Stephen Miller is reportedly the last staffer the president trusts in his own White House, as the Commander-in-Chief fears, accurately, there is a “coup” being launched against him. [Stephen Miller May Be the Only Staffer Trump Trusts Now, by Ed Kilgore, New York Magazine, September 13, 2018] The president trusts Miller because he shares Trump’s hostility towards the “administrative state” thwarting the president’s agenda and challenging his power. [“Trump believes there’s a coup”: Freaked by the Times Op-Ed, the President Is Seeing Enemies Everywhere, by Gabriel Sherman, Vanity Fair, September 13, 2018] Miller is, of course, one of the few in the White House who supported President Trump throughout the campaign and who actually cares about America’s immigration disaster.
Yet Miller is an exception. The president is surrounded by the exact same kind of Republicans that opposed him and who have now driven him to the brink of political catastrophe. [New polling shows disastrous warning signs for Republicans ahead of the midterm elections, by Eliza Reiman, Business Insider, September 12, 2018] The identity of these saboteurs is no secret—incredibly, President Trump either appointed them or allowed them to be appointed even when their hatred for him is long-established and well-known. And this even includes one of the men who is supposed to argue for the president’s agenda before the world, Deputy White House Press Secretary Raj Shah.
The senior communications official has a record of contempt for the President. A month before Trump was elected in 2016, Shah reveled in the release of the Access Hollywood tapes. “I’m kinda enjoying this, some justice. I honestly don’t think it’s the worst thing he’s done but he somehow got passes for the other acts,” Shah texted an RNC staffer at the time. “Trump is a deplorable.” [White House official called Trump a “Deplorable,” by Olivia Nuzzi, New York Magazine, February 5, 2018]. And well before those tapes leaked, Shah favored the utterly appalling Jeb Bush during the primaries and may have even helped craft an attack ad against Trump. [Report: White House Spokesman Called Trump a “Deplorable,” by Molly Olmstead, Slate, February 6, 2018]
See also: The Sweden Democrats—Alone Against Establishment Extremists, By Rafael Koski, September 2010
Let’s not mince words. Last Sunday, in Sweden’s general election, the Sweden Democrats got a disappointing result compared to expectations. Much of the MSM were convinced that there’d surely be a “shy Sweden Democrat effect.” If the opinion polls put the party on 20% and in second place, then they were bound to do even better, maybe even come first [Sweden election polls 2018: Who are the Sweden Democrats? Could anti-EU party WIN?, By Amalie Hendon, Daily Express, September 6, 2018] But, although Sweden Democrats did increase their vote from 12.8% to 17.6%, they remained in third place. What went wrong?
One Swedish reader even wrote to us to make the point: SD would get more like 25% and, in his view, there was a strong probability that a hard-line SD break away—Alternative for Sweden—would also cross the line and make it into the Riksdag.
Back in the 2014 election, Sweden Democrats garnered just under 13% of the vote, making them the third largest party in the Riksdag, some way behind the Moderates (cuckservatives responsible for about a decade of Muslim mass-immigration) and the Social Democrats, the party of the Prime Minister, Stefan Löfven, who’ve topped every poll since the 1930s. The conditions seemed ripe for Sweden Democrats to at the very least come in second.
In 2015 alone, the Social Democrat Prime Minister had allowed 160,000 mainly Muslim males to settle in the country. They were responsible for a spike in rapes and other crimes including the torching of 100 cars during the election campaign,
Stephen Miller is reportedly the last staffer the president trusts in his own White House, as the Commander-in-Chief fears, accurately, there is a “coup” being launched against him. [Stephen Miller May Be the Only Staffer Trump Trusts Now, by Ed Kilgore, New York Magazine, September 13, 2018] The president trusts Miller because he shares Trump’s hostility towards the “administrative state” thwarting the president’s agenda and challenging his power. [“Trump believes there’s a coup”: Freaked by the Times Op-Ed, the President Is Seeing Enemies Everywhere, by Gabriel Sherman, Vanity Fair, September 13, 2018] Miller is, of course, one of the few in the White House who supported President Trump throughout the campaign and who actually cares about America’s immigration disaster.
Yet Miller is an exception. The president is surrounded by the exact same kind of Republicans that opposed him and who have now driven him to the brink of political catastrophe. [New polling shows disastrous warning signs for Republicans ahead of the midterm elections, by Eliza Reiman, Business Insider, September 12, 2018] The identity of these saboteurs is no secret—incredibly, President Trump either appointed them or allowed them to be appointed even when their hatred for him is long-established and well-known. And this even includes one of the men who is supposed to argue for the president’s agenda before the world, Deputy White House Press Secretary Raj Shah.
