Kindle Price: $11.99

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

Audiobook Price: $14.30

Save: $6.81 (48%)

eBook features:
  • Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
  • In this edition, page numbers are just like the physical edition
You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.
Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Buy for others

Give as a gift or purchase for a team or group.
Learn more

Buying and sending eBooks to others

  1. Select quantity
  2. Buy and send eBooks
  3. Recipients can read on any device

These ebooks can only be redeemed by recipients in the US. Redemption links and eBooks cannot be resold.

Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Napoleon's Egypt: Invading the Middle East 1st Edition, Kindle Edition

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 59 ratings

In this vivid and timely history, Juan Cole tells the story of Napoleon's invasion of Egypt. Revealing the young general's reasons for leading the expedition against Egypt in 1798 and showcasing his fascinating views of the Orient, Cole delves into the psychology of the military titan and his entourage. He paints a multi-faceted portrait of the daily travails of the soldiers in Napoleon's army, including how they imagined Egypt, how their expectations differed from what they found, and how they grappled with military challenges in a foreign land. Cole ultimately reveals how Napoleon's invasion, the first modern attempt to invade the Arab world, invented and crystallized the rhetoric of liberal imperialism.

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

In July 1798, Napoleon landed an expeditionary force at Alexandria in Egypt, the opening move in a scheme to acquire a new colony for France, administer a sharp rebuff to England and export the values of French republicanism to a remade Middle East. Cole, a historian of the Middle East at the University of Michigan, traces the first seven months of Napoleon's adventure in Egypt. Relying extensively on firsthand sources for this account of the invasion's early months, Cole focuses on the ideas and belief systems of the French invaders and the Muslims of Egypt. Cole portrays the French as deeply ignorant of cultural and religious Islam. Claiming an intent to transplant liberty to Egypt, the French rapidly descended to the same barbarism and repression of the Ottomans they sought to replace. Islamic Egypt, divided by class and ethnic rivalries, offered little resistance to the initial French incursion. Over time, however, the Egyptians produced an insurgency that, while it couldn't hope to win pitched battles, did erode French domination and French morale. Perplexingly, Cole ends his account in early February 1799, with Napoleon still in control of Egypt but facing increasingly effective opposition. Napoleon's attack on Syria is only mentioned, not detailed, and his return to Cairo and eventual flight to France are omitted altogether. In a brief epilogue, Cole makes an explicit comparison between Napoleon's adventure in Egypt and the current American occupation of Iraq. Though at times episodic and disorganized, this doesn't detract from the value of Cole's well-researched contribution to Middle Eastern history. Illus. (Aug.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From Booklist

At the end of the eighteenth century, the Middle East had remained beyond the orbit of European concerns since the end of the Crusades in the late thirteenth century. Egypt, in particular, was viewed as a backward Ottoman province. In 1798, Napoleon led a massive force across the Mediterranean to the Nile Delta, quickly overwhelming the Egyptian forces, but the French occupiers were expelled by British and Ottoman armies in 1801. Although the military effects of the French incursion were minimal, the long-term cultural and political results were immense. Historian Cole, effectively utilizing diaries and letters of contemporaries on both sides, illustrates the confusion, hostilities, and necessary accommodations as two distinct cultures collide. French scholars who accompanied the expedition make the now familiar claims of "liberating" a people from backward oppressors while respecting the traditions of a great people. Arab reactions range from outrage to indifference. At the center of events, of course, is the young emerging titan, Napoleon, who is revealed here as cynical, power hungry, but possessed of an enormous intellect and insatiable curiosity. Jay Freeman
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved

Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B000UZPIV6
  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ St. Martin's Press; 1st edition (August 7, 2007)
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 7, 2007
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • File size ‏ : ‎ 659 KB
  • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
  • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
  • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 308 pages
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 59 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Juan Ricardo Cole
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
4.4 out of 5
59 global ratings

Top reviews from the United States

Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2008
Napoleon's Egypt: Invading the Middle East by Juan Cole should surely be considered "must reading" for anyone interested in today's foreign policy issues as they relate to this part of the world. It might appear a bit extreme to say it, but after reading this relatively short but deeply researched volume, one is likely to come to the conclusion that it is difficult to understand today's Middle East wihtout it. It is a piece of history often ignored and left unexplored, but is arguably one of the critical "keys" to understanding today's events in the region.

