Here is a link to the blog that I wrote for Ourkingdom on devolution if you want to take a look. It concentrates on the challenges ahead for both the Labour party and the Tories in the context of the referendum on a Parliament for Wales.
I visited Christchurch Primary school in Swansea today. I am always touched by the enthusiasm and the drive of teachers who dedicate themselves to their pupils. They were all very welcoming. My mother is also a Primary school teacher, and so I will always respect the time and effort that teachers invest in their work. It is certainly not an easy job, and I don't think that I could juggle a class of 30 children personally!
I am doing a surgery at the Berwyn Centre, Nantymoel on Monday between 10am and 12 if any readers of my blog live in that area and wish to raise any local issues with me personally. I am trying to do a mixture of street surgeries, and surgeries in various locations across the region so as to reach as many people as possible.
The next cross party group on eating disorders is at 5.30pm next Tuesday at the National Assembly if any of you wish to attend. We are looking at the provision of services by GPs, and also the response of the Health Minster to a letter that we wrote regarding the fact that the current care pathway on eating disorders is only an advisory document- which ultimately means that many local health boards, trusts and GPs alike do not take it as their own individual responsibility to treat eating disorders accordingly.
I've just remembered that there is a London Olympics event at the Assembly on Monday evening also. I was hoping to attend so that I could ask some awkward questions about the financial burden of the Olympics on Welsh lottery monies, but it looks to me as if it will be more of a wine and canapes session. hmmm!
Have a nice weekend....
Friday 27 June 2008
Thursday 26 June 2008
Review of Higher Education in Wales
The Education Minister at the Assembly, Jane Hutt announced a review of Higher Education yesterday, to be chaired by Prof Mervyn Jones, Vice Chancellor of Bangor University. The review will, and I quote from the Minister's statement:
'The first stage of the review, to conclude by the end of September 2008, will consider student finance arrangements in Wales. In particular, the group will assess the extent to which student finance is targeted to widen access and encourage take up of priority subjects as well as the need to identify options to help tackle graduate debt.
The second phase will focus on reviewing the purpose and role for higher education in Wales taking account of the vision set out in Reaching Higher – the Assembly Government’s strategy for the higher education sector in Wales and its skills and employment strategy, Skills that Work for Wales. It will also look at higher education policy developments in England and Scotland as well as analysing the current and likely future demands and needs of learners, the economy and society. The second stage of the review should be completed by the end of February 2009.'
Both elements of the review are important of course, but I am largely interested in the possibility of any changes to student finance in Wales. No doubt people are aware of the role that I played in the student movement in campaigning against the introduction of top-up fees in Wales, and I am pleased therefore that the One Wales Government has committed to retaining the current student support arrangements until the end of this Assembly term.
Nevertheless, with the review of HE funding set to take place on a UK level next year, it is necessary for Wales to conduct a review to assess the options available for Wales- especially if the UK Government is intent on lifting the cap on top-up fees in England. I don't agree with Andrew RT Davies, Tory AMs comments that the timescale is tight on the review. Far too many reviews are long-winded and seemingly everlasting, and I hope that this committee can work diligently and effectively to assess all options available for Welsh students for the future.
I am against the implementation of top-up fees, I cannot deny that, but I know that there are people within the sector that believe that such fees should be introduced in order that they can properly fund their Institutions and develop their research capacity- effectively buying in to the idea that we need to create a market in the HE sector, much like the DWP are intent on advocating the marketisation of the welfare sector on a UK level.
I don't see how charging students for their education, and forcing them in to debt can be a way in which to develop our Institutions, and the ambition of Wales as a Nation. I also believe that to introduce such fees undermines the legitimacy of the widening access, and the lifelong learning agendas here in Wales.
Nevertheless, we have to discuss these issues frankly and honestly if we are serious about addressing the issues surrounding student finance and HE funding. I look forward to taking part in the process, and in reading the committee's report in September ( how I will respond to any recommendations made is another matter altogether!)
'The first stage of the review, to conclude by the end of September 2008, will consider student finance arrangements in Wales. In particular, the group will assess the extent to which student finance is targeted to widen access and encourage take up of priority subjects as well as the need to identify options to help tackle graduate debt.
The second phase will focus on reviewing the purpose and role for higher education in Wales taking account of the vision set out in Reaching Higher – the Assembly Government’s strategy for the higher education sector in Wales and its skills and employment strategy, Skills that Work for Wales. It will also look at higher education policy developments in England and Scotland as well as analysing the current and likely future demands and needs of learners, the economy and society. The second stage of the review should be completed by the end of February 2009.'
Both elements of the review are important of course, but I am largely interested in the possibility of any changes to student finance in Wales. No doubt people are aware of the role that I played in the student movement in campaigning against the introduction of top-up fees in Wales, and I am pleased therefore that the One Wales Government has committed to retaining the current student support arrangements until the end of this Assembly term.