The senior communications official has a record of contempt for the President. A month before Trump was elected in 2016, Shah reveled in the release of the Access Hollywood tapes. “I’m kinda enjoying this, some justice. I honestly don’t think it’s the worst thing he’s done but he somehow got passes for the other acts,” Shah texted an RNC staffer at the time. “Trump is a deplorable.” [White House official called Trump a “Deplorable,” by Olivia Nuzzi, New York Magazine, February 5, 2018]. And well before those tapes leaked, Shah favored the utterly appalling Jeb Bush during the primaries and may have even helped craft an attack ad against Trump. [Report: White House Spokesman Called Trump a “Deplorable,” by Molly Olmstead, Slate, February 6, 2018]
See also: The Sweden Democrats—Alone Against Establishment Extremists, By Rafael Koski, September 2010
Let’s not mince words. Last Sunday, in Sweden’s general election, the Sweden Democrats got a disappointing result compared to expectations. Much of the MSM were convinced that there’d surely be a “shy Sweden Democrat effect.” If the opinion polls put the party on 20% and in second place, then they were bound to do even better, maybe even come first [Sweden election polls 2018: Who are the Sweden Democrats? Could anti-EU party WIN?, By Amalie Hendon, Daily Express, September 6, 2018] But, although Sweden Democrats did increase their vote from 12.8% to 17.6%, they remained in third place. What went wrong?
One Swedish reader even wrote to us to make the point: SD would get more like 25% and, in his view, there was a strong probability that a hard-line SD break away—Alternative for Sweden—would also cross the line and make it into the Riksdag.
Back in the 2014 election, Sweden Democrats garnered just under 13% of the vote, making them the third largest party in the Riksdag, some way behind the Moderates (cuckservatives responsible for about a decade of Muslim mass-immigration) and the Social Democrats, the party of the Prime Minister, Stefan Löfven, who’ve topped every poll since the 1930s. The conditions seemed ripe for Sweden Democrats to at the very least come in second.
In 2015 alone, the Social Democrat Prime Minister had allowed 160,000 mainly Muslim males to settle in the country. They were responsible for a spike in rapes and other crimes including the torching of 100 cars during the election campaign,
As a firm believer in the necessity of reporting good news, I have made a habit of writing on ICE and the DEA’s various busts of criminal foreigners. But although any strike against alien criminals is good, I will admit that these busts are often small in the grand scheme of things. For example, in the last week of August, ICE deported a Salvadoran MS-13 member back to El Salvador, a Jamaican murderer back to Jamaica, and helped put a Honduran rapist in prison for four decades.
Great news, certainly, but ultimately three bad hombres getting locked up or kicked out is not very many. But as of late, ICE has been stepping up its game considerably. On August 29, ICE reported that after a 30 day sweep in six states (Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Missouri, and Wisconsin), they nabbed 364 illegals. [ICE arrests 364 criminal aliens and immigration violators in 30-day enforcement surge in 6 Midwestern states, ICE Press Release, August 29, 2018.] Generally when ICE does region-specific sweeps, they net a few dozen illegals, occasionally some 120 or so. For example:
The only recent ICE sweep that tops this recent one was in September of 2017, when ICE conducted a nation-wide sweep of the larger “sanctuary cities”—which ended in 498 arrests. [ICE Arrests Over 450 on Federal Immigration Charges During Operation ‘Safe City’, ICE News Release, September 29, 2017.] When more than 300 illegals are arrested at a time, it is almost invariably a nation-wide sweep of some kind, or a raid on a large employer, such as in 2008, when a Howard Industries transformer plant in Mississippi was raided and 598 arrests were made. [ICE: Nearly 600 Detained in Mississippi Plant Raid, by Holbrook Mohr, Associated Press, August 26, 2008.]
Earlier from 2007: Robert Putnam: Diversity Is Our Destruction by Pat Buchanan, and Diversity Is Strength! It's Also…Oh, Wait, Make That "Weakness" By Steve Sailer
Our diversity is our greatest strength.
After playing clips of Democratic politicians reciting that truth of moder
It is now clear that a quiet crisis is developing on the Southwest border. A September 12 Department of Homeland Security statement notes that, while the August jump in apprehensions was “consistent with an expected seasonal increase”—itself disappointing after President Trump’s election seemed to have broken the pattern—the sharp increase in family units was “a clear indicator that the migration flows are responding to gaps in our nation’s legal framework” a.ka. judicial sabotage. Moreover, the recently-released jobs data revealed that August was not kind to native-born job seekers. The unavoidable conclusion: administrative remedies and jawboning—what we have called the “Trump Effect”—can only slow, not reverse, America’s immigration disaster. Ultimately, legislation is essential.
The Household Employment Survey, which unlike the more commonly cited Payroll Survey records the nativity of respondents, reports a total job decline of 423,000 in August. This, of course, is a jarring departure from general Payroll Survey euphoria—it reported job growth of 201,000—and calls into question the notion that incessant efforts to thwart Trump’s power have not diminished our economic mojo.
In August:
