaming China for their current hardships then the masses will likely stay away from any attempt to resist the capitalist class’ attacks on workers’ jobs and conditions.

There is another reason why the Australian regime and their big brother allies in Washington are so hysterically attacking China over the pandemic. The PRC’s stunning success in responding to the COVID-19 threat, versus on the other hand the seriously flawed response in Australia and the catastrophically botched one in the U.S., has shown the superiority of the PRC’s socialistic system based on public ownership and working class rule. The capitalist rulers around the world are terrified that their own masses will see this and, thus, conclude that socialism is what is needed in their own countries too. Indeed, that is precisely the conclusion that we must draw! For although working class rule in China is bureaucratically deformed and threatened by the presence of a still significant capitalist class, recent events have proven that such a socialist system, even in a flawed form, is far better able to protect the interests of the masses than the chaotic capitalist system. Thus, because the key sectors of the Chinese economy are dominated by public ownership – including banking, construction, ports, airlines, heavy industry, communication and mining – China was able to switch over its economy to building brand new emergency hospitals and pandemic response items in a flash. Moreover, the fact that the Chinese working class, in as imperfect a way as it is, have control of the PRC economy through their state means that the rise in unemployment in China since the pandemic has been relatively miniscule compared to the massive wave of joblessness that we are seeing in the U.S., Europe and Australia. So, yes, we definitely do need to fight here for a system based on public ownership and working class rule. And when business owners respond to our demands for them to retain more employees than is most profitable for them by saying that “this is not practical” then the workers movement must respond: if you capitalists cannot run the economy in a way that provides jobs for all then the economy should not be in your hands, we working class people will take it off you and put it into our own, strong and able, collective hands.

The Western capitalist rulers are right, from their point of view, to fear that the existence of socialistic rule in the world’s most populous country is an existential threat, if only by example, to capitalist rule in their own countries. That is precisely why it is in the interests of working class people and all the oppressed here to stand by socialistic rule in China. For the existence of Red China strengthens our own struggle against capitalist exploitation. So let us oppose the Australian regime’s participation in the provocative U.S.-led naval forays through distant Chinese waters and let us oppose its fulsome political support to counterrevolutionary forces within China – like the yuppy, rich people’s opposition in Hong Kong.

The Capitalists Have Waged Class War on Workers for Decades –
It’s Time to Wage Class War on Them!

For the last several years, most workers have barely received a pay rise even while rents have been rising significantly, electricity costs are climbing steeply and out of pocket medical costs are increasing. In the meantime, company profits have skyrocketed. As a result, the wealth of Australia’s richest 200 people went from $197 billion in 2016 to $342 billion in 2019 – a staggering 74% increase in just three years! But now that some of them have run into choppy waters they are dumping overboard the very workers who produced their spectacular wealth. And then they tell us that “we are all in the same boat together.” How dare they! Workers who have just been axed by their bosses must feel nauseous when they encounter such rubbish as they queue up for hours before opening time outside Centrelink offices while wealthy business owners drive past in their flashy prestige cars.

So let’s completely reject the lie that we are being sold by the big end of town, with the complicity of the current ALP leaders of the workers movement, that “we are all in this together.” Let’s never lose sight of the fact that while it is the pandemic that necessitates social distancing restrictions it is a choice of business owners to lay off or stand down workers without pay rather than pay their workers out of the profits that they have sweated out of these self same workers over many years. Let’s build mass working class struggle against the bosses to force them to re-hire retrenched or stood down without pay workers as well as all longer-term unemployed workers. And if James Packer complains that he can’t afford this, we should demand that he sell the new super yacht that he bought eleven months ago. That alone would give him enough money to fully pay all his stood-down Crown workers for nearly four months. Let’s win jobs for all through waging class war on the very exploiting class that has been waging a one-sided class war on us for the last three and a half decades!

Corporate Bosses Endanger Workers’ Lives During COVID-19 Epidemic

Waterfront Bosses Hide COVID-19 Case from Workers

Corporate Bosses Endanger Workers’ Lives
Even More During COVID-19 Epidemic

4 April 2020: The greed of capitalist bosses knows no bounds. They have always stolen the fruit of workers’ labour. And in their drive for still higher profits, they have always been willing to endanger workers’ lives by cutting corners on workplace safety. Now, since the COVID-19 outbreak, the cruelty of their drive for profits has reached new levels. On the one hand, many business owners, at the first sign of a decrease in revenue or the need to temporarily shut down for quarantine reasons, are throwing out of their jobs the very workers whose manual and mental labour made these bosses their fortunes. On the other hand, some of those workers still in work are being exposed to the COVID-19 virus due to the bosses’ callous disregard for workers’ well-being. The latter is what is taking place, for example, at the Hutchison port at Sydney’s Port Botany.

We received the following message tonight from a waterfront worker at Hutchison who is also a Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) member:

“COVID-19 outbreak at my work. Hutchison terminal in Sydney again stands still. This time due to COVID-19 where there is one confirmed case – not contracted in the terminal. Problem is the six shifts since March 24 prior to our [MUA] member being notified by NSW Health. The numbers exposed are greater than the company is revealing. 

“Hutchison deliberately concealed a positive COVID-19 test from workers and the Union [MUA]. Then they had wharfies working ensuring the ship got away before revealing on April 3. 

“Believe it or not Hutchison will still not reveal to the workforce or Union who was on shift and who crossed over the six shifts. 

“The terminal remains shut down until workers are satisfied all safety concerns have been agreed and implemented. 

“These people are beyond belief. 

“It’s criminal behaviour that puts the whole community at risk.”

Victory to the stop-work action of Hutchison workers! Solidarity with the endangered Hutchison workers!

