-
-
-
No!! It’s broken from the top down! But nice try!!
-
Where does the “top” start?As you know, we have 3 EQUAL branches of government. All are a part of a broken democracy?Is this what you are saying? If true the legislative branch is also broken and these laws the Dem controlled House are pushing should be void. Too broken to count.
-
JCoulter, from the tone of your tweets, and putting words in others mouths with the technique of then asking if that is what they meant, it seems likely that you do not actually care what they meant but are using a rhetorical device to avoid understanding and push your own agenda
-
She said it was broken from the top down. What the hell does that mean? Trump has been in office not even two years. Obama was there for 8. Did it just break? No tone, people need to get a grip.
-
I believe we have had two instances in which the damage was apparent. One was the irregularities in the Florida vote count that ultimately led to Bush being effectively appointed president by the SC. The second was in 2016. "Broken" in my opinion is short hand for dysfunctional.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’d be happy to as soon as they pass the bill to fund the wall
-
Tweet unavailable
-
You took the words right out of my mouth! Guess she thinks the wall can't be tunneled under or flown over. Colossal waste of money.
-
I’d be happy to entertain any solutions you can offer that protect our border security.
-
Drones, cameras, sensors etc etc
-
I love the idea of drones, cameras and sensors in addition to the wall! Great ideas!
-
Modern technology v old technology. Have you noticed they don’t build castles anymore.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Is this so we can get more people to vote that shouldn’t be voting in elections?
-
Nice strawman argument you have set up there. There was so little evidence of voting by those who were not qualified, that even the presidential commission set up to prove its existence shut down. But, keep trying. I am sure there are many GOP supporters who don't know that.
-
They shut down because the left refused to provide the information they needed to complete their research, if i remember correctly.
-
I don't think that recollection is correct. With the committee led by GOP, I fail to see how the "left" could have kept any critical documentation from them. The head of any given committee has the authority to requisition or subpoena info. Your info source may have been in error
-
The info was requested from the various election overseers (different by state and at times by county, etc.). The democrats filed suit in a number of jurisdictions to prevent the info from being transferred to the committee. Not my facts, but that's from my memory. Maybe faulty?
-
Would have to go back and check state by state. That is not the way I recall it, but it may have been the case in some jurisdictions.
-
I would recommend the Wikipedia page on "presidential advisory commission on election integrity" for starters. Not saying it's the final opinion, but just the opening section supports my sometimes faulty memory.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.