Nevertheless, with the review of HE funding set to take place on a UK level next year, it is necessary for Wales to conduct a review to assess the options available for Wales- especially if the UK Government is intent on lifting the cap on top-up fees in England. I don't agree with Andrew RT Davies, Tory AMs comments that the timescale is tight on the review. Far too many reviews are long-winded and seemingly everlasting, and I hope that this committee can work diligently and effectively to assess all options available for Welsh students for the future.
I am against the implementation of top-up fees, I cannot deny that, but I know that there are people within the sector that believe that such fees should be introduced in order that they can properly fund their Institutions and develop their research capacity- effectively buying in to the idea that we need to create a market in the HE sector, much like the DWP are intent on advocating the marketisation of the welfare sector on a UK level.
I don't see how charging students for their education, and forcing them in to debt can be a way in which to develop our Institutions, and the ambition of Wales as a Nation. I also believe that to introduce such fees undermines the legitimacy of the widening access, and the lifelong learning agendas here in Wales.
Nevertheless, we have to discuss these issues frankly and honestly if we are serious about addressing the issues surrounding student finance and HE funding. I look forward to taking part in the process, and in reading the committee's report in September ( how I will respond to any recommendations made is another matter altogether!)
Wednesday 25 June 2008
Senedd today
I'm not taking part in any of the debates today at the Senedd, but I am listening in on the debate on co-payments in the NHS. There is a debate later by the lib dems on bus services in Wales, where no doubt they will add to their growing wish list of financial demands from the Welsh Assembly Government. A few months ago, the idea was floated that backbenchers should be able to table debates here at the Assembly. We are still waiting to find out whether there is scope to table time for backbench debates. It is frustrating sometimes that those within the ruling groups in the Assembly cannot be pro active in initiating debates on this level. I believe this would inject some energy in to debates in the Chamber, and ultimately add another layer of scrutiny of Government Ministers. Of course, we respond diligently and thoughtfully to all the opposition party debates, but I sincerely believe that there is a need to re- assess the way that debates are run here, or how time is used during the afternoon, mid-week sessions.
Another conversation that I had today with fellow AMs was about the potential for more academic discussion amongst AMs on policy and strategy. We all know about the House magazine which is produced at Westminster, but there is no Assembly equivalent. Of course, we could look at doing an online journal of sorts, and encourage critical debate amongst AMs and political thinkers alike on the web. Those of us who blog take part in such discussions on a daily basis, but I believe that we could look in to this idea again, as this may be another way of encouraging public interest and involvement in our National Assembly.
An update on the Royal visit tomorrow- supposedly the cleaners have been asked to polish the plants on show at the Assembly! What a joke. The place is smelling of paint, and flowers have been placed on display. Its interesting that so much effort is being made for one person, for one day. Why don't the public have this treatment when they come here every day? I asked for a debate on the future of the Monarchy during business questions yesterday, and Nick Bourne AM also agreed that such a debate should take place. Perhaps that could be a theme for a backbench debate for the future?
Another conversation that I had today with fellow AMs was about the potential for more academic discussion amongst AMs on policy and strategy. We all know about the House magazine which is produced at Westminster, but there is no Assembly equivalent. Of course, we could look at doing an online journal of sorts, and encourage critical debate amongst AMs and political thinkers alike on the web. Those of us who blog take part in such discussions on a daily basis, but I believe that we could look in to this idea again, as this may be another way of encouraging public interest and involvement in our National Assembly.
An update on the Royal visit tomorrow- supposedly the cleaners have been asked to polish the plants on show at the Assembly! What a joke. The place is smelling of paint, and flowers have been placed on display. Its interesting that so much effort is being made for one person, for one day. Why don't the public have this treatment when they come here every day? I asked for a debate on the future of the Monarchy during business questions yesterday, and Nick Bourne AM also agreed that such a debate should take place. Perhaps that could be a theme for a backbench debate for the future?
Tuesday 24 June 2008
Israeli Ambassador
Today, the Israeli Ambassador to the UK will visit the National Assembly, and Assembly members will have an opportunity to raise questions with him. Following my commitment to discuss with Palestinian campaign groups in Wales, and to seek their advice on whether to attend the event or not, I have decided that the best course of action would be for me to join their protests outside the Senedd building.
Their arguments were compelling: that engaging in dialogue with the Ambassador would have no bearing on Israel’s continuing violations of UN resolutions in relation to human rights in the Palestinian Territories, and until they conform to such resolutions politicians such as myself should not provide them with a legitimate platform for which to endorse their actions.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu, following a visit to the Holy Land, publicly declared that the situation reminded him of what happened to black people in South Africa. As someone who was heavily involved in the anti-apartheid campaign, it does not sit easy with me to attend the event at this particular moment in time.
The Palestinian campaigners recommended that I join them outside the Senedd, as they believe that this course of action would be the most effective way of demonstrating our collective dissatisfaction with Israeli government policies.