Hutchison was started by British capitalists in the 19th century after Britain stole Hong Kong from China through the Opium War. In 1979, still during the period of British colonial rule, Hong Kong real estate tycoon Li Ka-shing took a decisive stake in Hutchison, then called Hutchison Whampoa. Today Li and his sons run Hutchison. Li has an estimated wealth of $A52 billion. Not surprisingly then, this capitalist has given tacit support to the pro-colonial, anticommunist opposition movement in Hong Kong. This movement expresses the interests of Hong Kong’s rich who know that their selfish interests will be harmed if socialistic China exerts more control over Hong Kong. A prominent leader of Hong Kong’s biggest trade union federation, the pro-Beijing Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions, aptly referred to Li Ka-shing as the “king of cockroaches” (see: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-protests-tycoons-li-exclusiv/exclusive-in-face-of-criticism-hong-kong-tycoon-li-ka-shing-says-hes-getting-used-to-punches-idUSKBN1Y11KW). We say that Red China should confiscate Hutchison and the other holdings of this king of cockroaches as well as those of the other Hong Kong tycoons and bring them all into public ownership so that the benefits of the socialist system can be brought to the people of Hong Kong; and improvements can be made to the conditions of workers employed in Hutchison Port operations around the world.

Unfortunately, the disregard for workers’ health shown by the bosses at Sydney’s Hutchison Ports is just one example of the attitude of greedy capitalists throughout Australia to the dangers to workers posed by COVID-19. In this time of the COVID-19 pandemic, working class people and our union movement will need to fight extra hard to stop layoffs, to prevent the bosses eroding our working conditions and to protect our very lives.

Update, 6 April 2020: The situation has now gotten worse at Hutchison Ports in Port Botany. A second worker has been confirmed as being infected and approximately 30 workers are now in isolation due to being high risk of exposure to COVID-19. See:
https://www.mua.org.au/news/port-botany-stevedore-exposes-workers-coronavirus-and-hides-positive-test-0

Socialistic China is Overcoming the Corona Virus Threat

Photo Above: Medical staff in China’s Wuhan celebrate on March 9 after all COVID-19 patients at the temporary hospital that they worked at were cured and discharged from hospital.

Socialistic China is Overcoming the COVID-19 Virus Threat

30 March 2020: Over the last few days, huge crowds in Wuhan have lined the streets to thanks the nurses and doctors from other parts of the Peoples Republic China (PRC) who heroically volunteered to go to Wuhan and help treat COVID-19 patients. The medics were given honorary police escorts as they went in buses to Wuhan airport to fly back to their home provinces happy in the knowledge that, in part through their brave efforts, the people of Wuhan have, at least for now, overcome the virus threat.

Please see the following short but powerful and emotional video of the people of Wuhan thanking the medics. The nurses and doctors leaving Wuhan break down in tears of joy as they receive thanks from Wuhan residents. The video can be accessed through our Facebook post on the subject here:
https://www.facebook.com/TrotskyistPlatform/posts/2807949902592547?__tn__=K-R

or through the direct link here:  https://twitter.com/OcastJournal…/status/1243791022489882624

The people of Wuhan now feel safe to congregate together in huge numbers, confident that the virus threat has been overcome.

The Peoples Republic of China has reduced the number of community transmission cases to almost zero. This is a stunning achievement for a country with 1439 million people – that is one in five of the world’s people. There is of course still a danger of a second wave. An average of around 30 to 50 people per day infected with COVID-19 have been coming into China as large numbers of Chinese people residing in the U.S. and Europe rush back to the safety of China. However, the numbers of COVID-19 infected people arriving are tiny compared to China’s overall population. Moreover, those infected people have been quickly identified and moved into hospitals for treatment.

Unlike Australia, the U.S. and many other countries, China has not closed its borders to citizens of any country at this time, despite the main risk to China now being from imported cases. Those coming into China are required to quarantine at designated hotels but this rule applies to everyone whether they are Chinese citizens or foreign nationals. Certainly there is nothing in China like the outrageous quarantine at the Christmas Island Detention Centre that the racist Australian regime forced mainly ethnic Chinese Australians – who had left Hubei Province – to have to endure when they returned here in early February. And from accounts of foreign nationals quarantined in China, it seems that they are not subjected to the harsh conditions experienced by those recent arrivals from overseas put into compulsory quarantine in Australia who have complained about intimidating guards, bad food, no fresh towels and no cleaning done (see: https://www.sbs.com.au/…/australians-in-quarantine-at-sydne…).

When the Australian mainstream media have had to grudgingly acknowledge that China has been at this time largely able to stop further spread of the virus, they have spun the myth that this is due to “authoritarian” measures. This is a lie. Indeed the lock downs currently in place in Britain, Spain, Italy, India and many other countries are in many ways stricter than the ones that were in place in China. To be sure, Wuhan had been in a stringent, complete lock down and so were many other parts of Hubei Province. However, Hubei only makes up 4% of China’s population. To be sure, in the rest of China, schools, universities and all non-essential workplaces were also closed as the PRC authorities extended the Chinese New Year holidays that had begun when the outbreak emerged and prioritised saving lives and stopping the spread of the virus over business profits. However, in these parts of China outside Hubei, including in major cities like Beijing and Shanghai, people while discouraged from unnecessary travel and required to wear masks when outside, were still able to move around. By contrast the lock downs in Britain, Spain, Italy, India and many other countries are completely nationwide.

So why has China, at least for now, been able to achieve a victory over the COVID -19 threat? Simply, it is because of the advantages of her socialistic system based on public ownership of the economy and working class rule – despite the fact that the workers state in China is bureaucratically deformed and undermined by the wavering government having allowed too much of a capitalistic private sector. So socialistic state-owned developers in China were mobilised to build two massive brand new hospitals in Wuhan in less than two weeks. They also converted in rapid time, large numbers of public facilities like gymnasiums and cultural halls into makeshift hospitals. This meant that although Wuhan’s hospitals were at the start overwhelmed, before long all COVID-19 patients in China could actually be treated in hospitals rather than be made to self-quarantine at home, as is the case with most corona virus infected people in Australia and the U.S. deemed to be “non-serious cases.” By ensuring that all people confirmed to have COVID-19 were treated in hospital and that others suspected of being infected were moved into either hospitals or centralised quarantine, the PRC guaranteed not only the proper treatment of infected people but, through ensuring that all infected people could be guaranteed food and essentials without having to go shopping for such goods, they ensured that the quarantine of these people was total and thus that they would not spread the disease to others.

