Showing posts with label Matt Lauer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matt Lauer. Show all posts

We Resist: Day 475

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Stormy Daniels' Lawyer Drops a Bombshell on Donald Trump's Lawyer and Trump Continues His Attacks on the Free Press and Trump Threatens Sanctions on European Allies.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Let's start with an ACTION ITEM: Contact your senators and tell them to support the Senate vote to PRESERVE NET NEUTRALITY.


MAKE YOUR CALLS.

* * *

[Content Note: Anti-Blackness; white supremacy. Covers entire section.]

Today in Shopping While Black: Kia Morgan-Smith at the Grio: Nordstrom Under Fire after Police Called on Black Teens Falsely Accused of Shoplifting Prom Clothes. "High school students Mekhi Lee, Dirone Taylor and Eric Rogers II were reportedly shopping for prom clothes and noticed that several employees started following them around the store. 'I was nervous the whole time,' Lee recalled. 'Every time we move, they move. When we looked up, they looked up.' Feeling uneasy about the situation, the teens decided to leave the store by were immediately surrounded and confronted by Brentwood Police in the parking lot. CBS News reports that police then informed the teens they were called to the scene because the store accused them of stealing. The police investigated and found the claims to be false and released them without charges."

Today in Working While Black: Katie Jane Fernelius at Indy Week: A Duke University VP Walked into the Campus Joe Van Gogh, Heard a Rap Song, Demanded That the Employees Be Fired. "On Friday, [vice president for student affairs Larry Moneta] came in during an afternoon rush. The baristas had a habit of playing music from Spotify over the speakers, usually on playlists curated by the service. When Moneta walked in, 'Get Paid' by Young Dolph was playing. The song's titular refrain included the n-word, as Young Dolph raps, 'Get paid, young nigga.' Britni Brown, who was manning the register, was in charge of the playlist that day. When he approached the counter, Moneta, a white man, told Brown, an African-American woman, that the song was inappropriate. ...She says she shut the song off immediately. She grabbed him a vegan muffin and offered it free of charge. ...On Monday morning, Brown and [Kevin Simmons, the other barista on duty] were called into Joe Van Gogh's Hillsborough office and asked to resign."

Today in Graduating While Black: Alex Harris and Madeleine Marr at the Miami Herald: Black UF Students Were 'Manhandled' off Graduation Stage. "It's a tradition for culturally black sororities and fraternities to 'stroll' across the graduation stage and perform their Greek organization's signature dance, but that tradition was interrupted Saturday at the University of Florida by an 'aggressive' graduation marshal. Video footage showed the orange-and-blue clad marshal physically hustling the celebrating students off the graduation stage — at one point bear-hugging a male student and dragging him away. The videos have spread widely on social media, with many critics calling the actions racist. On Tuesday, the school announced the faculty member serving as a marshal has been placed on paid administrative leave 'pending a review of the appropriate administrative steps.' He was not identified."

To realize the plea inherent in the call #BlackLivesMatter, Black people's lives must matter in all spaces and at all times. The relentless double standards that mean Black people are subjected to harassment and humiliation just for fucking existing as Black human beings must end.

* * *


That said, if the actual objective is stalling for time to allow the authoritarians to consolidate power, then a year is definitely not long enough. *side-eye*

Here is a piece of good news: Carol Morello, Anna Fifield, and David Nakamura at the Washington Post: North Korea Frees 3 American Prisoners Ahead of a Planned Trump-Kim Summit. "Three American men who had been imprisoned by North Korea are on their way to the United States, [Donald] Trump announced Wednesday after they were released to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during his visit to Pyongyang."

I'm very glad indeed for Kim Dong-chul, Tony Kim, and Kim Hak-song that they are no longer imprisoned in North Korea.

I am also very angry that Donald Trump continues to say that President Obama failed to secure freedom for the three men, when two of the men were taken into custody in 2017, after Trump had taken office.

[CN: Class warfare] Amanda Michelle Gomez at ThinkProgress: Health Insurers Say higher Obamacare Premiums Are Coming, and It's Republicans' Fault. "Health experts warned this would happen. In fact, insurers who set the premium rates cautioned that costs would rise if lawmakers continued to undermine the Obamacare exchanges and not shore up the market. A letter issued to lawmakers in November from major health industry players said '[e]liminating the individual mandate by itself likely will result in a significant increase in premiums, which would in turn substantially increase the number of uninsured Americans.' Now the public at large is learning what it meant for Congress to repeal the individual mandate, the tax penalty for not having insurance, and then not doing anything to improve a fragile market."

Speaking of Republicans being unfathomable assholes...


[CN: Misogyny; queer hatred; child abuse] Samantha Schmidt at the Washington Post: Mormon Church Breaks All Ties with Boy Scouts, Ending 100-Year Relationship. "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints said Tuesday it will sever all ties with the Boy Scouts of America, ending a century-old tradition deeply ingrained in the religious life of Mormon boys. ...Church officials did not cite specific Scouts policy changes that spurred the split, but the two groups have increasingly clashed over values in recent years, particularly after the Boy Scouts' move to include openly gay troop leaders. The announcement also came less than a week after the Boy Scouts announced it would be changing its flagship name to Scouts BSA, promoting its decision last year to welcome girls into the program for the first time."


[CN: Sexual assault and harassment] And speaking of turning an indifferent eye toward sex abuse:


Does NBC imagine that this reflects well on them? Because it doesn't.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Let the Rehabilitations Begin (Actually, Don't)

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

In January, I wrote:

So, I have been less optimistic about the lasting impact of the current spate of exposures of sexual predators than many other people have been — and the reason is because I have written about the rape culture for 13 years now, and among the many things I have learned is that our culture loves to rehabilitate abusive men.

Yes, some men have lost their jobs and suffered a bit of public humiliation. Men who are millionaires; men who will be just fine.

At the same time, in the middle of what is frequently called "the #MeToo moment," its very moniker suggesting an inherent transience, Mel Gibson made a comeback in a mainstream holiday franchise, despite infamously having sexually harassed a police officer, having been recorded verbally abusing his girlfriend, and having pleaded "no contest" to domestic violence charges.

Roman Polanski is still making movies. Woody Allen is still making movies. Johnny Depp is still making movies. Michael Fassbender, Christian Bale, the Affleck brothers, Terrence Howard, Gary Oldman, Jared Leto, and dozens of other men are still A-level celebrities after being accused of domestic violence and/or sexual assault.

Some of them have never even faced much public scrutiny for their abuse. Some of them have been vociferously defended and their accusers vilified.

Plenty of men, from Charlie Sheen to Mike Tyson, have benefited from second and third and fourth chances, even after they have confessed to or been convicted of violent crimes against women.

I am not remotely convinced that this dynamic has changed. Regretfully, I expect that following these recent disclosures, after some "reasonable" period of time, then the rehabilitations will begin.
About three months, as it turns out.


Every time I write about this, I get pushback along the lines of: Doesn't everyone deserve a second chance? And, honestly, I don't even know what that is supposed to mean, when Louis CK, for example, was not arrested, not tried, not convicted, not jailed, not held civilly liable, not forced to pay restitution, not compelled to abide by anything resembling a meting out of justice after confessing to what are criminal acts of sexual abuse.

He is a multimillionaire who has maybe lost some opportunity to make even more money.

So, really, all we're talking about is a "second chance" to be famous. To have power and influence. To have access to women whom he may harm by leveraging his fame, power, and influence.

If there is any chance for a man like Louis CK to be truly rehabilitated, restoring his power, and the attendant entitlement and privilege, isn't part of that equation.

It's his humanity that needs rehabilitation, not his career.

And we have plenty of evidence that abusive men handed more power and additional chances will exploit it all to do more harm.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 337

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Judge Rules Congress Should Do Something About Trump.

[Content Note: Update on October mass shooting in Vegas; death; injury; guns.] Yesterday, the Clark County coroner's office released the cause of death for each of the 58 victims killed by Stephen Paddock on October 1 in Las Vegas. Because of the scope of death and injury, and because the massacre was waged on a large crowd, many people speculated at the time that some of the deaths may have been due to trampling. But in a gruesome commentary on the efficacy of Paddock's weaponry, every one of the 58 people killed died from at least one gunshot wound.

Rachel Crosby at the Las Vegas Review-Journal reports:
In his first interview since the Oct. 1 shooting, Coroner John Fudenberg said it took his office so long to release the information because his staff was striving for accuracy and wanted to update the families first.

"Because of the impact that this incident had on our community, and the attention that this incident received, it became very important for us to ensure that all of the families had the information prior to us releasing it to the public," said Fudenberg, who responded to the scene the night of the shooting.

Most of those killed at the Route 91 Harvest festival died from a single gunshot wound, according to the coroner's office. Six died from multiple wounds.

Hundreds of others were injured but survived.

Of the homicide victims, 18 died from at least one gunshot wound to the head, 21 died from at least one gunshot wound to the chest, 15 died from at least one gunshot wound to the back, and three died from a gunshot wound to the neck.

Rocio Guillen of Corona, California, was the only person who died from a gunshot wound to the leg.
Fucking hell. My condolences, again and always, to the families, friends, colleagues, and communities of those who were killed. My thoughts are also with those injured and/or traumatized during the shooting.

Separately, the coroner's office also ruled Paddock's death a suicide.

* * *

Martin Belam at the Guardian: U.S. Ambassador to Netherlands Describes Own Words as 'Fake News'. "Trump's new choice for ambassador, Pete Hoekstra, who was only sworn in by the vice president, Mike Pence, on 11 December, was being interviewed for current affairs programme Nieuwsuur by reporter Wouter Zwart. Zwart says: 'You mentioned in a debate that there are no-go zones in the Netherlands, and that cars and politicians are being set on fire in the Netherlands.' Hoekstra replies: 'I didn't say that. This is actually an incorrect statement. We would call it fake news.' Hoekstra is then shown clips of him saying: 'The Islamic movement has now gotten to a point where they have put Europe into chaos. Chaos in the Netherlands, there are cars being burnt, there are politicians that are being burnt...and yes there are no-go zones in the Netherlands.' Challenged about having called this 'fake news,' Hoekstra then went on to deny to Zwart that he had in fact used the phrase 'fake news.' [Which he'd literally used moments before.—Liss] 'I didn't call that fake news. I didn't use the words today. I don't think I did.'"

