Facebook let Netflix and Spotify read users' private messages, NYT reports
NEW NYT INVESTIGATION: Internal documents show that Facebook gave, "Netflix and Spotify the ability to read Facebook users’ private messages.” https://nyti.ms/2GqnbC9?smid=nytcore-ios-share …
The Times obtained internal Facebook documents showing in intricate detail how Facebook allocated user data to “partner” companies, ranging from @Microsoft to @amazon to @Spotify and @Yahoo.
The key deals were all active in 2017. Some remained in place until this year.
These deals are different in significant respects from the access afforded app makers like the one working for Cambridge Analytica. But in a broad sense they are not. Companies you may never have had a relationship with could see your stuff.
Facebook allowed Microsoft’s Bing search engine to see the names of virtually all Facebook users’ friends without consent, the records show, and gave Netflix and Spotify the ability to read Facebook users’ private messages.https://twitter.com/JasonLeopold/status/1075211489252765697 …
The list of companies with which Facebook shared your private information includes China's Huawei and Russia's Yandex -- which is to say, companies regarded as partners of Chinese and Russian intelligence. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/18/technology/facebook-privacy.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage …
Also the Royal Bank of Canada. Are we still at war with Canada?
Facebook lied that it was giving unique user IDs to the Kremlin-linked Russian company Yandex. In October, Facebook denied such a partnership. This month, it admitted it to congressional investigators.pic.twitter.com/xEEEXTN1I9
Interesting. It seems back in September, when Sheryl Sandberg testified in the Senate, Sen. @RonWyden had many VERY specific questions about Facebook's "partnership" agreements that almost everyone missed. https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Facebook%20Questions%20for%20the%20Record.pdf …pic.twitter.com/rFrc9aPgea
In the summer of 2017, I asked Facebook if it used signals from "third parties such as data brokers" for friend recommendations. Kicking myself for not recognizing the evasion in their answer. 1. FB's answer via email 2 What the NYT found out about PYMK in internal FB docspic.twitter.com/Sv2kwqsJ6u
Netflix statement on NYT report: "At no time did we access people’s private messages on Facebook, or ask for the ability to do so.”
Amazon statement on NYT report: "We use information only in accordance with our privacy policy.”
Facebook statement on NYT report: "Facebook’s partners don't get to ignore people’s privacy settings, and it’s wrong to suggest that they do."
The NYT has broken massive stories around Facebook (Cambridge Analytica, Definers), but this latest one feel like the most problematic of them all. It counters nearly everything the company has said about listening to privacy concerns and doing better to protect user data.
Facebook denied that its dozens of "partners" were able to misuse Facebook users' personal data, but it didn't address explosive new allegations that it gave those companies far broader access to private data than it has previously acknowledged. https://nbcnews.to/2CmGPL2