Cole's book details Napoleon's invasion of the nation of Egypt in 1798, just a few years after the French Revolution transformed French society, and specifically covers the unfolding of the event from 1798 to 1801. This is, of course, before Napoleon coronated himself Emperor in 1804, and therefore, as one reads the text, it must be remembered that this is Napoleonic "pre-history;" at least, "pre-history" to what is more commonly known about Napoleon's career.

The book describes in extensive detail virtually every major military and civilian event of the invasion, including battles, uprisings, police actions, civil ceremonies, attempts at integration, populace control, and political tactics. But the book covers substantially greater than these alone, bringing to life the feelings of local tribes and individuals who sought to come to grips with the invasion in any way they could. It is a dispassionate account, but the accuracy and insight offered by the narrative cannot but help to swell the emotions, and the text offers a view of the event in such a manner that we are forced to rethink what we thought we knew about this period in history.

The similarities of this historical event with today's Iraq War are frighteningly similar. So similar, in fact, that some of the reviewers of the text have, like myself, tagged the work as a "must read" for anyone wishing to understand today's Middle East political realities. When we read towards the very end of the book the reasons why Napoleon himself decided that torture was ineffective and should be banned (Napoleon said that those under torture would say anything to be relieved, and most likely would say exactly what they knew the torturer wanted to hear most, regardless of its truthfulness), we cannot help but wonder why today's leaders can't come to the same conclusion. And the story has many more eerie parallels -- unilateral invasion, occupation tactics, propaganda techniques, religious appeals - that make it appear to be the "prequel" of the Iraq War. By reading this in a somewhat removed, historical setting, we are able to more clearly see the issues raised by such military events, and can develop conclusions that are not always as easy to see when the event is in progress. This alone makes the book a worthwhile read for any modern reader.

Cole does a good job of communicating the details of the invasion, including generals, important local personalities and leaders, troop movements, bouts of sickness, civilian control techniques, and so on, without making the text overwhelming. The names and number of specific individuals, however, towards the end of the book can become difficult to follow. Nevertheless the book is excellently written, with an eye toward historical scholarship, thoroughly documented and judiciously annotated when needed. The book is based mainly on eyewitness testimonials and recorded memoirs from first-hand witnesses, as the topic has been largely avoided by historians of the past two centuries, making these source documents the key materials available on the subject. There is a short section at the end of the text for additional reading for both French and English readers.

A highly recommended text for the history reader, political scientist, or anyone wishing to make further sense of the Middle East as it is known today. Five stars.
17 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on July 13, 2013
White European aggression against Muslim Middle Eastern people began with The Crusades; but its "Modern" paradigm was Napoleon's 1798 invasion of Egypt.All of the later invasions, including Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, et.al., followed his arrogant belief in weapon superiority, constant terror campaigns against civilians, and transparent , bogus claims of "being there to help", while none were true..
Outrageous Pretexts ,i.e., we were "sent by the Ottoman Empire to save you", or we are here to remove"Weapons of mass Destruction",are mixed with persistent divide and conquer tactics.
Since these inevitably fail; all out terror against defenseless people is always the "fallback",and constant policy, of the Invaders.
But---- the superior "intelligence gathering", even between otherwise bitter rivals, against the Invaders, is also a recurring theme.The inevitable denoument is eventual "Victorious withdrawal", and a battered, robbed and humiliated people---who never forget.
Especially today, as Egypt is once again torn asunder, Prof Cole , in this brilliant ,highly readable book, showst us that Muslims never givein, or give up, their homes, families, and even their erstwhile rivals, but even more their country.
Every single attempt, by armed invaders, or in-country "Stooges", to crush Middle East Muslim peoples end in even greater disaster for the Invadind "Western" state. France, allowing Napoleon to become a dictator, lost an entire generation of brave young men; and fell back to the authoritarian despotism it had so recently thrown off.
Maybe worse, Egypt since July 1798, fully 215 years this month,has been ruled by British, and "Native Son Dictatorships..
Pray for the Egyptian people---and read this remarkable, fascinating book by Prof. Cole,
2 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United States on September 23, 2007
Both a military and a cultural history, and for good reason. After Napoleon's infantry squares and artillery techniques prove absolutely lethal to fast and courageous Ottoman cavalry, the war becomes an occupation, and the occupation will not be decided by military might alone. It is a joy to watch the gifted and ruthless Napoleon gamely struggling to master occupation politics in a cultural setting of which he has only the dimmest grasp, and to watch his opponents outwit him using time-tested strategies of resistance while making up a few of their own.