Their arguments were compelling: that engaging in dialogue with the Ambassador would have no bearing on Israel’s continuing violations of UN resolutions in relation to human rights in the Palestinian Territories, and until they conform to such resolutions politicians such as myself should not provide them with a legitimate platform for which to endorse their actions.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu, following a visit to the Holy Land, publicly declared that the situation reminded him of what happened to black people in South Africa. As someone who was heavily involved in the anti-apartheid campaign, it does not sit easy with me to attend the event at this particular moment in time.
The Palestinian campaigners recommended that I join them outside the Senedd, as they believe that this course of action would be the most effective way of demonstrating our collective dissatisfaction with Israeli government policies.
Monday 23 June 2008
Who would be party president?
As one of the few elected politicians who blog from Plaid I thought that I should comment on the press interest that Elfyn Llwyd MP has announced his intention to run for the president's position within Plaid Cymru. While the blogger blogmenai looks at the various strands that could potentially make an effective president- strategist, thinker, and older politician that can be more of a figurehead for the party, or a person who inspires - other bloggers such as ordovicius have questioned Llwyd's interest in leading on this level while performing a role as an MP, and in leading Plaid's Parliamentary team. As far as the article in the Western Mail suggests, nobody in our party is willing to speak out against Dafydd Iwan, or give clear reasons as to why he should stand down. OK, so he lost his seat on the Council, but that does not mean that Dafydd Iwan cannot perform effectively as party president.
Personally, and I stress the word personally, I don't see that we actually need both a president and a party leader. Is a leader not sufficient in itself? I certainly don't think that there should be a massive debate in the press over it. There are already enough hierarchical structures in the political World, without us losing sleep in this instance!
I didn't closely follow the ongoing debate surrounding the confusion amongst the public when we had one too many leaders a few years ago (hence the reorganisation of the party structures that ensued) but I think now that we are in Government, that we have a strong team on every level of Government, and a strong leadership, we do not need to embroil ourselves in a debate on this issue. If two people want to stand for president then that should be accepted. It is also a positive that someone else is putting their name forward, so that people do not become complacent in their positions, or take support from others for granted.
As far as I am concerned, I am pleased with the work that Dafydd Iwan has done as president, and the work that Elfyn has done as an MP. Dafydd Iwan is an inspirational figure, that has strong, passionate beliefs, and this is what we need to enthuse party members. It is good for democracy that a party president can express his concerns regarding policy initiatives spearheaded by either the parliamentary or Assembly group that may go against the grain of party policy such as the St Athan military Academy. It keeps elected politicians' feet firmly on the ground, and is another level of scrutiny for elected politicians.
I look forward to the hustings process, and hope that Elfyn Llwyd continues his blog regardless of the result......
Personally, and I stress the word personally, I don't see that we actually need both a president and a party leader. Is a leader not sufficient in itself? I certainly don't think that there should be a massive debate in the press over it. There are already enough hierarchical structures in the political World, without us losing sleep in this instance!
I didn't closely follow the ongoing debate surrounding the confusion amongst the public when we had one too many leaders a few years ago (hence the reorganisation of the party structures that ensued) but I think now that we are in Government, that we have a strong team on every level of Government, and a strong leadership, we do not need to embroil ourselves in a debate on this issue. If two people want to stand for president then that should be accepted. It is also a positive that someone else is putting their name forward, so that people do not become complacent in their positions, or take support from others for granted.
As far as I am concerned, I am pleased with the work that Dafydd Iwan has done as president, and the work that Elfyn has done as an MP. Dafydd Iwan is an inspirational figure, that has strong, passionate beliefs, and this is what we need to enthuse party members. It is good for democracy that a party president can express his concerns regarding policy initiatives spearheaded by either the parliamentary or Assembly group that may go against the grain of party policy such as the St Athan military Academy. It keeps elected politicians' feet firmly on the ground, and is another level of scrutiny for elected politicians.
I look forward to the hustings process, and hope that Elfyn Llwyd continues his blog regardless of the result......
Sunday 22 June 2008
A right Royal visit.
Oh gosh. I'm faltering on the blog scene aren't I? But that's justified by the fact that I've just written a blog for ourkingdom regarding the Tories and devolution, so that should go live in the next few days. I've been really busy this week with attending local events to mark Refugee Week, to speaking at an event to support asylum seekers, to doing street surgeries in Porthcawl. These are all very valid reasons as to why I haven't been here on the blogosphere, although I do keep up to date with the affairs of the day from the comfort of my twitter page welsh politics updates.
Today I was on the Politics Show in Wales talking about Prince Charles's visit to the Assembly next week( its not a breach of security to discuss it we learnt today, as all the details are on the Royal Family website- check it out!) He is set to open the new youth chamber at the National Assembly, and I voiced my concerns with the fact that an unaccountable and undemocratic representative will be opening the chamber. After all, we are seeking to encourage young people to engage in politics, and the involvement of the Monarchy may well lead to more disengagement from our youth in the political process. How about asking a young person to 'officially' open the chamber. Would that be beyond the realm of possibility?
