Search results
  1. 7 hours ago

    Damit das nicht passiert, kämpfen wir Piraten für ein freies Internet!

    1 reply 18 retweets 19 likes
  2. Jul 27
    Replying to

    Thanks for your support! We will be organizing protests and activities around August 26 to remind lawmakers we won’t accept any .

  3. Jul 27

    goodbye, .

    2 retweets 2 likes
  4. Jul 25

    Danke —> Must Read!

    Auch wenn die Headline nicht ganz korrekt ist... lohnt sich das Lesen wohl.
    2 retweets 3 likes
  5. Jul 24
    Replying to

    Oh come on.... Even the super duper content ID does not consider fair use. which btw in th EU does not even rally exist. means mass survailance. and immediatr deletion actually will make debating faitly impossible. Flag and delete is only way!

  6. Jul 24
    Replying to

    Ps you are aware that without filters its impossible to solve the task and filters will cause false positives. See the overhyped Content Id of YT

  7. Jul 24
    Replying to

    Trust me Americans do not want either. And 80% actually want as well. But the politoans at both continents do not understand how the internet works so they promote things like and

  8. Jul 24

    Benieuwd naar hoe er precies gestemd is over het mandaat voor het (je weet wel: )? Bekijk het overzicht van :

    6 retweets 7 likes
  9. Jul 24

    Just because of the vote on July 5 we still have to and say no to „European Parliament: Stop the censorship-machinery! Save the Internet!” - Jetzt unterschreiben! via

  10. Jul 20

    The irony when people pushing for stricter laws have difficulties complying with them themselves... 🙄🤦‍♂️

    The MEP behind Europe's proposed copyright censorship proposal, Axel Voss, can't explain all the copyrighted images in his social media.
    1 retweet
  11. Jul 19
    Replying to and

    As long as the artists he "advocates" for he wont care. if they are they can sue. Jimmy's mom next door can't afford to sue. Discrimination pute.

    1 like
  12. Jul 19
    Replying to and

    With a faulty algorithm that wouldn’t benefit large or small creators? There are more effective ways than creating an . Like supporting networks who pay their creators to the penny. Why don’t you invest in an infrastructure that already exists? Why don’t you? 🤔🤔🤔

    1 reply
  13. Jul 19
    Replying to and

    Lets just agree..you defend your little profit you get from the folks you "Advocate" and dont give a damn if someones wedding dance or bday will be Censored. Also with your logic even today the only car we would have are Fords ;)

    1 reply
  14. Jul 19
    Replying to and

    That’s true. People I’ve spoke to think that was about too and was testing the water for future lawsuits. It will turn into a free-for-all for lawyers if the is put into place and the creators, large or small, will suffer because of it.

    1 reply 1 like
  15. Jul 19

    Proves that issues around copyright or other people’s material can be solved without an or a So, again , why do we need and to pass if you can penalize google without ruining the internet?

    2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
  16. Jul 19

    Huge news re: , & Google is being hit and has yet to be voted on fully. Either it’s come into effect (which would be illegal to do) or this fine means the internet and google will be treated differently and independently.

    I told you so! The European Union just slapped a Five Billion Dollar fine on one of our great companies, Google. They truly have taken advantage of the U.S., but not for long!
    1 like
  17. Jul 19

    Im steht das Thema wieder auf der Agenda im : Wir bleiben dran!

    2 replies 23 retweets 67 likes

No results.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.