Also very much in line with Truman Bewley's classic analysis, with the extra kicker that fear of future recessions weighs on current wages 2/ http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674009431&content=reviews …pic.twitter.com/a7YTIRlIII
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
That's too complex. The top folks don't think the rest of us earn our wages, especially those they never interact with. Why else were unions formed? Not because of owners and managers paying employees for what they do.
-
Remember the
#BP representative Those Guys send over to quell the uprising over the Horizon Gulf Fiasco... If so you’ll remember the S...Storm that Twit caused, Do You? He called us the#LittlePeople Big S...Storm that lasted until no longer on TV. Bring it Back#ShitStorm
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Real median hourly wage increases aren't significantly lower than implied by the tightness of the labor market; they're in line with historical experience. The next year will be interesting.pic.twitter.com/QOT0uuXm5W
-
To go with Ian's tight labor market thesis next year as we are still producing twice the jobs needed for population growth. We do have a demographic twist to the data since we have a larger older workforce in this centurypic.twitter.com/dQKqTfp3aM
-
Education is going in the dumps. It’s getting impossible to find *really* skilled labor, especially outside of cities. Plenty of crummy jobs to fill, but no labor pool to fill the good jobs. Brace yourself for something awful.
-
Disagree, we are more educated now than anytime in modern day historypic.twitter.com/2bYqt1wfyo
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My dude, no thought to Trump’s teetering towards nuclear war? What will the effect of that be on the economy?
-
bitcoin will hit £5bn per coin
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Doubt it. Companies eager to risk other fixed costs, like executive pay and mergers. Just excuse for keeping wages low. Academic economists suckers for this con.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
Exactly the problem! Bonuses are nice but can only be counted on the time they are received not as part of a formula to determine how much you can afford. People it’s not your salary or hourly wage!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
It's the lack of union power. Why would employers pay more wages when their is an abundance of labour desperate to work?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
Duh. This has only been obvious to every professional for the last 40 years. ANYTHING in tax-advantaged benefits, but the barest minimum in on-the-employment-history wages. And for exactly that reason: you just stop giving the benefits if you're squeezed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
One would think labor shortages would have changed this by now. My hunch is a lot of baby boomers are exiting the circus and it's a little too soon for their kids to be getting big career advances with pay. Plus all the big company consolidations eliminate white collar positions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
It's a way to manage risk, sure. Also, I would say the lack of infrastructure and education investment, combined with tighter immigration restrictions, leads to more foreign investment in human capital.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
Possibly not to a voodoo artist, but any thinking person could understand the link between increasing wage disparity and DEMS immigration policy that favors unskilled, uneducated folks, ... [presumably expecting their votes, to boot].
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
Krugman... the jobs for life... inflation is good fool that fell for the Keynesian lie.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
-
-
Any thinking person could understand the link between increasing wage disparity and DEMS immigration policy that favors unskilled, uneducated folks [presumably expecting their votes, to boot].
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.