Zwart's expression of disbelief after Hoekstra says this. OMG. This is the state of diplomacy under the Trump regime. We are an international disgrace and a laughingstock. With good reason. Sob.

Kevin Robillard, Nancy Cook, and Cristiano Lima at Politico: Republicans Plan Mega Marketing Push to Sell Unpopular Tax Plan. "Conservative groups are planning a multimillion-dollar effort to sell the GOP's tax cut law, hoping the American electorate can learn to love the party's signature — but massively unpopular — legislative achievement. ...The Koch network will launch a multimillion-dollar push next year to sell the bill, with paid advertising and town halls to educate voters. A major GOP super PAC is planning to spend $10 million to protect House members. And another group, the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, plans to spend the majority of its $1 million annual budget selling the tax plan next year, according to one of the group's founders, Stephen Moore, a distinguished visiting fellow at The Heritage Foundation and an informal economic adviser to the president."


Josh Dawsey and Robert Costa at the Washington Post: Trump Advisers Vent Frustrations About 2018 Strategy as President Listens. "The gathering saw tempers flare as aides vented their frustrations with electoral defeats this year and concerns about the 2018 political map, according to several people with knowledge of the discussion. Complaints about the president's political operation and the Republican National Committee boiled over, playing out in front of the president as an inner-circle drama. The late-afternoon meeting — attended by White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly, counselor Kellyanne Conway, political director Bill Stepien, marketing and data specialist Brad Parscale, communications director Hope Hicks, and political consultant and confidant Corey Lewandowski, among others — quickly became a griping session for Lewandowski and others about the way the White House manages the GOP and handles its planning for what is sure to be a hotly contested campaign season, people familiar with the meeting said."

Though you may be inclined to delight at reports of turmoil in Trump's White House, this type of discord will ultimately only result in Trump feeling increasingly insecure about his inner circle and doubling down on his reactionary authoritarianism as a result. That's no good for any of us.

Caitlin MacNeal at TPM: Top Trump Aide Rick Dearborn to Leave White House Early Next Year. "Rick Dearborn, a deputy chief of staff and key aide to [Donald] Trump, will leave the White House in early 2018. ...News of Dearborn's departure followed the announcement that Deputy National Security Adviser Dina Powell will leave the White House early next year. More departures are expected at the beginning of Trump's second year in office." One year on the resume and OUT.

Devlin Barrett, Ellen Nakashima, and Carol Leonnig at the Washington Post: FBI's Top Lawyer Said to Be Reassigned. "The FBI's top lawyer, James Baker, is being reassigned — one of the first moves by new director Christopher A. Wray to assemble his own team of senior advisers as he tries to fend off accusations of politicization within the bureau." What a remarkable lede. Wray is axing the top lawyer in a profoundly political move to avoid accusations of politicization. LOL. Welcome to the other side of the looking glass.

[CN: Nativism; child abuse] Caroline Bankoff at NY Mag: Trump Administration Might Start Separating Undocumented Parents and Children. "The Department of Homeland Security is considering separating parents and children who are caught entering the United States illegally. Officials say that the potential new policy is intended to discourage families from trying to come to the U.S. via the border with Mexico. Currently, families taken into custody along the border are either kept together at a DHS detention center or released and given a court date. Under the changes being considered, adults and kids would be sent to separate facilities. White House chief of staff John Kelly previously suggested the idea back when he was head of the DHS, but claimed to have abandoned it after it became clear that it sounded too cruel." I hate this administration so much.

* * *

Raphael Satter, Jeff Donn, and Nataliya Vasilyeva at the AP: Russian Hackers Targeted More Than 200 Journalists Globally.
The Associated Press found that Lobkov was targeted by the hacking group known as Fancy Bear in March 2015, nine months before his messages were leaked. He was one of at least 200 journalists, publishers, and bloggers targeted by the group as early as mid-2014 and as recently as a few months ago.

The AP identified journalists as the third-largest group on a hacking hit list obtained from cybersecurity firm Secureworks, after diplomatic personnel and U.S. Democrats. About 50 of the journalists worked at The New York Times. Another 50 were either foreign correspondents based in Moscow or Russian reporters like Lobkov who worked for independent news outlets. Others were prominent media figures in Ukraine, Moldova, the Baltics, or Washington.

The list of journalists provides new evidence for the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Fancy Bear acted on behalf of the Russian government when it intervened in the U.S. presidential election.
That 200 journalists were targeted doesn't mean 200 were successfully hacked. But some number were. And I'm very curious to know how much overlap there is, if any, between journalists who were successfully hacked and journalists who have been shit-canned for "sexual misconduct."

Because evidence of sexual harassment and/or assault in the hands of Russian hackers is prime blackmail material. That means:

1. Publications could have had an additional incentive to stop protecting journalists who were vulnerable to extortion. The "sea change" we're seeing, at least in political media, could be less about some newfound priority to keep women safe and more about keeping news organizations safe from Russian infiltration via compromised men.

2. We know that some outlets started working on big takedowns a year ago or more. (Matt Lauer quit right before an expose long in the works on him was about to be published, for example.) It occurs to me that it's possible Russian hackers posed as anonymous tipsters. What better way to sow discord in U.S. newsrooms than have reporters reporting on each other, no less largely along gendered lines? And, of course, to sow discord among their readership, as well. We know the Kremlin tried to exploit racial divisions. This could have been a strategy to exploit gender divisions among the populace, too.

3. It also occurs to me that journos on whom hackers had blackmail material because of "sexual misconduct" could have also been extorted to color their coverage of Clinton. Remember Lauer's famously bad performance at the Commander in Chief forum? Now that he has been exposed, his wife is divorcing him and planning to take him to the cleaners. He had both professional and personal reasons to do the bidding of anyone who was trying to compromise him.

Maybe it really is just as simple as misogynist men covered Clinton in a misogynist way, and now they're getting their comeuppance via karma and the bravery of the women they victimized.

But given that we know Russia targeted dozens of U.S. journalists, it's worth asking the question if the Kremlin's campaign to defeat Hillary Clinton leveraged accessed evidence of predatory men's abuse to enlist their service to the cause.

* * *

Speaking of which... [CN: Sexual harassment and assault. Covers entire section.]

Cora Lewis at BuzzFeed: Five Women Are Accusing a Top Left-Leaning Media Executive of Sexually Harassing Them. "Don Hazen has been an executive at left-leaning media outlets since the 1980s, first helming the influential Mother Jones magazine as publisher and in 1997 starting AlterNet, an online outlet publishing and syndicating reporting on 'the environment, human rights and civil liberties, social justice, media, and health care issues.' But five women journalists have told BuzzFeed News that Hazen sexually harassed them while they worked for AlterNet... A sixth journalist said she was sexually harassed by him, though she wasn't his employee at the time. After BuzzFeed News asked Hazen and the board of the Independent Media Institute, AlterNet's nonprofit parent, for comment, the board returned a statement on Wednesday saying Hazen has been placed on 'indefinite leave' as a result of the accusations."

Jon Levine at the Wrap: Young Turks' Founder Cenk Uygur Apologizes for 'Ugly,' 'Insensitive' Old Blog Posts.
Young Turks creator and host Cenk Uygur made multiple graphic and disparaging remarks about women in his early days as a blogger, including saying that women were genetically 'flawed' because they don't want to have sex often enough.

...In an entry from 2000, Uygur complained about not having enough sex while living in Miami: "It seems like there is a sea of tits here, and I am drinking in tiny droplets. I want to dive into the whole god damn ocean," he wrote. "Obviously, the genes of women are flawed. They are poorly designed creatures who do not want to have sex nearly as often as needed for the human race to get along peaceably and fruitfully."

...In a a post archived in 2003, he wrote about carousing with numerous women in New Orleans while drunk.

"I had one of the best nights of my life at Mardi Gras. I kissed over 23 different women, saw and felt countless breasts, and was in a wonderful drunken stupor thanks to my friend John Daniels," reads the post.

John Daniels is sometimes used as a nickname for Jack Daniels whiskey. Uygur told TheWrap that all of the behavior he described had been consensual.
Mm-hmm. I'm sure he recalls asking "over 23" women if he could kiss them and "countless" women if he could fondle their breasts while he was in a "drunken stupor." Sounds legit. As legit as this shit:


And while we're on the subject of how reprehensibly misogynistic the Dirtbag Left is, here's a timely reminder that Chapo Trap House's Felix Biederman still has not apologized to me for mocking me for being a rape survivor and then lying about me. Nor has Jon Lovett, or anyone at Pod Save America, apologize to me for having Felix on as a guest, even after publicly telling me that he does "care about this and take it seriously," right before ignoring me and never responding to me when I pointed out he did not understand how ugly Felix's treatment of me had been and that he had not apologized.

Meanwhile, these assholes all continue to raise more per month for their shitty podcasts than I make in an entire year trying to dismantle the rape culture, so progressives are still doing the most for women.

Anyway! More disgusting abuser news...

Caitlin MacNeal at TPM: House Ethics Committee Says It Will Expand Probe into GOP Rep. Farenthold. "The House Ethics Committee on Thursday announced that it will expand its investigation into Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-TX) to examine allegations that he lied to the committee and improperly used House resources for campaign work. ...The committee is already investigating sexual harassment allegations that several former staffers have made against Farenthold. Other former employees in recent weeks have accused the congressman of creating a hostile work environment and making sexually demeaning and other abusive remarks to his aides."

Sam Levin at the Guardian: As Google AI Researcher Accused of Harassment, Female Data Scientists Speak of 'Broken System'. "The allegations against [Steven Scott, a senior artificial intelligence (AI) researcher at Google], who declined to comment, has shone a harsh light on harassment in the male-dominated field of statistics, data science, and machine learning. Some said misconduct was common — especially at conferences that blend professional work with socializing — and that serial harassers rarely face consequences. In some cases, sexual misconduct has pushed women out of the field altogether. Beyond the personal devastation, there is long-term damage for machine learning and AI, a sector that is dramatically reshaping society, sometimes with powerful technology plagued by harmful biases."

Yashar Ali at the Huffington Post: The Miss America Emails: How the Pageant's CEO Really Talks About the Winners. "Many prior winners, or as they're called, 'formers,' consider the pageant a wonderful, wholesome activity for young women. But Haskell's behavior behind closed doors shows he regularly maligned, fat-shamed, and slut-shamed the former Miss Americas, calling them shocking names and in one case laughing at the suggestion that one of the women should die." Jesus fucking Jones.

Denise Petski at Deadline: Mark Schwahn Fired from The Royals Amid Sexual Harassment Allegations. "The Royals' creator/executive producer/showrunner was suspended last month following sexual harassment allegations against him made by the female cast and crew of his previous series, One Tree Hill. Now the network, producer Lionsgate TV, and Universal Cable Productions have opted to fire him. 'We have concluded our investigation and Mark will not be returning to The Royals,' Lionsgate said in a statement."

Jocelyn Gecker at the AP: Famed Conductor Accused of Sexual Misconduct. "In separate interviews with The Associated Press, the accusers provided detailed accounts of incidents they say occurred between 1985 and 2010 in a moving car, [world-renowned conductor Charles Dutoit]'s hotel suite, his dressing room, an elevator, and the darkness of backstage. The women accuse the 81-year-old artistic director and principal conductor of London's Royal Philharmonic Orchestra of sexual misconduct on the sidelines of rehearsals and performances in five cities — Chicago, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, Philadelphia, and Saratoga Springs, New York. Within hours of the story's release Thursday, the Boston Symphony Orchestra and San Francisco Symphony severed all ties with Dutoit."

BBC News: Sylvester Stallone Denies Rape as Police Investigate. "Santa Monica police said they were examining a complaint of sexual misconduct dating from the 1990s. The Rocky star said the allegation was 'completely fabricated.' His lawyer, Martin Singer, said a woman had filed a police report 'alleging a rape that occurred 27 years ago. My client categorically disputes the claim,' Singer continued. ...A 'thorough investigation' will be made before the case is presented to the district attorney, [Santa Monica police spokesman Lieutenant Saul Rodriguez] said. Lt Rodriguez told the Reuters news agency the accusation could fall within California's complex statute of limitations for criminal prosecutions of sexual abuse. Offences must generally be prosecuted within 10 years, Reuters said." Stallone has been accused of sexual assault at least once before, but he has never faced charges.

* * *

And finally, some good resistance news...

Keith L. Alexander and Ellie Silverman at the Washington Post: Not-Guilty Verdicts for First Six People on Trial in Violent Inauguration Day Protests. "The first six people to face trial in Inauguration Day protests that turned destructive in the nation's capital were acquitted of all charges, a victory not only for the defendants but also for advocates who argued the government overreached in its effort to prosecute more than 200 people arrested as they marched through the city. Following a nearly four-week trial and two full days of deliberations, a D.C. Superior Court jury delivered not-guilty verdicts Thursday on multiple charges of rioting and destruction of property." Fuck yeah!

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

More Lauer: This Is What NBC's Indifference Abetted

[Content Note: Description of sexual assault.]

As further details emerge about Matt Lauer's long reign of consequence-free sexual abuse of his female colleagues, and it becomes abundantly clear that NBC management had to have known, the picture of what the network's indiffernce abetted is coming into clear focus — and it is utterly grotesque.

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] At the New York Times, Ellen Gabler, Jim Rutenberg, Michael M. Grynbaum, and Rachel Abrams report on new allegations against Lauer, which include a harrowing account from an anonymous former colleague, who describes being sexually assaulted by Lauer in his office until she fainted and needed medical attention.

The woman who described the encounter in 2001 with Mr. Lauer in his office told The Times that the anchor had made inappropriate comments to her shortly after she started as a "Today" producer in the late 1990s.

While traveling with Mr. Lauer for a story, she said, he asked her inappropriate questions over dinner, like whether she had ever cheated on her husband. On the way to the airport, she said, Mr. Lauer sat uncomfortably close to her in the car; she recalled that when she moved away, he said, "You're no fun."

In 2001, the woman said, Mr. Lauer, who is married, asked her to his office to discuss a story during a workday. When she sat down, she said, he locked the door, which he could do by pressing a button while sitting at his desk. (People who worked at NBC said the button was a regular security measure installed for high-profile employees.)

The woman said Mr. Lauer asked her to unbutton her blouse, which she did. She said the anchor then stepped out from behind his desk, pulled down her pants, bent her over a chair, and had intercourse [sic] with her. At some point, she said, she passed out with her pants pulled halfway down. She woke up on the floor of his office, and Mr. Lauer had his assistant take her to a nurse.

The woman told The Times that Mr. Lauer never made an advance toward her again and never mentioned what occurred in his office. She said she did not report the episode to NBC at the time because she believed she should have done more to stop Mr. Lauer. She left the network about a year later.
I am so fucking sad and angry that Lauer did this to her. I believe her, and I take up space in solidarity with her.

A couple things about this account:

First of all, he did not "have intercourse with her." He raped her in his locked office.

Secondly, note the pattern of escalation (which tracks with what I described yesterday): He started with "inappropriate comments," then moved to invading her space/unwanted touching, then to cornering and assaulting her.

Finally, I don't know if NBC's claim that "the button was a regular security measure installed for high-profile employees" is true or if it's bullshit spin. Either way, it's reprehensible that no one in management considered how that button could be used by high-profile employees to harm the employees over whom they wielded enormous power. At best, the installation of such buttons was an aggressively irresponsible decision.

And at worst, they knew exactly how it was being used by Lauer and just didn't care. Anything to keep their $20 million man happy.

Open Wide...

More Lauer: An Execrable Abuser — and NBC Knew

[Content Note: Rape culture; descriptions of sexual harassment and assault.]

So, it turns out that Variety was working on a months-long investigation of Matt Lauer, so NBC didn't exactly fire him because of a complaint as much as they did to get out ahead of a report that makes it pretty goddamn clear that management — and probably the legal department — knew about Lauer's pattern of sexual harassment and assault for a very long time, but did nothing about it until they got wind of Variety's investigation.

The piece by Ramin Setoodeh and Elizabeth Wagmeister is headlined "Matt Lauer Accused of Sexual Harassment by Multiple Women." As I noted on Twitter, the headline is incorrect, because the story details, among Lauer's many acts of gross misconduct, his exposing himself to female colleagues without their consent. That is not merely "sexual harassment" just because it happened in a workplace. Flashing is criminal.


That's hardly the only problem with the story: There are a number of curious phrases that reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of the most basic principle that abusers aren't all skulking creeps who live under rocks.

"Despite being married, Lauer was fixated on women, especially their bodies and looks," the authors write, as though wives magically fix harmful men. "In front of the camera, for more than two decades, Lauer had positioned himself as America's squeaky-clean dad. But behind the scenes, Lauer was a different person," they tell us, as though "squeaky-clean dad" and "abuser" are inherently incompatible and thus mutually exclusive. They are not.

But between the problematic writing there is informative reporting on Lauer's history of abuse, as disclosed by some of his former female colleagues. Among those revelations is this:
His office was in a secluded space, and he had a button under his desk that allowed him to lock his door from the inside without getting up. This afforded him the assurance of privacy. It allowed him to welcome female employees and initiate inappropriate contact while knowing nobody could walk in on him, according to two women who were sexually harassed by Lauer.
There is no way that Matt Lauer requested that button, that it was approved and installed, without NBC management being aware of it and understanding its purpose.

And then there is this: "Several women told Variety they complained to executives at the network about Lauer's behavior, which fell on deaf ears given the lucrative advertising surrounding 'Today.' NBC declined to comment." I'm sure they did.

Especially since that flies in the face of NBC News Chair Andy Lack's contention that the recent complaint which supposedly prompted Lauer's firing was "the first complaint about his behavior in the over twenty years he's been at NBC News."

NBC knew. And they chose to abet Lauer's harassment and assault of his female colleagues. Right up until another news organization decided to expose him.

Open Wide...

The What Happened Book Club

image of Hillary Clinton's book 'What Happened' sitting on my dining room table, with my Hillary action figure standing on top of the book, her arms raised over her head

This is the eighth installment of the What Happened Book Club, where we are doing a chapter a week.

That pace will hopefully allow people who need time to procure the book a better chance to catch up, and let us deal with the book in manageable pieces: I figured we will have a lot to talk about, and one thread for the entire book would quickly get overwhelming.

So! Let us continue our discussion with Chapter Eight: Turning Mourning into a Movement.

* * *

This was a tough chapter to read, because it is always hard to read the stories of young Black people killed by gun violence and/or police brutality, and the stories of children and educators and police killed by gun violence.

It was also a hard chapter because it was the most "political" chapter so far. It's an indication of how truly politicized gun laws are in the United States that, in a book where Hillary Clinton is extremely personal, and in a chapter where she speaks so frankly about being moved and compelled by the Mothers of the Movement and gun violence survivors and parents of children killed in school shootings, here is where her words are most stilted and careful.

There are times, however, when she does not — or cannot — conceal her thoughts about the importance of gun restrictions and racial justice. This passage in particular stood out to me, for its contempt directed at Bernie Sanders and Democrats who would follow his dangerous lead:
I'm sure that some of my fellow Democrats will look at this high-priced onslaught and conclude, as many have in the past, that standing up to the NRA just isn't worth it. Some may put gun safety on the chopping block alongside reproductive rights as "negotiable," so as not to distract from populist economics. Who knows — the same might happen to criminal justice reform and racial justice more broadly. That would be a terrible mistake. Democrats should not respond to my defeat by retreating from our strong commitments on these life-or-death issues. The vast majority of Americans agree that we need to do more on gun safety. This is a debate we can win if we keep at it.
Her greatest contempt, of course, was reserved for the Republican Party — and its president.

She briefly but pointedly addressed the time Donald Trump suggested that the "Second Amendment people" find a way to stop her before she appointed liberal (anti-gun) justices to the Supreme Court. And of course her response was classic Hillary: "I was particularly concerned that if a 'Second Amendment person' came after me, he'd be coming after my security detail of Secret Service agents."

If that doesn't tell you what kind of person Hillary Clinton is, I don't know what could. Trump calls for her assassination, and her particular concern is that it put in danger the people tasked with protecting her.

That alone makes her more qualified to be president than Donald Trump ever could be.

Decency is aggressively underrated.

Especially in politics.

* * *


Although it's from the next chapter of What Happened, which we'll discuss in its entirety next week, I also want to take a moment to highlight the section on Matt Lauer and the Commander in Chief Forum, which I noted earlier as an example of Lauer's unequal treatment of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump during the campaign.

Here are (some of) Hillary's words on that event, which take on even greater meaning in light of today's news about Lauer's history of sexual harassment and/or assault:
"The decisions a Commander in Chief makes can have a profound and lasting impact on all Americans, but none more so than the brave men and women who serve, fight, and die for our country." That was Matt Lauer introducing NBC's "Commander in Chief Forum" from the deck of the aircraft carrier U.S.S. Intrepid on September 7, 2016. I was standing just offstage listening to his introduction, nodding my head.

Lauer promised the forum would be an opportunity to "talk about national security and the complex global issues that face our nation." That's exactly what I wanted. With Election Day just two months away, it was time to have a serious discussion about each candidate's qualifications to be President and how he or she would lead the country. This wouldn't be a formal debate with me and Donald Trump onstage at the same time. Instead, we'd each do our own thirty-minute session answering questions from Lauer and the audience. I was confident that with a real focus on substance and a clear contrast of our records, Americans would see that I was ready to be Commander in Chief, and Donald Trump was dangerously unprepared.

[...]

Lauer and NBC were promoting this forum as a chance to finally get serious about foreign policy and national security. [...] He began with a broad question about the most important characteristic that a Commander in Chief can possess. I used my answer to talk about steadiness, a quality that nobody ever associates with Donald Trump. Lauer cut in to say, "You're talking about judgment." That wasn't what I was talking about, exactly, but it was close enough. "Temperament and judgment, yes," I replied.

I've been around the block enough times to know that something bad was coming. Lauer had the look of someone proud of himself for having laid a clever trap.

"The word judgment has been used a lot around you, Secretary Clinton, over the last year and a half, and in particular concerning your use of your personal email and server to communicate while you were Secretary of State," Lauer said. "You've said it's a mistake. You said you made not the best choice. You were communicating on highly sensitive topics. Why wasn't it more than a mistake? Why wasn't it disqualifying, if you want to be Commander in Chief?"

It was disappointing but predictable that he had so quickly steered the supposedly high-minded "Commander in Chief Forum" to the subject of emails, months after the director of the FBI had announced there was no case and closed the investigation. I understood that every political reporter wanted his or her pound of flesh. But Lauer had already grilled me about emails in an interview back in April. I figured this must be about "balance."

[...]

Here I was, facing the blurring in real time, with a charlatan waiting in the wings. But what could I do? I launched into my standard answer on the emails, the one I'd given a thousand times before. [...] Instead of moving to any of a hundred urgent national security issues, from the civil war in Syria, to the Iranian nuclear agreement, to the threat from North Korea — the issues this forum was supposed to be about — Lauer stayed on emails. He asked four follow-ups. Meanwhile, the clock was ticking, and my thirty minutes to discuss serious foreign policy challenges were slipping away.

Finally, after learning absolutely nothing new or interesting, Lauer turned to a question from one of the veterans NBC had picked to be in the audience. He was a self-described Republican, a former Navy lieutenant who had served in the first Gulf War, and he promptly repeated the right-wing talking point about how my email use would have landed anyone else in prison. Then he asked how could he trust me as President "when you clearly corrupted our national security?"

Now I was ticked off. NBC knew exactly what it was doing here. The network was treating this like an episode of The Apprentice, in which Trump stars and ratings soar. Lauer had turned what should have been a serious discussion into a pointless ambush. What a waste of time.
Lauer was hunting her: He laid a trap and then he pounced. It was an ambush.

At the time, many feminist political commentators noted that Lauer's behavior was profoundly misogynist, only to be (as per usual) shouted down and accused of seeing sexism where none exists.

Let me be perfectly blunt: What we saw was Lauer behaving like a misogynist predator in ways that are familiar to women who study and document these patterns.

At some point, it might be both wise and valuable to start listening to women.

Open Wide...

Matt Lauer Fired for "Inappropriate Sexual Behavior"

[Content Note: Sexual harassment and/or assault. Video may autoplay at first link.]

Today host Matt Lauer has been fired by NBC after an allegation that he sexually assaulted a colleague, whom his bosses had reason to believe may have been only one of many victims.

NBC News Chair Andy Lack issued a statement to employees reading in its entirety:

Dear Colleagues,

On Monday night, we received a detailed complaint from a colleague about inappropriate sexual behavior in the workplace by Matt Lauer. It represented, after serious review, a clear violation of our company's standards. As a result, we've decided to terminate his employment. While it is the first complaint about his behavior in the over twenty years he's been at NBC News, we were also presented with reason to believe this may not have been an isolated incident.

Our highest priority is to create a workplace environment where everyone feels safe and protected, and to ensure that any actions that run counter to our core values are met with consequences, no matter who the offender.

We are deeply saddened by this turn of events. But we will face it together as a news organization — and do it in as transparent a manner as we can. To that end, Noah and I will be meeting with as many of you as possible throughout the day today to answer your questions.

Andy
Let's just be real clear: If Lauer has indeed sexually harassed and/or assaulted multiple colleagues over 20 years, none of whom have come forward until now, NBC has utterly failed to "create a workplace environment where everyone feels safe and protected." And that isn't going to change by magic. They have a hell of a lot of work to do.

That starts with acknowledging their failure to heed any of the many red flags about Lauer's rank misogyny over the years.


Just the tip of an enormous iceberg. Of what we could all see. Because we was doing it right on live television.

Yet we're meant to believe he was subtle and surreptitious about his treatment of women behind the scenes? Somehow I doubt that.

When Lauer's former co-host, Ann Curry, was ousted from Today, there was all sorts of speculation as to why. But I will never forget this quote: "Curry felt that the boys' club atmosphere behind the scenes at Today undermined her from the start, and she told friends that her final months were a form of professional torture."

A form of professional torture.

And Lack purports that this is all a big shock to NBC management. Welp.

Open Wide...

Matt Lauer Is Still a F#@king Dirtbag

[Content Note: Misogyny.]

Matt Lauer, longtime host of the Today show, is a fucking dirtbag. His interview of Anne Hathaway, while she was promoting Les Mis, cemented his position in the Dirtbag Hall of Fame. But he's still GOING FOR IT like it's not a lifetime appointment, reminding us all of how he earned his spot.

Today Show host Matt Lauer on Thursday asked General Motors CEO Mary Barra if she felt she could run a company and be a good mother during an interview about the company's controversial recalls.

"I want to tread lightly here," Lauer said before launching into a question about why Barra got the CEO job, noting that she is extremely qualified.

"But some people are speculating that you also got this job because, as a woman and as a mom, because people within General Motors knew this company was in for a very tough time, and as a woman and a mom you could present a softer image and softer face for this company as it goes through this horrible episode. Does it make sense or does it make you bristle?" he asked.

"Well, it's absolutely not true," Barra responded. "I believe I was selected for this job based on my qualifications. We dealt with this issue — when the senior leadership of this company knew about this issue, we dealt with this issue."

Lauer then asked Barra about her children, noting that her kids have said they will hold her "accountable for one job and that is being a mom."

"Given the pressures of this job at General Motors, can you do both well?" he asked.

"You know, I think I can. I have a great team, we're on the right path," Barra replied. "I have a wonderful family, a supportive husband and I'm pretty proud of the way my kids are supporting me in this."

Lauer on Thursday afternoon defended his question to Barra about balancing her at work and with her family. He said...that if a male CEO had discussed his struggle with work-family balance, Lauer would have followed up with him on it.

...Lauer interviewed Ford CEO Alan Mulally in 2009, and did not ask him how his job running the company would impact his role as a father to his five children.
So, first Matt Lauer suggests that the only or primary reason that Barra was hired as CEO of a massive corporation is to blunt public criticisms (because no one ever criticizes women), and then suggests that it's possible she cannot be both a successful CEO and a successful parent.

Which is something about which men are never asked, despite Lauer's specious claim to the contrary.

A man would also never be asked a question like: "Hey, this company that hired you has some PR troubles at the moment. Do you think that you were hired because you're a man, and as a man, the company knew you'd present a tough image for the company? Does it make sense that you were hired specifically because you're a man and can fulfill male stereotypes of strength in a way a woman could not, or does that suggestion make you bristle?"

It would never happen.

Even the thought of a male CEO being asked a question like that, being obliged to address the idea that he was only or primarily hired because he was a man, is absurd.

Despite the fact that lots of male CEOs probably have been hired in part because they're men. White straight cis men, to be precise.

Lauer's question about Barra's ability to balance work and parenthood have been getting a lot of attention, and deservedly so, but, for me, it's the other part I find even more contemptible.

There is no way that Lauer would ever even dare to claim he'd ask a male CEO sitting in front of him to account for and justify his hiring on the basis of his gender. There is no way that Lauer would ever look at a male CEO and say, "Sure, your credentials are excellent, but why do you think it is that they hired a man?"

Open Wide...