Unforgettable moments range from the ridiculous to the macabre. Napoleon lets word get out that he might convert to Islam and bring his army with him, in an attempt to curry favor among Muslim clerics, but his army quickly nixes the idea, as the French were unwilling to endure circumcision and give up wine. French officers discover the pleasures and perils of harems. And in a remote desert fortification, one third of Napoleon's soldiers contract a local disease that causes their eyelids to flip inside out and they go blind. An attack comes, and the blind soldiers are pushed to the front by their comrades and told not to fire until the enemy closes to 75 yards.

Juan Cole is a mideast expert and knows Arabic, so he well understands the Egyptian context and can show how locals perceived the French as well as the reverse. He enjoys the occasional victories of the Egyptian underdogs while at the same time retaining empathy for the French as they try to adapt to what becomes a terrible predicament.
13 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
Harold B. Pregler
5.0 out of 5 stars A lesson that should have been learned before meddling in today's middle east.
Reviewed in Canada on December 15, 2017
Great reading - more modern "statesmen" and military leaders should have read this before rushing in to today's middle eastern mess. (And thereby to have stayed out).
claude mawas
3.0 out of 5 stars Colonialisme résiduel et conquête de l'Egypte
Reviewed in France on September 23, 2014
Ce livre témoigne de la totale impréparation de Bonaparte dans sa conquête de l'Egypte et du comportement inadmissible, non seulement du chef mais aussi de la plupart de ses généraux vis à vis de la population ; le nombre de massacre de populations innocentes est scandaleux. Egalement surprenant l'attitude très coloniale des "savants" embarqués dans cette expédition...
Néanmoins j'ai trouvé léger la description de la dernière partie de la conquête vers la Syrie
Andreas Oberender
5.0 out of 5 stars Der Lockruf des Orients. Napoleon in Ägypten
Reviewed in Germany on December 10, 2013
Die Ägyptenexpedition von 1798/99 nimmt eine Sonderstellung unter Napoleons Feldzügen ein, war sie doch das einzige militärische Unternehmen, das den Korsen über die Grenzen Europas hinausführte. Anfang Juli 1798 landete ein französisches Heer von etwa 54.000 Mann in der Nähe von Alexandria. Nach einem strapaziösen Marsch Richtung Süden erreichten die Franzosen Kairo, die Hauptstadt der osmanischen Provinz Ägypten. In Sichtweite der Pyramiden schlug die technologisch überlegene französische Armee die ägyptischen Truppen. Am 24. Juli 1798 zog Napoleon in Kairo ein. Ein Jahr lang hielt er sich in Ägypten und im Nahen Osten auf. Die seit jeher vom Hauch des Exotischen umgebene Ägyptenexpedition ist vor allem deshalb in Erinnerung geblieben, weil sie als Geburtsstunde der modernen Ägyptologie gilt. Zu Napoleons Heer gehörte auch ein Stab von etwa 150 Wissenschaftlern, die mit der Aufgabe betraut waren, die Altertümer Ägyptens zu erforschen. Die wissenschaftlichen Erträge des Ägyptenfeldzugs erwiesen sich schon bald als bedeutsamer und langlebiger als die französische Herrschaft am Nil, die schon 1801 wieder endete.

