Skip to content

Jeff Flake threatens to block judicial nominees until Mueller bill gets vote

Politics Yesterday
The Arizona Republican, who holds a seat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, announced he would block the president's judicial nominees after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell prevented a bill to protect Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation from going to a vote. Republicans hold a slim 51-49 majority in the Senate.

Republican Sen. Jeff Flake said Wednesday that he won’t vote to confirm judicial nominees unless GOP leaders hold a vote on legislation to protect special counsel Robert Mueller from being fired.

100 replies 279 retweets 1,030 likes

Flake: "I have informed the Majority Leader that I will not vote to advance any of the 21 judicial nominees pending in the Judiciary Committee, or vote to confirm the 32 judges awaiting a confirmation vote on the floor, until S. 2644 is brought to the full Senate for a vote."

430 replies 1,825 retweets 7,971 likes

Flake takes action: He will not vote to confirm any judicial nominee that is already on Senate calendar, and will oppose any judicial nominee in committee, until the Mueller protection bill gets a vote. In 51-49 Senate, that can make McConnell life a tad more difficult.

507 replies 750 retweets 3,155 likes

They can only vote for those noms that have already made it out of committee and are awaiting confirmation from full Senate. And McConnell will need to tell Pence to stop traveling anywhere, so he can repeatedly break 50-50 ties. No more judicial noms can advance from committee.

23 replies 39 retweets 156 likes
Play
Hover to unmute
0:41

Sen. : "I will not vote to advance any of the 21 judicial nominees pending in the Judiciary Committee or vote to confirm the 32 judges awaiting confirmation on the Senate Floor until S. 2644 is brought to the full Senate for a vote."

382 replies 827 retweets 2,710 likes

Jeff Flake says Whitaker has expressed open hostility to the Mueller probe. “Why are we so sanguine about this?” “What will it take?”

54 replies 385 retweets 1,718 likes

"This is important, this should be a priority,” Flake says of legislation protecting the special counsel.

10 replies 63 retweets 400 likes

I know no one clicks the links and reads the stories so allow me to say this threat from Flake ain't nothin'. GOPers on Judiciary Committee have only a 1 vote majority so voting against advancing 21 judicial nominees in committee could be annoying for McConnell.

755 replies 1,544 retweets 6,234 likes

2/ That said, there are 32 judges awaiting a confirmation vote on the floor. Unless another GOP senator joins Flake in this boycott, Pence can break the tie (during lame duck) and confirm all of them.

98 replies 268 retweets 759 likes

3/ McConnell's position is that Mueller doesn't need to be protected through legislation, and that Sessions being fired/Whitaker being appointed acting AG doesn't change that at all.

25 replies 115 retweets 439 likes

4/ McConnell today: "There's been no indication -- as you can imagine, I've talked to the president fairly often -- no indication that the Mueller investigation will not be allowed to finish. And it should be allowed to finish."

97 replies 99 retweets 417 likes

Jeff Flake is a more effective Democrat than he is a Republican. Thank God he's gone in Jan. Why would ANY Republican threaten conservative judges?

94 replies 56 retweets 162 likes

Flake had leverage on the tax bill and on Kavanaugh. He chose not to use it. Now he's essentially threatening a 7-week delay in confirming some lower court judges. Is that going to move McConnell? I hope so, but I doubt it.

15 replies 94 retweets 415 likes