Moreover, China also had a massive mobilisation to test people for COVID-19. This included not only specific testing for the corona virus but very frequent temperature testing of people in their homes, workplaces and at public transport venues in order to identify people who were more likely to have been infected. As a result COVID-19 patients or those considered likely to be infected could be identified early and sent for treatment and quarantine.

Meanwhile, Chinese state-owned manufacturers – even aircraft manufacturers, car factories and oil giants – were quickly turned into factories making masks, ventilators, personal protective gear for medics, thermometers and testing kits. Such a mobilisation on this scale is not possible in capitalist countries because the private manufacturers here are totally driven by profit and will only agree to switch production if they can make a quick buck out of it. Similarly, if private developers in Australia had been asked to build a massive brand new hospital in ten days they would have demanded a massive premium for such an urgent construction and would have wasted days if not weeks haggling for a bloated price before even thinking about starting construction. In contrast, in the PRC, not only does the socialistic public sector put social needs above profit but because the smaller private enterprises are beholden to the large public sector that dominates the markets and supply chains and because private firms have a tenuous existence under a workers state, even some private companies felt compelled to join the mobilisation to provide for the medical relief effort.

A society dominated by a collectivist economy breeds a collectivist, community spirit amongst its people. So in China, during a crisis, people, by and large, have a sense of civic duty and community responsibility. To be sure, given that there is also a sizeable private sector in China that operates alongside the socialistic state sector and which operates largely on the capitalist mode, the dog-eat-dog mentality dominant in capitalist countries has infected Chinese society to some degree and there were some cases of selfish behaviour by individuals during the outbreak. Moreover, in a country with a population 60 times that of Australia’s, one could find a few cases too of over-zealousness by local officials. And the Western media did their best to try and find such isolated cases and deviously portray them as the norm in China. So too did Australian prime minister Scott Morrison when he deceptively claimed, at a recent news conference, that China’s response to COVID-19 was typified by welding doors shut to quarantine people (how many actual cases of that happening in China were there – like five cases in a country with a population of 1439 million!). But for all the cases of self-centred behaviour by a small number of individuals and the cases of bureaucratic heavy-handedness by a few Chinese local government officials, the big picture reality is that China’s current victory over the virus threat is in good part due to the overall community, collectivist spirit of her people – a spirit that has been created by the dominance in the PRC of the socialist economic mode. It was this spirit that led to a massive grassroots mobilisation in China to respond to the COVID-19 threat. Neighbourhood collectives, Communist Party of China local committees and volunteers organised to ensure deliveries of food and other essentials to people in lock down or quarantine as well as for vulnerable people like the elderly and disabled. They also organised frequent temperature testing for people in their own neighbourhoods. Meanwhile, they provided care for the children and even pets of nurses and doctors from other provinces who volunteered to join the emergency medical brigades to Hubei Province.

The capitalist Australian media are doing their best to mask this truth about China’s mobilisation to overcome the virus threat. Other than spreading the tale about “authoritarian methods,” the other way that the media are shrouding the truth about Red China’s stunning mobilisation is by trying to find some capitalist country that they can hold up as a positive model of successful response to the virus threat so that people don’t focus on the elephant in the room when it comes to successful response – Red China. The country that the Western media have designated to be their capitalist positive model is South Korea. Yet South Korea’s rate of COVID-19 infection among its people at 188 cases per million people is more than three times China’s and is actually in fact slightly higher than Australia’s rapidly climbing infection rate is at this point. And South Korea’s number of deaths per million people is already 35% higher than China’s and is climbing at a much higher rate than China’s death rate is climbing. This is despite China having had the added difficulty of being the country where the virus first spread in a big way (at least in terms of known spread) and thus had to not only take time to recognise and identify the threat but had to develop treatment methods from scratch. The fact is that the model of successful response to COVID-19 is socialistic China and not capitalist South Korea.

Tragically, at this time 3304 people have died from COVID-19 in China as part of the more than 35,000 people who have been killed by the disease worldwide. Our solidarity and heartfelt condolences go out to the friends, loved ones and families of all the victims of the virus in Australia, China and the entire world. But to put things in perspective, the number of deaths per million people in China from COVID-19 is not only significantly lower than in South Korea but it is already (as of 30 March) three times lower than in Germany, three and a half times lower than in the U.S., six and a half times lower than in Sweden, nine times lower than in Britain, 17 times lower than in France and nearly 85 times lower than in Italy. (see the second last column in this real time table for example: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries ). This is despite the virus having basically been contained, at least for now, in China while it is spreading at an frighteningly increasing rate in these capitalist countries.

The PRC has now moved in a big way to provide aid to other countries affected or potentially affected by the virus. In Iran, the worst hit country outside Europe and the U.S., China actually first sent in medical experts to help with the virus response on February 29, when she was still in the heaviest days of her own battle with COVID-19. In Iraq, a PRC medical team helped establish a new COVID-19 testing facility that has quadrupled the daily testing capacity of that war-torn country. Meanwhile, the PRC has sent several sets of medical experts as well as large amounts of ventilators, medical masks, testing kits, medicines and protective equipment for nurses and doctors to the country with currently the world’s highest death toll, Italy. China has also flown in medical experts and/or donated badly needed medical supplies to Cuba, Laos, Ethiopia, South Africa, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Algeria, the Philippines, Egypt, Chile, Cambodia, Serbia, Spain, France, South Korea, Japan and dozens of other countries.