I haven't been invited to the day of Royal bonanza at the Senedd, but as I left the Assembly today there were decorators in painting the walls of Ty Hywel. A member of staff muttered to me- 'If the weather is nice, he won't even walk through Ty Hywel anyway, so what's the point?' Is it a wonder that the Royal family believe that everywhere they go in the world smells of fresh paint and flowers, when public institutions must foot the bill to ensure that they don't see the cracks in the walls? I've put in a Freedom of Information request to find out how much this visit is costing the Assembly's Commission. Its times like this that I wish that I'd taken my full pay rise, as I know on good authority that the pay rise I didn't take went straight back in to the hands of the Commission! Is this really a good use of our resources?
So, another busy week ahead, what with Prince Charles's visit, and the controversy over the Israeli Ambassador's visit also. I can guarantee you that security will be tight this week at the Senedd so if you are considering visiting the Chamber to see the portrait of Maggie Thatcher, I'd probably wait a bit....
Wednesday 18 June 2008
Cameron on pay rise for MPs- political opportunism?
Does anyone recall Nick Bourne's remarks back in March this year with regards to the decision by a number of Plaid AMs to reject the 8.3% pay rise that was suggested by an Independent review? I'm sure you do, but I'll remind you- Bourne said that it was the 'worst kind of political opportunism'. Well, fast forward a few months, and the same debate is taking place on a Westminster level following an Independent report on MPs salaries. However, Tory hypocrisy is clear yet again, with David Cameron clearly indicating that those on the Ministerial payroll will not accept the suggested pay rise, or the above inflation pay rise for MPs. Will Nick Bourne be telling his leader at Westminster that he is guilty of political opportunism, and that of the worst kind? I don't think so somehow! Will Nick Bourne and his group at the Assembly refuse to take their pay rise retrospectively as a result of their colleagues' decision at Westminster? Hardly.
Don't think for a minute that I'm letting the other parties off the hook, either. Harriet Harman, a Labour Minister has also been quoted in the press as saying that MPs should not accept the pay rise due to rising inflation and household finances. It was for this very reason that I did not accept my pay rise- how can it be justified when workers on the front line are being squeezed due to rising social pressures, and a lack of salary increase to coincide with this?
At the time, I received hundreds of emails from Police officers and nurses, amazed that we were even considering accepting such a hefty pay rise under current circumstances. Of course I understand that we have more responsibilities as AMs due to new powers at the Assembly, but like those in the third sector, and those who work diligently on low wages throughout their lives, if we are passionate and committed about what we do, finances should be at the back of our minds, not the main reason as to why one becomes a political representative.
I understand that there will be a vote at Westminster on this issue on the 3rd of July, but I agree with the recommendation made that MPs should not vote on their own salary increase. It somehow defeats the object of having an independent investigation in to the issue in the first place.
I look forward to seeing what individual MPs have to say on the matter. Following the somewhat controversial discussion on MPs allowances, I think that many MPs will make up some excuse or another for why they deserve a pay rise of such significance.
Don't think for a minute that I'm letting the other parties off the hook, either. Harriet Harman, a Labour Minister has also been quoted in the press as saying that MPs should not accept the pay rise due to rising inflation and household finances. It was for this very reason that I did not accept my pay rise- how can it be justified when workers on the front line are being squeezed due to rising social pressures, and a lack of salary increase to coincide with this?
At the time, I received hundreds of emails from Police officers and nurses, amazed that we were even considering accepting such a hefty pay rise under current circumstances. Of course I understand that we have more responsibilities as AMs due to new powers at the Assembly, but like those in the third sector, and those who work diligently on low wages throughout their lives, if we are passionate and committed about what we do, finances should be at the back of our minds, not the main reason as to why one becomes a political representative.
I understand that there will be a vote at Westminster on this issue on the 3rd of July, but I agree with the recommendation made that MPs should not vote on their own salary increase. It somehow defeats the object of having an independent investigation in to the issue in the first place.
I look forward to seeing what individual MPs have to say on the matter. Following the somewhat controversial discussion on MPs allowances, I think that many MPs will make up some excuse or another for why they deserve a pay rise of such significance.
Tuesday 17 June 2008
Transatlantic Network- your involvement.
I have been given a deadline of the 23rd of June to nominate three people who I believe would be suitable to take part in the Transatlantic Network event in Ireland at the end of September this year. We are looking for young people from different social, cultural and political backgrounds.
I wrote a blog previously about my involvement in setting up the network alongside 30 other young leaders from across North America and Europe at Berlin earlier this year. The intention is to encourage greater links between young people in Europe and North America, and to break down barriers that have arisen over recent years. I was privileged to be part of the initial group to set up this scheme, looking at how we can enhance links between those who will be the leaders of the future- in all walks of life- from business leaders, to those in the political World, the environment and so on.
