Léim chuig an ábhar

Jeff Flake threatens to block judicial nominees until Mueller bill gets vote

Politics Inné
The Arizona Republican, who holds a seat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, announced he would block the president's judicial nominees after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell prevented a bill to protect Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation from going to a vote. Republicans hold a slim 51-49 majority in the Senate.
316 freagra 430 d’atweetálacha 1,702 croí

Republican Sen. Jeff Flake said Wednesday that he won’t vote to confirm judicial nominees unless GOP leaders hold a vote on legislation to protect special counsel Robert Mueller from being fired.

100 freagra 279 d’atweetálacha 1,030 croí

Flake: "I have informed the Majority Leader that I will not vote to advance any of the 21 judicial nominees pending in the Judiciary Committee, or vote to confirm the 32 judges awaiting a confirmation vote on the floor, until S. 2644 is brought to the full Senate for a vote."

430 freagra 1,825 d’atweetálacha 7,974 croí

Flake takes action: He will not vote to confirm any judicial nominee that is already on Senate calendar, and will oppose any judicial nominee in committee, until the Mueller protection bill gets a vote. In 51-49 Senate, that can make McConnell life a tad more difficult.

507 freagra 750 d’atweetálacha 3,155 croí
Ag tabhairt freagra ar

They can only vote for those noms that have already made it out of committee and are awaiting confirmation from full Senate. And McConnell will need to tell Pence to stop traveling anywhere, so he can repeatedly break 50-50 ties. No more judicial noms can advance from committee.

23 freagra 39 d’atweetálacha 156 croí
Seinn
Cuir an luch thart air le díbhalbhú
0:41

Sen. : "I will not vote to advance any of the 21 judicial nominees pending in the Judiciary Committee or vote to confirm the 32 judges awaiting confirmation on the Senate Floor until S. 2644 is brought to the full Senate for a vote."

382 freagra 827 d’atweetálacha 2,710 croí

Jeff Flake says Whitaker has expressed open hostility to the Mueller probe. “Why are we so sanguine about this?” “What will it take?”

54 freagra 385 d’atweetálacha 1,718 croí

"This is important, this should be a priority,” Flake says of legislation protecting the special counsel.

10 bhfreagra 63 d’atweetálacha 400 croí

I know no one clicks the links and reads the stories so allow me to say this threat from Flake ain't nothin'. GOPers on Judiciary Committee have only a 1 vote majority so voting against advancing 21 judicial nominees in committee could be annoying for McConnell.

755 freagra 1,544 d’atweetálacha 6,237 croí

2/ That said, there are 32 judges awaiting a confirmation vote on the floor. Unless another GOP senator joins Flake in this boycott, Pence can break the tie (during lame duck) and confirm all of them.

98 freagra 268 d’atweetálacha 759 croí

3/ McConnell's position is that Mueller doesn't need to be protected through legislation, and that Sessions being fired/Whitaker being appointed acting AG doesn't change that at all.

25 freagra 115 d’atweetálacha 439 croí

4/ McConnell today: "There's been no indication -- as you can imagine, I've talked to the president fairly often -- no indication that the Mueller investigation will not be allowed to finish. And it should be allowed to finish."

97 freagra 99 d’atweetálacha 417 croí

Jeff Flake is a more effective Democrat than he is a Republican. Thank God he's gone in Jan. Why would ANY Republican threaten conservative judges?

94 freagra 56 d’atweetálacha 162 croí

Flake had leverage on the tax bill and on Kavanaugh. He chose not to use it. Now he's essentially threatening a 7-week delay in confirming some lower court judges. Is that going to move McConnell? I hope so, but I doubt it.

15 freagra 94 d’atweetálacha 415 croí