That so much can be achieved by a socialistic country so squeezed by the relentless pressure of richer imperialist powers – and one which is undermined by the intrusion of capitalistic enterprises and weakened by the lack of genuine workers democracy – shows what we could achieve in a fully socialist world. At this time of public health emergency and with millions of working class people in Australia and the rest of the capitalist world being thrown out of their livelihoods every day we need to fight all the more energetically for a society based on public ownership and working class state power.

Resist the Anti-Chinese Racism Sweeping Through Australia

Above photo: The Christmas Island detention centre where Chinese-Australians who had recently been in Wuhan are being held.

MIXED MESSAGES & RACIST TRAVEL BANS
FROM THE CAPITALIST AUSTRALIAN REGIME

WHILE RED CHINA RESPONDS TO THE COVID-19 THREAT
WITH SOCIALIST PLANNING AND BY BUILDING
TWO LARGE NEW HOSPITALS IN TWO WEEKS

Resist the New Strain of Anti-Chinese Racism Sweeping Through Australia

5 February 2020 – People of Chinese ethnicity in Australia are once again under attack. The latest bout of anti-Asian racism is being masked as fear of the novel coronavirus. People of East Asian appearance have been abused on public transport, at shopping centres, in schools and even at hospital waiting rooms. In a typical incident in Sydney, a white person yelled at an Asian background mother travelling on a train with her baby in a pram. The despicable racist demanded that the Asian-Australian woman go to a corner of the train because she was “spreading viruses.” Meanwhile, last Friday in Port Hedland, a Woolworths staff member threateningly ordered customers of Asian appearance out of the store over supposed virus fears.

Anti-Chinese racism is hardly new in Australia. From the time of Captain Cook’s landing 250 years ago, the colonial regime’s murderous dispossessing of Aboriginal people has infected the culture of Australian society with virulent racism. Daily nourished by the capitalist ruling class’ ever present need to divert the anger of the masses whom they exploit away from they the exploiters and onto racial minorities, the virus of white supremacy has been able to mutate into many different strains. That is why the number one migrant-based target of racist attacks will swap from Chinese migrants, to the Vietnamese community, to South Asian students, to Muslims, to African (and especially Sudanese) youth and back again to people of Chinese background. Overall, the Chinese community have probably been second only to Australia’s brutally oppressed Aboriginal people in being hit with White Australia racism. Many of the diseased racists attacking the community today are hardly genuinely concerned about the coronavirus. Indeed, some of the people they are targeting are not even of Chinese origin – let alone recent arrivals from China. But the rednecks hardly care. For them anyone of East Asian appearance and indeed any person of colour is “fair” game.

The spread of anti-Asian bigotry is being encouraged by Australia’s capitalist elite. The newspapers in Australia owned by billionaire magnates Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan have sought to spread prejudice against the Chinese community. Sydney’s The Daily Telegraph had a huge front page headline, deliberately written in bold text made to read as a command, that shouted, “China Kids Stay Home.” However, what has most spawned xenophobic fears are the actions of the right-wing Morrison government. On Saturday, they announced an outright, temporary travel ban on Chinese nationals and other non-citizens who have arrived from China. As a result over a 100,000 international students from China are not able to return for the start of classes. Many are furious at the Australian regime. And because the government’s ban was implemented without any notice, a large number of people were left stranded when they arrived in Australia only to find that a ban on them had been decreed while they were mid-flight. In Sydney airport alone, some 80 Chinese people were detained, many of whom were interrogated for hours while being denied access to food. Many of these people were either then placed into detention or were immediately deported back to China regardless of their health. The Chinese embassy has rightly condemned this outrage and called for compensation for the victims of this draconian policy.

The Australian regime’s travel ban goes directly against the recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO) warning against such actions. Yesterday, the WHO head emphatically stated that:

“We reiterate our call to all countries not to impose restrictions inconsistent with the International Health Regulations.

“Such restrictions can have the effect of increasing fear and stigma, with little public health benefit.”

Very few other countries have applied the same blanket ban on arrivals of non-citizens from China as Australia has done. Those countries that have are Trump’s United States, Rodrigo Duterte’s Philippines, Benjamin Netanyahu’s Israel and Narendra Modi’s India – all countries administered by vicious, right-wing regimes – as well as the Ardern government in New Zealand, which is a coalition between the social-democratic Labour Party, the Greens and the xenophobic NZ First Party. Russia and Singapore have also imposed harsh restrictions on the entry of Chinese nationals but have not gone as far as the likes of Australia and the U.S.

Where the Australian regime is completely unique is with its quarantining of those Australian citizens evacuated from the virus epicentre of Wuhan in an immigrant detention centre 2,600 kilometres from the mainland in Christmas Island. Even the proudly racist Trump regime has not gone that far! Already many newly arrived evacuees have expressed their outrage at the conditions that they face in the detention centre which is unclean and has poor food. One evacuee, Belinda Chen, who is at the centre with two of her children, told ABC News that “the hygiene issues make it worse than a prison” and that her children were “too scared to touch their beds.” Even the mayor of Christmas Island denounced the government’s policy as “regressive colonial era ideas” that “would create a convict colony.”

The only reason that the government has implemented such outrageously heartless measures is because most of the evacuees are of Chinese ethnicity. You can bet that if the evacuees had been wealthy white businessmen they would not have been dumped in a remote detention centre. And as an Asian-Australian activist, Erin Chew, aptly said of the travel ban:

“When previous viruses happened such as mad cow disease or the swine flu, Australia didn’t ban non-citizens from Britain and the US. Nor was the blame placed on the people in [those countries].”