I had planned to approach the media in Wales to see if they would have an interest in helping me in my quest to nominate three people to take part in this exciting venture, but time is now short and it will not be possible. If you would like to take part in the scheme, please email me on bethan.jenkins@wales.gov.uk so that I can send you a form to complete. There is no guarantee that my suggestions of people for the network will be accepted, but at least I can try!
There is more information on this on the British Council website. The name of the network is TN2020.
I wrote a blog previously about my involvement in setting up the network alongside 30 other young leaders from across North America and Europe at Berlin earlier this year. The intention is to encourage greater links between young people in Europe and North America, and to break down barriers that have arisen over recent years. I was privileged to be part of the initial group to set up this scheme, looking at how we can enhance links between those who will be the leaders of the future- in all walks of life- from business leaders, to those in the political World, the environment and so on.
I had planned to approach the media in Wales to see if they would have an interest in helping me in my quest to nominate three people to take part in this exciting venture, but time is now short and it will not be possible. If you would like to take part in the scheme, please email me on bethan.jenkins@wales.gov.uk so that I can send you a form to complete. There is no guarantee that my suggestions of people for the network will be accepted, but at least I can try!
There is more information on this on the British Council website. The name of the network is TN2020.
Thursday 12 June 2008
Wales and our International links
Apologies for failing to blog in a few days. I was really ill yesterday, and am trying to catch up with everything today. Some of the blogs have made reference to my question to the First Minister on Tuesday requesting that he looks at securing observer status for Wales on the UN General Assembly. I was inspired to place this as a question following Elin Jones's heartfelt speech at our last Conference-unknowingly making the case fore more powers for Wales due to the fact that she could not partake in discussions with the Uk Government during an emergency meeting concerning foot and mouth.
It made me realise that we must push forward with enhancing Wales's links with the wider International community- as Wales, and not merely as part of the UK. Surely if people believe in devolution, they can see a strong case for us attending such meetings, and promoting Wales as a serious force in the World?
Perhaps not, that is for Rhodri Morgan to discuss now that he has conceded to consider this as a viable option for Wales.
After all, he has nothing to lose in doing so, especially as he is stepping down as First Minister very soon. Surely he wants his legacy to be much more than providing free transport for the elderly? ( Regardless of how important this is to those that benefit from it)
On the other issue- of the comments made by Dafydd Elis Thomas on the Israeli visit to the Assembly.. I don't particularly want to get sucked in to this issue if I am honest. I won't be boycotting the event, but I sincerely believe that the Presiding Officer has the right to make a principled stand on this matter. He can and should be political as one of the leaders of the National Assembly. There are no rules saying that the Presiding Officer cannot voice opinions of the sort.
Nevertheless, I only wish that he was as strong willed on the issue of the Monarchy. Prince Charles is visiting in the same week as the Israeli delegates. I am not invited to meet him surprisingly, but I will certainly be voicing my opposition to an unelected and archaic Institution.
It made me realise that we must push forward with enhancing Wales's links with the wider International community- as Wales, and not merely as part of the UK. Surely if people believe in devolution, they can see a strong case for us attending such meetings, and promoting Wales as a serious force in the World?
Perhaps not, that is for Rhodri Morgan to discuss now that he has conceded to consider this as a viable option for Wales.
After all, he has nothing to lose in doing so, especially as he is stepping down as First Minister very soon. Surely he wants his legacy to be much more than providing free transport for the elderly? ( Regardless of how important this is to those that benefit from it)
On the other issue- of the comments made by Dafydd Elis Thomas on the Israeli visit to the Assembly.. I don't particularly want to get sucked in to this issue if I am honest. I won't be boycotting the event, but I sincerely believe that the Presiding Officer has the right to make a principled stand on this matter. He can and should be political as one of the leaders of the National Assembly. There are no rules saying that the Presiding Officer cannot voice opinions of the sort.
Nevertheless, I only wish that he was as strong willed on the issue of the Monarchy. Prince Charles is visiting in the same week as the Israeli delegates. I am not invited to meet him surprisingly, but I will certainly be voicing my opposition to an unelected and archaic Institution.
Tuesday 10 June 2008
Now we know- child poverty targets let-down
Today I expressed my deep disappointment on the floor of the Senedd that the UK Government’s target of abolishing child poverty by 2020 has suffered a severe set-back. Figures released by the Department for Work an Pensions today reveal child poverty levels have risen for a second successive year – there are now an additional 100,000 children living in poverty, taking the total to 3.9million for the UK. The figures are a huge blow to the efforts being made to eradicate child poverty in Wales. The most vulnerable in our society are paying the price for the UK Government’s missed opportunities in several Budgets. There is a moral obligation on Whitehall to come up with the necessary resources to reverse this damaging trend.
I called on the Assembly’s Counsel General to set aside time at the Assembly to debate the issue as a matter of urgency, and also called on Social Justice Minister Brian Gibbons to lobby the Westminster Government for the Assembly to have an enhanced say on Welfare policy.
