jack인증된 계정

@jack

‽

가입일: 2006년 3월
사진 및 동영상 2,505개 사진과 동영상

트윗

@jack 님을 차단했습니다

정말로 이 트윗을 보시겠어요? 트윗을 봐도 @jack 님의 차단을 해제하지 않습니다

  1. 메인 트윗
    3월 1일

    We’re committing Twitter to help increase the collective health, openness, and civility of public conversation, and to hold ourselves publicly accountable towards progress.

    답글 8,539개 리트윗 4,634개 15,273 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  2. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    14시간 전

    On the 4th anniversary of Michael Brown's death in , Brown's father has a message for the men of the community.

    답글 31개 리트윗 33개 62 마음
    취소
  3. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    21시간 전

    .

    답글 15개 리트윗 213개 770 마음
    취소
  4. 17시간 전

    Thank you, Will. We will keep this conversation open and public.

    I've been impressed by the public conversations among twitter staff about this . Leaving the specific case to one side, I think twitter deserves more credit than they've got for their approach to misinformation specifically (thread)
    이 스레드 보기
    답글 102개 리트윗 49개 254 마음
    취소
  5. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    8월 8일

    One day when I leave this Earth.. My entire Twitter timeline will be my final Supreme work of Art.

    답글 308개 리트윗 3,976개 17,256 마음
    취소
  6. 8월 8일

    More context on why our rules are currently where they are and how we’re thinking about evolving them.

    Here's an email I sent Twitter employees today with more context around our thinking and our policies.
    답글 519개 리트윗 130개 450 마음
    취소
  7. 8월 8일

    Thank you Emily. Proud to work for an open company not afraid to speak up and push us all forward. Someday maybe we can have most of our conversations debates and disagreements right here on Twitter for everyone to see.

    Glad to see Twitter leadership encouraging thoughtful feedback from the team. And 🙌 Change is hard. Leadership is hard. Change and leadership on the world stage, on an open platform, in real time, are very hard. Good on and team for engaging and iterating 1/2
    이 스레드 보기
    답글 183개 리트윗 44개 289 마음
    취소
  8. 8월 8일

    Some fair points here. We certainly have a lot of work to do to help journalists do their jobs better. That’s our intent. Help with reach, balance, and economic incentives. We’re behind on those last two. Shouldn’t take away from skepticism and critical thinking tho.

    If had said this differently, journos might've said thanks: Twitter exists in a larger ecosystem in which journalism adds tremendous value. Every citizen would be wise to depend on journalists to confirm information and refute lies. We at Twitter value journalism highly.
    답글 169개 리트윗 65개 258 마음
    취소
  9. 8월 8일

    Definitely not happy with where our policies are. They need to constantly evolve. Doing that work. Thanks for the thoughtful tweets and push, Mike

    I don't agree with everything Twitter does or doesn't do. If we can consistently enforce the policies and terms of service for the platform, that's a good thing. But it doesn't mean we should be satisfied with the policies we have.
    이 스레드 보기
    답글 234개 리트윗 84개 439 마음
    취소
  10. 8월 8일

    Relying on algorithms alone will not work. Not today, not tomorrow. And we know providing broader reach isn’t enough. We need to figure out how to help with economic incentives too. We’re behind on that, but thinking deeply about it. Open to great and scalable ideas.

    답글 356개 리트윗 96개 399 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  11. 8월 8일

    One of the most important constituencies we serve is our journalist population. Has been since day 1. We don’t mean to shift the work here. We must build tools to help (and need to work together to do that). We can’t be a useful service without the integrity journalists bring.

    Accounts like Jones' can often sensationalize issues and spread unsubstantiated rumors, so it’s critical journalists document, validate, and refute such information directly so people can form their own opinions. This is what serves the public conversation best.
    이 스레드 보기
    답글 550개 리트윗 128개 416 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  12. 8월 8일

    Many more details here:

    답글 1,465개 리트윗 475개 1,869 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  13. 8월 8일

    Accounts like Jones' can often sensationalize issues and spread unsubstantiated rumors, so it’s critical journalists document, validate, and refute such information directly so people can form their own opinions. This is what serves the public conversation best.

    답글 7,464개 리트윗 1,234개 6,651 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  14. 8월 8일

    If we succumb and simply react to outside pressure, rather than straightforward principles we enforce (and evolve) impartially regardless of political viewpoints, we become a service that’s constructed by our personal views that can swing in any direction. That’s not us.

    답글 1,640개 리트윗 1,391개 8,275 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  15. 8월 8일

    Truth is we’ve been terrible at explaining our decisions in the past. We’re fixing that. We’re going to hold Jones to the same standard we hold to every account, not taking one-off actions to make us feel good in the short term, and adding fuel to new conspiracy theories.

    답글 1,722개 리트윗 803개 5,962 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  16. 8월 8일

    We didn’t suspend Alex Jones or Infowars yesterday. We know that’s hard for many but the reason is simple: he hasn’t violated our rules. We’ll enforce if he does. And we’ll continue to promote a healthy conversational environment by ensuring tweets aren’t artificially amplified.

    답글 14,114개 리트윗 5,764개 24,670 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  17. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    8월 6일

    The key is not to take ppl off their path. Jus share what u know and learn what u can .

    답글 109개 리트윗 14,175개 40,776 마음
    취소
  18. 8월 5일

    답글 125개 리트윗 76개 517 마음
    취소
  19. 8월 5일

    The

    답글 1,434개 리트윗 1,283개 4,872 마음
    취소
  20. 8월 4일

    @CzinnForTheWin 님, @seidtweets 님 외 3명에게 보내는 답글
    😜
    답글 43개 리트윗 37개 448 마음
    취소
  21. 8월 3일

    답글 33개 리트윗 147개 931 마음
    취소

@jack 님은 아직 트윗이 없습니다.

로딩하는데 시간이 지연되고 있습니다.

트위터의 트래픽이 폭주했거나 일시적인 문제가 발생했을 수 있습니다. 다시 시도하거나 트위터 상태 페이지를 방문하여 자세한 내용을 확인해 보세요.

    관심사 추천:

    ·