The Morrison government knows that its policies are doing much to nurture hostility to the Chinese community. The aim of the Liberal-National government is to send a message that it is OK to exclude Chinese and other non-white people. They want to legitimise White Australia xenophobia. Yet the Coalition is hardly alone in doing this. After initially being critical of the Christmas Island detention plan, ALP leader Anthony Albanese has now fallen right in behind the government’s travel ban policies saying yesterday that: “Australia has got to make decisions in our own national interest.” Indeed, it was actually Queensland Labor premier, Annastacia Palaszczuk, who egged on the Morrison government to place the travel ban on people coming from China in the first place. Just hours before the Morrison government announced the ban, Palaszczuk called to stop all incoming flights from China and apply in Australia the same ban implemented by the Trump government. We say: Lift the Morrison/Palaszczuk/Albanese ban on arrivals from China! Support Beijing’s demand for the Australian regime to compensate arrivals from China deported due to the travel ban! Bring everyone from the Christmas Island immigration detention centre to the mainland! Let them stay in their own homes! Free too all the refugees and other immigrants detained in Christmas Island, Nauru, Manus Island, Villawood and other Australian migrant detention centres!

IRRATIONAL FEAR-MONGERING, INADEQUATE PUBLIC HEALTH MOBILISATION, RACIST FAKE NEWS AND SOME MORE RATIONAL SPECULATION

The Australian government’s xenophobic policies under the guise of containing the new virus outbreak have no scientific basis. In creating an irrational panic about the coronavirus, Australian mainstream politicians and media are spreading a thinly veiled racist message: that people ought to be scared about the “evils” coming from China. At the same time, the Australian regime has failed to mobilise the health and production resources needed to provide sufficient testing of people with symptoms, adequate numbers of testing kits and enough protective masks for health workers. Moreover, they have been incapable of ensuring the creation of adequate public hospital beds and spare capacity in the health system to deal with a potential rapid virus spread in this country. For the coronavirus is indeed infectious and deadly. To date 492 people have died from it worldwide.

Thanks to the swift action of the Peoples Republic of China’s (PRC) authorities and their transparency in sharing information, the spread of coronavirus outside China is at the moment – at the start of February – limited. To be sure, if the virus were to spread widely into countries with less capable health and social systems than China, the effects could be devastating. And even though Australia is a wealthier country, you can’t rule out the possibility, given that everything in capitalist societies run for the sake of profits for the big end of town, combined with the Australian regime’s tendency to swap xenophobia for sound scientific practice, that the ruling class here and similar capitalist ruling classes abroad will botch their response to the new virus.

Encouraged by the xenophobia and anti-China bias of Australia’s mainstream media, conscious white supremacists here are spreading fake news stories in order to create hostility to the Chinese community. One social media post, that went viral, masquerading as if it was from Queensland Health, warned people to avoid suburbs in Brisbane with a certain proportion of Chinese background residents in order to avoid contracting the virus.

Meanwhile, within Chinese communities, there is widespread speculation that the new virus was spread by the U.S. regime as a New Cold War attack on Red China and to help Trump get the advantage in his trade protectionist campaign against the PRC. Unlike the racist fake news stories, this speculation is more plausible. This is because U.S. intelligence agencies have actually used such biological warfare methods in the past – namely, against socialistic Cuba. To damage the Cuban economy, the CIA once spread swine fever in Cuba causing Cuba to have to slaughter 500,000 pigs. Most seriously, in 1981, the CIA spread dengue fever in the island causing the death of 158 Cubans. What has heightened speculation about the virus outbreak were findings by Chinese scientists reported by China’s official state media seven days ago. The scientists found that contrary to interim findings that the virus had spread entirely from Wuhan’s Seafood Wholesale Market, the virus appeared to have spread from multiple locations (see: http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-01/29/c_138741063.htm). In the rare case that a virus jumps from an animal to a human, it is likely that this will occur at one location and then the virus will spread from one human carrier to the next. Should multiple animal to human transmissions occur, the probability that they will take place almost simultaneously at multiple locations is tiny. So if initial transmissions to humans did, in fact, occur almost simultaneously at multiple locations, this opens up the possibility that the virus was deliberately spread. One of the telling things about the 1981 dengue fever “outbreak” in Cuba is that it started simultaneously in three different parts of the country. Nevertheless, to date, there is no direct evidence that the coronavirus was started by U.S. intelligence agencies. What there is evidence of is that while the coronavirus was first discovered in Wuhan, the human form of the virus may not have initially started in Wuhan or even in China but rather was accidentally brought there from abroad by carriers with mild symptoms and then spread rapidly once it got into the Wuhan’s Seafood Wholesale Market. Experts in Japan have suggested that a few of the 14,000 people who died of influenzalike symptoms during the last U.S. flu season may have actually died of the coronavirus rather than influenza but the U.S. health system at the time had not picked up that they were victims of a new virus.

ANTI-CHINESE BIGOTRY WAS ALREADY RAMPANT
BEFORE THE NEW CORONAVIRUS EMERGED

The new strain of anti-Chinese racism spreading through Australia in recent weeks is hitting a Chinese community already under attack. From racist assaults against Chinese high-school and university students in Canberra bus stops and class rooms to violent attacks on Asian-background residents in busy Sydney suburban streets in Randwick and Burwood, the last three years have seen a wave of violence and abuse directed at people of Chinese heritage. There are three factors spawning this outbreak. First is the racist scapegoating that the capitalist rulers engage in against all people of colour in order to blame others for the social decay, lack of secure jobs for young people and lack of affordable rental accommodation caused by their system. Second is the growing economic nationalism in Australia. Those who claim to stand for workers interests (like the ALP and Greens) but who have no program for militant struggle against the real cause of unemployment, casualisation and low wages – that is, the capitalist bosses and their greed – seek to improve conditions for the masses by setting them up to support protectionist schemes against foreign guest workers and imported goods. Such economic nationalist schemes do not protect the interests of local workers. Overseas producers simply respond with their own counter-measures and all that ends up happening is that workers of different countries are set against each other leaving the Aussie bosses as well as the overseas cohort of capitalists laughing all the way to the bank. Regardless of the intentions of those who promote it, such economic nationalist schemes inevitably rebound against local migrant communities who become targeted as a fifth column of the overseas producers supposedly “stealing Aussie jobs.” Given that China is by far Australia’s largest trading partner it is inevitable that the xenophobia spawned by protectionist agendas especially targets people of Chinese background.

The biggest factor that has germinated anti-Chinese racism in recent years is the Australian ruling class’ anti-communist campaign against socialistic China. Australian politicians and mainstream media are making increasingly hyped-up claims against China. They accuse the PRC of everything from cyber-hacking, to “threatening Australia’s sovereignty,” to supposed bullying behaviour in the South China Sea. The most ridiculous claim is the one that “China is imprisoning over one million Muslim Uighurs.” This assertion has about as much credibility as the fake news stories doing the rounds saying that eating certain Asian food like fortune cookies could spread the coronavirus! The outright lie about the detention of Uighurs is spread by some of the most openly Islamophobic regimes in the world, including the Trump regime, the Morrison regime and fascist-infested governments in Switzerland and Austria. However, the lie is so grotesque that it has been completely refuted by most Muslim majority countries, not only those friendly to China like Palestine, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Algeria, Djibouti, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Iran, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan but even by many Muslim-majority governments thoroughly subservient to Washington like those in Bahrain, Egypt, Kuwait, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Yemen. The effect of all this anti-communist, anti-China propaganda is that backward parts of the Australian population come to see Chinese people as savage and as a “threat” to Australia’s people. This became heightened further last year during the anti-communist protests by pro-colonial, rich kids in China’s Hong Kong. While Australia’s establishment hailed students who held rallies in Australia supporting the anti-PRC rioters in Hong Kong as “expressing their right to free speech”, international students from China who expressed their right to free speech by bravely rallying in defence of Red China were pilloried for “interfering in Australia’s internal affairs.” Most sinisterly, early last spring, the Australian government announced the creation of a new Federal Government taskforce to look into “foreign interference” on Australian campuses – a move clearly aimed at intimidating pro-PRC Chinese students studying in Australia.

The anti-communist section of the Chinese community has also played an active part in the campaign against the PRC and her local Chinese and international student supporters. Even though anti-Chinese prejudice could rebound against them, they have nourished a movement that combines anti-communism with white supremacist racism. Thus, Hong Kong anti-PRC students distributed at a rally that they held in Sydney’s Martin Place last year a leaflet calling to keep out of Australia migrants from the PRC. Meanwhile, members of the far-right Chinese group Falun Dafa – that masquerades as a religious group but which has an agenda of racial segregation, the shunning of mixed race people as “subhuman,” extreme homophobia and hostility to women’s rights movements – has held joint meetings with violent Australian white supremacist forces.

CHINA’S RESPONSE TO THE VIRUS EMERGENCY SHOWS
THE GREAT ADVANTAGES OF THE SOCIALIST SYSTEM

China’s response to the new virus outbreak is a stunning refutation to all the propaganda spread against her. She has responded with humanity, speed and coordination. Fortunately, China has not gone down Morrison’s road of holding anyone who has been in Hubei in remote detention centres. Instead, people have been asked to self-quarantine at home and wear masks when outside. Those ill are moved into hospital and many people who are thought more likely to have been infected have been moved into hotels or newly furbished accommodation in public buildings. What has enabled China to respond so effectively is that, despite her wavering leadership having allowed too much capitalism into the economy, the PRC remains a socialistic society in which public ownership plays the dominant role. And it is the PRC’s socialistic state-owned enterprises that have been at the forefront of her response to the virus epidemic. State-owned energy companies are providing free electricity and gas supplies to makeshift new hospitals and state-owned pharmaceutical manufacturers are leading the drive to provide badly needed medical supplies. One state-owned developer even built a 1000-bed hospital in just 10 days in the virus epicentre of Wuhan. Try doing that in a capitalist country! A capitalist developer would demand a massive premium for mobilising that amount of labour and raw materials in such a short time. Here, reconstruction for most of those who lost homes in the bushfires has not even started, even for those who lost homes early in the fire season.

In capitalist countries, the system runs for the profit of the business owners. During the bushfires, many business owners and supermarkets here got away with cruelly jacking up their prices to take advantage of desperate bushfire victims. But in China, when some tried that – including outlets of French supermarket chain Carrefour – they were promptly stomped on by PRC state authorities. Meanwhile, even private business owners in China have been ordered to step up production of masks and medical kits to aid the medical emergency. This reflects the fact that the PRC – for all its bureaucratic deformations and its leaders’ concessions to world capitalism – is a workers state that was created by the 1949 revolution. One way that the PRC state has moved to limit the spread of the virus is by extending the Lunar New Year holiday. While we only get one day off for New Year, in China they already get one day off for January 1 plus five week days off for Lunar New Year (people in the PRC get a minimum of 18 workdays off for public holidays each year as opposed to 9 for most people here). Now the Lunar New Year is being extended across China by a few days and in some regions by much longer. If a government tried to do that here, the capitalists, whom the governments ultimately answer to, would have the measure stopped as they are not about to let their filthy profits plummet by giving workers longer holidays. Meanwhile, back in China, the empowerment that the masses feel in a workers state has led to a huge grassroots mobilisation to respond to the crisis. Teams of volunteers are being established to provide food for potentially infected people self-quarantining. Neighbourhood committees are organising people to go around with loudspeakers spreading scientific information about the virus. Celebrities and entertainers are providing free live streaming entertainment and exercise programs to liven up the moods of those stuck at home due to self-quarantining.

