Q&A Forum: March 11, 2019

Posted in Open Forum | 112 Comments

The business of business is no longer business

The business of business is no longer business.  It is now something completely different.

Nowadays the business of business is a cocktail of social and socialist agendas funded through higher than necessary prices by businesses protected from competition by government.  It is the most recent incarnation of stamocap, state monopoly capitalism.

If you are a business who wants to engage in business, you need to find a new business to engage in.

A whole new industrial complex has emerged from the new NGO sector seeking to shape, promote and propagate social policy through business and the private sector.  Why bother nationalising business and industry when government and its NGO acolytes can achieve the same political outcomes without the political costs.

Have a look a the work of social NGOs such as the Australian Institute of Company Directors, the ASX Corporate Governance Council and business schools who no longer seem have any interest in identifying and teaching best business practice.  It is now about best social practice.

Consider this.  The UTS business school last week hosted a discussion titled The Banking Royal Commission: How Should Business Schools Respond.  And at this discussion, Walter Jarvis, the director of the UTS Master of Management course said:

business was about serving society and that meant looking after not just shareholders but all stakeholders

For those who did not hear that properly, let’s just repeat that:

business was about serving society and that meant looking after not just shareholders but all stakeholders

Business used to be about delivering a product or service above the cost of production to customers who were prepared to VOLUNTARILY pay for that product or service, and ideally come back.  Yes, employees, shareholders and broader stakeholders were important, but at the core, at the center, was the customer.  Much like the tax payer, the customer is no longer that important.  Customers, in the mine of the business socialisation industrial complex, are a nice but not necessary ingredient.

Reflect upon your local butcher shop, trying to deal with rising electricity prices, rising rent and rising labour costs trying to sell its products to customers at a price they are prepared to pay.  Sitting of an evening, rather than going through sales and costs figures, said butcher is working on strategies to ensure that he only sources methane neutral meat and that he has an appropriate gender balance on his staff and board – and if he does not have a board, working out how to get a board with at least 30% women.

And thanks to the National Party, the Hayne Royal Commission has turbocharged this process of quasi-nationalisation.  While the Hayne Banking Royal Commission was an important process, it failed to ask the fundamental question and as a consequence the conclusions and recommendations address the wrong issues.  In case there are any politicians or political staffers reading, let’s try to explain this another way.

Consider the following scenario.  You have the people who build stadiums (unrelated to Allianz) and ensure a constant supply of Christians, you have the lions and you have the Christians.

If the lions kill and eat the Christians, who carries most of the blame?  It’s not the Christians.  Perhaps the lions have some blame, but they are behaving as lions behave.  The greatest share of blame belongs to the people who build the stadiums , ensure the constant supply of Christians and subsidise the breeding of lions.

In contemporary Australian financial services, the Stadium builders and Christian suppliers are the Government.  They created giant financial system edifice through things like the RBA, ASIC and APRA.  They then made sure there was a steady supply of Christians through compulsory superannuation and financial services laws.  And when the Christians were killed, they blamed the lions.

But it all makes sense because the academy and the experts agree it is the fault of the lions.  After all, there are no consulting fees and lectures to give if the government, dare it be said, got the hell out of the way.

The new and current business of business is compliance and tax revenue generation.  Customers, well, they are for the textbooks.  Old textbooks for historians to study.

Posted in Uncategorized | 28 Comments

Monday Forum: March 11, 2019

Posted in Open Forum | 360 Comments

What if this is true?

The presentation seems low-key for what he says but the content is deadly serious. And everyone in the video speaks as plainly as one could wish about all the events described.

I will also say that I had watched AOC’s examination of a series of witnesses in a Congressional committee shown early in the video and had been astonished by it. It was both extraordinarily polished and deep. She is also bizarrely confident for a 29-year-old who has just arrived in Congress. Nothing intimidates her. She is clearly not on her own. The only person I didn’t recognise in the video was Mr Reagan.

I have also gone looking high and low to see who else has presented this video. It shows up in a few places, each time with a disclaimer about conspiracy theories, but that is not what surprises me. In politics all kinds of people work together to achieve ends. Rather it is how open all this is and how relatively easy it was to find the evidence presented. Who would have expected that the Deep State existed in such a brazen way? So why not this as well?

The video was picked up by Karabar in a previous comments thread for which I am grateful.

Posted in American politics, Politics of the Left | 78 Comments

Let’s get Zuckerberg

As many Cats know I’m a huge fan of Facebook and Google too. Those two organisations provide extremely valuable services and are so good at what they do that many of their competitors are struggling. As such they have come to the attention of various nay-sayers.

To be clear – there is plenty to criticise. Mistakes are being made. Okay. But here is the thing – these are genuinely entrepreneurial ventures undertaking greenfield innovation. It is very much a trial and error process.

Some criticisms, however, are unfair or just downright silly. In response to a  rather bland (I think) essay on privacy by Mark Zuckerberg the MIT Technology Review published an op-ed calling for Facebook to be broken up.  It contained this gem:

If Facebook is constantly sending you push notifications, it diminishes the mental space you have available for tinkering and coming up with your own ideas. If Facebook bombards the gullible with misinformation, this too is an invasion of privacy.

But “Facebook” does not send you “push notifications”. “Facebook” does not “bombard the gullible with misinformation”. Your “friends” send you notifications, your “friends” bombard you with misinformation. Choose your “friends” wisely.

Posted in Technology & Telco | 51 Comments

Muddy: It’s a Cat-word Thing.

Well, well, well, look what the Catictionary dragged in!

To avoid any further horrendous puns – hand over your NEW words (with definitions please) quick-smart.

As examples of what I’m looking for, the following have been plucked from various threads since the last round:

ARTISANARIANISM from Stimpson J. Cat (inspired by Infidel ‘Artisan’ Tiger, I believe); VIGILTAINMENT courtesy of C.L;

PITH-HEAD by the one-and-only Carpe Jugulum;

Notafan’s HORRONATED;

and for the sake of my touch-deprived ego: POLARAZZI, and URBIGENOUS, by yours truly.

To those whose suggestions I have rejected – please keep trying. You might feel better knowing that all contributions pass through a rigorous quality control process, otherwise known as the Yeah-but-Nah Test.

Please let me know if any of the strays I have picked up since the last round were NOT your own originals. As much as some of you have created apt and entertaining redefinitions of existing words, as a simple Muddy with a simply-functioning cognitive process, I want to keep this, well … what’s the word? So I’ve chosen to focus on new/original words only.

The plan is to harass you another two or perhaps three times in the coming months, before I present the whole of the Catictionary – this year’s contributions, plus your old favourites – towards the end of 2019.

Posted in Guest Post | 36 Comments

Jane! Jane! Jane!

The magnificent Jane Hume eating Julian Burnside alive on national television.

Notice Julian wagging his finger and telling Jane “Don’t interrupt”.

Posted in Hypocrisy of progressives, Politics | 29 Comments

What is the technical term used to describe an anti-semitic socialist?

NAZI.

The left has gone truly bonkers, vile and repulsive.

The rest is from Ace of Spades from a while ago but the same thing is found everywhere, except in the newspapers or on the media. They did end up passing the resolution to condemn “hate”. Hate is not a policy, but an emotion. What they really mean to condemn is racism, but since they are defending rascists, they have to obfuscate once again. Dark times ahead.

So The Alleged House Condemnation of Antisemitism Is Already Watered Down, and Now the Congressional Black Caucus and Progressive Caucus are Delaying It

As David Harsanyi wrote, the resolution which is supposedly a condemnation of antisemtism is so deliberately vague so as not to offend actual antisemites.

Democrats’ draft measure condemning anti-Semitism, which the House will vote on this Wednesday, is a useless and transparent attempt to distract from a serious problem. The melodramatic resolution mentions Alfred Dreyfuss, Leo Frank, Henry Ford, and “anti-Muslim bigotry”–because, hey, even when Jews are being smeared it’s about Islamophobia, but not once does it condemn Rep. Ilhan Omar or the strain of Jew-hatred she is helping normalize on the left. The resolution, teeming with useless platitudes, is one that even Omar could probably support.

But even that’s too much.

Even watered down to the point of saying nothing, it’s still too aggressive a statement for an idea — Jew-hating — that is all too popular in some communities.

I guess “GOAT” Farrakhan has some problems with the resolution.

Meanwhile, Alexandria Donkey-Chompers is defending Ilhan Omar’s antisemtism by making up Whataboutism situations that didn’t actually happen.

This is PDT discussing the vote in Congress.

Posted in Politics of the Left | 14 Comments

Open Forum: March 9, 2019

Posted in Open Forum | 1,381 Comments

Currency Lad: Fairfax Goes Full Heffernan …

… and you should never go full Heffernan.

An ex-seminarian known as ‘‘Joe’’ came forward alleging that Pell and several other priests had, 10 to 15 years earlier, been having sex with Mannix College trainee clerics at ‘‘parties … involving young men’’.

Joe was not a strong witness. He wanted $20,000 for compromising photographs that appeared to be of Pell and others engaged in sexual acts, but could not produce the negatives. Despite this, Ms Last felt she could not dismiss Joe’s allegations…It is believed that ‘‘Joe’’ has not pursued the matter. The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald have been unable to contact him.

There are a lot of “Joes” in the white pages, I guess. By “not pursued the matter,” Fairfax means that “Joe” – if he is still alive – has decided there are no gullible dopes left to fleece in 2019. He’s wrong about that, of course. If you’re reading this, Joe, get in touch with Fairfax or Victoria Police with those “photographs.” They’ll pay you a lot more than 20 large.

Speaking of Fairfax, here’s a flashback to April, 2011:

Heffernan, who was then cabinet secretary to the prime minister, John Howard, had been spreading the accusation among colleagues and media since at least mid-1999 without gaining much traction. However, in late 2000 he had met secretly in a motel with Wayne Patterson, who had been the prime minister’s driver.

Patterson handed over a thin sheaf of photocopied documents – supposedly driver records – which Heffernan described in the Senate as concrete evidence of trips in which Kirby used cars to pick up and return a ”young male companion”.

The photocopied documents were false. Somebody went to vast and extraordinary lengths to falsely accuse and frame Justice Kirby, a brilliant and highly respected High Court justice. Imagine that.

Posted in Guest Post | 31 Comments