New Left Review I/51, September-October 1968
Jacques Lacan
The Mirror-Phase as Formative of the Function of the I
The conception of the mirror-phase which I introduced at our last congress, 13 years ago, has since become more or less established in the practice of the French group; I think it nevertheless worthwhile to bring it again to your attention, especially today, for the light that it sheds on the formation of the I as we experience it in psychoanalysis. [1] Translator’s note—‘I’ is used here and throughout to translate Lacan’s ‘je’, in ‘le je’, ‘la fonction du je’, etc. ‘Ego’ translates ‘le moi’ and is used in the normal sense of psychoanalytic literature. On ‘je’, see note 2 below. It is an experience which leads us to oppose any philosophy directly issuing from the Cogito.
Subscribe for just £36 and get free access to the archive Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3 |
’My institution subscribes to NLR, why can't I access this article?’
Related articles:
- Richard Wollheim: Psychoanalysis and Feminism
- Lacan Study Group: 'Psychoanalysis and Feminism'
- Jean Roussel: Introduction to Jacques Lacan
- Nancy Chodorow, Eli Zaretsky: 'Psychoanalysis and Feminism': Rejoinder to Wollheim
- Richard Wollheim: Reply to Critics
- Christopher Lasch: The Freudian Left and Cultural Revolution
- Michele Barrett, Mary McIntosh: Narcissism and the Family: A Critique of Lasch