OPPOSING ANTI-CHINESE RACISM MEANS
OPPOSING THE COLD WAR DRIVE AGAINST THE PRC

Everyone who is not blinded by either white supremacy, “First World” arrogance or anti-communist hostility can see that the PRC is doing an excellent job responding to a serious virus outbreak in a developing country with a population density fifty times greater than Australia’s. Following an inspection trip to China, WHO Director General, Dr Tedros Ghebreyesus hailed China’s mobilisation:

“China identified the pathogen in record time and shared it immediately, which led to the rapid development of diagnostic tools. They are completely committed to transparency, both internally and externally….

“The fact that to date we have only seen 68 cases outside China, and no deaths, is due in no small part to the extraordinary steps the government has taken to prevent the export of cases. For that, China deserves our gratitude and respect. They’re doing that at the expense of their economy and other factors.”


Press briefing on WHO Mission to China and novel coronavirus outbreak, 29 January 2020, WHO website (see: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/press-briefing-on-who-mission-to-china-and-novel-coronavirus-outbreak)

Yet the capitalist-owned Western media are desperately thrashing around trying to find some angle that they can attack the PRC over. So are those sections of the Australian Left – unfortunately the majority right now – who are lined up behind the capitalist class’ Cold War drive against the PRC state. Thus, the Socialist Alternative (SAlt) group, in an article published two days ago, claimed that: “When it comes to the political system, there’s no denying that local authorities in Hubei province tried to hush up the outbreak in December. Chinese people suffer from their corrupt political leaders.” Although SAlt do also criticise the U.S. and Australian rulers as well, their attacks on the PRC are even more extreme than the mainstream media which grudgingly has had to acknowledge positive aspects of the PRC’s response to the coronavirus.

At the same time as echoing the anti-China propaganda of the Australian ruling class, SAlt are emphatic in stating opposition to anti-Chinese racism. They are part of a left social democratic and left-liberal milieu who think that it is possible to both join the Cold War crusade against Red China and stand against anti-Chinese racism. Others in this trend include other left groups like Solidarity and Socialist Alliance. The main element, however, and the one who the social democratic “far left” groups pander to is the Greens. The problem is that it is not possible to walk on both sides of the streets in this way! Ever since China’s 1949 anticapitalist revolution created near hysteria amongst the Western capitalist establishment, anti-communist hostility to the PRC has gone hand in hand with anti-Chinese xenophobia. For example, the anti-PRC, “pro-democracy” movement in Hong Kong that these groups all rabidly support, are characterised by a nativist hostility to Chinese people from mainland China. It is hard to fathom but the yuppy rioters in Hong Kong, seeped as they are in the values of the British Empire, believe that, even though they are themselves ethnic Chinese, they are superior to Mainland Chinese because they are closer to being British! No wonder Western, extreme white supremacists have been flocking to join the anti-PRC protests in Hong Kong as have more mainstream hard right forces, like Liberal MP, Tim Wilson. Wilson, who visited Hong Kong to march with the anti-PRC forces, is notorious for having been a director of the extremely conservative, Institute of Public Affairs, as well as for speaking out for the “rights” of vile racist media commentator Andrew Bolt. Today, the pro-colonial opposition in Hong Kong is demanding the complete closure of Hong Kong’s border with mainland China to keep out mainland Chinese. The likes of the Greens, SAlt and Solidarity are in a united front with people in Hong Kong – and their Hong Kong student supporters in Australia – who have as a central plank of their platform a xenophobic measure to keep out people from mainland China that is even more severe than the ones that the Australian government has implemented. Meanwhile, progressive NSW Greens senator David Shoebridge has made common cause with the most hard-right politicians in Australia in his xenophobic opposition to the China-connected Chinese language institute, the Confucius Institutes program.

Stepping back a little, the basic reason why it is not possible, regardless of ones intentions, to consistently oppose anti-Chinese racism if one is supporting the Cold War drive against Red China is that both anti-Chinese racism and hostility to the PRC are policies undertaken by the capitalist rulers because it serves their interests. Racism serves the exploiting class because it divides and diverts the masses that they exploit. Propaganda against the PRC serves Australia’s capitalist rulers because it serves to “justify” their hostile actions against Red China. These actions include a military build up targeted at China, the deployment of Australian naval vessels and aircraft thousands of kilometres away from home in waters off China and Korea and the supporting of anti-PRC Chinese exile organisations. Those actions the Australian capitalists see as necessary because they know that supporting the U.S.-led drive to undermine socialistic rule in China is in their very own interests. Although the Australian capitalists make a fortune from exporting to China, they calculate that they could make even more if socialistic rule was destroyed there so that China could be turned into a giant sweatshop and market for unrestricted capitalist exploitation. Quite bizarrely, while the Australian ruling class opposes the PRC precisely because it remains a socialistic state, groups like SAlt and Solidarity oppose the PRC because they claim that it is actually “capitalist.”

But facts speak loudly. And the fact is that China has responded to the novel coronavirus threat with compassion and with a determined mobilisation that is only possible when the decisive sectors of the economy are in the hands of the people. In contrast, the response of the Australian capitalist regime has been shaped by xenophobia and cruelty. That gives us just one more reason why we need to eradicate capitalist rule in this country: along with the need to stop union-busting attacks on workers rights, to stop the degrading treatment of unemployed workers and to bring secure, permanent jobs for all, alongside the need to end homelessness and achieve a massive increase in public housing, the need to bring true equality for women, the need to stop racist state terror against Aboriginal people and the need to stop the Australian military’s role in imperialist wars abroad and to stop the Australian capitalists raping the people of the South Pacific.

However, capitalism does not fall by people simply saying a lot of times how bad it is. It comes through the masses being trained in struggle against all the particular atrocities of capitalism and against all the contagious ideologies that the capitalist rulers seek to infect the minds of the exploited masses with. That is why we in Trotskyist Platform are proud that we not only stand against anti-Chinese racism but stand against all the different components fuelling it. Today, we fully solidarise with the stand taken by those in the Chinese community who are bravely starting to respond to the epidemic of racism that has accompanied the coronavirus outbreak. We fight for actions to demand: Immediately lift the ban on arrivals from China! Bring everyone from the Christmas Island detention centre to the mainland. Let them stay in their own homes! We also say: Down with protectionism! Down with xenophobic campaigns against Chinese imported goods and investment! Say no to campaigns to keep out guest workers – fight for full rights of citizenship, local pay rates and full union coverage for all guest workers! Very crucially right now we also fight to mobilise struggles to demand: Down with the repressive attempts to silence the political voice of pro-PRC Chinese international students! Down with the Cold War witch-hunt against the Confucius Institutes, Huawei, Chinese international students and Chinese community social groups with links to the PRC! Defend socialistic China against the U.S./Australian capitalist rulers!

We have confidence in the future success of this program, even though xenophobia and Cold War anti-communism is running rampant right now. This is for one simple reason. While this program is against the interests of Australia’s capitalist ruling class it is very good for the vast majority of this country’s people. Working class people and all the oppressed need to fight against racism and xenophobia if they are going to be able to unite into a force capable of challenging their oppressors. Defending socialistic China is in the interests of the masses because having the world’s most populous country remain under at least some sort of socialistic rule enhances the struggle for liberation of the working class and oppressed the world over. Indeed, that is partly why the Australian ruling class has been so nervous about the presence of a large number of international students from China. On the one hand they need these students as a cash cow. On the other hand they are fearful that these students might start telling their Australian class mates and friends that all that they hear from the mainstream media about China is false; and having lived in both socialistic China and one of the more developed of the capitalist countries, Australia, that they still love the PRC and still support socialism. The Australian rulers are fearful that if these pro-PRC students become involved in political activity here, what the Australian regime sees as the virus of support for socialism could spread from China and infect people in Australia too. We say let it spread rampantly! Let as many people know the benefits of socialistic rule – even when it exists in as imperfect and unfinished a form as it currently does in China! The “right to free speech” must include the right to support socialistic countries like the Peoples Republic of China! Down with anti-Chinese racism! Long live socialistic rule in China!

释放Chan Han Choi – 一位在澳大利亚的社会主义者政治犯!

释放Chan Han Choi  –
一位在澳大利亚的社会主义者政治犯!

2019年11月23日,集会,在悉尼的唐人街:
释放Chan Han Choi – 一位在澳大利亚的社会主义者政治犯!

反抗对亲中华人社区的种族主义、扣“赤色分子”帽子式的政治迫害!
为营救澳州政治犯社会主义者Chan Han Choi而斗争!
抵制对左派进行新的冷战政治迫害的黑流!

2019年11月28日: 今天, 华人社区中的亲华群体不仅面临着重新兴起的针对这个国家所有有色人的白澳种族主义, 而且还面临着在正在出现的新冷战时期对社会主义中国支持者的政治迫害环境下的特意污蔑。

澳大利亚正在出现的冷战政治迫害开始扩大, 已经不仅仅针对中国的支持者。这一点在澳大利亚亲朝鲜的社会主义政治犯Chan Han Choi的案件中很为明显。在过去23个月中, 他被无耻地拒绝保释, 部分原因是他是朝鲜支持者, 对此,检方声称这意味着他对澳大利亚没有忠诚。因此, 就像诽谤亲华学生一样, 又发生了人们因赞同或同情社会主义国家而被剥夺权利的案件。

Choi是一名澳大利亚公民,从韩国移民过来差不多已经有31年了。Choi被指控违反联合国经济制裁,帮助朝鲜出口物资。尽管当局在严酷的条件下拘禁他,但他仍然蔑视并要做“无罪”辩护。即使这些针对Choi的指控证实属实,但从工人阶级的角度来看,他当然不是罪犯。恰恰相反!如果Choi确实试图通过交易来帮助朝鲜,这只会证明他冒着巨大的个人风险来帮助朝鲜人民,他们正经受着没有任何其他国家经受过的最严厉的摧残式制裁。 Choi反对制裁不仅基于他的人道主义,而且基于他对朝鲜社会的平等主义和社区精神的热爱。无论人们如何看待朝鲜的某个特别领导人,朝鲜都是一个以所有主要银行,工业,农业用地和矿山的集体所有制为基础的工人国家。在支持这种基于公有制的社会主义国家的过程中,Choi和所有遭受以资本主义私有制为主的经济而带来的痛苦的澳大利亚人的利益是一致的。他和遭受资本主义社会造成的种族主义暴力和虐待的澳大利亚原住民以及亚洲,穆斯林和非洲少数民族社区是站在一起的。所以澳大利亚和世界的工人阶级有必要支持Chan Han Choi。我们现在必须要求清除对他所有指控。

除了拒绝Choi保释外,澳大利亚政府还限制支持者访问他,切断他的电话,阻止他的儿子去监狱里探望他,并阻止他的律师去访问。剥夺他的权利以及基于他对朝鲜的支持而否决他的保释是澳大利亚新兴的冷战式政治迫害社会主义国家支持者的一部分。这种逐渐侵入的麦卡锡主义也出现在澳大利亚华人社区的成员和中国国际学生中,他们被澳大利亚国家和媒体妖魔化,只是为了他们对红色中国的同情, 现在也受到了迫害 。

世界各地的所有人都反对帝国主义的欺凌行为,那些代表基于社会主义公有制的制度的人和反对冷战式政治迫害左翼的人有必要参加竞选活动,以要求释放Chan Han Choi。我们还有必要与Choi一起反对资本主义大国,利用制裁来对朝鲜人民进行经济恐吓,使他们默许资本主义征服,以及亿万富翁,西方银行家,房地产投机商和血汗工厂老板的收购。帝国主义对朝鲜的压力最终也是为了破坏其邻国和盟国中国的社会主义政权。