![](http://web.archive.org./web/20181113171535im_/https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DrneVRIX0AAvTAR.jpg)
-
-
-
Nah, Trump would hold his breath for 30 seconds & then claim he did it for longer than any president in history.
- 1ಮತ್ತಷ್ಟು ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆ
ಹೊಸ ಸಂವಾದ -
-
-
#America We have a problem! That is abuse. If your boss or colleague said this... -
The thing is he isn’t the boss. He works for us. He needs to be reminded. Imagine if we responded like that our boss?
- 3 ಮತ್ತಷ್ಟು ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆಗಳು
ಹೊಸ ಸಂವಾದ -
-
-
“Do you want him to reign in Robert Mueller?” ... It WAS a stupid question. Did she expect him to say “yes, I’m guilty and Mueller is getting too close to the truth, so I hired someone to stop him.” What did she expect the reply to be?
#stupidquestion -
Well, if the guy knew a true statement if it stole his hairspray, then hell yea I expect him to say yes.
-
LOL. Why is everyone acting like the media are angels all of a sudden? They’re not supposed to be biased and they clearly are, on both sides.
-
The media are suppose to challenge public servants with complaints& accusations that have been made ag. them to force them to address these. This reporter did EXACTLY what she is suppose to do. Reporters aren't there to repeat lies & spin. They are there to CHALLENGE.
-
Reporters are there to gain information. You shouldn’t be able to tell which side the reporter is on by the question she asks. The question was rhetorical. His reply was too harsh, but their bias puts him on the defensive.
-
Leading questions that feel like Cross Examination are ok bc a public servant has to answer criticism. Trump GAVE the reporter the authority to demand answers. He works for *US*, including the reporter. Pushing questions like this, forces him to either lie or admit a crime.
-
He answered every legitimate question. What did she mean by “reign mueller in”? She is not supposed to show bias. Period. She is implying that he needs to reign Mueller in because he’s getting close to the truth & Trump is guilty. That tells HER opinion.
-
Her ? was the best one. Straight to the issue. Being fair doesn't mean being neutral. She's not a judge. Her obligation is to report what happened without changing or omitting elements to mislead. No evidence she did otherwise.
- 7 ಮತ್ತಷ್ಟು ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆಗಳು
ಹೊಸ ಸಂವಾದ -
-
-
I think reporters should all start saying TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE when he calls them names. Seems like something he could understand. (And it always worked for me at Oak Forest Elementary.)
-
They should all start responding to him with childish clichéss. I like your idea of “it takes one to know one” I also think they should say “I know you are,but what am I?” and “sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me” etc
- 1ಮತ್ತಷ್ಟು ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆ
ಹೊಸ ಸಂವಾದ -
-
-
I bet she can operate an umbrella, though.
- 1ಮತ್ತಷ್ಟು ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯೆ
ಹೊಸ ಸಂವಾದ -
ಲೋಡಿಂಗ್ ಸಮಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿರುವಂತೆನಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.
Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಮೀರಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಕ್ಷಣಿಕವಾದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.