Before I go into the review itself I am going to do two things. First, I’m going to very, very vaguely describe why I am doing it {still more harassment, this time directed at four acquaintances} and some background as to why I think what I do about what is contained in the documentary as well as what people in general, TIs or not, need to know about history as well as human biology and psychology in order to make some sense of the question about what is happening.

WHY

Right. In the month of May 2017, two of the four situations regarding friends, acquaintances, and, yes, former lovers, were in the works for months, two of them actually occurred during that month and I only found out the details about the other two in that month. I take this as a shot across the bow and am answering it with the following analysis. Without saying much more than these four people all fall into both the LGBT and minority categories, two now face the possibility of incarceration {and one of those was shot in the arms and killed someone in what appears to be self-defense}, one has been driven out of his mind targeted individual style, and the last has had her personality altered by having been drugged by a group of individuals she was drinking with, whom not only told her that they had done so after, but laughed and joked about it.

This last incident is reminiscent of the time that Sydney Gottlieb himself and likely another unidentified MKULTRA researcher drugged an American in Paris, France and destroyed his life. This is partially documented in H.B. Albarelli’s A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA’s Secret Cold War Experiments. I will refer to the back of this book later with regards to the review and how it relates to targeted individuals.

All four sets of incidents have connections to the Cartels, which as I’ve noted before, so does the Central Intelligence Agency. See the Mike and Gary tag posts.

BACKGROUND

The first thing one should know–and if one doesn’t remember anything else, they should remember this–is that the real goal of so-called mind control, or if you prefer, behavioral modification, or even my preferred term, brainhacking, is with regards to labor. That is, the real, main purpose has always been slavery and I mean that I think on every level. Whether the ability to neutralize whistleblowers who might embarrass multinationals and their wrongdoings, the ability to turn an “enemy combatant” into a mole or agent provocateur such as CIA has been attempting at Strawberry Fields–also known as Camp No–at Guantanamo Bay, the ability to create so-called lone wolf shooters and terrorists and thereby dominate the news rather than subjects like healthcare, benefits, and working conditions; or simply just what it sounds like: The ability to control the workforce.

That is the real goal. This is what is at stake.

Next, the question of sanity/insanity. Latest research as reported by outlets like Psychology Today is that it is possible and likely that the cause of schizophrenia, possibly other ailments like paranoia, depression, bi-polar, etc., may actually be centered in the stomach, the gut, and not in the brain. That is, trauma and isolation can cause a shift in the makeup of the bacteria that human beings use to digest, and when that shift occurs, the result is the “gut bugs” send the too many of the wrong neurotransmitters to the brain causing mental imbalance.

This is further underlined by the brainwashing report CIA commissioned regarding Soviet and Chinese brainwashing. Some at CIA were hoping that there was some kind of new, special method that had been discovered by either or both, but the report came to the conclusion that is was just the same old stuff: Sleep deprivation, isolation, psychological torture, and physical torture and that the effects of those would tend to wear off some time after the subject was released. It did confirm, however, that the subject might start hearing voices or experiencing other schizophrenic-type symptoms, though of course in the 1950s they had no idea how this shift occurred, merely that it did.

What can we draw from this? Merely that even if a targeted individual does display symptoms of mental illness, this does not necessarily mean that they did when their harassment began. Further, it should serve equally as proof of something having occurred to make them that way as much as proof that they may be imagining it all. Once the harassment begins, it is traumatic and the result is often being isolated from friends, family and co-workers and the ability to sleep peacefully with the thought that some unseen force is out to get you is not likely. Precisely what the CIA report described the Soviets and Chinese as doing with the exception that in the latter the individuals were in custody of their torturers and not simply being forced into virtual custody in their own homes a la harassment and PSYOP. {And, by the way, even if a person did have mental illness before becoming a TI does not mean they are not actually being targeted. I explained all of that here}.

As for history, we have not only MKULTRA but also COINTELPRO, many, many other programs such as MKOFTEN, SRPOINTER, HTLINGUAL, etc., most of which were the surreptitious surveillance of celebrities and Vietnam War protesters, civil liberty and labor leaders, etc.

Is it any wonder that the US has both heroin and prescription pain killer epidemics? The latter is the third leading cause of death in states like Tennessee. If the invasion of Iraq was about oil for Exxon, et al, then one can make an easy case that the invasion of Afghanistan was about poppy, which is used for both heroin and Oxycontin. One is reminded of Gary Webb’s work on crack cocaine being smuggled into Los Angeles with the help of CIA in order to fund operations that CIA did not or could not ask Congress for funding for.

CIA’s MKULTRA project dealt extensively with studying mental illness. See the list of subprojects that John Marks pried from their greedy, grubby, psychopathic fingers via FOIA.

Finally, if there is a question in the reader’s/viewer’s mind as to whether or not microwave harassment weapons exist, it was confirmed by the former president of Honduras when he spoke to Amy Goodman and Anjali Kamat of DemocracyNow! in October of 2009. See bottom of the MICROWAVE section.

You might want to watch the film now before reading what’s below. Many spoilers below.

VICE UK: Meet the Targeted Individual Community on YouTube

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

REVIEW

Warning: Spoilers below.