Other countries across Europe continue to out-perform the UK in child poverty eradication. I fully support calls made by child poverty charities for an additional £3billion from the Treasury to be targeted at children in poverty using the welfare systems. If London continues to show impotence in this area then the Assembly will have an obligation to seek powers over aspects of the welfare system to deliver for our young people.
Today's figures show that:
* The number of children in the UK experiencing low income and material deprivation - those who can't afford basic things such as sending their kids on a school trip - fell by 100,000 between 2005/06 and 2006/07.
* The number of children in relative poverty rose by 100,000, both before and after housing costs are taken into account, to 2.9million (BHC) and 3.9million (AHC) respectively between 2005/06 and 2006/07. Between 1998/99 and 2006/07 the number of children in relative poverty has fallen by 600,000 (BHC) and 500,000 (AHC).
* The numbers of pensioners in relative poverty rose by 300,000 to 2.5million (BHC) and by 200,000 (AHC) to 2.1million between 2005/06 and 2006/07. Between 1998/99 and 2006/07 the number of pensioners in relative poverty has fallen by 200,000 (BHC) and 900,000 (AHC).
I called on the Assembly’s Counsel General to set aside time at the Assembly to debate the issue as a matter of urgency, and also called on Social Justice Minister Brian Gibbons to lobby the Westminster Government for the Assembly to have an enhanced say on Welfare policy.
Other countries across Europe continue to out-perform the UK in child poverty eradication. I fully support calls made by child poverty charities for an additional £3billion from the Treasury to be targeted at children in poverty using the welfare systems. If London continues to show impotence in this area then the Assembly will have an obligation to seek powers over aspects of the welfare system to deliver for our young people.
Today's figures show that:
* The number of children in the UK experiencing low income and material deprivation - those who can't afford basic things such as sending their kids on a school trip - fell by 100,000 between 2005/06 and 2006/07.
* The number of children in relative poverty rose by 100,000, both before and after housing costs are taken into account, to 2.9million (BHC) and 3.9million (AHC) respectively between 2005/06 and 2006/07. Between 1998/99 and 2006/07 the number of children in relative poverty has fallen by 600,000 (BHC) and 500,000 (AHC).
* The numbers of pensioners in relative poverty rose by 300,000 to 2.5million (BHC) and by 200,000 (AHC) to 2.1million between 2005/06 and 2006/07. Between 1998/99 and 2006/07 the number of pensioners in relative poverty has fallen by 200,000 (BHC) and 900,000 (AHC).
Monday 9 June 2008
Saturday 7 June 2008
Will child poverty targets be met?
I've indicated many a time on this blog that for the One Wales government to be able to seriously reach the same UK government based targets of halving child poverty by 2010 and its eradication by 2020, it will rely heavily on joint up commitment and policy drive on both an Assembly and a Westminster level. New figures out next week by the DWP are being primed in the press to suggest that the targets will be missed, and that without a £3 billion investment in the 2009 budget, the target will be nothing more than a failed aspiration.
This is of course very worrying, especially as here in Wales we are trying on every level of Government to ensure that the child poverty agenda is at the forefront of the work by Ministers and policy initiatives alike.How this work can prove successful, however, without the UK Labour party investing in the benefits system, and overhauling the taxation system is a challenge even for the best of us.
We need only look at how the UK government is intent upon centralising public services, prioritising the strategy of securing seats in middle Engand where child poverty is a trendy buzz word for middle class volunteers, and the general lack of drive behind addressing child poverty to understand that we are going nowhere fast on this issue.
Child Poverty campaigners will be the first to criticise the Government for not reaching its targets when the stats are released on Tuesday. Whether Brown can, and will, be bold enough after months of dithering on a wide variety of matters to deliver on child poverty will be anyone's guess.
But until he does act, I reserve my right to be judgemental of a Government in London who prefer the sound of fluffly soundbites on key social policy as opposed to actually getting on with the job at hand.
This is of course very worrying, especially as here in Wales we are trying on every level of Government to ensure that the child poverty agenda is at the forefront of the work by Ministers and policy initiatives alike.How this work can prove successful, however, without the UK Labour party investing in the benefits system, and overhauling the taxation system is a challenge even for the best of us.
We need only look at how the UK government is intent upon centralising public services, prioritising the strategy of securing seats in middle Engand where child poverty is a trendy buzz word for middle class volunteers, and the general lack of drive behind addressing child poverty to understand that we are going nowhere fast on this issue.
Child Poverty campaigners will be the first to criticise the Government for not reaching its targets when the stats are released on Tuesday. Whether Brown can, and will, be bold enough after months of dithering on a wide variety of matters to deliver on child poverty will be anyone's guess.
But until he does act, I reserve my right to be judgemental of a Government in London who prefer the sound of fluffly soundbites on key social policy as opposed to actually getting on with the job at hand.
