I think we’ve reached a weird place in our history where Buzzfeed, BUZZFEED, is reporting news and people are surprised that’s it’s not accurate. It’s Buzzfeed people, take it with the same grain of salt/humor you do The Onion
-
-
-
BuzzFeed News is a Pulitzer Prize nominated organization. They have credibility.
-
For what it’s worth I’m hoping their reporting is accurate and they can prove what they’ve reported; it’s a big bomb to drop and to have it be a dud with no backup/evidence is a horrendous call to publish
-
Oh, 100%. It's also important to note that the SCO didn't outright deny the report, just dispute certain parts of it - what those parts are will probably remain unknown until Mueller's report is finalized.
-
Clinging to that last bit of hope
-
No, just putting things in context. If mueller comes out and says Trump had absolutely nothing to do with Russia I’ll accept that. Tough pill to swallow maybe, but I trust the SCO.
-
I'm no Trump supporter, I don't know if Trump is guilty, hoping he isn't because that will be bad for our country, but look at how many bombshell stories like this have been published in the last two years with most of them being false. Clickbate, making money off Trump hate
- 2 pang sagot
Bagong usapan -
-
-
because you're a lying loser who can't get out of his own way. When I was a news director at an ABC affiliate, I wouldn't have hired you to empty to trash. You should be apologizing and show some remorse after being debunked by Mueller himself. Wow.
-
You should show some professional restraint and some reading comprehension. Mueller’s office didn’t refute any specific allegations.
-
Mueller wouldn’t say anything. The fact he came out and said anything means it WAY WRONG. Mueller’s group is tight lipped
-
Read what Mueller wrote Example: Trump bought 300 hamburgers he said it was 1000 at the end of the day the hamburgers were there the number was off Same premise
-
You mean Hamberders. but nope! Mueller wouldn’t come out and say anything if it was a small detail. His team doesn’t speak out to correct small errors
-
Actually he would Because the dems have oversight and he knows that unlike the 115th, 116th congress will investigate the claim. Feb 8th we will find out, when Cohen testifys to Congress. You know this will be one of the first questions out of the gate.
-
Lol! Nope, but stay in denial. Dems investigating everything. he could have just told them if it was a slight detail. Nothing is stopping the Dems investigations. Seems like others are saying the proof of Trump giving the order is one of the false things. So like the main point
-
He said just that
- 1 pang sagot
Bagong usapan -
-
-
1st time Mueller speaks out in almost 2 years, is to make sure he doesn't have to report to a Dem House as
@SenBlumenthal & Sen@ChrisMurphyCT were starting to demand. Mueller obviously wants to hide all this from the American people to protect Republicanism. Remember Comey 2016? -
No. Not going there. There's something Mueller doesn't want to reveal yet and the Dems were beginning to press.
-
Then he needs to provide some interim reportage. He knows good and damn well he will lose credibility soon. This is America. Not some authoritarian government with secrets running everything.
-
He does, all the time. We’ve had multiple convictions. People have confessed to serious crimes. Assets have been seized, more than paying for the SCO. People have gone to jail. A judge just granted the grand jury an extension. A great deal has been revealed already.
Katapusan ng usapan
Bagong usapan -
Ang paglo-load ay mukhang natatagalan.
Maaaring lumagpas na sa kapasidad ang Twitter o nakakaranas ng panandaliang problema. Subukan muli o bisitahin ang Twitter Status para sa karagdagang impormasyon.