Der amerikanische Historiker Juan Cole blendet in seinem Buch über den Ägyptenfeldzug den wissenschaftlichen Teil der Expedition aus. Ihm geht es um die politischen und militärischen Dimensionen des Feldzuges, den er - im Gegensatz zu vielen anderen Autoren - nicht allein aus französischer, sondern auch aus ägyptischer Perspektive untersucht. Cole greift hauptsächlich auf Memoiren und andere Selbstzeugnisse von Franzosen und Ägyptern zurück. Es gibt eine Vielzahl von arabischsprachigen Quellen, die zeigen, wie die Einheimischen die französische Invasion erlebten und deuteten. In dieser Kombination der beiden gegensätzlichen Perspektiven, in der Spiegelung der unterschiedlichen Wahrnehmungen von Eroberern und Eroberten liegt die große Stärke des Buches. Allerdings wäre es ratsam gewesen, wenn Cole gerade die französischen Quellen in einem separaten Kapitel näher charakterisiert und einer kritischen Analyse unterzogen hätte. Die vielen Memoiren von Teilnehmern und Augenzeugen der napoleonischen Kriege und Feldzüge kann man nicht "einfach so", d.h. unreflektiert benutzen. Fast alle diese Quellen sind lange nach Napoleons Sturz und nach den Ereignissen, über die sie berichten, entstanden. Daher muß man sie mit Vorsicht benutzen. Es wäre ein Trugschluss zu glauben, die von Cole verwendeten Memoiren französischer Offiziere und Soldaten könnten ohne Weiteres ein objektives und wahrheitsgetreues Bild vom Ägyptenfeldzug liefern.

Im ersten Kapitel behandelt Cole die Vorbereitung des Feldzugs und die Motive, die die französische Regierung - das sogenannte Direktorium - zu dem Entschluss bewogen, das zum Osmanischen Reich gehörende Ägypten zu erobern. Die Motivlage war komplex: Eine wichtige Rolle spielte der Wunsch, eine neue Kolonie zu erwerben, um den "überschüssigen Energien des französischen Volkes" ein neues Betätigungsfeld zu erschließen. Die Wahl fiel auf Ägypten, das aus Sicht der französischen Führung ein großes wirtschaftliches Entwicklungspotential zu besitzen schien. Ägypten, am Landweg nach Asien und Indien gelegen, wurde auch deshalb ausgewählt, weil sich das Direktorium von der Kontrolle über den Vorderen Orient und den östlichen Mittelmeerraum einen entscheidenden Vorteil im Konflikt mit Großbritannien, dem Hauptfeind der Republik, erhoffte. Napoleon selbst sprach 1797 davon, dass die Eroberung Ägyptens Voraussetzung für einen Sieg über Großbritannien sei. Weitere Motive kamen hinzu. Das Direktorium, beunruhigt über Napoleons wachsende Popularität, wollte den siegreichen Feldherrn des Italienkrieges von Paris - und von der hohen Politik - fernhalten. Napoleons lebhaftes Interesse an der Eroberung Ägyptens spielte denen in die Hände, die seinen Aufstieg mit Unbehagen verfolgten und ihm ein neues Kommando fern der Heimat geben wollten. Schon damals bemüht, seinen militärischen Unternehmungen den Anstrich einer von hehren idealen getragenen Mission zu verleihen, entwickelte Napoleon eine weitere Rechtfertigung für die Eroberung Ägyptens. Nach der Landung in Alexandria stilisierte er sich zum Befreier und Modernisierer, der gekommen sei, um die Ägypter von ihren vermeintlich "tyrannischen" Herrschern zu erlösen und an die europäische Zivilisation heranzuführen.

In den Kapiteln 2 bis 12 zeichnet Cole anschaulich und farbig nach, wie die Franzosen in Ägypten Fuß fassten, wie sie eine fragile Herrschaft errichteten und wie sie mit der einheimischen Bevölkerung umgingen. Von Anfang an stand die Expedition unter keinem guten Stern. Die logistisch schlecht vorbereitete Invasion erfolgte zur denkbar ungünstigsten Jahreszeit, nämlich im Hochsommer. Etwa 1.500 Soldaten kamen auf dem anstrengenden Marsch von Alexandria nach Kairo ums Leben. An Land konnte Napoleon einige beachtliche Siege erringen, die aber nahezu entwertet wurden, als der britische Admiral Nelson Anfang August 1798 die französische Flotte bei Abukir vernichtete. Die Franzosen beherrschten allenfalls einige größere Städte, aber nicht das flache Land, wo immer wieder Rebellionen aufflammten, deren Niederschlagung die begrenzten Ressourcen der Armee über Gebühr beanspruchten. Die Stadtbewohner, besonders die Einwohner Kairos, begegneten den selbsternannten "Befreiern" zunächst verständnislos und schließlich feindselig. Mit den revolutionären Parolen der Franzosen, die das Land am Nil in eine Republik umwandeln wollten, konnten die Ägypter überhaupt nichts anfangen. Kulturelle Missverständnisse und Verständigungsprobleme waren an der Tagesordnung. Die meisten Franzosen sahen in den Ägyptern die Verkörperung orientalischer Barbarei und Rückständigkeit. Napoleons Versuche, die französische Herrschaft durch den Aufbau einer Verwaltung nach europäischem Vorbild, die Einberufung einer Art von Parlament und die Kooperation mit der muslimischen Geistlichkeit zu stabilisieren, trugen nur bescheidene Früchte. Das Vorhaben, die Ägypter über Nacht auf eine höhere Zivilisationsstufe zu heben, war von vornherein zum Scheitern verurteilt. Verblüffend sind die Parallelen zu heutigen Versuchen, muslimischen Völkern westliche Wertvorstellungen und Institutionen aufzupfropfen.

Bald empfanden die Ägypter die französische Herrschaft als anmaßend und übergriffig. Repressionen gegen Rebellen, die drückende Steuerlast und vandalenhafte Eingriffe in das Stadtbild Kairos führten schließlich dazu, dass im Oktober 1798 ein landesweiter Aufstand losbrach. Nur mit brutaler Gewalt konnte Napoleon Kairo halten. Etwa 3.000 Aufständische fanden den Tod. Da sich Sultan Selim III. unterdessen entschlossen hatte, Ägypten zurückzuerobern, zog Napoleon mit dem Großteil seiner Truppen nordwärts nach Palästina, wo er sich bis Mai 1799 aufhielt. Im August reiste er nach Frankreich ab. Damit endet Coles Buch, obgleich die Reste der Orientarmee noch bis 1801 in Ägypten blieben. In militärischer und politischer Hinsicht erwies sich die Ägyptenexpedition als Fehlschlag. Es gehört zu den Ironien der Geschichte, dass das Debakel Napoleons Popularität keinen Abbruch tat und den weiteren Aufstieg des Korsen nicht verhinderte. Wie Cole abschließend feststellt, ist der Feldzug trotz allem historisch bedeutsam. Er war der erste neuzeitliche Versuch einer westlichen Macht, eine Teilregion des Orients zu unterwerfen und umzugestalten. Damit steht Napoleons Ägyptenexpedition am Beginn einer nunmehr zweihundertjährigen Konfliktgeschichte, die gekennzeichnet ist vom westlichen Streben nach politischer und kultureller Hegemonie über den Orient und vom Bemühen muslimischer Völker und Staaten, sich dieses Hegemoniestrebens zu erwehren.
Reviewed in Canada
4.0 out of 5 stars https: //www. amazon. ca/review/review-your-purchases/ref=pe_30840_157727500_cm_add_1_star5?
Reviewed in Canada on December 2, 2015
https://www.amazon.ca/review/review-your-purchases/ref=pe_30840_157727500_cm_add_1_star5?_encoding=UTF8&asins;=3658084987%3A5%2C0230606032%2C1908531231%2C1483376168%2C0874809517%2C1107664829&channel;=ec_phy&crAuthToken;=gPak%2BFfsbesxCgussQIz7qCTFiqjkqtmmeI269kAAAAFAAAAAFZfcUVyYXcAAAAA&customerId;=A3BJMYB63DXCQ5#
Mohamed AlY
3.0 out of 5 stars Good but not full
Reviewed in Germany on March 22, 2017
I find that the book has only focused on the year Napoleon has stayed in Egypt not the whole story of the French invasion from the beginning till the end. The next 2 years of the invasion were mentioned only in 2 lines, which doesn't give a holistic narration of this historical era.
One person found this helpful
Report

Report an issue


Does this item contain inappropriate content?
Do you believe that this item violates a copyright?
Does this item contain quality or formatting issues?