Thursday 5 June 2008
Migrant workers in Wales
Glyn Davies's blog on the Polish community in Wales makes some valid points about the current downward trend in those from Poland moving to the UK to find work. There are of course varying reasons for such actions, but the most predominant being that due to the economic downturn in the UK at the moment, living costs are soaring, and those who are moving here from the A8 countries are suddenly finding that the money they earn is being thrown into this area as opposed to providing them with the opportunities to send money home to their families. Poland and other such countries are also settling in to the EU system, which means that there are steady increases in salaries in their countries of residence, thus negating the need for them to move elsewhere to find jobs and support their loved ones.
Nevertheless, the reality at the moment is that there are thousands of people from such countries settling in Wales without sufficient support mechanisms around them in terms of understanding how to access advice on employment, benefits and such. They are also very vulnerable to unscrupulous employers who take advantage of the fact that they do not have sufficient skills in English or Welsh language, in communicating their situation to relevant authorities.
The Equal Opportunities committee at the National Assembly, of which I am a member is currently carrying out a review on migrant workers, and I have found the evidence sessions from those who are supporting Polish, Portuguese or other EU residents in Wales very interesting, and thought provoking. We are set to advise the Welsh Assembly Government on how to improve support for such communities, and how to ensure that they are fully accepted into Welsh society.
We have heard evidence of the lack of ESOL funding available that enables migrant workers to learn both English and Welsh when they arrive here, the need to create an Employment Commission on a UK level so that migrant workers' rights are protected and respected, and the need for more partnership work between the WAG, Local Authorities and organisations such as Careers Wales, Embassies and voluntary organisations.
There is much to be done in this area, especially with regards to transferring migrant workers skills in to applicable qualifications here in Wales, but I sincerely hope that, given that many of the powers rests with the UK Government on this issue, that we will be able to take our key recommendations to both the Welsh Assembly Government and the UK Parliament.
Nevertheless, the reality at the moment is that there are thousands of people from such countries settling in Wales without sufficient support mechanisms around them in terms of understanding how to access advice on employment, benefits and such. They are also very vulnerable to unscrupulous employers who take advantage of the fact that they do not have sufficient skills in English or Welsh language, in communicating their situation to relevant authorities.
The Equal Opportunities committee at the National Assembly, of which I am a member is currently carrying out a review on migrant workers, and I have found the evidence sessions from those who are supporting Polish, Portuguese or other EU residents in Wales very interesting, and thought provoking. We are set to advise the Welsh Assembly Government on how to improve support for such communities, and how to ensure that they are fully accepted into Welsh society.
We have heard evidence of the lack of ESOL funding available that enables migrant workers to learn both English and Welsh when they arrive here, the need to create an Employment Commission on a UK level so that migrant workers' rights are protected and respected, and the need for more partnership work between the WAG, Local Authorities and organisations such as Careers Wales, Embassies and voluntary organisations.
There is much to be done in this area, especially with regards to transferring migrant workers skills in to applicable qualifications here in Wales, but I sincerely hope that, given that many of the powers rests with the UK Government on this issue, that we will be able to take our key recommendations to both the Welsh Assembly Government and the UK Parliament.
Wednesday 4 June 2008
Will the ' Welsh' Tory Party please stand up?
Gosh. Just heard Nick Bourne AM on a question to the Heritage Minister regarding supporting the commemoration of Owain Glyndwr! Whatever next? Supporting Welsh Independence?! I wonder whether their leader in Westminster knows what they are up to here in the Bay. After all, Alun Cairns Tory AM ( a Parliamentary candidate) has said on record during a debate last week that Cameron isn't their leader in Wales. For a Unionist party, they appear on face value to be on very shaky ground. But I know full well of course what the Tory strategy is in terms of merely appearing to be a unique Welsh party. However, we need only look at how Glyn Davies and his colleagues are refusing to accept that the decision on the right to buy be devolved to Wales to know that the cracks are appearing in the 'Welsh' Tory game.
The same divergence in opinion is clear from the Tory camp when discussing top-up fees. David Cameron has of course stated on numerous occasions that he now supports the rolling out of top-up fees, but his party in Wales purport to be able to take a differing line in opposing such fees here in Wales for now, at least ( or until the General election campaign kicks off) Again, there is a lack of consistency in the Tory spin machine, and a robust opposition in even admitting that they will have to take a UK Unionist opinion on most policy decisions and directions.
On the Referendum front, the Tories are holding a consultation process on whether they support future devolution for Wales. If this consultation results in a positive outcome to support a referendum on more powers for Wales, it will be highly interesting to see whether they place this in their Uk General election manifesto, and whether they will promise to enact on this if they take power on a UK level.
Of course, if the Tories win power at Westminster, or even if all the polls prior to the election indicate as such, I will be keeping a keen eye on Labour party activity in this area. I want to see whether or not those who are current devo sceptics in Labour's Unionist wing, (we all know who they are) and who are currently intent on talking down the referendum in the One Wales Government will be manouvering to change their mind, and to support future powers for our National Assembly in fear of losing all power in the devolved administrations.