First, I’d like to thank Matt Shea and VICE UK for doing it at all, even though I am not a targeted individual in the classic sense. I have spoken to many and met a few, however, and am glad to see that even if the question of “Is it real?” could not be reached that Matt and VICE did not descend into ridicule, as so many even very, very liberal people do, but rather came to the conclusion that the pain and anguish are obviously real, and therefore these people are deserving of some kind of help regardless of the cause. He also notes that the Internet has allowed them to find each other.

Curiously, Matt notes that there are around 10,000 people worldwide who make these claims. Though I do not know where they got that number, it makes a lot of sense to me, being much, much lower than the numbers you’ll hear bandied about by the TIs themselves.

Why? Because it fits better with my belief, my “model” if you will, of how this works. 10,000 is a much, much easier number to harass than 250,000, if, as I believe, it is not satellites {apart from what we all know: NSA, GCHQ, etc. conduct surveillance using cellphones that do sometimes use satellites to communicate}, not cellphone towers, not chemtrails, but rather field operatives using handheld and/or mobile systems enclosed inside vehicles when the do actually use V2K, acoustic psycho-correction, or e-weapons to harass people.

Speaking of which, another point about what I wrote with regards to being “driven crazy,” is that it may over time become impossible to discern when one is actually being communicated with via V2K and what is misbehaving neurochemicals from having been exposed to harassment for so long. In other words, part of the idea is to confuse the target to the point they cannot even separate their own thoughts from the PSYOP team’s and that from chemical imbalance.

Speaking of chemical imbalance, at least in my experience and those Cold War ones noted above as well as one of my four friends, the target is often also typically drugged to make them seem and act crazy as well. This is in fact CIA’s very first goal in the 1955 draft memo that survived being destroyed by the Director’s order when the coverup happened.

Next the big issue I had with the documentary, though it is neither Matt’s nor VICE‘s fault that this happened, at least as far as I know, is the question of implants.

While CIA did dabble with implants at one point, it was discovered that other methods were superior in that they left no trace. Voice-to-skull and acoustic psycho-correction, which CIA stole from the Russians in the early 1980s, fall into this category.

However, it is entirely possible to convince someone that they have implants. This in turn can be further enforced by groupthink and “experts” coming in to sell meters to TIs. A note here: People suffering from mental illness are on average eleven times more likely to be the victim of a crime than the perpetrator.

Now jumping back to Albarelli’s book for a moment. In the back, he writes an extra chapter about people having contacted him regarding his book. Some make the claim that they in fact assassinated people in a particular place but they cannot recall precisely who or when.

I wrote Hank and suggested once that the idea here was not that these people actually killed anyone. Rather, the point was to convince them, brainwash them, into believing that they had done so, so that when and if those behind the conditioning ever decided to make those people kill someone, they would be more inclined to do so because they believe that they already have.

That’s quite a mouthful, so let me break it down a little by describing a psychological experiment I read about once that used basketball tosses as the test.

Two groups were given two hoops from which they would eventually be tested on making free throws. One group was given ten minutes to practice. The other group was told to simply stand at the free-throw line and imagine the throw, the ball moving toward the net, and going in, scoring. When the ten minutes were up, the imaginers out-did the practicers.

It’s about mental conditioning, is the point.

Now let’s try to relate that to implants. If a TI believes that they have implants, are they more likely or less likely to “obey” an “order” given them? By the way, I should note something that was mentioned but not really explored in the film: V2K can be used subliminally. How much more effective might a subliminal suggestion be if the party is thoroughly convinced that they have to obey because a microchip is forcing them to comply?

I think that the answer is obvious and exactly what is going on.

So, while I may be wrong, I don’t think that the majority of TIs are in fact microchipped. I do think that their attackers are very interested in making them think so, however, and have a goal and operational benefits in mind of doing so, including discrediting, which is what winds up happening in the film.

{I note that though I have never been tested, I expected exactly what Matt experienced, that the meter would go off and would do so with any human being, chipped or not. As to why I came to think that, well that’s a post in itself}.

Anyway, this is why I think that the focus on implants is without a doubt coming from CIA HQ in Langley, Virginia and its UK, etc. counterparts, and serves two purposes: Enhancing control and discrediting the target at the same time. Diabolical, isn’t it? Much of this is.

Back to the film proper, there’s a point where implant removal surgery is refused by a surgeon via a rejection letter. While I agree with the surgeon, these probably are not implants, I totally disagree with his reasons given for thinking so, even though I understand them too well. One does not have to be a spy or a terrorist to be the focus of an intelligence apparatus. One merely, especially now when the rule of multinational corporations is almost realized globally, simply be on the same planet with them.

All I really want to say is thanks again, and kudos to Matt, for making the point that he does at the end: These people deserve our pity, our kindness, our love if you will, not our scorn and ridicule. Scorn and ridicule should be employed as much as possible against those in power, not the powerless. To do so, is to become a bully, and when you do that, you help power, not hinder it.

—–

2017/06/08
Categories: Uncategorized . Tags: 01-Discredited in Public, 01-Illogical Thinking and Impulsiveness, MKULTRA, Targeted Individuals, VICE UK . Author: mccoyote . Comments: Leave a comment