The same divergence in opinion is clear from the Tory camp when discussing top-up fees. David Cameron has of course stated on numerous occasions that he now supports the rolling out of top-up fees, but his party in Wales purport to be able to take a differing line in opposing such fees here in Wales for now, at least ( or until the General election campaign kicks off) Again, there is a lack of consistency in the Tory spin machine, and a robust opposition in even admitting that they will have to take a UK Unionist opinion on most policy decisions and directions.
On the Referendum front, the Tories are holding a consultation process on whether they support future devolution for Wales. If this consultation results in a positive outcome to support a referendum on more powers for Wales, it will be highly interesting to see whether they place this in their Uk General election manifesto, and whether they will promise to enact on this if they take power on a UK level.
Of course, if the Tories win power at Westminster, or even if all the polls prior to the election indicate as such, I will be keeping a keen eye on Labour party activity in this area. I want to see whether or not those who are current devo sceptics in Labour's Unionist wing, (we all know who they are) and who are currently intent on talking down the referendum in the One Wales Government will be manouvering to change their mind, and to support future powers for our National Assembly in fear of losing all power in the devolved administrations.
Tuesday 3 June 2008
Closure of Post Offices
It is frustrating to learn that there are many Post Offices earmarked for closure in my region, especially given that this is largely due to the fact that the London Government has been gradually removing key services from the Post Office Ltd. It is also therefore ironic when you read about Labour AMs and MPs in the local press ( South Wales Evening Post being case in point) whereby members such as Gwenda Thomas AM have declared their willingness to fight their own Government's ruling at Westminster to close Post Offices. It seems somewhat reactionary now for Labour AMs to be taking such a stance, when they could have been raising their concerns vociferously and robustly with Gordon Brown et al before the Post Office reached a crisis point.
This situation will again be intensified by the fact that the Post Office will have to compete in a tendering process alongside other companies to retain the Post Office Card Account. It seems that they will struggle quite substantially to even retain the service that they currently have if they lose the tender for the POCA. I met with representatives from Post Office Ltd yesterday at my office to discuss this very issue, aswell as the local consultation process. I acknowledge the work that they are seeking to do in trying to ensure that the current Post Office network is viable, but I sincerely believe that there should be wider dialogue as to how to make Post Offices run effectively for the future, and how to introduce new, creative ideas for implementation. Introducing a People's Bank for Wales is one of Plaid Cymru's ideas, of course.
I am also concerned about the consultation process itself. There are no guidelines provided by the Post Office as to how to submit a consultation response, and they are advising against residents proposing local petitions as part of the consultation process as this does not assist the outcome. The consultation is also only consulting on what Post Office should close or become an outreach area, which does not leave a wide range of options in my opinion for local people to present as valid concerns.
The issue of Post Office closures is of course an issue about retaining and developing communities, but it is also a key element of the poverty agenda. If Post Offices are closed in many of the areas outlined in the South Wales West plan this will only serve to intensify poverty in these areas. With the centralising of key services such as the Job Centre, the administration and provision of benefits entitlements are a key concern. Removing people's ability to access Post Offices will again add to the level of disengagement of vulnerable groups from services which they see as a necessity.
I intend to raise my concerns with the Westminster Government as part of this consultation exercise, and I am sure that those constituents in South Wales West will make their views known to me on this issue also.
This situation will again be intensified by the fact that the Post Office will have to compete in a tendering process alongside other companies to retain the Post Office Card Account. It seems that they will struggle quite substantially to even retain the service that they currently have if they lose the tender for the POCA. I met with representatives from Post Office Ltd yesterday at my office to discuss this very issue, aswell as the local consultation process. I acknowledge the work that they are seeking to do in trying to ensure that the current Post Office network is viable, but I sincerely believe that there should be wider dialogue as to how to make Post Offices run effectively for the future, and how to introduce new, creative ideas for implementation. Introducing a People's Bank for Wales is one of Plaid Cymru's ideas, of course.
I am also concerned about the consultation process itself. There are no guidelines provided by the Post Office as to how to submit a consultation response, and they are advising against residents proposing local petitions as part of the consultation process as this does not assist the outcome. The consultation is also only consulting on what Post Office should close or become an outreach area, which does not leave a wide range of options in my opinion for local people to present as valid concerns.
The issue of Post Office closures is of course an issue about retaining and developing communities, but it is also a key element of the poverty agenda. If Post Offices are closed in many of the areas outlined in the South Wales West plan this will only serve to intensify poverty in these areas. With the centralising of key services such as the Job Centre, the administration and provision of benefits entitlements are a key concern. Removing people's ability to access Post Offices will again add to the level of disengagement of vulnerable groups from services which they see as a necessity.
I intend to raise my concerns with the Westminster Government as part of this consultation exercise, and I am sure that those constituents in South Wales West will make their views known to me on this issue also.
